11 Nov 2025, 19:05 [ UTC - 5; DST ]
|
| Username Protected |
Message |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cessna/columbia 400 and 350? Posted: 11 Aug 2016, 22:07 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 09/02/09 Posts: 8726 Post Likes: +9456 Company: OAA Location: Oklahoma City - PWA/Calistoga KSTS
Aircraft: UMF3, UBF 2, P180 II
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Cirrus would not exist if it came with a parachute... Each to his own I suppose. Personally I find the cabin of the Cirrus more comfortable as well as the ergonomics. If Cessna agreed with you they could engineer a chute solution. In the meantime the GAMA report is out and once again it appears that Cirrus has the market virtually to itself.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cessna/columbia 400 and 350? Posted: 13 Aug 2016, 01:45 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 07/13/11 Posts: 2755 Post Likes: +2187 Company: Aeronautical People Shuffler Location: Picayune, MS (KHSA)
Aircraft: KA350/E55/DA-62
|
|
Username Protected wrote: If Cessna agreed with you they could engineer a chute solution. When the hell has Cessna ever given us something we've asked for?
_________________ The sound of a second engine still running after the first engine fails is why I like having two.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cessna/columbia 400 and 350? Posted: 28 Apr 2023, 13:18 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 10/07/21 Posts: 23 Post Likes: +5
Aircraft: Bonanza F33A
|
|
Quote: When the hell has Cessna ever given us something we've asked for? A ominous comment for Pipistrel owners (Pipistrel was bought by Textron last year). Though, so far all they've done publicly is fire the US distributor (or maybe they quit... no one is talking to me) and appoint a couple of regional dealers in the US. No word what their future plans are for the productl lines.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cessna/columbia 400 and 350? Posted: 28 Apr 2023, 20:15 |
|
 |
|
|
|
Joined: 03/13/19 Posts: 1 Post Likes: +1
|
|
|
Not sure of how far your missions take you, but a Lancair IVP (similar size) is one heck of away to cross the country quickly and efficiently. Living in Colorado, it works great to haul my wife and I to any coast in 6.5 hrs maximum. 240 ktas, LOP (60% power), at 15 gph, 17000 ft, in pressurized comfort.
It’s a plane for a specific mission and pilot (not for everyone), but we are happy with it.
JRO
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cessna/columbia 400 and 350? Posted: 29 Apr 2023, 10:48 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 01/12/10 Posts: 576 Post Likes: +1071 Location: Dallas, Texas
Aircraft: Piaggio P180, T-6
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Cirrus would not exist if it came with a parachute... Each to his own I suppose. Personally I find the cabin of the Cirrus more comfortable as well as the ergonomics. If Cessna agreed with you they could engineer a chute solution. In the meantime the GAMA report is out and once again it appears that Cirrus has the market virtually to itself.
Yeah got to call you out on this one Tony lol. I have owned both... the TTx I had was MILES better in workmanship, durability, and speed than the Cirrus. Mercedes against Chevy.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cessna/columbia 400 and 350? Posted: 30 Apr 2023, 13:03 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 01/30/09 Posts: 3855 Post Likes: +2414 Location: $ilicon Vall€y
Aircraft: Columbia 400
|
|
|
Blast from the past!
Since I started this thread, in 2016, I bought the Columbia 400. I just returned from a CAART training event in Arlington, TX over the weekend.
The Columbia 400 has proven itself to be a very good traveling machine. Going east, I had a rip-roaring flight in the high-teens, with TAS just over 200kts running lean of peak at 64% power. The 30-35kt tailwinds really ate up the miles in no time. Nothing like only sipping the gas and seeing 235kts of ground speed.
Even coming back west in headwinds, the flexibility of flowing low where the winds weren't as bad is one of the advantages of piston power.
So far, I've been pretty happy with it. My biggest wish is that I had popped the $50k to upgrade it to WAAS when I bought it. Since then, the parts to upgrade my non-WAAS G1000 have gone out of production.
Maintenance has been more than I hoped for, but mostly related to the TSIO550 and keeping up with the time-limited items, like seat belt replacement, O2 tank hydrostatic testing, and the scheduled main battery replacements. But I've had no serious problems.
Fast, efficient and comfortable traveling machine for 2 and bags.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cessna/columbia 400 and 350? Posted: 30 Apr 2023, 20:53 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 11/08/12 Posts: 286 Post Likes: +137
Aircraft: Cessna 340A; C172
|
|
|
Larry,
Where does the windshield lawsuit stand? Is it still progressing or did Textron come up with a solution?
