banner
banner

21 Nov 2025, 14:26 [ UTC - 5; DST ]


Stevens Aerospace (Banner)



Reply to topic  [ 60 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Username Protected Message
 Post subject: Re: 180/185 vs 195
PostPosted: 05 Aug 2016, 17:42 
Offline



 Profile




Joined: 12/09/07
Posts: 3836
Post Likes: +1908
Location: Camarillo CA
Username Protected wrote:
I *can* tinker, but I prefer flying.

You still out fightin' fires? Looks like that is becoming a full-time, year-round job!


Top

 Post subject: Re: 180/185 vs 195
PostPosted: 05 Aug 2016, 18:01 
Offline


 WWW  Profile




Joined: 06/17/13
Posts: 3432
Post Likes: +1719
Location: Cabot Arkansas
And here I though I was the only one that was "bent". I found myself looking at old 35s and C195s when I realized my -35 may be totaled... I'm not quite 50, but I guess I have too may role models that have polluted my concept of what an airplane should be... the old stuff is just 'cool' for some reason.

Might see if you can find a polished C180. A local here has one and it has the ramp appeal and is dirt simple to maintain. Not the fastest bird, but fast enough ...


Top

 Post subject: Re: 180/185 vs 195
PostPosted: 05 Aug 2016, 18:20 
Offline



User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 10/05/11
Posts: 10265
Post Likes: +7333
Company: Hausch LLC, rep. Power/mation
Location: Milwaukee, WI (KMKE)
Aircraft: 1963 Debonair B33
195s are so classy... Also hard to believe they were produced at the same time as the Bo. When the Bo rolled up next to a 195, the Bo must have looked like a prop from a Buck Rogers movie.

I lusted after the 195, but decided a Bo was a smarter decision for me.

However, for true utility and back country use I would go for the 185.

After all, you have a T-6 for cool factor...

_________________
Be Nice


Top

 Post subject: Re: 180/185 vs 195
PostPosted: 05 Aug 2016, 18:30 
Offline



User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 07/13/09
Posts: 5053
Post Likes: +6637
Location: Nirvana
Aircraft: OPAs
Username Protected wrote:
I *can* tinker, but I prefer flying.

You still out fightin' fires? Looks like that is becoming a full-time, year-round job!



Yes sir.

Left home on June 15....will be done when the fires are done....


It is highly enjoyable. I’m still writing about it on my blog.


stan


(“when will you be back?”

-when fire season ends....

“when will fire season end?”

-sometime between Labor Day and Christmas....)
_________________
"Most of my money I spent on airplanes. The rest I just wasted....."
---the EFI, POF-----


Top

 Post subject: Re: 180/185 vs 195
PostPosted: 05 Aug 2016, 18:31 
Offline



User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 07/13/09
Posts: 5053
Post Likes: +6637
Location: Nirvana
Aircraft: OPAs
Username Protected wrote:
I think I stared at this one every day until it sold.

Very appealing. :drool:

http://www.beechtalk.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=43&t=88087&hilit=180



Yeah, that one was nice...

_________________
"Most of my money I spent on airplanes. The rest I just wasted....."
---the EFI, POF-----


Top

 Post subject: Re: 180/185 vs 195
PostPosted: 05 Aug 2016, 18:54 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 01/18/11
Posts: 7664
Post Likes: +3697
Location: Lakeland , Ga
Aircraft: H35, T-41B, Aircoupe
I had a 185 with STOL package, it nearly the climb angle of an elevator.
Downside it was noisy inside and out.
The 195 is easier in ground handling just because it is longer. They definitely are a lot more work. I think a lot more fun too.


Top

 Post subject: Re: 180/185 vs 195
PostPosted: 05 Aug 2016, 18:58 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 01/28/13
Posts: 6310
Post Likes: +4393
Location: Indiana
Aircraft: C195, D17S, M20TN
Stan,

195 requires some tinkering. If you buy a rebuilt one and fly it like the Bonanza it will probably not require much more handholding than a Bo. Most people only fly them 30 or less hours a year. Many that say they have rebuilt them are kidding themselves. They perhaps added paint and interior.

