banner
banner

30 Oct 2025, 03:00 [ UTC - 5; DST ]


Greenwich AeroGroup (banner)



Reply to topic  [ 45 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Username Protected Message
 Post subject: Re: Robb Report article on Piper Mirage
PostPosted: 31 May 2014, 12:38 
Offline


User avatar
 WWW  Profile




Joined: 04/16/12
Posts: 7366
Post Likes: +13873
Location: Keller, TX (KFTW)
Aircraft: '68 36 (E-19)
Username Protected wrote:
Well, the question is do you like to spend your money on fuel and maintenance or on interest ?


Not sure I understand. The upfront purchase price between a 90s vintage Malibu Mirage and a late 70s/early 80s vintage 340 is pretty close. Upper 200s to mid 300s. :shrug:

_________________
Things are rarely what they seem, but they're always exactly what they are.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Robb Report article on Piper Mirage
PostPosted: 31 May 2014, 12:42 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 03/03/11
Posts: 2057
Post Likes: +2136
Aircraft: Piaggio Avanti
Username Protected wrote:
As a disturbingly large number of PA46 pilots have found out, the airframe makes a good glider down from FL200


I am curious how that compares with the number of folks that have found out that BE36s glide quite well too when they lose power.

Top

 Post subject: Re: Robb Report article on Piper Mirage
PostPosted: 31 May 2014, 13:26 
Offline



User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 12/10/11
Posts: 2125
Post Likes: +566
Location: Shelbyville, TN (KSYI)
Aircraft: 1975 Baron B55
I am not real familiar with the Mirage, however the Meridian (same airframe) can do 270KTS at 27,0000 on 45 gal/hr and is a nice ride. I have a friend that just went from a F-33A to a full de-iced Meridian and I think for a personal aircraft it is amazing. His mission is a 600 mile one way round trip each week with two people and he is elated. He also goes to Destin once a once for the weekend with the family of 4. I agree it is not a 6 place aircraft however. My Baron is and I have 6 in the aircraft once every 2 years or so. Aircraft needs to match the mission.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Robb Report article on Piper Mirage
PostPosted: 31 May 2014, 13:52 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 02/10/12
Posts: 1321
Post Likes: +213
Location: Albuquerque,NM KAEG
Aircraft: 1991 AA F33A 550R
Username Protected wrote:
The EPS 400 hp diesel would really change this airplane, that would be my first STC candidate if I was EPS.


What would work really well on that plane is a well executed 500hp turbine installation :stir:


I have a friend back east who owned and flew a Mirage for 17 years and traded up to a Jetprop. He says it has more than enough power.

Top

 Post subject: Re: Robb Report article on Piper Mirage
PostPosted: 31 May 2014, 14:05 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 05/19/09
Posts: 1023
Post Likes: +523
Location: Tulsa OK
Aircraft: B55 P2
Let's say you are flying along happily at FL230 with a cabin full of people. If an engine quits what does the conventional wisdom say to do? I would assume within a short time you lose pressurization so unless everyone had masks in hand and the ship has enough oxygen for everyone for 30 mins I doubt you will just trim for best glide and try to make the most convenient airport. More likely you will rapidly descend to non-oxygen altitudes and then your glide is really no better than an A36 at 12,000 with an engine failure. Is my thinking flawed?

_________________
Kent Wyatt
Tulsa, OK
KGCM


Top

 Post subject: Re: Robb Report article on Piper Mirage
PostPosted: 31 May 2014, 14:39 
Offline



User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 09/01/10
Posts: 420
Post Likes: +54
Company: Tarheel Aero Tech
Location: Concord, NC (JQF)
Aircraft: 2003 Bonanza A36
My 2014 Mirage has 6 oxygen generators that are designed to provide 30 minutes of oxygen for that very purpose. As far as I know all the Malibu's do.

That would be no different than pressurization in any pressurized piston, turbine or turbojet. Get the masks on and get the aircraft into an emergency decent below 12,000 feet.

_________________
ATP, ASEL/ASES/AMEL, CFI, CFII, MEI, IGI, DPE(PE, CIRE, ATPE, FIE, FIEI)
Gold Seal Flight Instructor


Top

 Post subject: Re: Robb Report article on Piper Mirage
PostPosted: 31 May 2014, 14:48 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 06/14/09
Posts: 745
Post Likes: +9
Location: Chicago, IL (KGYY), GA, KVLD, FL, KOPF
Aircraft: Cirrus SR22 Turbo
I sold my Baron for a late model Cirrus Turbo 2 years ago and have been very happy with my decision, not to mention my bank account. FIKI, however, is becoming increasingly important so I am now faced with the choice of a new Cirrus G-5 or a 2008 mirage for about the same price. Max is clearly a big consideration as a new plane will be maintenance free for 4 years (warranty). While the turbo cirrus can technically fly to 25K, realistically 18k is more sensible. I just don't think anyone has any business in the flight level with an unpressurized aircraft.

