23 May 2025, 16:47 [ UTC - 5; DST ]
|
Username Protected |
Message |
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Stearman anybody? Posted: 10 Feb 2014, 00:39 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 01/07/08 Posts: 196 Post Likes: +275 Location: KCRQ Carlsbad, KTOA Torrance
Aircraft: Baron E-55, Stearman
|
|
Doug,
You are obviously a very experienced warbirds pilot and I agree with your assessment and given my choice I would rather be on grass. I love flying off grass and have, but, there are no grass strips around where I fly.
It can happen and I would be unhappy and hopefully unhurt but would fix it and do it again. What choice does one have other than remain on the sidelines? I've done that and it is no fun at all. I do practice often and flying on one main wheel often for the sight picture as well as crosswind landings. True, there is not a lot of room for error. Just trying to get "better all the time" as the Beatles would say.
I would guess there are some aircraft you fly that have reputations and are considered much more risky than flying the Stearman on pavement. Do you fly Stearmans off pavement? Just curious as you seem to fly a large variety of aircraft and I doubt there are grass strips or good balanced field lengths etc always available in many situations.
Rick
Last edited on 10 Feb 2014, 02:29, edited 1 time in total.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Stearman anybody? Posted: 10 Feb 2014, 08:20 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 02/03/08 Posts: 960 Post Likes: +1509 Location: Fort Worth (50F)
Aircraft: F33C, PT-17, Husky
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Here are my words of warning about flying a stock Stearman on Pavement...
The Bottom wing of a Stearman is never more than a heartbeat away from being a canvas bag full of toothpicks.....
The Stearman is a glorious airplane, and a blast to fly... but nothing sends shivers down my spine like flying a stock Stearman on Pavement... Doug- Now you have surprised me.... didn't think that would happen. gunny
_________________ gunny https://www.flywire.online/
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Stearman anybody? Posted: 10 Feb 2014, 09:50 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 10/21/13 Posts: 53 Post Likes: +16
Aircraft: TBM7
|
|
[img]/Users/scottallen/Desktop/IMG_1211.JPG[/img]
I bought A Stearman about 3 years ago. A blast to fly and cheap to maintain. My annuals are under $1000. Very few problems. I fly from a paved runway, it takes some practice, but totally doable. Mine had just been completely restored. Scott
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Stearman anybody? Posted: 10 Feb 2014, 11:11 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 03/17/08 Posts: 6475 Post Likes: +14193 Location: KMCW
Aircraft: B55 PII,F-1,L-2,OTW,
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Doug,
You are obviously a very experienced warbirds pilot and I agree with your assessment and given my choice I would rather be on grass. I love flying off grass and have, but, there are no grass strips around where I fly.
It can happen and I would be unhappy and hopefully unhurt but would fix it and do it again. What choice does one have other than remain on the sidelines? I've done that and it is no fun at all. I do practice often and flying on one main wheel often for the sight picture as well as crosswind landings. True, there is not a lot of room for error. Just trying to get "better all the time" as the Beatles would say.
I would guess there are some aircraft you fly that have reputations and are considered much more risky than flying the Stearman on pavement. Do you fly Stearmans off pavement? Just curious as you seem to fly a large variety of aircraft and I doubt there are grass strips or good balanced field lengths etc always available in many situations.
Rick Rick, I used to fly a stock Stearman quite a bit, and on pavement, and I did not say I wouldn't do it, I absolutely would, but it is a pay attention operation... Mostly because the Stearman is so docile in every way and most landings are a breeze, but every once in a while, and without warning, it nibbles or bites... It is a wonderful airplane, but not an airplane to be disrespected... The CAF had two or 3 Stearman wing scrapes last season...
_________________ Tailwinds, Doug Rozendaal MCW Be Nice, Kind, I don't care, be something, just don't be a jerk ;-)
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Stearman anybody? Posted: 10 Feb 2014, 14:54 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 02/03/08 Posts: 960 Post Likes: +1509 Location: Fort Worth (50F)
Aircraft: F33C, PT-17, Husky
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Biplanes are a blast. Horsepower is your friend - the stock Stearmans and Wacos with the 220hp engines can be anemic. The 300hp Jake or Lycoming engines give a little more oomph. Not more speed, necessarily, (so much drag...) but certainly better takeoff performance and better tug for aerobatics, formation work etc.