The one I bought was rebuilt basically from the ground up in 2007 by John Barron in Hannibal MO. There are 3-4 top shops that know the 195. Lot's of great knowledgeable owners like Aubie who will help a newbie find the right plane. I joined the http://www.cessna195.org group. Great info and good way to let owners know you are looking. The one I purchased was not listed.

195 can fly back country grass. Not a short field performer landing. Others with actual experience will tell you min 2000' in most instances. The 195 is cool, round and a tail dragger. What can you say more than that. Oh it sounds really good, no a P51 but what is...
:cheers:

_________________
Chuck
KEVV


Top

 Post subject: Re: 180/185 vs 195
PostPosted: 05 Aug 2016, 20:36 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 05/23/08
Posts: 6063
Post Likes: +715
Location: CMB7, Ottawa, Canada
Aircraft: TBM - C185 - T206
C185 is what you want. Its fast, light and will carry a good load.
I've owned mine for the last 18 years and over 2000 hrs on floats, wheels and skis.
It's a workhorse that wont let you down in any conditions.

_________________
Former Baron 58 owner.
Pistons engines are for tractors.

Marc Bourdon


Top

 Post subject: Re: 180/185 vs 195
PostPosted: 05 Aug 2016, 22:41 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 05/27/16
Posts: 899
Post Likes: +580
Location: KAPA - Denver
Aircraft: 1983 Bonanza A36TN
Username Protected wrote:
Stan - that 195 that Neal listed prompt any of this?

Man, that is one great looking plane!


It is that. I want it the same way I want a '57 Bel Air or a '59 'vette...


Top

 Post subject: Re: 180/185 vs 195
PostPosted: 05 Aug 2016, 22:50 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 11/08/12
Posts: 12835
Post Likes: +5276
Location: Jackson, MS (KHKS)
Aircraft: 1961 Cessna 172
What about a helio courier? Certified but extra cool factor.


Top

 Post subject: Re: 180/185 vs 195
PostPosted: 05 Aug 2016, 22:53 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 01/28/13
Posts: 6310
Post Likes: +4393
Location: Indiana
Aircraft: C195, D17S, M20TN
Marc's right but it's hard to pass by one of these.


Please login or Register for a free account via the link in the red bar above to download files.

_________________
Chuck
KEVV


Top

 Post subject: Re: 180/185 vs 195
PostPosted: 05 Aug 2016, 22:55 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 11/20/14
Posts: 6846
Post Likes: +5039
Aircraft: V35
If I were thinking about diminished reaction time / eyesight in later years and an airplane that would let me keep flying longer...that would be a nose wheel airplane that's easy to fly and land. Not a tail wheel. A Bonanza could be an adequate grass field plane, a good cross country plane, and an easy to land hamburger run airplane when your skills start to diminish.

But really... You're not that old yet, right :D


Top

 Post subject: Re: 180/185 vs 195
PostPosted: 06 Aug 2016, 13:03 
Offline



User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 07/13/09
Posts: 5053
Post Likes: +6637
Location: Nirvana
Aircraft: OPAs
As I told Walter back when we both had twin beeches....

"If rather have a case of clap than a nosegear Twin Beech.....at least you can cure the clap...."

_________________
"Most of my money I spent on airplanes. The rest I just wasted....."
---the EFI, POF-----


Top

 Post subject: Re: 180/185 vs 195
PostPosted: 06 Aug 2016, 13:10 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 05/23/08
Posts: 6063
Post Likes: +715
Location: CMB7, Ottawa, Canada
Aircraft: TBM - C185 - T206
Helio's are slow at 115-120 kts compared to 140-145 kts for the C185.



Username Protected wrote:
What about a helio courier? Certified but extra cool factor.

