25 Nov 2025, 19:30 [ UTC - 5; DST ]
|
| Username Protected |
Message |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Turbo Navajo to Normally Aspirated Navajo Conversion Posted: 02 Feb 2016, 17:55 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 09/05/13 Posts: 125 Post Likes: +7
|
|
Username Protected wrote: How about this for single-engine performance. In May of 1951, the Aero Commander company flew their new aircraft at full maximum takeoff weight from Oklahoma City to Washington, D.C. with one propeller removed, and stowed in the baggage compartment. The record-breaking single-engine flight was such a success that the company found itself in a backorder situation. The first production Twin Commander delivered was the Model 520 with two Lycoming engines. The second production version was the Model 560 and 560A which had a slightly larger cabin and more powerful engines. In 1955, the Air Force was so impressed with the single-engine capability of the 560, that fifteen were ordered, with two for the exclusive use of the then-President Dwight Eisenhower. It was the first civilian aircraft ever approved for Presidential use.  This guy got a positive rate of climb, sucked the gear up, and flew this baby all the way to DC. ALL ON ONE ENGINE! At gross weight. The Navajo's performance is slightly better than the Aero Commander's.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Turbo Navajo to Normally Aspirated Navajo Conversion Posted: 02 Feb 2016, 17:59 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 01/31/10 Posts: 13631 Post Likes: +7766 Company: 320 Fam
Aircraft: 58TC
|
|
Username Protected wrote: How about this for single-engine performance.
In May of 1951, the Aero Commander company flew their new aircraft at full maximum takeoff weight from Oklahoma City to Washington, D.C. with one propeller removed, and stowed in the baggage compartment. The record-breaking single-engine flight was such a success that the company found itself in a backorder situation. The first production Twin Commander delivered was the Model 520 with two Lycoming engines. The second production version was the Model 560 and 560A which had a slightly larger cabin and more powerful engines. In 1955, the Air Force was so impressed with the single-engine capability of the 560, that fifteen were ordered, with two for the exclusive use of the then-President Dwight Eisenhower. It was the first civilian aircraft ever approved for Presidential use.
:popcorn: This guy got a positive rate of climb, sucked the gear up, and flew this baby all the way to DC. ALL ON ONE ENGINE! At gross weight. The Navajo's performance is slightly better than the Aero Commander's.
No windmilling prop.
_________________ Views are my own and don’t represent employers or clients My 58TC https://tinyurl.com/mry9f8f6
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Turbo Navajo to Normally Aspirated Navajo Conversion Posted: 02 Feb 2016, 18:03 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 09/05/13 Posts: 125 Post Likes: +7
|
|
|
At 25 feet I am already well past my decision. I continue flying.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Turbo Navajo to Normally Aspirated Navajo Conversion Posted: 02 Feb 2016, 18:05 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 09/05/13 Posts: 125 Post Likes: +7
|
|
|
No windmilling prop. As soon as I feather mine, and that takes just few seconds, there won't be any windmilling props either.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Turbo Navajo to Normally Aspirated Navajo Conversion Posted: 02 Feb 2016, 18:53 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 01/14/12 Posts: 2001 Post Likes: +1494 Location: Hampton, VA
Aircraft: AEST
|
|
K, You spent some time on your analysis. It deserves a response. Executive Summery: You are wrong, and if you attempt to do what you describe in any kind of Navajo at Max TO weight, you, and whoever is on the plane with you, will most likely die. Comparing aircraft based on their listed S/E rate of climb is a poor way to compare expected performance for YOUR mission. Keep in mind, at the SAME weight a Chieftain (PA31-350) is going to out-perform a 310 Navajo, and a T-1040 is going to out perform a Chieftain. There is a chart in every POH that describes S/E climb performance at different weights, temperatures, and pressure altitudes, ALL at Vxse, gear up, flaps up, prop feathered. The performance you will get with the gear down, or with the gear in transition is going to be less. (Not to mention - before the propeller is feathered  ) Here's a way to get some idea how much worse: With both motors running, set power for 89KTs (obviously don't do this close to the ground, at reduced power Vmc isn't going to be a big deal, but Vs will be), after everything is stable, lower the gear, maintain your airspeed and power, note that you are now descending at 200-400'/min. You can play with the cowl flaps as well. Try the same exercise at Vyse. You can assume your actual S/E performance will be reduced by an equivalent amount. One more exercise you can do: Add power to maintain altitude and airspeed (@89KTs), after everything is stable, retract the gear, and time how long it takes for the aircraft to accelerate to blue line. Bottom line: A Navajo isn't an Airbus, it doesn't have a stick to finesse. Treat it like a 121 aircraft and it will bite. In a light twin, the gear handle is the key, gear down, and you are landing straight ahead, gear up and you are going flying (at least for a while), as for climbing to clear obstacles, you should plan on doing that before the engine quits. 
_________________ Forrest
'---x-O-x---'
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Turbo Navajo to Normally Aspirated Navajo Conversion Posted: 02 Feb 2016, 21:39 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 08/01/11 Posts: 6920 Post Likes: +6192 Location: In between the opioid and marijuana epidemics
Aircraft: 182, A36TC
|
|
|
Nice commander summary. Are they still dangerous?
