05 Dec 2025, 10:54 [ UTC - 5; DST ]
|
| Username Protected |
Message |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Closed on another Twin Cessna yesterday Posted: 11 Apr 2015, 23:31 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 03/04/13 Posts: 2795 Post Likes: +1413 Location: Little Rock, Ar
Aircraft: A36 C560 C551 C560XL
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Speaking of improvements to the CJ, I've been talking with the Cessna folks about this mod which will be offered exclusively through Cessna hopefully next year. It is currently undergoing EASA certification and the FAA process will follow afterwords (they say it is faster this way as the Europeans make you redo all testing while the FAA is more pragmatic and allows for EASA test results). http://jetav.com/tamarack-winglet-equip ... ce-record/These winglets supposedly reduce time to climb and fuel burn which translates into longer range. The airplane used for Certs and testing is/was sn 12. I owned that one before sn 1. It is leased to them for the purpose of development of the winglets. Congratulations on your purchase. As soon as you get comfortable in the airplane, you will be amazed as to how much the stress is reduced. I love these airplanes. Robert
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Closed on another Twin Cessna (CJ) yesterday Posted: 13 Apr 2015, 10:33 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 01/08/11 Posts: 919 Post Likes: +1279 Location: California
Aircraft: C182 B350
|
|
Quote: Get your RVSM authorization in process so you can get high Great advice...you don't want to be /G needlessly for 2 months or more. And, congratulations!
_________________ NOT FOR NAVIGATIONAL USE
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Closed on another Twin Cessna (CJ) yesterday Posted: 13 Apr 2015, 13:35 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 07/11/11 Posts: 2425 Post Likes: +2813 Location: Woodlands TX
Aircraft: C525 D1K Waco PT17
|
|
Thanks for all the kind words. Username Protected wrote: G1000 upgrade? I didn't know you could do this Here are a few links of interest: https://buy.garmin.com/en-US/US/in-the- ... 67985.htmlhttp://jetav.com/making-the-citationjet ... john-hall/http://cessna.txtav.com/en/citation-ser ... s-upgradesInteresting business strategy as it brings the CJ somewhat on par with the M2 for less money - but it gives a cut of the used CJ market to Cessna and Garmin, which is one of the best selling light jets in its class. By the way, the CJ, CJ1 and CJ1+, and to a certain extent the M2, are all basically the same airframe with the same engines (FJ44-1). During the evolution of the CJ line up, Cessna switched avionics from a Honeywell flight deck in the CJ to a partially integrated Proline in the CJ1 to a full Fadec Proline in the CJ1+. The Proline is heavy with all those CRT screens and clunky boxes - state of the art 15 years ago, but not that hot by today's standards. The weight increase ate up on the useful load, so on the CJ1, Cessna added a 200 lb gross weight increase on paper (what they gave up in UL due to the Proline) and on the CJ1+ added 200 extra pounds of thrust to the engines. However the range and performance is very similar on all 3 variants. The M2 sports a Garmin 3000 (basically a G1000 with touchscreen keypads = less weight/newer technology) + winglets, so it performs better (more range & better climb rate). A straight CJ with the G1000 will see 120 lbs of weight savings. The upgrade on a CJ1, would provide double that - and it all goes straight to the UL.
Last edited on 13 Apr 2015, 16:53, edited 2 times in total.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Closed on another Twin Cessna (CJ) yesterday Posted: 13 Apr 2015, 15:26 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 01/31/09 Posts: 5193 Post Likes: +3038 Location: Northern NJ
Aircraft: SR22;CJ2+;C510
|
|
Username Protected wrote: G1000 upgrade? I didn't know you could do this Cessna will put a G1000 into a CJ or a G3000 into a CJ2+.
_________________ Allen
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Closed on another Twin Cessna (CJ) yesterday Posted: 13 Apr 2015, 15:30 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 07/11/11 Posts: 2425 Post Likes: +2813 Location: Woodlands TX
Aircraft: C525 D1K Waco PT17
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Alex, did you look at putting in an FMS upgrade into the Honeywell suite, such as the Universal FMS like the UNS-1xw?
