banner
banner

15 Jan 2026, 18:52 [ UTC - 5; DST ]


Garmin International (Banner)



This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 7667 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 96, 97, 98, 99, 100, 101, 102 ... 512  Next
Username Protected Message
 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50
PostPosted: 14 Jan 2015, 09:17 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 06/09/09
Posts: 4438
Post Likes: +3306
Aircraft: C182P, Merlin IIIC
Steven,

Do you have any insight as to what happened in the westwind crash in Alabama a while back?


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50
PostPosted: 14 Jan 2015, 09:33 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 01/31/10
Posts: 13686
Post Likes: +7843
Company: 320 Fam
Aircraft: 58TC
What happened to this Lear?

http://www.avweb.com/avwebflash/news/Me ... 004-1.html

_________________
Views are my own and don’t represent employers or clients
My 58TC https://tinyurl.com/mry9f8f6


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50
PostPosted: 14 Jan 2015, 09:44 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 01/29/08
Posts: 26338
Post Likes: +13087
Location: Walterboro, SC. KRBW
Aircraft: PC12NG
Username Protected wrote:
Debating twin versus single with someone who has no twin experience is pointless. Flying a twin requires a higher level of proficiency, it's no secret. If you aren't comfortable with the risks, don't reap the rewards, simple as that.

Definite thread drift for sure.

Then how do I go to the places I go in a Pilatus (single)? I hit all the amazing places of the world just like a guy that a jet does. Probably more.

Higher level of proficiency to fly a twin has nothing to do with going places. I fly into Teterboro and Aspen all the time. I never miss a beat. It's not that hard to do. What level of proficiency am I missing out on? Do you ever get of Flightaware and look at 50+ PC12's flying at any given time all over the world? Waaaaaaaaay more than any SP jet. Where am I lacking in proficiency?

What are the rewards I'm missing out on flying a Pilatus? I make my destinations non stop with a full boat. What SP jet can do this? What are the rewards? Please explain. If the reward of JET was so great, wouldn't they hold their value better? They crash in value like no product I've ever seen.

Sell me on "jet". I'm ready. I can afford it. I crunch the numbers constantly. It doesn't take much number crunching before I realize the only reason I'm doing it is to say "I have a jet".


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50
PostPosted: 14 Jan 2015, 11:10 
Offline


 WWW  Profile




Joined: 12/03/14
Posts: 21079
Post Likes: +26518
Company: Ciholas, Inc
Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
Username Protected wrote:
Do you ever get of Flightaware and look at 50+ PC12's flying at any given time all over the world?

Slow airplanes stay in the air longer. :-)

If you only look at owner flown PC12s, then not so many PC12s flying. The cargo, freight, and other commercial uses of PC12 is what drives the utilization, so not a true apples to apples when looking at SP jets.

Quote:
Where am I lacking in proficiency?

Do you really want someone to answer that question?

No good pilot thinks they are 100% proficient. There is no such thing in my view.

Quote:
What are the rewards?

100 knots faster, 10,000 ft higher, quieter, safer, simpler.

Main negatives to jets are cost and runway issues (short and/or slick). Turboprop can go when and where jets can't in some cases.

Mike C.

_________________
Email mikec (at) ciholas.com


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50
PostPosted: 14 Jan 2015, 11:16 
Offline


 WWW  Profile




Joined: 12/03/14
Posts: 21079
Post Likes: +26518
Company: Ciholas, Inc
Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
Username Protected wrote:
What happened to this Lear?

Appears to be loss of awareness while flying over a dark ocean. Their inability to manage altitude and heading is strange.

That flight appears to have two passengers sitting up front and no pilots.

Fly the airplane first.

NTSB has yet to release findings, so there could be some other reason for the accident that emerges.

Mike C.

_________________
Email mikec (at) ciholas.com


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50
PostPosted: 14 Jan 2015, 11:25 
Offline


 WWW  Profile




Joined: 12/03/14
Posts: 21079
Post Likes: +26518
Company: Ciholas, Inc
Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
Username Protected wrote:
Do you have any insight as to what happened in the westwind crash in Alabama a while back?

Little to go on.

Sounds like improperly set pitch trim or flaps and stall right after liftoff.

They had just switched pilot flying, one wonders if something got missed on the checklist.

http://www.ntsb.gov/_layouts/ntsb.aviat ... 3251&key=1

Mike C.

