11 May 2025, 08:19 [ UTC - 5; DST ]
|
Username Protected |
Message |
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Bull Moose Posted: 28 Jun 2019, 16:31 |
|
 |

|

|
 |
Joined: 07/21/08 Posts: 5710 Post Likes: +7037 Location: Decatur, TX (XA99)
Aircraft: 1979 Bonanza A36
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Please let me know the next time you find a brand new, zero time C185 or Beaver, and what it costs! I'll happily buy you a beer when we can sit down and discuss your C185 annual that cost less than $300! This is the heart of the matter. Experimental is incredibly cheap to build, maintain, and upgrade. The complete avionics package in my new plane, G3x, comm, transponder, autopilot, wiring harness, circuit breakers, and all accessories, was $18,000.00 I am a true believer in the experimental plane business.
_________________ I'm just here for the free snacks
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Bull Moose Posted: 28 Jun 2019, 18:22 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 06/09/09 Posts: 4438 Post Likes: +3303
Aircraft: C182P, Merlin IIIC
|
|
When I was just getting into aviation I wanted a moose and even flew out to the factory. Talked to some guys who had built them and everyone told me don’t do it.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Bull Moose Posted: 28 Jun 2019, 18:34 |
|
 |

|

|
 |
Joined: 07/21/08 Posts: 5710 Post Likes: +7037 Location: Decatur, TX (XA99)
Aircraft: 1979 Bonanza A36
|
|
Username Protected wrote: When I was just getting into aviation I wanted a moose and even flew out to the factory. Talked to some guys who had built them and everyone told me don’t do it. what was their reasoning for not liking them?
_________________ I'm just here for the free snacks
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Bull Moose Posted: 29 Jun 2019, 00:35 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 05/23/08 Posts: 6060 Post Likes: +709 Location: CMB7, Ottawa, Canada
Aircraft: TBM - C185 - T206
|
|
This year was 39 hrs@$35 Cnd. Or $1375 + oil & filter. I dont believe mx is any cheaper on an homebuilt if its done right and you hire out to get it done. Get a low time airframe and redo the rest wirh new parts. Mine as 3000 hrs, new engine, new panel, new paint & leather interior, new floats... At least I could sell it tomorrow if I wanted to. Username Protected wrote: I look at what these guys are spending to build these homebuilts and you can buy a good C185 for the price or a Beaver in some case. Please let me know the next time you find a brand new, zero time C185 or Beaver, and what it costs! I built my aircraft because there was no way I could afford to buy it. (Mmmm I love the smell of that brand new leather interior!) Now that it's flying, I know there's no way I could afford the maintenance on a certificated aircraft that offers similar performance. I'll happily buy you a beer when we can sit down and discuss your C185 annual that cost less than $300!
_________________ Former Baron 58 owner. Pistons engines are for tractors.
Marc Bourdon
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Bull Moose Posted: 29 Jun 2019, 02:16 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 11/22/12 Posts: 2817 Post Likes: +2773 Company: Retired Location: Lynnwood, WA (KPAE)
Aircraft: Lancair Evolution
|
|
Username Protected wrote: An acquaintance has an LS1-powered Sea Bee....His opinion was that a similarly-debilitating failure of the stock "certificated" engine would have taken considerably longer to repair at a cost likely closer to 5-10 times the cost of getting the Corvette engine swapped out. Sure, but the SeaBee's stock engine your comparing it to is a Franklin model unique to that plane, out of production over 65 years, from a company that's been dead over 45 years. Any alternative looks good against that option.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Bull Moose Posted: 29 Jun 2019, 07:12 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 06/09/09 Posts: 4438 Post Likes: +3303
Aircraft: C182P, Merlin IIIC
|
|
Username Protected wrote: When I was just getting into aviation I wanted a moose and even flew out to the factory. Talked to some guys who had built them and everyone told me don’t do it. what was their reasoning for not liking them?
Durability was one thing I recall. By the time your done it would take only a bit morenand you could have a known quantity factory built aircraft with resale value.
|
|
Top |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us
BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a
forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include
the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner,
Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.
BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates.
Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.
Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2025
|
|
|
|