29 Oct 2025, 16:41 [ UTC - 5; DST ]
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Rode in a Malibu today Posted: 22 Mar 2016, 10:41 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 02/22/10 Posts: 988 Post Likes: +1548 Location: Milwaukee WI
Aircraft: Ex J35, Onex
|
|
Username Protected wrote: When the Bonanza was designed in 1945, people were still wearing hats when travelling. The average height has grown since, but no more hats now. A major car purchase criterion for my father was headroom while wearing his hat. He was 6'2" and needed additional room for his fedora.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Rode in a Malibu today Posted: 22 Mar 2016, 14:09 |
|
 |

|


|
 |
Joined: 02/09/09 Posts: 6507 Post Likes: +3220 Company: RNP Aviation Services Location: Owosso, MI (KRNP)
Aircraft: 1969 Bonanza V35A
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Ditto on the MU2, at least for me. Love the plane; hate the pilot seating. Got more room in a 35. The Merlin is a very roomy cabin class aircraft with a 7 psi pressure diff. 6'2" and comfortable. Texas built.
Now you're just making me jealous! We had one Metro III that had the right bulkhead removed. They were already comfortable, but what a world of difference it made.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Rode in a Malibu today Posted: 22 Mar 2016, 14:32 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 11/21/09 Posts: 12451 Post Likes: +17062 Location: Albany, TX
Aircraft: Prior SR22T,V35B,182
|
|
Username Protected wrote: What would be an example of a luxuriously roomy plane? A Navion maybe? Comanche? I'm VERY happy with the room in the SR. Well, at least with the 4 seat places. I miss my big baggage door in the 35. And I wouldn't make a peep if Tyler were near by in his TwinBo. But there's no shoulder rubbing. Attachment: photo 3 (1).JPG
Please login or Register for a free account via the link in the red bar above to download files.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Rode in a Malibu today Posted: 22 Mar 2016, 14:43 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 12/09/10 Posts: 3634 Post Likes: +865 Location: KPAN
Aircraft: PA12
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I find the bonanza very roomy, even with two adult males.
What would be an example of a luxuriously roomy plane? A Navion maybe? Comanche? 400 series twin Cessna has a luxuriously comfortable cockpit. But they come with the cost of doing business which is quiet a bit higher than a Malibu.
_________________ 520 M35, 7ECA, CL65, CE550, E170/190, B737 5/19 737 5/18 E170/190 8/17 CL65 3/17 CE500
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Rode in a Malibu today Posted: 22 Mar 2016, 19:01 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 05/13/11 Posts: 127 Post Likes: +52
Aircraft: None
|
|
|
I second the Cirrus, most comfortable plane I've been in up front. Piper Lance was great as well, though almost tight on headroom. C182 pretty good. The headroom in the Baron / Bonanza is ok for me, shoulder room tight. 6'2" 195lbs, with a long torso and short legs.
767 simulator at the Delta HQ wasn't too bad either, and I hear baggage room's more than adequate (though the simulator itself isn't good for traveling unless you have a Peterbilt)
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Rode in a Malibu today Posted: 22 Mar 2016, 23:12 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 02/10/12 Posts: 6710 Post Likes: +8233 Company: Minister of Pith Location: Florida
Aircraft: Piper PA28/140
|
|
Username Protected wrote: What would be an example of a luxuriously roomy plane? A Navion maybe? Comanche? I'm VERY happy with the room in the SR. Well, at least with the 4 seat places. I miss my big baggage door in the 35. And I wouldn't make a peep if Tyler were near by in his TwinBo. But there's no shoulder rubbing. Attachment: photo 3 (1).JPG
Nate, what's your useful load? Those accoutrements are gorgeous but look heavy.
_________________ "No comment until the time limit is up."
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Rode in a Malibu today Posted: 23 Mar 2016, 00:33 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 12/03/14 Posts: 20716 Post Likes: +26146 Company: Ciholas, Inc Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Those accoutrements are gorgeous but look heavy. Not to worry, with a black interior in Texas, you will sweat off the pounds before takeoff. Mike C.
_________________ Email mikec (at) ciholas.com
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Rode in a Malibu today Posted: 23 Mar 2016, 02:54 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 12/21/08 Posts: 938 Post Likes: +574 Location: Townsville (YBTL), Australia
|
|
Quote: 400 series twin Cessna has a luxuriously comfortable cockpit. +1 
_________________ Lee Fitzpatrick (aka Forkie!)
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Rode in a Malibu today Posted: 23 Mar 2016, 03:18 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 02/14/08 Posts: 3133 Post Likes: +2674 Location: KGBR
Aircraft: D50
|
|
|
It doesn't get more comfortable than my bench seat tbone. The copilot rudder pedals are in the middle so I fly with my right foot on the right rudder pedal. My right arm draped on the back of the bench and around my wife. I'm 6'5" 210. Cruising.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Rode in a Malibu today Posted: 23 Mar 2016, 09:30 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 11/21/09 Posts: 12451 Post Likes: +17062 Location: Albany, TX
Aircraft: Prior SR22T,V35B,182
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Nate, what's your useful load? Those accoutrements are gorgeous but look heavy.
That is the trade off. UL is just under 900. In the Bo, I topped off after every flight. In the SR, I wait until I know what my mission is. At tabs (60 gallons), I can take me plus 375 lbs of guests and luggage for 3 hours. That easily gets me to Houston, which is most most popular destination. It fits 95% of my mission. I'd still like to have the extra 200 lbs of UL the newer G5's have, but not the cost. And the black interior isn't an issue even in TX. I do spread a sheet over the seats when it's really hit, but the a/c works INCREDIBLY well.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Rode in a Malibu today Posted: 23 Mar 2016, 13:06 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 05/23/08 Posts: 6061 Post Likes: +713 Location: CMB7, Ottawa, Canada
Aircraft: TBM - C185 - T206
|
|
|
I believe the 2004 Mirage model on as more leg rooms as the seats backs are extended. Im 6'2 and it was a tight fit, not comfortable on long flights.
The TBM as lots of leg room espercially when you remove the cabinet behind the seats and move the seats 1-2 holes back like mine is. I cant touch the rudder pedals when its all the way back.
_________________ Former Baron 58 owner. Pistons engines are for tractors.
Marc Bourdon
|
|
| Top |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us
BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a
forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include
the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner,
Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.
BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates.
Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.
Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2025
|
|
|
|