14 Jan 2026, 23:22 [ UTC - 5; DST ]
|
| Username Protected |
Message |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50 Posted: 14 Jan 2015, 12:15 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 08/21/14 Posts: 185 Post Likes: +119
Aircraft: C33A, Challenger 604
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Again, cruise speed is only 25% of the of the equation. I've flown all over the Western Hemisphere of this planet and never needed 10K more feet. maybe a jet is quiter but I already don't wear a headest. "Safer" is totally subjective. There are no numbers to back this up. "Simpler"? How? I fly an airplane that goes to 41,000' and often wish I could go higher, so I just don't see how you flying an airplane only going to 30,000, and 28,000 without RVSM, you can't want more altitude. Topping weather, getting above turbulence, getting out of the wind, etc are the reasons I'd like to be able to go higher. I have no problem with differing opinions. But you know Jason, you appear to make up your own facts to validate your opinion. Sadly, what you state as factual is easily disputed with actual data. A PC-12 is a great airplane, no doubt about it, but compared to a jet, it isn't as wonderful as you make it sound. I enjoyed my time flying the PC-12, but wouldn't ever trade a jet for a PC-12 unless I was going into unimproved strips. The PC-12 lacks speed, altitude capabilities, systems redundancy, pressurization differential, and much more.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50 Posted: 14 Jan 2015, 12:16 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 01/29/08 Posts: 26338 Post Likes: +13087 Location: Walterboro, SC. KRBW
Aircraft: PC12NG
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Using a headset (or boom mic) is a requirement for SP jests. You won't like that. Stay with your PC12. It seems to be serving you fine.
That doesn't bother me. I use Halo with one ear plug in and one out. If I lived in NYC, I'd have a jet like you. The main reason I bought PC12 is Atlanta. I'm close to everything except the ski slopes.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50 Posted: 14 Jan 2015, 12:17 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 11/09/13 Posts: 1910 Post Likes: +927 Location: KCMA
Aircraft: Aero Commander 980
|
|
Username Protected wrote: As I said, debating this with you is pointless. Mike raises some good points. It's pointless because you can NEVER back up your position. You just say things like this and give up. I asked you to "sell me". I'm all ears. I want a jet. I just can't make the math work. I'll probably get one anyways because I want one. But at least I acknowledge why I'm doing it and that it's totally irrational.
Jets rarely make sense. The only advantage is altitude.
I guess you have never needed an extra 10k ft but many have. Problem is even at jet altitudes you will sometimes be wanting another 2k.
You eventually will always want higher it just happen less frequently in a jet.
Get a jet; cure your jet fever and go back to a TP.
Irrational was the right word!
Jets are for the airlines.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50 Posted: 14 Jan 2015, 12:18 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 01/29/08 Posts: 26338 Post Likes: +13087 Location: Walterboro, SC. KRBW
Aircraft: PC12NG
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Yes, my airplane is slower than a jet if you take only cruise speed into account. But that's only 25% of the equation. Out of Atlanta, a jet will NOT beat me to NYC, Chicago or S. Florida. Out of Atlanta a jet WILL beat a PC-12 to any of the above. The below times are based on actual flights taken place, on the same days, to eliminate the wind variable. ATL-LGA: Jet - 1 hour 34 minutes. PC-12 - 2 hours 33 minutes. ATL-MIA: Jet - 1 hour 18 minutes. PC-12 - 2 hours 3 minutes. ATL-MDW: Jet - 1 hour 23 minutes. PC-12: 2 hours 21 minutes. You've done this before. I don't fly into LGA. I fly into TEB. So do all the other SP jets. You have to compare to SP jets not 737's. You're comparing apples to oranges. Flying into TEB is totally different routing than a 737 into LGA. All traffic into TEB has to follow the same BS routing.
For Miami I go into OPF like all other private planes. I don't get MIA preference.
You MDW routing is wrong too. I don't fly the arrrival into MDW.
Last edited on 14 Jan 2015, 12:24, edited 1 time in total.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50 Posted: 14 Jan 2015, 12:22 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 01/29/08 Posts: 26338 Post Likes: +13087 Location: Walterboro, SC. KRBW
Aircraft: PC12NG
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Jets rarely make sense. The only advantage is altitude.