_________________
Email mikec (at) ciholas.com


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50
PostPosted: 14 Jan 2015, 11:29 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 07/30/12
Posts: 2388
Post Likes: +364
Company: Aerlogix, Jet Aeronautical
Location: Prescott, AZ
Aircraft: B-55, RV-6
Username Protected wrote:
Debating twin versus single with someone who has no twin experience is pointless. Flying a twin requires a higher level of proficiency, it's no secret. If you aren't comfortable with the risks, don't reap the rewards, simple as that.

Definite thread drift for sure.

Then how do I go to the places I go in a Pilatus (single)? I hit all the amazing places of the world just like a guy that a jet does. Probably more.

Higher level of proficiency to fly a twin has nothing to do with going places. I fly into Teterboro and Aspen all the time. I never miss a beat. It's not that hard to do. What level of proficiency am I missing out on? Do you ever get of Flightaware and look at 50+ PC12's flying at any given time all over the world? Waaaaaaaaay more than any SP jet. Where am I lacking in proficiency?

What are the rewards I'm missing out on flying a Pilatus? I make my destinations non stop with a full boat. What SP jet can do this? What are the rewards? Please explain. If the reward of JET was so great, wouldn't they hold their value better? They crash in value like no product I've ever seen.

Sell me on "jet". I'm ready. I can afford it. I crunch the numbers constantly. It doesn't take much number crunching before I realize the only reason I'm doing it is to say "I have a jet".



As I said, debating this with you is pointless. Mike raises some good points.

Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50
PostPosted: 14 Jan 2015, 11:38 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 01/31/10
Posts: 13686
Post Likes: +7843
Company: 320 Fam
Aircraft: 58TC
Username Protected wrote:
That flight appears to have two passengers sitting up front and no pilots.



And yet these were two pro medivac pilots who likely had more experience than both of us.

There are no absolutes in aviation.

_________________
Views are my own and don’t represent employers or clients
My 58TC https://tinyurl.com/mry9f8f6


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50
PostPosted: 14 Jan 2015, 11:42 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 01/29/08
Posts: 26338
Post Likes: +13087
Location: Walterboro, SC. KRBW
Aircraft: PC12NG
Username Protected wrote:
Do you ever get of Flightaware and look at 50+ PC12's flying at any given time all over the world?

Slow airplanes stay in the air longer. :-)

If you only look at owner flown PC12s, then not so many PC12s flying. The cargo, freight, and other commercial uses of PC12 is what drives the utilization, so not a true apples to apples when looking at SP jets.

Quote:
Where am I lacking in proficiency?

Do you really want someone to answer that question?

No good pilot thinks they are 100% proficient. There is no such thing in my view.

Quote:
What are the rewards?

100 knots faster, 10,000 ft higher, quieter, safer, simpler.

Main negatives to jets are cost and runway issues (short and/or slick). Turboprop can go when and where jets can't in some cases.

Mike C.


Yes, my airplane is slower than a jet if you take only cruise speed into account. But that's only 25% of the equation. Out of Atlanta, a jet will NOT beat me to NYC, Chicago or S. Florida.

Did I say I was 100% proficient?

Who cares if it's "owner flown"? It's a PC12 doing what PC12's do.

Again, cruise speed is only 25% of the of the equation. I've flown all over the Western Hemisphere of this planet and never needed 10K more feet. maybe a jet is quiter but I already don't wear a headest. "Safer" is totally subjective. There are no numbers to back this up. "Simpler"? How?

Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50
PostPosted: 14 Jan 2015, 11:43 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 08/18/13
Posts: 1152
Post Likes: +770
Aircraft: 737
Ain't that the truth. You do everything you can to keep it safe and reduce the luck factor needed to complete a flight safely, but when your number is up...


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50
PostPosted: 14 Jan 2015, 11:45 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 08/18/13
Posts: 1152
Post Likes: +770
Aircraft: 737
Hey Jason- my plane is faster than yours. Also, I have larger genitalia that comes only with operating a twin. Nah nah.

Lol. This thread is fantastic, but I'm tuning out after it hits 100 pages. It's like stopping in at a bus crash in slow motion.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50
PostPosted: 14 Jan 2015, 11:45 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 01/29/08
Posts: 26338
Post Likes: +13087
Location: Walterboro, SC. KRBW
Aircraft: PC12NG
Username Protected wrote:
As I said, debating this with you is pointless. Mike raises some good points.

