30 Oct 2025, 03:00 [ UTC - 5; DST ]
|
| Username Protected |
Message |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Robb Report article on Piper Mirage Posted: 31 May 2014, 12:38 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 04/16/12 Posts: 7366 Post Likes: +13873 Location: Keller, TX (KFTW)
Aircraft: '68 36 (E-19)
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Well, the question is do you like to spend your money on fuel and maintenance or on interest ? Not sure I understand. The upfront purchase price between a 90s vintage Malibu Mirage and a late 70s/early 80s vintage 340 is pretty close. Upper 200s to mid 300s. 
_________________ Things are rarely what they seem, but they're always exactly what they are.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Robb Report article on Piper Mirage Posted: 31 May 2014, 12:42 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 03/03/11 Posts: 2057 Post Likes: +2136
Aircraft: Piaggio Avanti
|
|
Username Protected wrote: As a disturbingly large number of PA46 pilots have found out, the airframe makes a good glider down from FL200
I am curious how that compares with the number of folks that have found out that BE36s glide quite well too when they lose power.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Robb Report article on Piper Mirage Posted: 31 May 2014, 13:52 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 02/10/12 Posts: 1321 Post Likes: +213 Location: Albuquerque,NM KAEG
Aircraft: 1991 AA F33A 550R
|
|
Username Protected wrote: The EPS 400 hp diesel would really change this airplane, that would be my first STC candidate if I was EPS. What would work really well on that plane is a well executed 500hp turbine installation 
I have a friend back east who owned and flew a Mirage for 17 years and traded up to a Jetprop. He says it has more than enough power.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Robb Report article on Piper Mirage Posted: 31 May 2014, 14:05 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 05/19/09 Posts: 1023 Post Likes: +523 Location: Tulsa OK
Aircraft: B55 P2
|
|
|
Let's say you are flying along happily at FL230 with a cabin full of people. If an engine quits what does the conventional wisdom say to do? I would assume within a short time you lose pressurization so unless everyone had masks in hand and the ship has enough oxygen for everyone for 30 mins I doubt you will just trim for best glide and try to make the most convenient airport. More likely you will rapidly descend to non-oxygen altitudes and then your glide is really no better than an A36 at 12,000 with an engine failure. Is my thinking flawed?
_________________ Kent Wyatt Tulsa, OK KGCM
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Robb Report article on Piper Mirage Posted: 31 May 2014, 14:39 |
|
 |

|

|
 |
Joined: 09/01/10 Posts: 420 Post Likes: +54 Company: Tarheel Aero Tech Location: Concord, NC (JQF)
Aircraft: 2003 Bonanza A36
|
|
|
My 2014 Mirage has 6 oxygen generators that are designed to provide 30 minutes of oxygen for that very purpose. As far as I know all the Malibu's do.
That would be no different than pressurization in any pressurized piston, turbine or turbojet. Get the masks on and get the aircraft into an emergency decent below 12,000 feet.
_________________ ATP, ASEL/ASES/AMEL, CFI, CFII, MEI, IGI, DPE(PE, CIRE, ATPE, FIE, FIEI) Gold Seal Flight Instructor
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Robb Report article on Piper Mirage Posted: 31 May 2014, 14:48 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 06/14/09 Posts: 745 Post Likes: +9 Location: Chicago, IL (KGYY), GA, KVLD, FL, KOPF
Aircraft: Cirrus SR22 Turbo
|
|
|
I sold my Baron for a late model Cirrus Turbo 2 years ago and have been very happy with my decision, not to mention my bank account. FIKI, however, is becoming increasingly important so I am now faced with the choice of a new Cirrus G-5 or a 2008 mirage for about the same price. Max is clearly a big consideration as a new plane will be maintenance free for 4 years (warranty). While the turbo cirrus can technically fly to 25K, realistically 18k is more sensible. I just don't think anyone has any business in the flight level with an unpressurized aircraft.
So it becomes a trade-off between the chute or pressurization. The high cost of maintenance, I believe, will be some what offset by the pounding I'll take on price depreciation of a new plane. Still struggling with this decision.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Robb Report article on Piper Mirage Posted: 31 May 2014, 14:50 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 11/06/10 Posts: 12183 Post Likes: +3068 Company: Looking Location: Outside Boston, or some hotel somewhere
Aircraft: None
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Let's say you are flying along happily at FL230 with a cabin full of people. If an engine quits what does the conventional wisdom say to do? I would assume within a short time you lose pressurization so unless everyone had masks in hand and the ship has enough oxygen for everyone for 30 mins I doubt you will just trim for best glide and try to make the most convenient airport. More likely you will rapidly descend to non-oxygen altitudes and then your glide is really no better than an A36 at 12,000 with an engine failure. Is my thinking flawed? I have a nice large O2 tank in my Aerostar, if I lost both engines at 30K MSL (max altitude) I have a few hours of O2 to glide down.  In the case of the PA46, I recall the on board O2 was about three times normal max glide time before you are below O2 requirements. Not an issue is the basic point. Tim
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Robb Report article on Piper Mirage Posted: 31 May 2014, 14:52 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 11/06/10 Posts: 12183 Post Likes: +3068 Company: Looking Location: Outside Boston, or some hotel somewhere
Aircraft: None
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I sold my Baron for a late model Cirrus Turbo 2 years ago and have been very happy with my decision, not to mention my bank account. FIKI, however, is becoming increasingly important so I am now faced with the choice of a new Cirrus G-5 or a 2008 mirage for about the same price. Max is clearly a big consideration as a new plane will be maintenance free for 4 years (warranty). While the turbo cirrus can technically fly to 25K, realistically 18k is more sensible. I just don't think anyone has any business in the flight level with an unpressurized aircraft.
So it becomes a trade-off between the chute or pressurization. The high cost of maintenance, I believe, will be some what offset by the pounding I'll take on price depreciation of a new plane. Still struggling with this decision. Depending on mission, a FIKI 2009 Cirrus G3 might do the job. Also save you about 300K on the purchase price.  Tim
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Robb Report article on Piper Mirage Posted: 31 May 2014, 14:57 |
|
 |

