banner
banner

09 Nov 2025, 00:07 [ UTC - 5; DST ]


Greenwich AeroGroup (banner)



Reply to topic  [ 383 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 ... 26  Next
Username Protected Message
 Post subject: Re: The Ultimate Pilatus PC12 Thread!
PostPosted: 30 Dec 2017, 16:01 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 01/01/10
Posts: 3503
Post Likes: +2476
Location: Roseburg, Oregon
Aircraft: Citation Mustang
There’s both low and high altitude turbulence, but it’s rare at 40 and higher. Not that you don’t ever get it, but it’s rare.

_________________
Previous A36TN owner


Top

 Post subject: Re: The Ultimate Pilatus PC12 Thread!
PostPosted: 30 Dec 2017, 20:20 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 09/05/12
Posts: 698
Post Likes: +524
Location: Vero Beach, FL
Aircraft: C310R, E55P, H130T2
Anyone in this group have something to confess? Saw this on Facebook :D


Please login or Register for a free account via the link in the red bar above to download files.


Top

 Post subject: Re: The Ultimate Pilatus PC12 Thread!
PostPosted: 30 Dec 2017, 20:53 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 12/04/09
Posts: 356
Post Likes: +149
Aircraft: Dakota
Username Protected wrote:
Anyone in this group have something to confess? Saw this on Facebook :D

Oooopps!! Knew a rich guy who did that twice in his Conquest 1. Always in a big a$$ hurry :eek: :eek: :eek:


Top

 Post subject: Re: The Ultimate Pilatus PC12 Thread!
PostPosted: 31 Dec 2017, 23:59 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 07/13/11
Posts: 2755
Post Likes: +2187
Company: Aeronautical People Shuffler
Location: Picayune, MS (KHSA)
Aircraft: KA350/E55/DA-62
Username Protected wrote:
You see 400+ knots and you're done.



There is so much truth to this. I dread long trips in the PC12 after I started flying the Falcon. That thing runs 450kts. With a 100 knot headwind, we are still going almost 100 knots faster than the PC12 on a no-wind day.

_________________
The sound of a second engine still running after the first engine fails is why I like having two.


Top

 Post subject: Re: The Ultimate Pilatus PC12 Thread!
PostPosted: 01 Jan 2018, 02:48 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 11/22/12
Posts: 2919
Post Likes: +2895
Company: Retired
Location: Lynnwood, WA (KPAE)
Aircraft: Lancair Evolution
Username Protected wrote:
Is it possible that engine technology has improved turboprop reliability to the point that that the safety benefits of a second engine are negligible?
Possible, sure, but it's irrelevant to the twin fans in the singles vs. twins debate. Twin fans focus on the possibility of an engine failure, not the probability. MTBF of 100,000 hours, a million, ten million? Doesn't matter how reliable the belt, they still want suspenders. It's emotion, not a calculation of risk/reward or cost/benefit. Electric motors could make for a step change in reliability beyond even turbines but it wouldn't change the mindset.


Top

 Post subject: Re: The Ultimate Pilatus PC12 Thread!
PostPosted: 01 Jan 2018, 11:16 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 01/29/08
Posts: 26338
Post Likes: +13085
Location: Walterboro, SC. KRBW
Aircraft: PC12NG
Username Protected wrote:
Is it possible that engine technology has improved turboprop reliability to the point that that the safety benefits of a second engine are negligible?
Possible, sure, but it's irrelevant to the twin fans in the singles vs. twins debate. Twin fans focus on the possibility of an engine failure, not the probability. MTBF of 100,000 hours, a million, ten million? Doesn't matter how reliable the belt, they still want suspenders. It's emotion, not a calculation of risk/reward or cost/benefit. Electric motors could make for a step change in reliability beyond even turbines but it wouldn't change the mindset.

"Twin fans" are a dying breed. The market speaks. In a few years there won't be any "twin fans".

Top

 Post subject: Re: The Ultimate Pilatus PC12 Thread!
PostPosted: 01 Jan 2018, 13:44 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 07/23/09
Posts: 1126
Post Likes: +667
Location: KSJT
Aircraft: PC-24 Citabria 7GCBC
Here is a video showing the incredible utility of the 12.

[youtube]https://youtu.be/BPgCl7Lp5T0[/youtube]


Top

 Post subject: Re: The Ultimate Pilatus PC12 Thread!
PostPosted: 01 Jan 2018, 15:31 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 08/16/15
Posts: 3680
Post Likes: +5445
Location: Ogden UT
Aircraft: Piper M600
Username Protected wrote:
I don't remember anything but smooth at FL410 or above...

