03 May 2025, 16:29 [ UTC - 5; DST ]
|
Username Protected |
Message |
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Seneca II vs Seneca III Posted: 10 Sep 2023, 17:29 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 09/18/21 Posts: 367 Post Likes: +316
|
|
How do the Merlin wastegates work?
I understand wastegates and turbo systems in general. I'm wonder specifically how the merlyns are setup on the seneca. Is there a seperate wastegate controller, a link rod to the throttle, or ??? In other words what causes the wastegate to control boost, and how does the pilot affect that?
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Seneca II vs Seneca III Posted: 10 Sep 2023, 18:56 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 01/22/19 Posts: 1082 Post Likes: +844 Location: KPMP
Aircraft: PA23-250
|
|
Username Protected wrote: How do the Merlin wastegates work?
I understand wastegates and turbo systems in general. I'm wonder specifically how the merlyns are setup on the seneca. Is there a seperate wastegate controller, a link rod to the throttle, or ??? In other words what causes the wastegate to control boost, and how does the pilot affect that? https://www.merlynproducts.com/awholenewairplane.pdfYou should also get intercoolers to get the most life from the engines. To get the most performance from the plane, you'll want to use altitudes in the 11,000 to 18,000 foot range. Intercoolers will help the cylinders live longer. http://turboplus.com/
_________________ A&P/IA/CFI/avionics tech KPMP Cirrus aircraft expert
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Seneca II vs Seneca III Posted: 10 Sep 2023, 23:12 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 09/18/21 Posts: 367 Post Likes: +316
|
|
Username Protected wrote: The Merlyn system for Mooneys and Sennecas holds a constant pressure in the "upper deck" (i.e. upstream of the throttle) as long as the turbo can deliver that much pressure and the MAP is set directly by the throttle. Ahh, ok. So I assume if you ram the throttle all the way open at low altitude you can overboost it then, correct?
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Seneca II vs Seneca III Posted: 11 Sep 2023, 02:38 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 01/30/09 Posts: 3614 Post Likes: +2258 Location: $ilicon Vall€y
Aircraft: Columbia 400
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Ahh, ok. So I assume if you ram the throttle all the way open at low altitude you can overboost it then, correct?
Yes, you can in the Seneca II/III (and Arrows, Mooneis and many other aircraft with TSIO360, except for the TSIO360-RB engine, in the Seneca V which is very different and modern) There are over-boost valves on the engine that relieve the overboost so you don't damage the engine. Normal take off at sea level in the Seneca II/III is about 3/4 throttle, not wide open. You, Mr. Discount Seneca Pilot Guy, have to advance the throttles until take off power is reached, and stop advancing the throttle at that point. At higher altitudes, the throttles need to be opened more. But you read the MP gauge to set takeoff power. Like I said, you get used to operating them, ain't that big of a deal. The Merlyn is a simple device, and it improves efficiency, by reducing the amount of turbocharging when you operating at reduced MAP, and also can improve critical altitude.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Seneca II vs Seneca III Posted: 11 Sep 2023, 10:12 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 01/08/17 Posts: 425 Post Likes: +288
Aircraft: Aerostars, Debonair
|
|
Username Protected wrote: The Merlyn system for Mooneys and Sennecas holds a constant pressure in the "upper deck" (i.e. upstream of the throttle) as long as the turbo can deliver that much pressure and the MAP is set directly by the throttle. Ahh, ok. So I assume if you ram the throttle all the way open at low altitude you can overboost it then, correct?
If you are relying on overboost / pop-off valves and the controller you are doing it wrong.
I would recommend some high quality instruction on running a turbo-charged engine or it will potentially get very expensive.
You should always be slowly increasing throttle until you see the controller limit the top end in any case. The Lycoming servos typically have an enrichening feature at full throttle, so once you see the controller stop it at TO manifold pressure you slowly advance to the full throttle position.
You should never just go to the full throttle position casually in a turbo piston engine in any case. It is unwise and poor form to be slamming the throttle around in those engines in any case. Everything in the turbo-realm is done slowly while watching the MP gauges!
Kent
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Seneca II vs Seneca III Posted: 11 Sep 2023, 14:48 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 01/30/09 Posts: 3614 Post Likes: +2258 Location: $ilicon Vall€y
Aircraft: Columbia 400
|
|
Yeah, the autopilot in mine was a sore point for a long time. It was an Altimatic IIIC (Century 3). However, once I got it entirely working correctly, and added GNSS steering module, it was actually pretty good. Mine had all the options, with glideslope coupling.
It had the common problems in the IIIc series, namely all the "blue" connectors throughout the entire AP wiring harness, and a bunch of completely stupid hacks into the harness when avionics were changed over the history of the airplane. Thing is, none of those cuts and hacks into the AP harness were ever necessary. Once all those were replaced and the attitude gyro rebuilt twice, and all the servos overhauled, it was actually quite good.
When I sold and got the Columbia 400, the Garmin G1000/GFC700 are in a completely different class of autopilot.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Seneca II vs Seneca III Posted: 25 Sep 2023, 16:00 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 08/25/22 Posts: 33 Post Likes: +17 Company: Instacart Location: Park City, UT
Aircraft: PA-34-220T, M20J
|
|
Now you can get a GFC500 for your Seneca, if you want to spend the $$.
|
|
Top |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us
BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a
forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include
the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner,
Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.
BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates.
Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.
Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2025
|
|
|
|