So it becomes a trade-off between the chute or pressurization. The high cost of maintenance, I believe, will be some what offset by the pounding I'll take on price depreciation of a new plane. Still struggling with this decision.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Robb Report article on Piper Mirage
PostPosted: 31 May 2014, 14:50 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 11/06/10
Posts: 12183
Post Likes: +3068
Company: Looking
Location: Outside Boston, or some hotel somewhere
Aircraft: None
Username Protected wrote:
Let's say you are flying along happily at FL230 with a cabin full of people. If an engine quits what does the conventional wisdom say to do? I would assume within a short time you lose pressurization so unless everyone had masks in hand and the ship has enough oxygen for everyone for 30 mins I doubt you will just trim for best glide and try to make the most convenient airport. More likely you will rapidly descend to non-oxygen altitudes and then your glide is really no better than an A36 at 12,000 with an engine failure. Is my thinking flawed?


I have a nice large O2 tank in my Aerostar, if I lost both engines at 30K MSL (max altitude) I have a few hours of O2 to glide down. :D
In the case of the PA46, I recall the on board O2 was about three times normal max glide time before you are below O2 requirements. Not an issue is the basic point.

Tim


Top

 Post subject: Re: Robb Report article on Piper Mirage
PostPosted: 31 May 2014, 14:52 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 11/06/10
Posts: 12183
Post Likes: +3068
Company: Looking
Location: Outside Boston, or some hotel somewhere
Aircraft: None
Username Protected wrote:
I sold my Baron for a late model Cirrus Turbo 2 years ago and have been very happy with my decision, not to mention my bank account. FIKI, however, is becoming increasingly important so I am now faced with the choice of a new Cirrus G-5 or a 2008 mirage for about the same price. Max is clearly a big consideration as a new plane will be maintenance free for 4 years (warranty). While the turbo cirrus can technically fly to 25K, realistically 18k is more sensible. I just don't think anyone has any business in the flight level with an unpressurized aircraft.

So it becomes a trade-off between the chute or pressurization. The high cost of maintenance, I believe, will be some what offset by the pounding I'll take on price depreciation of a new plane. Still struggling with this decision.


Depending on mission, a FIKI 2009 Cirrus G3 might do the job. Also save you about 300K on the purchase price. :D

Tim


Top

 Post subject: Re: Robb Report article on Piper Mirage
PostPosted: 31 May 2014, 14:54 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 09/13/12
Posts: 367
Post Likes: +61
Aircraft: Piper Mirage
The Mirage glides better than any plane I have ever flown. Even the most green pilot can plan on 2 miles per 1000 feet of altitude. A more proficient pilot can probably do better than that. I don't understand the animosity towards the Mirage on this site. One of the first posters made a joke about putting 6oz of gas in to accommodate 4 people. This is simply not true. I routinely make trips between KLOZ (London,KY) to KISM (Orlando,FL) with 4 people and luggage and within W & B limitations. We have not had any maintenance nightmares during a year and a half of ownership. I credit this to an intensive prebuy inspection at Malibu Aerospace. They found quite a few squawks on an airplane that had 400 hours and was maintained by a Piper Service Center. The windshield is $30k. That is just something you have to be prepared to deal with if you want FIKI and pressurization. The full fuel payload is not something that is a big deal in this airplane. I have filled the tanks full maybe 3 times in almost 400 hours. The airplane is not perfect. I do think that is a good value if you want pressurization and FIKI.

Jimmy Elza


Top

 Post subject: Re: Robb Report article on Piper Mirage
PostPosted: 31 May 2014, 14:57 
Offline



User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 09/01/10
Posts: 420
Post Likes: +54
Company: Tarheel Aero Tech
Location: Concord, NC (JQF)
Aircraft: 2003 Bonanza A36
I think you are correct Victor, flying above 18,000' without pressurization is not comfortable and most passengers do not want to wear a mask.

The Mirage is very comfortable and quiet for that matter all the way up to FL250. In fact, that is where you see the best TAS and that is why I bought the Mirage, also FIKI certified.