Love my Waco...little to no maintenance (knock on wood) and pure fun. Ground handling is a little more forgiving than the narrow-track Stearmans. Cockpit a little more roomy. Only problem I've found with it is that I have small kids who I'm reluctant to take along for most flights. So it is primarily a fun toy for CK and the occasional buddy who rides along. CK- fly it out to 50F one of these days... we've got two Stearmans at the field... could be fun! Gotta be warmer though! gunny
_________________ gunny https://www.flywire.online/
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Stearman anybody? Posted: 10 Feb 2014, 15:45 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 01/07/08 Posts: 196 Post Likes: +275 Location: KCRQ Carlsbad, KTOA Torrance
Aircraft: Baron E-55, Stearman
|
|
Quote: It is a wonderful airplane, but not an airplane to be disrespected... The CAF had two or 3 Stearman wing scrapes last season... Doug
My hangar neighbor is 95 and instructed in Stearmans and other planes of the era. He always tells me "Don't think your last landing has anything to do with the next one." and "you don't have to land, you have a throttle." I have found both to be true. The Stearman serves to keep me humble. Rick
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Stearman anybody? Posted: 10 Feb 2014, 20:24 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 09/02/09 Posts: 8671 Post Likes: +9175 Company: OAA Location: Oklahoma City - PWA/Calistoga KSTS
Aircraft: UMF3, UBF 2, P180 II
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I LOVE biplanes.....had a Starduster Too for 10 years. Was always grinning whenever I flew it, but living in NY that's truth about only flying it about 4 months a year ( mine was open cockpit). Someday I sure as hell will get another biplane, but for now, flying my Deb is a dream that was worth giving up the biplane for. Gene, I've looked at a lot of photos of Starduster Too's but never seen one in the flesh. Tell us all about them! How is the ground handling? Can you see over the nose? How are the manners on take off? Does it have a steerable and lockable tail wheel typically? What about air handling? Roll rate, stability, stall behavior? The cockpits look small. How hard/easy are they to get into? How would you compare to a Stearman cockpit which are quite large?
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Stearman anybody? Posted: 11 Feb 2014, 00:06 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 09/08/13 Posts: 761 Post Likes: +181 Company: Gene's Mountain View Auto Location: 4B0 Upstate NY/ VRB Florida
Aircraft: 67 Debonair C33A
|
|
Gene,
I've looked at a lot of photos of Starduster Too's but never seen one in the flesh. Tell us all about them!
How is the ground handling? Can you see over the nose? How are the manners on take off? Does it have a steerable and lockable tail wheel typically? What about air handling? Roll rate, stability, stall behavior? The cockpits look small. How hard/easy are they to get into? How would you compare to a Stearman cockpit which are quite large?[/quote]
Hahaha! I'd be happy to..... mine had an IO470...260 hp so it was quite a beast in climb ( 3500fpm was easy) but you had to watch adding power on takeoff, though the large rudder could handle it if you were awake.Ground handling was honest, visibility over the nose sucked, you learned to always slip to landing in order to see anything.Tailwheel steered, locking not needed nor equipped. Roll rate with 4 ailerons was brisk, but not like a Pitts. Stability was neutral, it stayed wherever you "put" it, and stalls were hardly worth noting, unless you tried a STEEP departure stall....then you'd better have that harness tight!No bad habits, it BEGGED to be racked around the sky, but always felt like you were part of the plane.I've done almost everything except tailslides (too hard on the rudder if it gets away). Cockpits are very snug....I'm 5'11", 200lbs would have been tight if much taller, a Stearman is WAY roomier. Wide open she'd do 165mph, easy cruise at 140 @ 13 gph.I REALLY miss that airplane!!
Please login or Register for a free account via the link in the red bar above to download files.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Stearman anybody? Posted: 11 Feb 2014, 09:10 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 10/21/13 Posts: 53 Post Likes: +16
Aircraft: TBM7
|
|
Didn't see the file upload yesterday.
Please login or Register for a free account via the link in the red bar above to download files.
|
|
Top |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us
BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a
forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include
the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner,
Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.
BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates.
Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.
Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2025
|
|
|
|