15 May 2025, 09:44 [ UTC - 5; DST ]
|
Username Protected |
Message |
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Being on the Williams engine program paid off! Posted: 12 Jun 2018, 20:11 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 05/29/10 Posts: 3943 Post Likes: +1096 Company: Advanced Pilot Seminars Aust. Location: Brisbane Qld Australia
Aircraft: RV-10....ssshhh!
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I'm not familiar with engine programs. Is the $146/hour similar to an all-in replacement reserve so that your overhauls and inspections are covered? Yes. Pretty much it is thrust as a service. Keep paying Williams, and they will make sure you have thrust. There are no such programs for pistons, with good reason. Mike C.
Nicknamed as "Power by the Hour"
I am envious of your engine allowance AUD$400 before fuel!
_________________ David Brown
The two best investments you can make, by any financial test, an EMS and APS!
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Being on the Williams engine program paid off! Posted: 12 Jun 2018, 21:02 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 09/04/10 Posts: 3535 Post Likes: +3228
Aircraft: C55, PC-12
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I wondered why you hadn't been flying! Going out on a bike trip with Clements. I'll be in Ouray on Sunday.
Bill U. I’ll be up there this weekend too. Give me a shout!
_________________ John Lockhart Phoenix, AZ Ridgway, CO
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Being on the Williams engine program paid off! Posted: 12 Jun 2018, 21:16 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 09/04/10 Posts: 3535 Post Likes: +3228
Aircraft: C55, PC-12
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Hi John- I'm glad this little situation worked itself out as the piece that broke off and went through the motor wouldn't be considered "FOD" - as it is not foreign to the engine - it is native. Which means a hull and liability policy in all likelihood would have excluded coverages for this type of situation. It is truly a testimony to the value of these engine programs and I'm glad you posted about it!  So NOD?
_________________ John Lockhart Phoenix, AZ Ridgway, CO
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Being on the Williams engine program paid off! Posted: 13 Jun 2018, 08:58 |
|
 |

|
BeechTalk Vendor

|
 |
Joined: 01/26/09 Posts: 2979 Post Likes: +1065 Location: Tampa, FL (KVDF)
Aircraft: 1984 Bonanza A36TN
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Pretty much it is thrust as a service. Keep paying Williams, and they will make sure you have thrust.
There are no such programs for pistons, with good reason.
Mike C. Thanks for the explanation.
_________________ Friends don't let friends fly commercial.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Being on the Williams engine program paid off! Posted: 14 Jun 2018, 22:29 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 06/17/14 Posts: 5860 Post Likes: +2633 Location: KJYO
Aircraft: C-182, GA-7
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I thought turbine airplanes never broke?
Robert ...but this one has two engines!
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Being on the Williams engine program paid off! Posted: 14 Jun 2018, 22:42 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 10/28/11 Posts: 1359 Post Likes: +599
Aircraft: V35A, B300
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Hi John- I'm glad this little situation worked itself out as the piece that broke off and went through the motor wouldn't be considered "FOD" - as it is not foreign to the engine - it is native. Which means a hull and liability policy in all likelihood would have excluded coverages for this type of situation. It is truly a testimony to the value of these engine programs and I'm glad you posted about it!  So NOD? DOD. Domestic Object Damage. We had a temp probe let loose and take out blades on our otter. Insurance didn’t cover it. I argued that how do we know it didn’t suck something up hitting the probe causing it to break. Didn’t go anywhere.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Being on the Williams engine program paid off! Posted: 15 Jun 2018, 07:47 |
|
 |

|


|
 |
Joined: 06/25/08 Posts: 5753 Post Likes: +586 Company: Latitude Aviation Location: Los Angeles, CA (KTOA)
Aircraft: 2007 Bonanza G36
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Yes.
Pretty much it is thrust as a service. Keep paying Williams, and they will make sure you have thrust.
There are no such programs for pistons, with good reason.
Mike C. Mike, Have you seen or heard of PistonPower? It was started by the guy who created (and later sold) JSSI. Here is their website: http://www.pistonpower.com/ Here is another blurb on the company: http://www.pistonpower.com/twin-turbine-april-2-2018/Neal
_________________ Latitude Aviation Specializing in sales/acquisitions services for Bonanzas, Barons, and TBM's
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Being on the Williams engine program paid off! Posted: 15 Jun 2018, 09:38 |
|
 |

