16 Dec 2025, 10:26 [ UTC - 5; DST ]
|
| Username Protected |
Message |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Can Experimentals save General Aviation? Posted: 06 Aug 2014, 23:25 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 09/13/08 Posts: 2418 Post Likes: +649 Location: Bakersfield, CA
Aircraft: 260B Comanche
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I built and completed an RV and flew it all over the country and beyond. To answer your question Arlen I'd have to say that I don't think so. I just don't see enough people committing the time and perseverance to complete an airplane for it save the GA flying world. For example I worked four tens during the years that I built and got in three solid eight plus hour days a week in addition to a couple of hours in the evenings about twice a week. Working like this it took me 3 1/2 years to complete my airplane.
While it is proving out that buyers will pony up for a flying RV, there just isn't enough to be had if people started dumping their factory built planes in mass to buy one. Bryan, Why did you sell the RV and buy a Vtail?
Edited. I always wanted one. Sending you a PM.
Last edited on 06 Aug 2014, 23:41, edited 3 times in total.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Can Experimentals save General Aviation? Posted: 06 Aug 2014, 23:31 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 09/08/13 Posts: 762 Post Likes: +181 Company: Gene's Mountain View Auto Location: 4B0 Upstate NY/ VRB Florida
Aircraft: 67 Debonair C33A
|
|
I don't think the experimental market can/ will save GA in the long term. There's NO arguing the fact that dollar for dollar an experimental offers more....unless you need 4 seats. Innovation, performance, customization, cost, AND owner repairs....even annuals IF you built it. The problem lies in the HUGE time commitment to build it, and further gets complicated in the fact that you still need to fly in the interim, which means rental.....which means cost and time.Now, some of this can be circumvented by simply buying a completed homebuilt....and there are many out there. BUT.....the good ones aren't going cheap ( nor should they) and now your back to another problem. YOU didn't build it.......so unless your a mechanic you'll need to pay someone to do it for you, and still pay for an annual. Some savings yes.....but no huge epiphany found there. GA is going downhill because.......COST, and the world is a different place. Sadly, us airplane "nuts" are a dying breed. We've lost a big frontier that used to make little boys look up at the sky and dream...... I know, because I was one of them..... 
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Can Experimentals save General Aviation? Posted: 07 Aug 2014, 00:00 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 07/27/10 Posts: 2155 Post Likes: +533
|
|
To quote Tom Gresham: Quote: Omniscience. It comes in handy. . . . and paraphrasing his recommendation to buy in 5 pound cans at Spruce, I am just not a very good shopper, because I haven't found the aisle it's on. As a result I'm not smart enough to tell just where GA is going, but the journey will be much better if we have a Big Tent. (That's for you Nate, we're still buds) I have NEVER flown an airplane I didn't like, period. Some more than others perhaps, but all were a joy. If I were to "inherit" a Cirrus, Saratoga, Archer, Mooney, RV, or any Cessna would I fly and enjoy it . . . You bet. Sitting in a foreign land with my plane a half a world away, reminds me of how much I'd like to go out and just do some slow flight, stalls and approaches. I keep hoping GA doesn't need "saving" but then I'm short on the omniscient stuff. BTW Arlen neet thread, 'cuzz it gets people thinking.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Can Experimentals save General Aviation? Posted: 07 Aug 2014, 00:16 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 12/17/13 Posts: 6656 Post Likes: +5969 Location: Hollywood, Los Angeles, CA
Aircraft: Aerostar Superstar 2
|
|
No, I don't think so. Too much hassle to build, too much liability and not enough variety. I'm basically into flying so that I can travel and avoid going by airlines at a time and cost effective way (ok, not cost effective..  ). There are no homebuilt alternatives for me - twin, 6 pass, pressurised, FIKI. The experimental kits that are sold are basically geared for the tinkerer with a two car garage and hence they're limited in their size and capability. And has anyone tried to fly internationally with an experimental? You need an exception from every country for non-ICAO compliant aircraft, pretty much. My European tour I want to do next summer to visit family and friends would be a logistical nightmare in an experimental. I'm hoping the rewrite of FAR part 23 will allow more freedom to us with certified aircraft for retrofits and avionics so as to close the gap towards experimentals. I'm very jealous of the avionics and easy retrofits you guys can use. As for the future: I'm actually pretty optimistic. Electric aircraft has the potential to revolutionise aviation and make it a lot cheaper, less complex and better performing. But until that electric PC12 that'll cost $100K new to buy arrives, or the electric fanjet that looks like a Phenom and costs $200K, then I'll stick with the certified for now.
_________________ Without love, where would you be now?
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Can Experimentals save General Aviation? Posted: 07 Aug 2014, 06:11 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 03/17/08 Posts: 6612 Post Likes: +14815 Location: KMCW
Aircraft: B55 PII,F-1,L-2,OTW,
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Finally saw an Evolution in person today. Very cool but VERY small. Backseat was teeny. Why no bigger experimentals for 2014 sized people? Did you get in the back seat? I thjnk it is very comfortable and I'm 6'1" & 220#.... I love the Evolution! What a machine....