_________________
Former Baron 58 owner.
Pistons engines are for tractors.

Marc Bourdon


Top

 Post subject: Re: 180/185 vs 195
PostPosted: 07 Aug 2016, 15:43 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 12/07/12
Posts: 224
Post Likes: +114
Aircraft: Cessna 185
Stan, the 185 is a good old man's airplane. I'm probably biased since I just celebrated being the caretaker of my 185 for 40 years this past June. I just joined the United Flying Octogenarians this Spring when I turned eighty so that is why I say it's a great old man's airplane.

It's a very good all around aircraft, fairly docile in ground handling manners. A great load hauler and speed is not bad. Easy to maintain and work on, and a joy to fly. My 185 has never had a shop annual in the 40 years I've owned it. I've worked with just 3 I/A's in that time, all have been 185 owners, the last one for the past 30 years.

There are quite a few of us (older guy's) flying the 180/185 aircraft in the 180/185 type club. The 180 is a great aircraft also, I owned one back in the late sixties and early seventies, also flew skydivers in 180's in the late sixties. You get the best of both planes with the 185.

There is a fair amount of junk on the market in these aircraft. Damage history is OK if rebuilt buy a good shop, such as Beggles in Greeley,CO. There are also a few good one's that come on the market off and on. Beggles usually has at least 5-10 180/185 aircraft in their shop at all times for either upgrades or ground loops and the damage it does. You know what they say about GL's, there are those that have and those that will, same as the old gear up saying. Beggles has rebuilt a number of high time 185's from the ground up for different agency's, since you can't buy a new one, a ground up restoration is big $$$, still cheaper than a new 206.

There are also a lot of good mods to make these aircraft even better. Stan, if you need any help on a purchase Ill do what I can.
Ron


Top

Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic  [ 60 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next



PWI, Inc. (Banner)

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  

Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us

BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner, Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.

BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates. Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.

Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2025

.airmart-85x150.png.
.boomerang-85x50-2023-12-17.png.
.avnav.jpg.
.bpt-85x50-2019-07-27.jpg.
.KalAir_Black.jpg.
.v2x.85x100.png.
.ocraviation-85x50.png.
.planelogix-85x100-2015-04-15.jpg.
.midwest2.jpg.
.jandsaviation-85x50.jpg.
.MountainAirframe.jpg.
.b-kool-85x50.png.
.Wentworth_85x100.JPG.
.stanmusikame-85x50.jpg.
.sarasota.png.
.Wingman 85x50.png.
.CiESVer2.jpg.
.blackwell-85x50.png.
.garmin-85x200-2021-11-22.jpg.
.puremedical-85x200.jpg.
.LogAirLower85x50.png.
.sierratrax-85x50.png.
.pdi-85x50.jpg.
.kadex-85x50.jpg.
.bullardaviation-85x50-2.jpg.
.KingAirMaint85_50.png.
.geebee-85x50.jpg.
.mcfarlane-85x50.png.
.daytona.jpg.
.saint-85x50.jpg.
.ssv-85x50-2023-12-17.jpg.
.Latitude.jpg.
.aviationdesigndouble.jpg.
.AAI.jpg.
.dbm.jpg.
.headsetsetc_Small_85x50.jpg.
.performanceaero-85x50.jpg.
.Aircraft Associates.85x50.png.
.tempest.jpg.
.wat-85x50.jpg.
.AeroMach85x100.png.
.Plane AC Tile.png.
.Elite-85x50.png.
.temple-85x100-2015-02-23.jpg.
.concorde.jpg.
.traceaviation-85x150.png.
.8flight logo.jpeg.
.holymicro-85x50.jpg.
.SCA.jpg.
.camguard.jpg.
.gallagher_85x50.jpg.
.shortnnumbers-85x100.png.
.aerox_85x100.png.
.blackhawk-85x100-2019-09-25.jpg.
.BT Ad.png.
.tat-85x100.png.
.rnp.85x50.png.
.kingairnation-85x50.png.
.suttoncreativ85x50.jpg.
.ABS-85x100.jpg.
.jetacq-85x50.jpg.