I know that would not help shed any weight, but did you look at the capabilities it would give you and was it an available and attractive option? I did and quickly came to the realization that the upgrade didn't buy much other than possibly complying with the 2020 mandate and giving WAAS capability, for a 100+ K price tag (didn't do much negotiating). In addition to the weight savings, here's what the standard G1000 buys: - GFC700 autopilot - GWX68 radar - ADSB in/out & WAAS - Substantially enhanced situational awareness - Dual FMS/AHARS - TAWS-B - Synthetic vision - XM standard - Improved reliability - this is a big one - 80% of the non-scheduled mx events I found on the logbooks were avionics related on this airplane. The new Garmin stuff just works and the MTBF is light years better. As an avionics shop told me - have you ever priced out a replacement CRT display from the legacy flight deck? You will be shocked. The only con is the price tag, but the benefits will pay for themselves over time. Traditional wisdom indicates you will be extremely lucky if you recoup 50-60% of these types of upgrades on resale, but the reduction in workload (especially SP) and corresponding safety was more important to me than resale value. Furthermore, at the price point we were able to get the low time airframe we found, I imagine we will be alright.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Closed on another Twin Cessna (CJ) yesterday Posted: 13 Apr 2015, 15:40 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 01/31/09 Posts: 5193 Post Likes: +3038 Location: Northern NJ
Aircraft: SR22;CJ2+;C510
|
|
Username Protected wrote: The upgrade on a CJ1+, would provide double that - and it all goes straight to the UL. I don't think Cessna can upgrade the 1+ with FADEC engines with the G1000.
_________________ Allen
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Closed on another Twin Cessna (CJ) yesterday Posted: 13 Apr 2015, 15:57 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 01/31/09 Posts: 5193 Post Likes: +3038 Location: Northern NJ
Aircraft: SR22;CJ2+;C510
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I did and quickly came to the realization that the upgrade didn't buy much other than possibly complying with the 2020 mandate and giving WAAS capability, for a 100+ K price tag (didn't do much negotiating).
In addition to the weight savings, here's what the standard G1000 buys:
- GFC700 autopilot - GWX68 radar - ADSB in/out & WAAS - Substantially enhanced situational awareness - Dual FMS/AHARS - TAWS-B - Synthetic vision - XM standard - Improved reliability - this is a big one - 80% of the non-scheduled mx events I found on the logbooks were avionics related on this airplane. The new Garmin stuff just works and the MTBF is light years better. As an avionics shop told me - have you ever priced out a replacement CRT display from the legacy flight deck? You will be shocked.
The only con is the price tag, but the benefits will pay for themselves over time.
Traditional wisdom indicates you will be extremely lucky if you recoup 50-60% of these types of upgrades on resale, but the reduction in workload (especially SP) and corresponding safety was more important to me than resale value. Furthermore, at the price point we were able to get the low time airframe we found, I imagine we will be alright. You also get glass PFD's and MFD with all engine instruments being replaced with the MFD.
Please login or Register for a free account via the link in the red bar above to download files.
_________________ Allen
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Closed on another Twin Cessna (CJ) yesterday Posted: 13 Apr 2015, 16:16 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 07/11/11 Posts: 2425 Post Likes: +2813 Location: Woodlands TX
Aircraft: C525 D1K Waco PT17
|
|
Username Protected wrote: The upgrade on a CJ1+, would provide double that - and it all goes straight to the UL. I don't think Cessna can upgrade the 1+ with FADEC engines with the G1000.
Right Allen - The 1+ is not covered under the Garmin STC.
On the others, instead of FADEC you get an N1 computation with the engine instruments on the MFD. And if you read the threads on the Citation Pilots Forum, there are occasional issues with the FADEC whereas bringing the power up manually to the target N1 is not that big of an issue.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Closed on another Twin Cessna (CJ) yesterday Posted: 13 Apr 2015, 17:05 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 07/15/12 Posts: 230 Post Likes: +77 Location: Texas
Aircraft: G1000 182
|
|
Username Protected wrote: A CJ with a G1000 retrofit sounds like a fantastic idea, if the G1000 retrofit is reasonably priced... I don't know what reasonably is, but I believe the retrofit is around $400k. The Alpine Edition (G3000) in a CJ2+ is real? Have they delivered one yet?
|
|
| Top |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us
BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a
forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include
the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner,
Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.
BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates.
Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.
Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2025
|
|
|
|