I guess you have never needed an extra 10k ft but many have. Problem is even at jet altitudes you will sometimes be wanting another 2k.
You eventually will always want higher it just happen less frequently in a jet.
Get a jet; cure your jet fever and go back to a TP.
Irrational was the right word!
Jets are for the airlines. Of course there are times I WANT higher. But that doesn't mean I NEED higher to complete the mission. It's a very small % of the total mission. I agree with your post.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50 Posted: 14 Jan 2015, 12:25 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 08/21/14 Posts: 185 Post Likes: +119
Aircraft: C33A, Challenger 604
|
|
Username Protected wrote: You've done this before. I don't fly into LGA. I fly into TEB. So do all the other SP jets. You have to compare to SP jets not 737's. You're comparing apples to oranges. Flying into TEB is totally different routing than a 737 into LGA. All traffic into TEB has to follow the same BS routing.
For Miami I go into OPF like all other private planes. I don't get MIA preference. The flights above were completed in an Embraer Phenom 300. Single pilot last I checked! I used LGA only because I could get a like for like between a PC-12 and Phenom 300 between those altitudes. I couldn't readily find a PC-12 and Phenom 300 going between Atlanta and TEB.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50 Posted: 14 Jan 2015, 12:27 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 01/29/08 Posts: 26338 Post Likes: +13087 Location: Walterboro, SC. KRBW
Aircraft: PC12NG
|
|
Username Protected wrote: The flights above were completed in an Embraer Phenom 300. Single pilot last I checked! I used LGA only because I could get a like for like between a PC-12 and Phenom 300 between those altitudes. I couldn't readily find a PC-12 and Phenom 300 going between Atlanta and TEB.
OK. But still apples to oranges. TEB is the game changer. You're the red headed step child going into TEB. You just need to look at the arrival procedure. Most of the flight is low altitude which is where the PC12 shines over the Jet. You found PC12's flying from ATL to LGA? Really?
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50 Posted: 14 Jan 2015, 12:29 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 08/21/14 Posts: 185 Post Likes: +119
Aircraft: C33A, Challenger 604
|
|
Username Protected wrote: You MDW routing is wrong too. I don't fly the arrrival into MDW.
Since I didn't say what arrival, if any, my time was based on how could you know that it was wrong? And since it was based on an actual PC-12 between Atlanta & Midway, how could the times be wrong?
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50 Posted: 14 Jan 2015, 12:31 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 11/06/10 Posts: 12201 Post Likes: +3086 Company: Looking Location: Outside Boston, or some hotel somewhere
Aircraft: None
|
|
Username Protected wrote: You've done this before. I don't fly into LGA. I fly into TEB. So do all the other SP jets. You have to compare to SP jets not 737's. You're comparing apples to oranges. Flying into TEB is totally different routing than a 737 into LGA. All traffic into TEB has to follow the same BS routing.
For Miami I go into OPF like all other private planes. I don't get MIA preference. The flights above were completed in an Embraer Phenom 300. Single pilot last I checked! I used LGA only because I could get a like for like between a PC-12 and Phenom 300 between those altitudes. I couldn't readily find a PC-12 and Phenom 300 going between Atlanta and TEB.
Check out of PDK. A lot of GA has left ATL due to costs. if going to Washington DC, check HEF, GAI, JYO...
Basically, hit the GA airports are ones to compare. The class bravo airports will not equal routing. If flying to TEB, most jets and turboprops from the south are dropped out of the flight levels around Potomac, and you fly low the last 200 miles.
Tim
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50 Posted: 14 Jan 2015, 12:31 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 08/21/14 Posts: 185 Post Likes: +119
Aircraft: C33A, Challenger 604
|
|
Username Protected wrote: You found PC12's flying from ATL to LGA? Really?