|


|
 |
Joined: 06/25/08 Posts: 5753 Post Likes: +586 Company: Latitude Aviation Location: Los Angeles, CA (KTOA)
Aircraft: 2007 Bonanza G36
|
|
Username Protected wrote: That's pretty cool Neil, how much does it cost? The program has 3 levels of service so the cost varies. I don't know the exact numbers off the top of my head but I remember them being very reasonable for the level of care and service you would receive. I highly recommend to anyone that is interested that they contact Ron Zilberbrand at rz@pistonpower.com and set up a phone call to go over the programs. He is very passionate about his company and what it can provide to piston operators. -Neal
_________________ Latitude Aviation Specializing in sales/acquisitions services for Bonanzas, Barons, and TBM's
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Being on the Williams engine program paid off! Posted: 15 Jun 2018, 10:07 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 03/09/11 Posts: 1764 Post Likes: +825 Company: Wings Insurance Location: Eden Prairie, MN / Scottsdale, AZ
Aircraft: 2016 Cirrus SR22 G5
|
|
Username Protected wrote: DOD. Domestic Object Damage. We had a temp probe let loose and take out blades on our otter. Insurance didn’t cover it. I argued that how do we know it didn’t suck something up hitting the probe causing it to break. Didn’t go anywhere. Many years ago I had a Citation Bravo client who's aircraft shed some rivets in the area of the nose cowl lip skin. The rivets of course were ingested and caused compressor blade damage. Unfortunately the rivets holes were the smoking gun as to the cause of the damage not being from a 'foreign' object. Unfortunately the claim was denied based on this. I can see however if you have a broken probe or vane that caused the downline damage being tough to prove. As it could have been broken due to actual FOD (a small stone for instance) - really tough one there!
_________________ Tom Hauge Wings Insurance National Sales Director E-mail: thauge@wingsinsurance.com
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Being on the Williams engine program paid off! Posted: 15 Jun 2018, 10:13 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 12/03/14 Posts: 20003 Post Likes: +25057 Company: Ciholas, Inc Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Have you seen or heard of PistonPower? Just started. Another company tried this about 10-15 years ago, though mostly focused on overall maintenance, not just the engine. They lasted less than 18 months. I predict the service with either charge too much and get few sales, or charge too little and lose money, and will not last more than 3 years in either case. If they go bye bye, then your paid in program equity goes bye bye, too. There is always something "wrong" with a piston engine. One cylinder a bit low, a small case crack, little oil leak past nose seal, spark plug lead chaffing, and so on. When the owner is paying, those items are fine to leave alone. When someone else is paying, then they all got to be fixed right now. So the economic dynamic changes in these programs. I would expect significant tension between owner and PistonPower over what needs to be done or not. Those sorts of arguments are far less in the turbine world. I am expecting they will be evasive about pricing so the only way to find out is to present an exemplar case, someone needs to go through the process to tell us the price. It wouldn't surprise me if they have you sign something to not disclose the price in order to get a quote. When/if we do get a pricing, it will expose just how much piston engines cost per hour, something that is relatively vague to most owners. I predict for their highest level of coverage, scheduled and unscheduled, for a GTSIO-520 on a 421C will be about $75/hour. That's $120,000 over a 1600 hour overhaul period. Mike C.
_________________ Email mikec (at) ciholas.com
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Being on the Williams engine program paid off! Posted: 15 Jun 2018, 11:00 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 01/07/15 Posts: 174 Post Likes: +136 Location: KPDK
|
|
Username Protected wrote: DOD. Domestic Object Damage. We had a temp probe let loose and take out blades on our otter. Insurance didn’t cover it. I argued that how do we know it didn’t suck something up hitting the probe causing it to break. Didn’t go anywhere. Many years ago I had a Citation Bravo client who's aircraft shed some rivets in the area of the nose cowl lip skin. The rivets of course were ingested and caused compressor blade damage. Unfortunately the rivets holes were the smoking gun as to the cause of the damage not being from a 'foreign' object. Unfortunately the claim was denied based on this. I can see however if you have a broken probe or vane that caused the downline damage being tough to prove. As it could have been broken due to actual FOD (a small stone for instance) - really tough one there!