|

|
 |
Joined: 09/01/10 Posts: 420 Post Likes: +54 Company: Tarheel Aero Tech Location: Concord, NC (JQF)
Aircraft: 2003 Bonanza A36
|
|
|
I think you are correct Victor, flying above 18,000' without pressurization is not comfortable and most passengers do not want to wear a mask.
The Mirage is very comfortable and quiet for that matter all the way up to FL250. In fact, that is where you see the best TAS and that is why I bought the Mirage, also FIKI certified.
_________________ ATP, ASEL/ASES/AMEL, CFI, CFII, MEI, IGI, DPE(PE, CIRE, ATPE, FIE, FIEI) Gold Seal Flight Instructor
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Robb Report article on Piper Mirage Posted: 31 May 2014, 15:01 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 06/14/09 Posts: 745 Post Likes: +9 Location: Chicago, IL (KGYY), GA, KVLD, FL, KOPF
Aircraft: Cirrus SR22 Turbo
|
|
Depending on mission, a FIKI 2009 Cirrus G3 might do the job. Also save you about 300K on the purchase price.  Tim[/quote] I looked at the FIKI G3's Tim. I need full tanks and the G-3 has a fuel full payload enough for me and a tooth brush and that's with me lying about my weight. The extra 200 payload on the G5 is critical.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Robb Report article on Piper Mirage Posted: 31 May 2014, 15:29 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 08/03/08 Posts: 16153 Post Likes: +8870 Location: 2W5
Aircraft: A36
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Well, the question is do you like to spend your money on fuel and maintenance or on interest ? Not sure I understand. The upfront purchase price between a 90s vintage Malibu Mirage and a late 70s/early 80s vintage 340 is pretty close. Upper 200s to mid 300s. 
Apples to apples, that is probably correct, but what is the fun in that
Earlier there was mention of a G1000/GFC700 Mirage, and those are still considerably more of an outlay than even the most dolled up RAM7 C340A.
One interesting fact is that 2 TSIO520s on the 340 are not much more to overhaul than the one TIO540 on the Mirage. The twin-turbo Lycomings seem to have some parts that are whittled from solid blocks of rhodium by unionized swiss watchmakers.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Robb Report article on Piper Mirage Posted: 31 May 2014, 22:25 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 06/23/09 Posts: 2320 Post Likes: +720 Location: KIKK......Kankakee, Illinois
Aircraft: TBM 850
|
|
|
For the acquisition costs of a newer Mirage I just found myself looking at SE turboprops. I liked the Meridian a lot. For the same cost a little bit older TBM made more sense. At least that's what I've convinced myself.............time will tell?!?
|
|
| Top |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us
BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a
forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include
the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner,
Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.
BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates.
Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.
Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2025
|
|
|
|