28 Nov 2025, 17:45 [ UTC - 5; DST ]
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: DA42 interception by military aircraft Posted: 08 Jul 2016, 19:04 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 01/21/14 Posts: 5689 Post Likes: +4435 Company: FAA Flight Check Location: Oklahoma City, OK (KOKC)
Aircraft: King Air 300F/360ER
|
|
It is no trouble shadowing anyone flying slow either. There is always the vertical (or some part thereof) for use too. We escort helos too. 
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: DA42 interception by military aircraft Posted: 22 Jul 2016, 03:27 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 12/24/15 Posts: 15 Post Likes: +15 Company: easyflying Location: llhz
Aircraft: diamond da 62
|
|
Hello, no they didn't try to contact me they just observed very closly actually since it is my first time with such an experience it was pretty scary at the beginning and i tought how to speed up rather than slowing down.... 
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: DA42 interception by military aircraft Posted: 22 Jul 2016, 16:27 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 05/11/10 Posts: 9429 Post Likes: +13521 Company: ? Most always. I like people. Location: KFIN Flagler, FL
Aircraft: 1991 Bonanza A36
|
|
Username Protected wrote: pretty cool video. not sure i'd ever fly within 5 miles of a carrier though- nerves are a bit raw these days overseas... Just flew within five miles of a carrier this morning. Should have taken a picture. Actually my wife did but it was of the inside of the plane.
_________________ Bible In Poems BibleInPoems.com BNice
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: DA42 interception by military aircraft Posted: 24 Jul 2016, 10:41 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 01/31/12 Posts: 3027 Post Likes: +5452 Company: French major Location: France
Aircraft: Ejet
|
|
Username Protected wrote: pretty cool video. not sure i'd ever fly within 5 miles of a carrier though- nerves are a bit raw these days overseas... This has been bugging me since the beginning of this thread so after researching a lot, let me ask about this. But just before, this post will most likely piss off some people. It's meant to be thought provoking, and to find the laws and regulations I've forgotten, since I'm in the process of writing another OM for a company. And after what happened last week in Turkey (where we operated for 6 months last year), I'm trying to cover a lot of grey areas in the OM. The CAA only sends me back to ICAO... So here we go. First off, overflying a foreign carrier, or any military vessel, in the international waters. In the SERA (Standardised European Rules of Air), which governs the ops of any european registered airplane, no distinction is made between civilian and military vessels. So at this point the only requirement is 500ft from the vessel, within the european airspace, or outside any FIR. I've also looked through my military doc which is in France calld CAM, for Circulation Aérienne Militaire. (for those interested: https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/affichTe ... 0020830648) They get into Montego Bay (kind of expected). First the distinction between territorial and high seas-> 12NM. And it defines a volume around aircraft-carrying vessels, in two situations: -within the limits of the french airspace, in which case it's a P, D, or R zone which gets notam and activation, and there is a volume around it which is defined depending on the size of the boat -within high seas, it is only recommended to follow such volumes, with a note mentioning avoiding less than 2Nm and 500ft in the case of foreign vessels, unless the mission warrants it. But again, this only applies to military planes, for civilians, SERA, 500ft. Strangely, per maritime law, the distance is higher depending on the flag the ship is displaying (type of ops). And it varies per state, I seem to recall 500yds in the US, for us ColReg 72 applies all the time. Second part, in relation to Montego Bay. On a boat, in high seas, a foreign coast-guard or military boat can intercept/board you IF they have approval from the state of your flag or if you present immediate danger (I'm simplifying). ICAO issued doc 9433 with regards to interception protocols, and it details the conditions of such operations towards a civilian airplane: http://www.wing.com.ua/images/stories/l ... d/9433.pdfWithin a national airspace (including FIR apparently, so that's pretty big), one can be intercepted by the national state. There is a little leeway given to each contracting state, in that it also covers airplane about to enter the airspace. And of course there is still the possibility to intercept an airplane that presents a danger to other planes (1.2.2 c). I would also expect to be intercepted and have to follow the indications of any state plane from the state of registration of my airplane, outside of that state airplane. That is to say, if I'm flying an F-reg plane in the uncontrolled airspace over the Mediterranean Sea, outside of the FIR, and get intercepted by a 406 from the customs or a pair of French Navy Rafale, sure. But if I'm intercepted by a foreign jetfighter in that airspace, unless per Montego Bay they have approval from the state of registration, or I constitute a hazard to other aircraft, I don't see the legal justification for it. And I'm wondering to what extent I need to comply, because I haven't found anything forcing me to do so (besides the whole "it's got weapons"). So I am certain I am missing some regulations, and I'd love to find out, because after asking my former navy friends, and the caa, besides the uneasiness, we haven't got many solid laws to follow at this point.
_________________ Singham!
Last edited on 24 Jul 2016, 10:47, edited 2 times in total.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: DA42 interception by military aircraft Posted: 24 Jul 2016, 11:39 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 08/01/11 Posts: 6924 Post Likes: +6194 Location: In between the opioid and marijuana epidemics
Aircraft: 182, A36TC
|
|
|
Fabien,
Cool video.