_________________ Fly High,
Ryan Holt CFI
"Paranoia and PTSD are requirements not diseases"
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Turbo Navajo to Normally Aspirated Navajo Conversion Posted: 02 Feb 2016, 23:12 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 11/25/11 Posts: 9015 Post Likes: +17225 Location: KGNF, Grenada, MS
Aircraft: Baron, 180,195,J-3
|
|
Kw, I just want to ask one favor. If you buy a Navajo and plan on demonstrating a single engine takeoff, PLEASE let me know. I want to watch. I've never seen a really bad airplane crash before. Jgreen 
_________________ Waste no time with fools. They have nothing to lose.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Turbo Navajo to Normally Aspirated Navajo Conversion Posted: 02 Feb 2016, 23:26 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 11/25/11 Posts: 9015 Post Likes: +17225 Location: KGNF, Grenada, MS
Aircraft: Baron, 180,195,J-3
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Nice commander summary. Are they still dangerous? Only when the wings come off. Oh, I am funny  , really I am. Jgreen 
_________________ Waste no time with fools. They have nothing to lose.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Turbo Navajo to Normally Aspirated Navajo Conversion Posted: 03 Feb 2016, 02:11 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 09/05/13 Posts: 125 Post Likes: +7
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Nice commander summary. Are they still dangerous? Hi Ryan, Even with the reinforcing spar cap straps installed at the factory, they still cracked, albeit at a slower rate. I don't know much about them though. I think Adam S Frisch and few other guys here on BT are into Aero Commanders. Poke them a bit. They ought to know. In fact he has a pretty active thread right here on the first page, called "Turbine step up?". Check it out, some good reading. KW
Last edited on 03 Feb 2016, 08:19, edited 1 time in total.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Turbo Navajo to Normally Aspirated Navajo Conversion Posted: 03 Feb 2016, 02:40 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 09/05/13 Posts: 125 Post Likes: +7
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Will you be going to Simcom for your Navajo initial? I will look into Simcom to see what sort of Navajo sim they have. Is it a realistic Navajo sim or a generic piston twin sim, pretending to be a Navajo. Also, the quality of instructors, and recommendations will determine if I do my initial with them. At the beginning of my flying career, for two and a half years, I taught as a CFIIME and Ground Instructor. Enjoyed it a lot. I specialized in training military pilots to civilian Multi Engine ATP standard, ME instructors, ME ratings, and ME re- current training. I flew a Seminole, an Aztec, and have some time in a Chieftain. I also was involved in a training de- partment of a foreign regional airline, where I worked on an Operations Manual, and was nominated a type rating examiner. So eventually, I probably will write my own training syllabus, and do in-house training. KW
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Turbo Navajo to Normally Aspirated Navajo Conversion Posted: 03 Feb 2016, 07:58 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 09/05/13 Posts: 125 Post Likes: +7
|
|
Quote: TAKEOFF ACCIDENTS 53 Concerning engine failures, an NTSB study concluded that accidents in multi-engine aircraft are related to the pilot's proficiency: "Accidents following engine failures in light twins generally occur due to a lack of proficiency in responding to these emergencies. Often such accidents involve some degree of panic, probably related to inadequate immediate recall of the exact emergency procedures or lack of confidence in one's ability to execute the emergency procedures. These symptoms are indicative of insufficient initial or recurrent training in engine-failure emergencies." Therefore, as said before, you are unsafe to fly a light twin without regular recurrency training hopefully in a simulator—in the last twelve months. Without such training, both your memory and your reflex actions in an emergency will be inadequate. And if you haven't flown the airplane for three months, it's not just three takeoffs and landings you need, but a couple hours' practice and a thorough review of procedures before you take passengers along.
Last edited on 03 Feb 2016, 14:58, edited 1 time in total.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Turbo Navajo to Normally Aspirated Navajo Conversion Posted: 03 Feb 2016, 09:10 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 01/31/10 Posts: 13631 Post Likes: +7766 Company: 320 Fam
Aircraft: 58TC
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Will you be going to Simcom for your Navajo initial? I will look into Simcom to see what sort of Navajo sim they have. Is it a realistic Navajo sim or a generic piston twin sim, pretending to be a Navajo. Also, the quality of instructors, and recommendations will determine if I do my initial with them. At the beginning of my flying career, for two and a half years, I taught as a CFIIME and Ground Instructor. Enjoyed it a lot. I specialized in training military pilots to civilian Multi Engine ATP standard, ME instructors, ME ratings, and ME re- current training. I flew a Seminole, an Aztec, and have some time in a Chieftain. I also was involved in a training de- partment of a foreign regional airline, where I worked on an Operations Manual, and was nominated a type rating examiner. So eventually, I probably will write my own training syllabus, and do in-house training. KW
They have a Navajo sim in Orlando. You will be exposed to safe technique there.
Best,
_________________ Views are my own and don’t represent employers or clients My 58TC https://tinyurl.com/mry9f8f6
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Turbo Navajo to Normally Aspirated Navajo Conversion Posted: 03 Feb 2016, 09:30 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 09/05/13 Posts: 125 Post Likes: +7
|
|
|
Thanks Jesse. I will definitely look into it, and will visit them, as I am in FLA quite often, and it will be a leisurely drive to Orlando.
KW
|
|
| Top |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us
BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a
forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include
the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner,
Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.
BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates.
Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.
Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2025
|
|
|
|