09 Nov 2025, 00:07 [ UTC - 5; DST ]
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: The Ultimate Pilatus PC12 Thread! Posted: 31 Dec 2017, 23:59 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 07/13/11 Posts: 2755 Post Likes: +2187 Company: Aeronautical People Shuffler Location: Picayune, MS (KHSA)
Aircraft: KA350/E55/DA-62
|
|
Username Protected wrote: You see 400+ knots and you're done.
There is so much truth to this. I dread long trips in the PC12 after I started flying the Falcon. That thing runs 450kts. With a 100 knot headwind, we are still going almost 100 knots faster than the PC12 on a no-wind day.
_________________ The sound of a second engine still running after the first engine fails is why I like having two.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: The Ultimate Pilatus PC12 Thread! Posted: 01 Jan 2018, 02:48 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 11/22/12 Posts: 2919 Post Likes: +2895 Company: Retired Location: Lynnwood, WA (KPAE)
Aircraft: Lancair Evolution
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Is it possible that engine technology has improved turboprop reliability to the point that that the safety benefits of a second engine are negligible? Possible, sure, but it's irrelevant to the twin fans in the singles vs. twins debate. Twin fans focus on the possibility of an engine failure, not the probability. MTBF of 100,000 hours, a million, ten million? Doesn't matter how reliable the belt, they still want suspenders. It's emotion, not a calculation of risk/reward or cost/benefit. Electric motors could make for a step change in reliability beyond even turbines but it wouldn't change the mindset.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: The Ultimate Pilatus PC12 Thread! Posted: 01 Jan 2018, 11:16 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 01/29/08 Posts: 26338 Post Likes: +13085 Location: Walterboro, SC. KRBW
Aircraft: PC12NG
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Is it possible that engine technology has improved turboprop reliability to the point that that the safety benefits of a second engine are negligible? Possible, sure, but it's irrelevant to the twin fans in the singles vs. twins debate. Twin fans focus on the possibility of an engine failure, not the probability. MTBF of 100,000 hours, a million, ten million? Doesn't matter how reliable the belt, they still want suspenders. It's emotion, not a calculation of risk/reward or cost/benefit. Electric motors could make for a step change in reliability beyond even turbines but it wouldn't change the mindset. "Twin fans" are a dying breed. The market speaks. In a few years there won't be any "twin fans".
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: The Ultimate Pilatus PC12 Thread! Posted: 01 Jan 2018, 15:31 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 08/16/15 Posts: 3680 Post Likes: +5445 Location: Ogden UT
Aircraft: Piper M600
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I don't remember anything but smooth at FL410 or above...
The airliners are just above TP altitudes... getting beat up.
The other component critical to a smooth ride is the wing loading, most jets have high wing loading and the ride is smoother... same is true of some turboprops like the MU2.
This is also a major factor in the high / hot issues. Aviation is always about trade-offs.
I do agree that for private transportation a SETP is hard to beat and the Pilatus is the ultimate SETP. CDC UA /OV EHK295020/TM 1810/FL400/TP E55P/TB CONS MOD /ZLC That doesn't sound fun! High altitude Airmets for turbulence today. Lots of squawking about continuous light and occasional moderate from the heavies. I was smooth until crossing the lower UT mountains at FL270, then got into continuous light. dropped to 250 and baby bottom smooth all the way to destination. It is an OWT that jets are smoother than TP's in the 20's. I hear this almost every time the Jet stream is active. Today looks like moderate or greater eddies above 450. Nice ride in the middle air.  Attachment: 1.jpg Attachment: Turb gmet.jpg
Please login or Register for a free account via the link in the red bar above to download files.
_________________ Chuck Ivester Piper M600 Ogden UT
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: The Ultimate Pilatus PC12 Thread! Posted: 01 Jan 2018, 16:42 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 01/16/11 Posts: 11068 Post Likes: +7097 Location: Somewhere Over the Rainbow
Aircraft: PC12NG, G3Tat
|
|
Username Protected wrote: "Twin fans" are a dying breed. The market speaks. In a few years there won't be any "twin fans". This was my view as I walked to get outta dodge yesterday.........weather btw was great in the islands.........gonna miss not working There was not a single KA on the ramp. Bunch of frigging jets, and some big ones to boot..........I think that the PC12 has nailed this market because of efficiency, reliability, loading and load capacity, and then range. Coupled with ease of operation and I bet that everyone will agree that the PC12 NG is a very, very easy airplane to fly and operate and you have a congo line that resembles the one below at most airports these days. Attachment: MYAM_PilatusLine.jpg
Please login or Register for a free account via the link in the red bar above to download files.