_________________
ATP, ASEL/ASES/AMEL, CFI, CFII, MEI, IGI, DPE(PE, CIRE, ATPE, FIE, FIEI)
Gold Seal Flight Instructor


Top

 Post subject: Re: Robb Report article on Piper Mirage
PostPosted: 31 May 2014, 15:01 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 06/14/09
Posts: 745
Post Likes: +9
Location: Chicago, IL (KGYY), GA, KVLD, FL, KOPF
Aircraft: Cirrus SR22 Turbo
Depending on mission, a FIKI 2009 Cirrus G3 might do the job. Also save you about 300K on the purchase price. :D

Tim[/quote]

I looked at the FIKI G3's Tim. I need full tanks and the G-3 has a fuel full payload enough for me and a tooth brush and that's with me lying about my weight. The extra 200 payload on the G5 is critical.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Robb Report article on Piper Mirage
PostPosted: 31 May 2014, 15:29 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 08/03/08
Posts: 16153
Post Likes: +8870
Location: 2W5
Aircraft: A36
Username Protected wrote:
Well, the question is do you like to spend your money on fuel and maintenance or on interest ?


Not sure I understand. The upfront purchase price between a 90s vintage Malibu Mirage and a late 70s/early 80s vintage 340 is pretty close. Upper 200s to mid 300s. :shrug:


Apples to apples, that is probably correct, but what is the fun in that ;)

Earlier there was mention of a G1000/GFC700 Mirage, and those are still considerably more of an outlay than even the most dolled up RAM7 C340A.

One interesting fact is that 2 TSIO520s on the 340 are not much more to overhaul than the one TIO540 on the Mirage. The twin-turbo Lycomings seem to have some parts that are whittled from solid blocks of rhodium by unionized swiss watchmakers.

Top

 Post subject: Re: Robb Report article on Piper Mirage
PostPosted: 31 May 2014, 15:41 
Offline



 Profile




Joined: 09/21/10
Posts: 1720
Post Likes: +193
Location: Greenville, NC (KPGV)
Aircraft: 1984 Bonanza B36TC
Username Protected wrote:
The twin-turbo Lycomings seem to have some parts that are whittled from solid blocks of rhodium by unionized swiss watchmakers.

:coffee: :coffee: :coffee:

_________________
Wade Naziri


Top

 Post subject: Re: Robb Report article on Piper Mirage
PostPosted: 31 May 2014, 22:25 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 06/23/09
Posts: 2320
Post Likes: +720
Location: KIKK......Kankakee, Illinois
Aircraft: TBM 850
For the acquisition costs of a newer Mirage I just found myself looking at SE turboprops. I liked the Meridian a lot. For the same cost a little bit older TBM made more sense.
At least that's what I've convinced myself.............time will tell?!?


Top

Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic  [ 45 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next



Plane AC

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  

Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us

BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner, Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.

BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates. Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.

Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2025

.jetacq-85x50.jpg.
.kingairnation-85x50.png.
.ssv-85x50-2023-12-17.jpg.
.stanmusikame-85x50.jpg.
.dbm.jpg.
.kadex-85x50.jpg.
.LogAirLower85x50.png.
.AAI.jpg.
.aerox_85x100.png.
.Latitude.jpg.
.daytona.jpg.
.headsetsetc_Small_85x50.jpg.
.blackhawk-85x100-2019-09-25.jpg.
.avfab-85x50-2018-12-04.png.
.boomerang-85x50-2023-12-17.png.
.tempest.jpg.
.KalAir_Black.jpg.
.midwest2.jpg.
.traceaviation-85x150.png.
.temple-85x100-2015-02-23.jpg.
.b-kool-85x50.png.
.saint-85x50.jpg.
.MountainAirframe.jpg.
.Aircraft Associates.85x50.png.
.mcfarlane-85x50.png.
.CiESVer2.jpg.
.pdi-85x50.jpg.
.holymicro-85x50.jpg.
.gallagher_85x50.jpg.
.shortnnumbers-85x100.png.
.bullardaviation-85x50-2.jpg.
.jandsaviation-85x50.jpg.
.ABS-85x100.jpg.
.BT Ad.png.
.ocraviation-85x50.png.
.airmart-85x150.png.
.Plane AC Tile.png.
.garmin-85x200-2021-11-22.jpg.
.AeroMach85x100.png.
.Wingman 85x50.png.
.KingAirMaint85_50.png.
.sierratrax-85x50.png.
.rnp.85x50.png.
.tat-85x100.png.
.performanceaero-85x50.jpg.
.blackwell-85x50.png.
.geebee-85x50.jpg.
.SCA.jpg.
.suttoncreativ85x50.jpg.
.wat-85x50.jpg.
.Wentworth_85x100.JPG.
.aviationdesigndouble.jpg.
.Elite-85x50.png.
.camguard.jpg.
.v2x.85x100.png.
.puremedical-85x200.jpg.
.sarasota.png.
.bpt-85x50-2019-07-27.jpg.
.planelogix-85x100-2015-04-15.jpg.
.8flight logo.jpeg.
.concorde.jpg.