Looks like you are in the right.
May not matter. Think about being a naval captain in charge of that ship. Unless I was in radio communication I would give them some more space.
There are still Americans alive who sacrificed greatly to free the med. Plan on there presence for years to come.
_________________ Fly High,
Ryan Holt CFI
"Paranoia and PTSD are requirements not diseases"
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: DA42 interception by military aircraft Posted: 24 Jul 2016, 11:56 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 01/31/12 Posts: 3027 Post Likes: +5452 Company: French major Location: France
Aircraft: Ejet
|
|
Username Protected wrote: May not matter. Think about being a naval captain in charge of that ship. Unless I was in radio communication I would give them some more space.
There are still Americans alive who sacrificed greatly to free the med. Plan on there presence for years to come. I'm certainly not advocating for reckless behaviour, and I have respect for the service of any armed forces. I've been on those vessels during some ops and I can understand some of the challenges the captain faces. I'm just trying to find out the legality of it in a situation where any armed force seems to have no jurisdiction. I agree with the overfly of any boat, I've always tried to give as much as possible, but sometimes my job can require that I fly to specific waypoints at specific altitudes, so I'm hoping that I'm missing something besides the 500ft. As to the interception, let's say tomorrow I get to fly over the Med. again. I get intercepted by an airplane outside of any FIR and it requests I follow him. It's turkish and there's been a coup. It's israeli and they want to do the same trick they did with the french-flagged boat a few years ago. It's an F-16 and I have no way of finding out whether it's greek, american, turkish, israeli or egyptian...It's not about the americans in the Med., which they are free to navigate as much as I am (no more, no less), just the actual law in those waters/airspaces.
_________________ Singham!
Last edited on 24 Jul 2016, 13:03, edited 1 time in total.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: DA42 interception by military aircraft Posted: 24 Jul 2016, 12:43 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 03/24/08 Posts: 2893 Post Likes: +1146
Aircraft: Cessna 182M
|
|
Username Protected wrote: May not matter. Think about being a naval captain in charge of that ship. Unless I was in radio communication I would give them some more space.
There are still Americans alive who sacrificed greatly to free the med. Plan on there presence for years to come. I'm certainly not advocating for reckless behaviour, and I have respect for the service of any armed forces. I've been on those vessels during some ops and I can understand some of the challenges the captain faces. I'm just trying to find out the legality of it in a situation where any armed force seems to have no jurisdiction. I agree with the overfly of any boat, I've always tried to give as much as possible, but sometimes my job can require that I fly to specific waypoints at specific altitudes, so I'm hoping that I'm missing something besides the 500ft. As to the interception, let's say tomorrow I get to fly over the Med. again. I get intercepted by an airplane outside of any FIR and it requests I follow him. It's turkish and there's been a coup. It's israeli and they want to do the same trick they did with the french-flagged boat a few years ago. It's an F-16 and I have no way of finding out whether it's greek, american, turkish, israeli or egyptian...It's not about the americans, which they are free to navigate as much as I am (no more, no less), just the actual law in those waters/airspaces.
Fabien
I do see some difference between flying near a ship, particularly a carrier, and a plain vanilla open water intercept.
As to the first, I would view a carrier as I would any other airport - it just happens to be mobile and has guns. I suspect that somewhere there exists some document that outlines the control of airspace around a mobile airport - and thus I would not overfly unless I am sure I am not in their controlled airspace.
As to a plan vanilla intercept - if I am flying anywhere near an ADIZ I darn sure will have read the rules of that ADIZ - may well be that the country issuing the ADIZ has some authority to id you. No where near an ADIZ and intercepted and directed to follow - 121.5 and politely, no, unsafe - fuel restrictions whatever you care to say - I would avoid booty call as an excuse. Persisted, I would set my transponder appropriately and if really aggressive I might trigger my 406 ELT ....
RAS
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: DA42 interception by military aircraft Posted: 24 Jul 2016, 13:01 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 01/31/12 Posts: 3027 Post Likes: +5452 Company: French major Location: France
Aircraft: Ejet
|
|
Thanks Richard, that's what I'm looking for if that's an ADIZ, no problem, although in some places it can get interesting. For instance they can overlap. I've had that scenario last year in Finland with Russia, or in Poland with Belarus (though it seems this year when we flew it, they were less problems in Poland). I like your approach, and I would most likely react the same way, obey to a certain extent, let them id the plane if they don't behave like cowboys, but I'm still in charge and not going to follow. Obviously broadcast it on 121 and elt if need be, also get in touch with one of the air france flights around or something, if I'm really not liking the orders. It just bothers me very much that this seems to be a grey area in aviation whereas it's not for boats for instance, and I would like to find a good protocol for my om, or at least my SOP. Even more I would like to find the regs! Booty call I need to use one of these days, it's hilarious. I've already read back information Unicorn instead of uniform, next time ATC will send a fighter for fear I'm in the middle of a hypoxia
_________________ Singham!
|
|
| Top |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us
BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a
forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include
the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner,
Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.
BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates.
Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.
Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2025
|
|
|
|