_________________ ---Rusty Shoe Keeper---
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: The Ultimate Pilatus PC12 Thread! Posted: 06 Jan 2018, 12:52 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 12/26/17 Posts: 142 Post Likes: +76
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I don't remember anything but smooth at FL410 or above...
The airliners are just above TP altitudes... getting beat up.
The other component critical to a smooth ride is the wing loading, most jets have high wing loading and the ride is smoother... same is true of some turboprops like the MU2.
This is also a major factor in the high / hot issues. Aviation is always about trade-offs.
I do agree that for private transportation a SETP is hard to beat and the Pilatus is the ultimate SETP. CDC UA /OV EHK295020/TM 1810/FL400/TP E55P/TB CONS MOD /ZLC That doesn't sound fun! High altitude Airmets for turbulence today. Lots of squawking about continuous light and occasional moderate from the heavies. I was smooth until crossing the lower UT mountains at FL270, then got into continuous light. dropped to 250 and baby bottom smooth all the way to destination. It is an OWT that jets are smoother than TP's in the 20's. I hear this almost every time the Jet stream is active. Today looks like moderate or greater eddies above 450. Nice ride in the middle air. 
Some days you are right - smoother down low, however many, maybe even more days smoother up high. Jets can fly lower if need be at the expense of more fuel, but they can do it. The TP's cannot go high no matter what.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: The Ultimate Pilatus PC12 Thread! Posted: 06 Jan 2018, 12:59 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 08/16/15 Posts: 3680 Post Likes: +5445 Location: Ogden UT
Aircraft: Piper M600
|
|
That is true. I can only go so high. I have been flying several times over the years when ATC asks for a pirep and I report good conditions and the airliners ask for lower and start descending at or below my altitude. Guess Delta and United write the revenues on those flights off after paying the fuel bill  I will say that in a couple of thousand flight level hours, I have yet to have a turbulence day in cruise that I would say was uncomfortable, and certainly none that were dangerous. In the terminal in the mountains, that is a different story. I have had days where I could not use autopilot due to concerns of over stressing the airframe, or the servos not being able to keep up. But those conditions affect everyone. So I would put turbulence in TP's being a problem as an OWT, or at the very least, not a practical issue.
_________________ Chuck Ivester Piper M600 Ogden UT
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: The Ultimate Pilatus PC12 Thread! Posted: 06 Jan 2018, 13:16 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 08/16/15 Posts: 3680 Post Likes: +5445 Location: Ogden UT
Aircraft: Piper M600
|
|
Username Protected wrote: There’s both low and high altitude turbulence, but it’s rare at 40 and higher. Not that you don’t ever get it, but it’s rare. Pirated this from Scott D, hope I don't get sued  Interesting graph anyway if I am interpreting it correctly. Kind of supports the twenties as being pretty benign. Clear air turbulence seems more of a very high or very low altitude phenomenon, obviously include turbulence more for the lower altitudes Which is why flight attendants need good disability policies.... Attachment: Pireps.jpg
Please login or Register for a free account via the link in the red bar above to download files.
_________________ Chuck Ivester Piper M600 Ogden UT
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: The Ultimate Pilatus PC12 Thread! Posted: 06 Jan 2018, 13:30 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 11/11/12 Posts: 1603 Post Likes: +843 Location: san francisco (KHAF)
Aircraft: C55 baron
|
|
|
Is that a count of PIREPs? That graph just peaks at the usual cruising altitude of airliners. Fewer planes spend meaningful time in the teens and 20s.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: The Ultimate Pilatus PC12 Thread! Posted: 06 Jan 2018, 14:32 |
|
 |

|

|
 |
Joined: 06/28/09 Posts: 14423 Post Likes: +9555 Location: Walnut Creek, CA (KCCR)
Aircraft: 1962 Twin Bonanza
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Is that a count of PIREPs? That graph just peaks at the usual cruising altitude of airliners. Fewer planes spend meaningful time in the teens and 20s. Agree... not sure this means anything.. also the airlines are hyper sensitive to turbulence because they’ve got hundreds of people in the back they’re trying to please. I rarely ask for ride reports but nearly every airliner asks at every check on.
_________________ http://calipilot.com atp/cfii
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: The Ultimate Pilatus PC12 Thread! Posted: 06 Jan 2018, 16:02 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 10/31/14 Posts: 560 Post Likes: +268
Aircraft: eclipse
|
|
|
Often I am at 40 and having a smooth ride and the airlines are in the mid thirties bitching about the ride
|
|
| Top |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us
BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a
forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include
the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner,
Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.
BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates.
Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.
Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2025
|
|
|
|