Only one.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50 Posted: 14 Jan 2015, 12:32 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 01/29/08 Posts: 26338 Post Likes: +13087 Location: Walterboro, SC. KRBW
Aircraft: PC12NG
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Since I didn't say what arrival, if any, my time was based on how could you know that it was wrong? And since it was based on an actual PC-12 between Atlanta & Midway, how could the times be wrong? The arrival into MDW is ridiculous. It's like the arrival into OPF. If you 86 the arrival (like I always do) you just cut 30-40 minutes off your flight time. I drop to 17.5 and take it in VFR.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50 Posted: 14 Jan 2015, 12:33 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 01/29/08 Posts: 26338 Post Likes: +13087 Location: Walterboro, SC. KRBW
Aircraft: PC12NG
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Only one. Fair enough but I've never done that route. I wouldn't use that as a comparison. I can only imagine how much ATL and LGA flew that poor bastard around keeping him out of the way. You guys aren't taking ATC into account when you shop airplanes. You gotta do what ATC says to do above 18K. If they tell you to slow down...... You just blew all reasons left to own a jet. On my recent flight to Cancun, ATC delayed my takeoff time 2 hours due to traffic. I re-filed to Cancun for 15k'. Got my clearance, took off immediately and then got to 26k' by requesting it as soon as I was out of ATL class B. If I were a NetJets pilot, I'd have told my PAX "we're delayed 2 hours so we'll need to sit around".
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50 Posted: 14 Jan 2015, 12:38 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 01/31/09 Posts: 5193 Post Likes: +3038 Location: Northern NJ
Aircraft: SR22;CJ2+;C510
|
|
Username Protected wrote: If I lived in NYC, I'd have a jet like you. The main reason I bought PC12 is Atlanta. I'm close to everything except the ski slopes. Sitting at the Ritz in SOBE writing this. Flew down to FXE on Friday. Bit of icing departing the NY area that the hot wings handled easily. 3:14 flight. 150+ headwinds in the lower FLs from NY to NC. Went up to FL450 for about an 80kt headwind. Put a raft in the back and went down AR21 overwater. Used a lot of the capabilities of the CJ2+ to make it a nice relaxing flight.
_________________ Allen
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50 Posted: 14 Jan 2015, 12:40 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 01/29/08 Posts: 26338 Post Likes: +13087 Location: Walterboro, SC. KRBW
Aircraft: PC12NG
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Sitting at the Ritz in SOBE writing this. Flew down to FXE on Friday. Bit of icing departing the NY area that the hot wings handled easily. 3:14 flight. 150+ headwinds in the lower FLs from NY to NC. Went up to FL450 for about an 80kt headwind. Put a raft in the back and went down AR21 overwater. Used a lot of the capabilities of the CJ2+ to make it a nice relaxing flight.
That's a perfect example of what I'm talking about. Sobe isn't a long flight from Atlanta. I do it VFR at 17.5 all the time and go Direct to, ENTER ENTER. PC12 has ice protection too.  NYC isn't close to anything. I'd have a jet too if I lived there. You bought the right airplane
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50 Posted: 14 Jan 2015, 12:59 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 01/31/09 Posts: 5193 Post Likes: +3038 Location: Northern NJ
Aircraft: SR22;CJ2+;C510
|
|
Username Protected wrote: On my recent flight to Cancun, ATC delayed my takeoff time 2 hours due to traffic. I re-filed to Cancun for 15k'. Got my clearance, took off immediately and then got to 26k' by requesting it as soon as I was out of ATL class B. If I were a NetJets pilot, I'd have told my PAX "we're delayed 2 hours so we'll need to sit around". You went to Cancun around Xmas New Years. I've done that trip at that time. I think your ATC delay was due to flow control into Cancun and not ATL traffic saturation. Once you were in the air it was hard for ATC to hold you for flow control so you just slipped into the system. Many 135 operators are required in their OPSPECS to be IFR with passengers and can't use that dodge. Also you can burn into your fuel reserve quicker in a jet VFR low. Heading into Cancun is not when I want to be getting low on fuel because I was low for a while picking up my clearance into the FLs.
_________________ Allen
|
|
| Top |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us
BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a
forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include
the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner,
Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.
BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates.
Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.
Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2026
|
|
|
|