banner
banner

27 Dec 2025, 09:33 [ UTC - 5; DST ]


Greenwich AeroGroup (banner)



Reply to topic  [ 17 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
Username Protected Message
 Post subject: Re: Aerostar vs C-421C
PostPosted: Today, 01:45 
Offline




User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 02/09/09
Posts: 6572
Post Likes: +3278
Company: RNP Aviation Services
Location: Owosso, MI (KRNP)
Aircraft: 1969 Bonanza V35A
Username Protected wrote:
I concur that pretty much all turbine parts are expensive but in 1700hrs (with 2 engines). I’ve only replaced compressor seals, a fuel pump due to seeps, two fuel shutoff valve for the same. I’ve never heard of an unscheduled hot section issue. I’m sure it’s occurred, but likely due to pilot caused over temp or lack of nozzle maintenance. The three MU2s I’ve owned required less maintenance than the pressurized piston twin I owned and were cheaper to operate per mile…and much faster with a larger cabin and more capable systems..


We had a surprise lightning strike on the 441 that I managed. At the teardown, the shop found a SB needed to be done and one should be done. That was $25k per engine that wasn't covered by the insurance. We also had a $6000 ignition box, a $5000 monopole sensor, and a $25k air cycle machine, all that were surprises.

You can tell us how much cheaper an entry level turbine airplane is than a high end piston airplane all you want, but the real fact is, the risk is much higher with the turbine airplane. Believe me, I'd love to be looking at similar purchase price MU-2's vs a 421C, but the financial risk is so much higher that I can't put my family in that situation. That's before you even look at higher insurance costs, higher training costs, higher landing fees, higher registration costs, higher hangar costs, etc. etc. etc....


Top

 Post subject: Re: Aerostar vs C-421C
PostPosted: Today, 02:02 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 11/19/15
Posts: 1747
Post Likes: +1661
Company: Centurion LV and Eleusis
Location: Draper UT KPVU-KVNY
Aircraft: N45AF 501sp Eagle II
Jason

You are not wrong.

For sure larger risk with higher end aircraft. You really need to compare what they were new.

Just because you can buy a $20mm jet for $3mm does not mean you are only maintaining a $3mm aircraft. You are paying to service a $20mm aircraft at today’s part prices with inflation

Not many $30k parts on a 421 but many of those on a jet.

That being said something like the 501sp with a large parts supply is an outlier. Still more risky than a 421.


The question is is that risk worth it to fly a safer faster aircraft and for me it was.

Mike


Top

Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic  [ 17 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2



PlaneAC

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  

Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us

BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner, Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.

BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates. Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.

Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2025

.kadex-85x50.jpg.
.8flight logo.jpeg.
.AAI.jpg.
.bpt-85x50-2019-07-27.jpg.
.Wingman 85x50.png.
.stanmusikame-85x50.jpg.
.midwest2.jpg.
.BT Ad.png.
.blackhawk-85x100-2019-09-25.jpg.
.suttoncreativ85x50.jpg.
.boomerang-85x50-2023-12-17.png.
.sierratrax-85x50.png.
.kingairnation-85x50.png.
.aerox_85x100.png.
.SCA.jpg.
.Plane AC Tile.png.
.performanceaero-85x50.jpg.
.MountainAirframe.jpg.
.mcfarlane-85x50.png.
.ABS-85x100.jpg.
.puremedical-85x200.jpg.
.camguard.jpg.
.Latitude.jpg.
.headsetsetc_Small_85x50.jpg.
.CiESVer2.jpg.
.Elite-85x50.png.
.rnp.85x50.png.
.daytona.jpg.
.planelogix-85x100-2015-04-15.jpg.
.dbm.jpg.
.Wentworth_85x100.JPG.
.KingAirMaint85_50.png.
.wat-85x50.jpg.
.LogAirLower85x50.png.
.aviationdesigndouble.jpg.
.garmin-85x200-2021-11-22.jpg.
.ocraviation-85x50.png.
.saint-85x50.jpg.
.tat-85x100.png.
.blackwell-85x50.png.
.pdi-85x50.jpg.
.v2x.85x100.png.
.jetacq-85x50.jpg.
.tempest.jpg.
.geebee-85x50.jpg.
.AeroMach85x100.png.
.gallagher_85x50.jpg.
.holymicro-85x50.jpg.
.airmart-85x150.png.
.concorde.jpg.
.jandsaviation-85x50.jpg.
.shortnnumbers-85x100.png.
.traceaviation-85x150.png.
.temple-85x100-2015-02-23.jpg.
.bullardaviation-85x50-2.jpg.
.b-kool-85x50.png.
.avnav.jpg.
.KalAir_Black.jpg.
.Aircraft Associates.85x50.png.
.sarasota.png.