It's pointless because you can NEVER back up your position. You just say things like this and give up. I asked you to "sell me". I'm all ears. I want a jet. I just can't make the math work. I'll probably get one anyways because I want one. But at least I acknowledge why I'm doing it and that it's totally irrational.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50
PostPosted: 14 Jan 2015, 11:46 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 07/30/12
Posts: 2388
Post Likes: +364
Company: Aerlogix, Jet Aeronautical
Location: Prescott, AZ
Aircraft: B-55, RV-6
Username Protected wrote:
Steven,

Do you have any insight as to what happened in the westwind crash in Alabama a while back?


I do recall they were conducting training. Beyond that, I haven't heard anything and I hate to speculate with no other indicators of what could have went wrong.

Our biggest issue on Westwinds was the flap system. Split flaps while conducting V1 cuts could definitely cause some issues, but that is a shot in the dark and probably worth what you paid for it.

I'll follow up and see what I can find out.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50
PostPosted: 14 Jan 2015, 11:53 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 07/30/12
Posts: 2388
Post Likes: +364
Company: Aerlogix, Jet Aeronautical
Location: Prescott, AZ
Aircraft: B-55, RV-6
Username Protected wrote:
As I said, debating this with you is pointless. Mike raises some good points.

It's pointless because you can NEVER back up your position. You just say things like this and give up. I asked you to "sell me". I'm all ears. I want a jet. I just can't make the math work. I'll probably get one anyways because I want one. But at least I acknowledge why I'm doing it and that it's totally irrational.


:bang:

Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50
PostPosted: 14 Jan 2015, 12:10 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 01/31/09
Posts: 5193
Post Likes: +3038
Location: Northern NJ
Aircraft: SR22;CJ2+;C510
Username Protected wrote:
I want a jet. I just can't make the math work. I'll probably get one anyways because I want one. But at least I acknowledge why I'm doing it and that it's totally irrational.


Using a headset (or boom mic) is a requirement for SP jests. You won't like that. Stay with your PC12. It seems to be serving you fine.

_________________
Allen


Top

Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 7667 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 96, 97, 98, 99, 100, 101, 102 ... 512  Next



PlaneAC

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  

Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us

BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner, Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.

BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates. Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.

Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2026

.dbm.jpg.
.traceaviation-85x150.png.
.daytona.jpg.
.stanmusikame-85x50.jpg.
.kingairnation-85x50.png.
.mcfarlane-85x50.png.
.geebee-85x50.jpg.
.jetacq-85x50.jpg.
.bullardaviation-85x50-2.jpg.
.tempest.jpg.
.rnp.85x50.png.
.planelogix-85x100-2015-04-15.jpg.
.AeroMach85x100.png.
.Elite-85x50.png.
.aerox_85x100.png.
.garmin-85x200-2021-11-22.jpg.
.puremedical-85x200.jpg.
.ABS-85x100.jpg.
.gallagher_85x50.jpg.
.jandsaviation-85x50.jpg.
.Plane Salon Beechtalk.jpg.
.headsetsetc_Small_85x50.jpg.
.Wingman 85x50.png.
.AAI.jpg.
.KingAirMaint85_50.png.
.b-kool-85x50.png.
.blackwell-85x50.png.
.KalAir_Black.jpg.
.holymicro-85x50.jpg.
.tat-85x100.png.
.bpt-85x50-2019-07-27.jpg.
.midwest2.jpg.
.ocraviation-85x50.png.
.airmart-85x150.png.
.temple-85x100-2015-02-23.jpg.
.Aircraft Associates.85x50.png.
.ElectroairTile.png.
.performanceaero-85x50.jpg.
.pdi-85x50.jpg.
.BT Ad.png.
.blackhawk-85x100-2019-09-25.jpg.
.wat-85x50.jpg.
.sierratrax-85x50.png.
.camguard.jpg.
.SCA.jpg.
.concorde.jpg.
.CiESVer2.jpg.
.kadex-85x50.jpg.
.LogAirLower85x50.png.
.saint-85x50.jpg.
.aviationdesigndouble.jpg.
.shortnnumbers-85x100.png.
.avnav.jpg.
.Wentworth_85x100.JPG.
.v2x.85x100.png.
.boomerang-85x50-2023-12-17.png.
.suttoncreativ85x50.jpg.
.MountainAirframe.jpg.
.Latitude.jpg.
.Plane AC Tile.png.