_________________ Tailwinds, Doug Rozendaal MCW Be Nice, Kind, I don't care, be something, just don't be a jerk ;-)
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Can Experimentals save General Aviation? Posted: 07 Aug 2014, 06:57 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 02/13/10 Posts: 20385 Post Likes: +25536 Location: Castle Rock, Colorado
Aircraft: Prior C310,BE33,SR22
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Correct me if I'm wrong, but, I believe almost as many experimental aircraft are registered each year as production built aircraft. That certainly is helping.....  In the piston plane realm, Richard VanGrunsven's company (Vans) sees more new (E-AB) planes flying each year than Cirrus, Beech, and Diamond - combined. I think these big numbers of new planes are helping to keep GA going..
_________________ Arlen Get your motor runnin' Head out on the highway - Mars Bonfire
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Can Experimentals save General Aviation? Posted: 07 Aug 2014, 07:03 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 02/13/10 Posts: 20385 Post Likes: +25536 Location: Castle Rock, Colorado
Aircraft: Prior C310,BE33,SR22
|
|
Adam, you make some good points. A couple comments, however... Username Protected wrote: No, I don't think so. Too much hassle to build, too much liability and not enough variety. I'm basically into flying so that I can travel and avoid going by airlines at a time and cost effective way (ok, not cost effective..  ). There are no homebuilt alternatives for me - twin, 6 pass, pressurised, FIKI. Some enjoy the build process. That wasn't for me. There are hundreds that come on to the market each year as finished products. If you need pressurized FIKI 6-place, then you're mostly stuck with expensive certified planes. Quote: And has anyone tried to fly internationally with an experimental? You need an exception from every country for non-ICAO compliant aircraft, pretty much. My European tour I want to do next summer to visit family and friends would be a logistical nightmare in an experimental. I don't know about Europe, though there are many RVs that fly there. I do know that it's no big deal to fly to the Bahamas in an E-AB plane. Quote: I'm hoping the rewrite of FAR part 23 will allow more freedom to us with certified aircraft for retrofits and avionics so as to close the gap towards experimentals. I'm very jealous of the avionics and easy retrofits you guys can use. . I agree completely. The cost of avionics for the E-AB is about one-fourth that of certified. I'm not holding my breath, however, while waiting on the Feds.
_________________ Arlen Get your motor runnin' Head out on the highway - Mars Bonfire
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Can Experimentals save General Aviation? Posted: 07 Aug 2014, 07:10 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 02/13/10 Posts: 20385 Post Likes: +25536 Location: Castle Rock, Colorado
Aircraft: Prior C310,BE33,SR22
|
|
Username Protected wrote: .....by simply buying a completed homebuilt....and there are many out there. BUT.....the good ones aren't going cheap ( nor should they) and now your back to another problem. YOU didn't build it.......so unless your a mechanic you'll need to pay someone to do it for you, and still pay for an annual. Some savings yes.....but no huge epiphany found there.
Gene, The rules about who can work on an E-AB plane are actually pretty relaxed. I didn't build mine. But, I could do all the work on mine that I want to do; an A&P (no IA needed) must sign off the Annual. That's all. So, trading money savings for one's own labor is an option. More importantly, at least for me, is that I don't have to buy an FAA-certified starter or alternator or battery or even engine. I had my alternator overhauled at the local auto electric shop: $90. So, savings on parts is another big player here.
_________________ Arlen Get your motor runnin' Head out on the highway - Mars Bonfire
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Can Experimentals save General Aviation? Posted: 07 Aug 2014, 08:25 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 01/29/08 Posts: 26338 Post Likes: +13086 Location: Walterboro, SC. KRBW
Aircraft: PC12NG
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Yep, you need healthy FBO's to keep the smaller airports going and just three tanks of fuel from your Pilatus is about a years worth of gas sales from an RV-6. What are you saying? How does an airplane that uses no gas helping FBO's?
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Can Experimentals save General Aviation? Posted: 07 Aug 2014, 08:27 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 01/29/08 Posts: 26338 Post Likes: +13086 Location: Walterboro, SC. KRBW
Aircraft: PC12NG
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I don't think so, Jason.
If we don't develop more pilots, and if they don't buy and fly airplanes, and if Avgas goes up a couple more dollars, then the Pilatuses and Embraers of the world won't be enough to keep FBOs open. GA needs many thousands of Avgas-burning planes hopping from airport to airport... New pilots and charter ops are at an all time high. Where are all these Cirri, Pilatus, TBM and Embrares going? They're selling all they can build.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us
BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a
forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include
the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner,
Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.
BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates.
Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.
Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2025
|
|
|
|