I was under the impression that if something broke and then cause collateral damage, the collateral damage was covered. I recall an incident with an MU2 window breaking and damaging the prop and horizontal stabilizer. The window was not cover by insurance but the prop and tail feathers were covered.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Being on the Williams engine program paid off! Posted: 15 Jun 2018, 11:04 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 03/09/11 Posts: 1764 Post Likes: +825 Company: Wings Insurance Location: Eden Prairie, MN / Scottsdale, AZ
Aircraft: 2016 Cirrus SR22 G5
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I was under the impression that if something broke and then cause collateral damage, the collateral damage was covered. I recall an incident with an MU2 window breaking and damaging the prop and horizontal stabilizer. The window was not cover by insurance but the prop and tail feathers were covered.
I'm not aware of ANY aviation insurance hull and liability policies that cover 'mechanical breakdown' of components. That said if your piston engine quits due to a thrown rod and you deadstick into a field damaging the aircraft - the aircraft damage you incur due to the forced landing would be covered but your engine damage (failure) would not be. This is customary with any aviation insurance policy. I can't comment on a specific claim you may have experienced but the principal concept of mechanical failure I outlined is customary with all policies.
_________________ Tom Hauge Wings Insurance National Sales Director E-mail: thauge@wingsinsurance.com
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Being on the Williams engine program paid off! Posted: 15 Jun 2018, 11:35 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 12/29/10 Posts: 2745 Post Likes: +2577 Location: Dallas, TX (KADS & KJWY)
Aircraft: T28B,7GCBC,E90
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I can't comment on a specific claim you may have experienced but the principal concept of mechanical failure I outlined is customary with all policies. But if a rivet falls off of the engine cowling and then causes FOD damage, wouldn't the mechanical failure be the rivet falling out? So, insurance wouldn't cover replacing the rivet, but shouldn't it cover the ancillary damage to the engine? When my nose gear collapsed in my 421 on landing, it was clearly a mechanical failure of the rod end that was connected to the actuator - I ended up eating the cost of the actuator since it wasn't worth the fight to argue that it was the rod end not the actuator (and insurance was actually really good about paying the claim), but if I was dealing with a multi-hundred thousand dollar turbine repair then it would be something I'd fight pretty hard for insurance to pay. Robert
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Being on the Williams engine program paid off! Posted: 15 Jun 2018, 11:43 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 03/09/11 Posts: 1764 Post Likes: +825 Company: Wings Insurance Location: Eden Prairie, MN / Scottsdale, AZ
Aircraft: 2016 Cirrus SR22 G5
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I can't comment on a specific claim you may have experienced but the principal concept of mechanical failure I outlined is customary with all policies. But if a rivet falls off of the engine cowling and then causes FOD damage, wouldn't the mechanical failure be the rivet falling out? So, insurance wouldn't cover replacing the rivet, but shouldn't it cover the ancillary damage to the engine? When my nose gear collapsed in my 421 on landing, it was clearly a mechanical failure of the rod end that was connected to the actuator - I ended up eating the cost of the actuator since it wasn't worth the fight to argue that it was the rod end not the actuator (and insurance was actually really good about paying the claim), but if I was dealing with a multi-hundred thousand dollar turbine repair then it would be something I'd fight pretty hard for insurance to pay. Robert
I'll withhold any comments on your experience or your specific claim as I wasn't involved - however in the case I noted the part causing the engine damage was native to the airframe so respects an engine FOD definition as a covered loss - it was excluded. It was not a foreign object it was domestic object or native object. Turbine engines in an aviation policy will specifically DEFINE coverages as respects FOD.
_________________ Tom Hauge Wings Insurance National Sales Director E-mail: thauge@wingsinsurance.com
|
|
Top |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us
BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a
forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include
the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner,
Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.
BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates.
Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.
Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2025
|
|
|
|