The airliners are just above TP altitudes... getting beat up.

The other component critical to a smooth ride is the wing loading, most jets have high wing loading and the ride is smoother... same is true of some turboprops like the MU2.

This is also a major factor in the high / hot issues. Aviation is always about trade-offs.

I do agree that for private transportation a SETP is hard to beat and the Pilatus is the ultimate SETP.


CDC UA /OV EHK295020/TM 1810/FL400/TP E55P/TB CONS MOD /ZLC

That doesn't sound fun!

High altitude Airmets for turbulence today. Lots of squawking about continuous light and occasional moderate from the heavies. I was smooth until crossing the lower UT mountains at FL270, then got into continuous light. dropped to 250 and baby bottom smooth all the way to destination. It is an OWT that jets are smoother than TP's in the 20's. I hear this almost every time the Jet stream is active. Today looks like moderate or greater eddies above 450. Nice ride in the middle air. ;)

Attachment:
1.jpg


Attachment:
Turb gmet.jpg


Please login or Register for a free account via the link in the red bar above to download files.

_________________
Chuck Ivester
Piper M600
Ogden UT


Top

 Post subject: Re: The Ultimate Pilatus PC12 Thread!
PostPosted: 01 Jan 2018, 16:42 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 01/16/11
Posts: 11068
Post Likes: +7097
Location: Somewhere Over the Rainbow
Aircraft: PC12NG, G3Tat
Username Protected wrote:
"Twin fans" are a dying breed. The market speaks. In a few years there won't be any "twin fans".


This was my view as I walked to get outta dodge yesterday.........weather btw was great in the islands.........gonna miss not working :D

There was not a single KA on the ramp. Bunch of frigging jets, and some big ones to boot..........I think that the PC12 has nailed this market because of efficiency, reliability, loading and load capacity, and then range. Coupled with ease of operation and I bet that everyone will agree that the PC12 NG is a very, very easy airplane to fly and operate and you have a congo line that resembles the one below at most airports these days.


Attachment:
MYAM_PilatusLine.jpg


Please login or Register for a free account via the link in the red bar above to download files.

_________________
---Rusty Shoe Keeper---


Top

 Post subject: Re: The Ultimate Pilatus PC12 Thread!
PostPosted: 06 Jan 2018, 12:52 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 12/26/17
Posts: 142
Post Likes: +76
Username Protected wrote:
I don't remember anything but smooth at FL410 or above...

The airliners are just above TP altitudes... getting beat up.

The other component critical to a smooth ride is the wing loading, most jets have high wing loading and the ride is smoother... same is true of some turboprops like the MU2.

This is also a major factor in the high / hot issues. Aviation is always about trade-offs.

I do agree that for private transportation a SETP is hard to beat and the Pilatus is the ultimate SETP.


CDC UA /OV EHK295020/TM 1810/FL400/TP E55P/TB CONS MOD /ZLC

That doesn't sound fun!

High altitude Airmets for turbulence today. Lots of squawking about continuous light and occasional moderate from the heavies. I was smooth until crossing the lower UT mountains at FL270, then got into continuous light. dropped to 250 and baby bottom smooth all the way to destination. It is an OWT that jets are smoother than TP's in the 20's. I hear this almost every time the Jet stream is active. Today looks like moderate or greater eddies above 450. Nice ride in the middle air. ;)


Some days you are right - smoother down low, however many, maybe even more days smoother up high. Jets can fly lower if need be at the expense of more fuel, but they can do it. The TP's cannot go high no matter what.

Top

 Post subject: Re: The Ultimate Pilatus PC12 Thread!
PostPosted: 06 Jan 2018, 12:59 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 08/16/15
Posts: 3680
Post Likes: +5445
Location: Ogden UT
Aircraft: Piper M600
That is true. I can only go so high. I have been flying several times over the years when ATC asks for a pirep and I report good conditions and the airliners ask for lower and start descending at or below my altitude. Guess Delta and United write the revenues on those flights off after paying the fuel bill ;-) I will say that in a couple of thousand flight level hours, I have yet to have a turbulence day in cruise that I would say was uncomfortable, and certainly none that were dangerous. In the terminal in the mountains, that is a different story. I have had days where I could not use autopilot due to concerns of over stressing the airframe, or the servos not being able to keep up. But those conditions affect everyone. So I would put turbulence in TP's being a problem as an OWT, or at the very least, not a practical issue.