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cessna/columbia 400 and 350? Posted: 01 May 2023, 11:13 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 08/24/13 Posts: 10165 Post Likes: +4845 Company: Aviation Tools / CCX Location: KSMQ New Jersey
Aircraft: TBM700C2
|
|
Username Protected wrote: At some point they will probably certify the g500txi (or maybe its successor) as a replacement for the avidyne and g1000 units like they have in the cirrus. The lower number of airframes will delay it versus the cirrus, but eventually someone will push it through. The G500TXi STC doesn't support replacing any G1000 systems. Not that an STC couldn't be developed but G1000 is a lot more integrated than the Avidyne systems. Things like annunciators, trim indications, etc are typically integrated in the G1000 but not available in the G500TXi
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cessna/columbia 400 and 350? Posted: 01 May 2023, 13:10 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 05/13/15 Posts: 170 Post Likes: +48 Location: Rancho Cucamonga, California
Aircraft: Cessna 182R
|
|
Username Protected wrote: At some point they will probably certify the g500txi (or maybe its successor) as a replacement for the avidyne and g1000 units like they have in the cirrus. The lower number of airframes will delay it versus the cirrus, but eventually someone will push it through. For what its worth the Columbia/Cessna 300, 350, and 400 are on the G500TXi AML. I am assuming its for pre-G1000 aircraft. But I haven't seen anyone do the conversion yet.....but my exposure to those models are limited.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cessna/columbia 400 and 350? Posted: 01 May 2023, 13:24 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 05/13/15 Posts: 170 Post Likes: +48 Location: Rancho Cucamonga, California
Aircraft: Cessna 182R
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Blast from the past!
Since I started this thread, in 2016, I bought the Columbia 400. I just returned from a CAART training event in Arlington, TX over the weekend.
The Columbia 400 has proven itself to be a very good traveling machine. Going east, I had a rip-roaring flight in the high-teens, with TAS just over 200kts running lean of peak at 64% power. The 30-35kt tailwinds really ate up the miles in no time. Nothing like only sipping the gas and seeing 235kts of ground speed.
Even coming back west in headwinds, the flexibility of flowing low where the winds weren't as bad is one of the advantages of piston power.
So far, I've been pretty happy with it. My biggest wish is that I had popped the $50k to upgrade it to WAAS when I bought it. Since then, the parts to upgrade my non-WAAS G1000 have gone out of production.
Maintenance has been more than I hoped for, but mostly related to the TSIO550 and keeping up with the time-limited items, like seat belt replacement, O2 tank hydrostatic testing, and the scheduled main battery replacements. But I've had no serious problems.
Fast, efficient and comfortable traveling machine for 2 and bags. Thanks for the update Larry! I co-own a 182, and we are seriously thinking about upgrading to a 400. I heard you can still do the WAAS upgrade (which is a Textron service bulletin I've been told), but you just have to find used Garmin GIA-63W's which are about $10,000 to $15,000 a piece. Perhaps there is more to it as I don't have a copy of the SB. If you don't mind me asking, what is the empty weight and CG of your plane?
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cessna/columbia 400 and 350? Posted: 01 May 2023, 13:29 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 12/18/12 Posts: 829 Post Likes: +421 Location: Europe
Aircraft: Aerostar 600A
|
|
Username Protected wrote: My biggest wish is that I had popped the $50k to upgrade it to WAAS when I bought it. Since then, the parts to upgrade my non-WAAS G1000 have gone out of production. I have sold 2 pairs of "salvaged" GIA63Ws in the last 24 months for less than half that, so all is not lost !
_________________ A&P/IA P35 Aerostar 600A
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cessna/columbia 400 and 350? Posted: 01 May 2023, 17:15 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 07/29/16 Posts: 1687 Post Likes: +942 Location: KMKE, WI, USA
Aircraft: Columbia 350
|
|
Username Protected wrote: At some point they will probably certify the g500txi (or maybe its successor) as a replacement for the avidyne and g1000 units like they have in the cirrus. The lower number of airframes will delay it versus the cirrus, but eventually someone will push it through. For what its worth the Columbia/Cessna 300, 350, and 400 are on the G500TXi AML. I am assuming its for pre-G1000 aircraft. But I haven't seen anyone do the conversion yet.....but my exposure to those models are limited. There are a couple of threads over on CAAC posting pics of Avidyne 350 and 400s with G500 upgrades. You'll need an account though. http://www.cessnaadvancedaircraftclub.c ... tall.9750/ http://www.cessnaadvancedaircraftclub.c ... min.10179/
|
|
| Top |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us
BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a
forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include
the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner,
Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.
BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates.
Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.
Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2025
|
|
|
|