29 Nov 2025, 15:13 [ UTC - 5; DST ]
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: So I have a turbine, now I'm a sap? Posted: 25 Nov 2014, 23:23 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 02/10/12 Posts: 1321 Post Likes: +213 Location: Albuquerque,NM KAEG
Aircraft: 1991 AA F33A 550R
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Yes, read some of Dave's posts about the turbine tax. There are plenty of places that charge $$$$$$$$ for turbines and exploit whatever monopoly they have.
I think the decline in GA volume has forced a lot of people into fairly rapacious business practices towards turbines. Sutton's Law at work. So would you be charged more for a turbine powered Bonanza than a regular piston version?
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: So I have a turbine, now I'm a sap? Posted: 25 Nov 2014, 23:29 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 02/10/12 Posts: 1321 Post Likes: +213 Location: Albuquerque,NM KAEG
Aircraft: 1991 AA F33A 550R
|
|
Username Protected wrote: In fairness to the FBO's, I think some sort of turbine "tax" is appropriate. They're more expensive, they are often easier to break and more expensive to fix. And it's difficult to price out granular charges model by model. So piston singles get averaged. And turboprops (likely single and double) get averaged. The system sacrifices accuracy for efficiency ... and the PA46/P46T comparison is a great example. How is a turbine easier to break? 
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: So I have a turbine, now I'm a sap? Posted: 26 Nov 2014, 00:28 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 11/08/12 Posts: 12835 Post Likes: +5276 Location: Jackson, MS (KHKS)
Aircraft: 1961 Cessna 172
|
|
Username Protected wrote: How is a turbine easier to break?  They are generally bigger - easier to hit things while towing They often have restrictions to how they can be towed (don't turn more than X degrees, or need to remove some pin to tow, etc) -------------------- Getting back to the "charge them more because they can pay" scheme. The alternate scheme would be to take the FBO required annual revenue and divide it by the number of operations. In this scenario, let's say everyone has a ramp fee of $100. There are two FBO's at the airport and they say "you know, I bet we'd get more piston traffic if we charged them a little bit less. Call it $75 for pistons and we can charge $125 for turbines. We have X advantage over the other FBO and the turbines aren't going to change plans over $25 but the pistons will. Piston volume then jumps 50% and turbine volume drops 2%. It's easy to see how this would play out.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: So I have a turbine, now I'm a sap? Posted: 26 Nov 2014, 00:29 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 11/08/12 Posts: 12835 Post Likes: +5276 Location: Jackson, MS (KHKS)
Aircraft: 1961 Cessna 172
|
|
Username Protected wrote: So would you be charged more for a turbine powered Bonanza than a regular piston version? The FBO's that are sophisticated enough to charge big bucks generally have an N-number based system to assign types. STC turboprop conversions often fly under the radar here.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: So I have a turbine, now I'm a sap? Posted: 26 Nov 2014, 01:07 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 04/27/10 Posts: 2301 Post Likes: +1200 Location: Phoenix (KDVT) & Grand Rapids (KGRR)
Aircraft: BE36
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I have an MU2 Solitaire that takes up just a little less surface area than an Aerostar.
Why the fu(k do these places I visit think I'll pay three times as much for a hangar? I've bargained my way around this, but honestly, I feel like kicking someone's ass. Is it just me? Maybe I'm just cheap...wasn't this way in the 90's when I had my Cheyenne IIXL... This is EXACTLY why I haven't pulled the trigger on an MU-2!
_________________ Since Retirement: CL65 type rating, flew 121, CE680, CE525S, and CE500 type ratings.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: So I have a turbine, now I'm a sap? Posted: 26 Nov 2014, 01:15 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 05/29/09 Posts: 4166 Post Likes: +2990 Company: Craft Air Services, LLC Location: Hertford, NC
Aircraft: D50A
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I have an MU2 Solitaire that takes up just a little less surface area than an Aerostar.
Why the fu(k do these places I visit think I'll pay three times as much for a hangar? I've bargained my way around this, but honestly, I feel like kicking someone's ass. Is it just me? Maybe I'm just cheap...wasn't this way in the 90's when I had my Cheyenne IIXL... This is EXACTLY why I haven't pulled the trigger on an MU-2!
While certainly not the only reason, I have the same thoughts every time I get serious about a twin turbine. It definitely takes some of the shine off of the apple.
_________________ Who is John Galt?
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: So I have a turbine, now I'm a sap? Posted: 26 Nov 2014, 04:04 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 08/18/13 Posts: 1152 Post Likes: +770
Aircraft: 737
|
|
|
Anyone who says "it's ok, it's capitalism", you're absolutely right. That works both ways; I can choose to go someplace else. I always check to see what the fuel price is, and I use CAA or just call and bargain on fuel. I need to ask the same questions about hangars.
This really was more fun in the 90's, but there's no going back so I'll just work with what I've got.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: So I have a turbine, now I'm a sap? Posted: 26 Nov 2014, 05:28 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 06/09/09 Posts: 4438 Post Likes: +3306
Aircraft: C182P, Merlin IIIC
|
|
|
As far as I know, no one is being forced to rent the hangar. If it is too expensive then park out on the ramp. Or build your own hangar and charge everyone else what they feel is a fair price, not what you think you need to charge.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: So I have a turbine, now I'm a sap? Posted: 26 Nov 2014, 08:07 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 05/23/08 Posts: 6063 Post Likes: +715 Location: CMB7, Ottawa, Canada
Aircraft: TBM - C185 - T206
|
|
Most place charge it as a turbine, cheaper than a King Air or jet but more than a single piston. Its frustrating when you pay 2-3 times the parking of a Malibu for roughly the same size footprint. Username Protected wrote: PC12 gets charged as a "single". It's nice.
_________________ Former Baron 58 owner. Pistons engines are for tractors.
Marc Bourdon
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: So I have a turbine, now I'm a sap? Posted: 26 Nov 2014, 08:12 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 01/31/10 Posts: 13631 Post Likes: +7766 Company: 320 Fam
Aircraft: 58TC
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Anyone who says "it's ok, it's capitalism", you're absolutely right. That works both ways; I can choose to go someplace else. I always check to see what the fuel price is, and I use CAA or just call and bargain on fuel. I need to ask the same questions about hangars.
This really was more fun in the 90's, but there's no going back so I'll just work with what I've got. Agreed.
_________________ Views are my own and don’t represent employers or clients My 58TC https://tinyurl.com/mry9f8f6
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: So I have a turbine, now I'm a sap? Posted: 26 Nov 2014, 08:16 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 01/29/08 Posts: 26338 Post Likes: +13085 Location: Walterboro, SC. KRBW
Aircraft: PC12NG
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Most place charge it as a turbine, cheaper than a King Air or jet but more than a single piston.
Its frustrating when you pay 2-3 times the parking of a Malibu for roughly the same size footprint.
It just depends where you go. I have yet to pay more than $50 a night. Most places it's $30. Teterboro is 3 nights free with 100 gallons. I'm paying $180 a night this week in Aspen and that's by faaaaaaaar the most I ever pay.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: So I have a turbine, now I'm a sap? Posted: 26 Nov 2014, 08:40 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 06/09/09 Posts: 4438 Post Likes: +3306
Aircraft: C182P, Merlin IIIC
|
|
|
Is that for a hangar or just a spot on the ramp?
|
|
| Top |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us
BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a
forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include
the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner,
Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.
BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates.
Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.
Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2025
|
|
|
|