_________________
Chuck Ivester
Piper M600
Ogden UT


Top

 Post subject: Re: The Ultimate Pilatus PC12 Thread!
PostPosted: 06 Jan 2018, 13:16 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 08/16/15
Posts: 3680
Post Likes: +5445
Location: Ogden UT
Aircraft: Piper M600
Username Protected wrote:
There’s both low and high altitude turbulence, but it’s rare at 40 and higher. Not that you don’t ever get it, but it’s rare.


Pirated this from Scott D, hope I don't get sued ;) Interesting graph anyway if I am interpreting it correctly. Kind of supports the twenties as being pretty benign. Clear air turbulence seems more of a very high or very low altitude phenomenon, obviously include turbulence more for the lower altitudes Which is why flight attendants need good disability policies....

Attachment:
Pireps.jpg


Please login or Register for a free account via the link in the red bar above to download files.

_________________
Chuck Ivester
Piper M600
Ogden UT


Top

 Post subject: Re: The Ultimate Pilatus PC12 Thread!
PostPosted: 06 Jan 2018, 13:30 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 11/11/12
Posts: 1603
Post Likes: +843
Location: san francisco (KHAF)
Aircraft: C55 baron
Is that a count of PIREPs? That graph just peaks at the usual cruising altitude of airliners. Fewer planes spend meaningful time in the teens and 20s.


Top

 Post subject: Re: The Ultimate Pilatus PC12 Thread!
PostPosted: 06 Jan 2018, 14:32 
Offline



User avatar
 WWW  Profile




Joined: 06/28/09
Posts: 14423
Post Likes: +9555
Location: Walnut Creek, CA (KCCR)
Aircraft: 1962 Twin Bonanza
Username Protected wrote:
Is that a count of PIREPs? That graph just peaks at the usual cruising altitude of airliners. Fewer planes spend meaningful time in the teens and 20s.


Agree... not sure this means anything.. also the airlines are hyper sensitive to turbulence because they’ve got hundreds of people in the back they’re trying to please. I rarely ask for ride reports but nearly every airliner asks at every check on.

_________________
http://calipilot.com
atp/cfii


Top

 Post subject: Re: The Ultimate Pilatus PC12 Thread!
PostPosted: 06 Jan 2018, 16:02 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 10/31/14
Posts: 560
Post Likes: +268
Aircraft: eclipse
Often I am at 40 and having a smooth ride and the airlines are in the mid thirties bitching about the ride


Top

Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic  [ 383 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 ... 26  Next



Postflight (Bottom Banner)

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  

Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us

BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner, Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.

BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates. Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.

Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2025

.traceaviation-85x150.png.
.gallagher_85x50.jpg.
.performanceaero-85x50.jpg.
.daytona.jpg.
.shortnnumbers-85x100.png.
.blackhawk-85x100-2019-09-25.jpg.
.camguard.jpg.
.Plane AC Tile.png.
.midwest2.jpg.
.Latitude.jpg.
.boomerang-85x50-2023-12-17.png.
.wat-85x50.jpg.
.concorde.jpg.
.Aircraft Associates.85x50.png.
.tempest.jpg.
.aerox_85x100.png.
.stanmusikame-85x50.jpg.
.v2x.85x100.png.
.jandsaviation-85x50.jpg.
.mcfarlane-85x50.png.
.kadex-85x50.jpg.
.LogAirLower85x50.png.
.kingairnation-85x50.png.
.planelogix-85x100-2015-04-15.jpg.
.sierratrax-85x50.png.
.Wingman 85x50.png.
.Elite-85x50.png.
.b-kool-85x50.png.
.tat-85x100.png.
.blackwell-85x50.png.
.holymicro-85x50.jpg.
.saint-85x50.jpg.
.bpt-85x50-2019-07-27.jpg.
.headsetsetc_Small_85x50.jpg.
.puremedical-85x200.jpg.
.jetacq-85x50.jpg.
.geebee-85x50.jpg.
.ssv-85x50-2023-12-17.jpg.
.suttoncreativ85x50.jpg.
.KingAirMaint85_50.png.
.sarasota.png.
.ABS-85x100.jpg.
.aviationdesigndouble.jpg.
.AAI.jpg.
.KalAir_Black.jpg.
.pdi-85x50.jpg.
.8flight logo.jpeg.
.dbm.jpg.
.ocraviation-85x50.png.
.AeroMach85x100.png.
.CiESVer2.jpg.
.bullardaviation-85x50-2.jpg.
.BT Ad.png.
.temple-85x100-2015-02-23.jpg.
.SCA.jpg.
.rnp.85x50.png.
.garmin-85x200-2021-11-22.jpg.
.MountainAirframe.jpg.
.Wentworth_85x100.JPG.
.airmart-85x150.png.