28 Jan 2026, 05:11 [ UTC - 5; DST ]
|
| Username Protected |
Message |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: FS: 2008 Pilatus PC12NG Posted: 27 Nov 2018, 21:42 |
|
 |

|

|
 |
Joined: 07/21/08 Posts: 5869 Post Likes: +7383 Location: Decatur, TX (XA99)
Aircraft: 1979 Bonanza A36
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Of corse if your looking to burn some cash the equation changes....It becomes a " because I can " I agree and it's an expensive experiment to have to back pedal on. For now, the Universe made the decision for me. Now I'm getting quotes for HSI, wing pull etc. on my plane since I won't be trading it in. A buddy of mine bought a used KA350 a few years ago and made a deal with Beech to order a new one and trade the used one back in. If I remember correctly, they gave him 100% credit on the first one. I wonder if you could work a deal like that towards the new model when it is released? I doubt they would make that sweet of a deal, but it might still scratch the itch and get you into something newer now.
_________________ I'm just here for the free snacks
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: FS: 2008 Pilatus PC12NG Posted: 28 Nov 2018, 01:11 |
|
 |

|

|
 |
Joined: 12/10/07 Posts: 8239 Post Likes: +7973 Location: New York, NY
Aircraft: Debonair C33A
|
|
Username Protected wrote: You and I finally agree on something.
We agree on more than you know. It's just that when we disagree, we really disagree. You know, type A personality and all... 
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: FS: 2008 Pilatus PC12NG Posted: 28 Nov 2018, 05:30 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 12/17/13 Posts: 6686 Post Likes: +5996 Location: Hollywood, Los Angeles, CA
Aircraft: Aerostar Superstar 2
|
|
Username Protected wrote: With the Denali slowly coming out, there has to be some serious updates coming for the PC12. Would only be a reasonable deduction. But realistically, where they gonna go with it? 1. There are no engines they can stick on it to make it go faster. 2. There is no real way to redesign wing to reduce drag without losing the exempted stall speed it already has. 3. It's not gonna be able to go any higher, because you can't get above FL280 without a secondary pressurization backup. 4. It's not going to get any roomier. OK, so maybe they'll be able to stick a G3000 in there or something, change the trim a bit. But does constitute a serious update? I wouldn't hold my breath for the PC12 changing much more than that.
_________________ "Either we heal now as a team, or we will die as individuals."
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: FS: 2008 Pilatus PC12NG Posted: 28 Nov 2018, 08:29 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 01/29/08 Posts: 26338 Post Likes: +13087 Location: Walterboro, SC. KRBW
Aircraft: PC12NG
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I see zero reason to replace a pc12 with a pc12. 5 knots from a prop change on a new one doesn’t change anything.
Get a jet and enjoy the flights west. Colorado is a more fun place than atl to spend time.
I predict you get a jet and end up flying more because speed is awesome.
The cj3 cabin is small. The Phenom cabin is a lot better. If you could afford that, why on earth would you not get that? Seems like a real upgrade.
If you are spending this much on a plane, who cares if it burns more gas on a short hop? It will be faster than your pc12 at 17.5. Look at it this way..... a 2008 PC12 and a 2008 CJ2+ are the same price on the used market. A Phenom 300 is 2X=3X that price. Yes I can get a jet for the same price as my PC12 but not one that can do what I need it to do. Even a used CJ3+ is asking $6.8MM. A new Phenom 300 is $10MM and a new PC24 is $10MM If you had $100MM in the bank, would you spend 10% of your net worth on a jet? Serious question.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: FS: 2008 Pilatus PC12NG Posted: 28 Nov 2018, 08:31 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 01/29/08 Posts: 26338 Post Likes: +13087 Location: Walterboro, SC. KRBW
Aircraft: PC12NG
|
|
Username Protected wrote: A buddy of mine bought a used KA350 a few years ago and made a deal with Beech to order a new one and trade the used one back in. If I remember correctly, they gave him 100% credit on the first one. I wonder if you could work a deal like that towards the new model when it is released? I doubt they would make that sweet of a deal, but it might still scratch the itch and get you into something newer now.  I went to the PC12 dealership yesterday with my money to buy an airplane that was sitting right there in the hangar and they told me "no". These PC12's are hot. 
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: FS: 2008 Pilatus PC12NG Posted: 28 Nov 2018, 08:34 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 01/29/08 Posts: 26338 Post Likes: +13087 Location: Walterboro, SC. KRBW
Aircraft: PC12NG
|
|
Username Protected wrote: There are so many ways to look at your situation that I don't think there's a right or wrong direction. The thing is that you really do fly a lot of hours, and I doubt you're going to fly less regardless of what you're in. I know you're apprehensive to use a jet for short legs, but maybe you should try it. I think there's a chance you might be more comfortable with it than you think. I think you should continue to shop. Go find a P300. Find a CJ3+. Demo them a few times. Pay for the demos if you need to. Take the time to answer your own questions. I think you've likely done some of this already, just go do it some more. Who knows, maybe the jet market will soften over the next 12 months and by the time you’re selling your PC12, you'll have something under contract. I've demo'd both many times. "Wanting" one is not the issue. I want one. The issue is coming to terms with the $$. "Jet" means a lot of different things. Many jets I can even up trade for for the PC12. The one's I want I can't.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: FS: 2008 Pilatus PC12NG Posted: 28 Nov 2018, 08:37 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 01/29/08 Posts: 26338 Post Likes: +13087 Location: Walterboro, SC. KRBW
Aircraft: PC12NG
|
|
Username Protected wrote: But realistically, where they gonna go with it?
1. There are no engines they can stick on it to make it go faster. 2. There is no real way to redesign wing to reduce drag without losing the exempted stall speed it already has. 3. It's not gonna be able to go any higher, because you can't get above FL280 without a secondary pressurization backup. 4. It's not going to get any roomier.
OK, so maybe they'll be able to stick a G3000 in there or something, change the trim a bit. But does constitute a serious update?
I wouldn't hold my breath for the PC12 changing much more than that.
My PC12 already certified to FL300 Denali marketing claims certification to FL310 (I think it'll be higher) I think Pilatus will redesign the PC12. It's the same concept as the P180. Get close to jet speeds with the efficiency of a turboprop.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: FS: 2008 Pilatus PC12NG Posted: 28 Nov 2018, 08:43 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 11/03/08 Posts: 17155 Post Likes: +29235 Location: Peachtree City GA / Stoke-On-Trent UK
Aircraft: A33
|
|
|
A neighbor parted with his 180hp C172 and moved to a 310. He wanted to go further and faster. But after the honeymoon phase, he got frustrated that he couldn't get into many of the airports he wanted to visit, and he found himself not wanting to pull the airplane out for short trips because it cost so much to operate. Now barely a year later the 310 is gone and he's trying to find a cessna single as nice as the one he used to have.
Jason, you are certainly in a different pay grade than my friend and I, but to me it sounds familiar. His uprated skyhawk fit his lifestyle perfectly and it seems like you have much the same situation.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: FS: 2008 Pilatus PC12NG Posted: 28 Nov 2018, 08:44 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 01/29/08 Posts: 26338 Post Likes: +13087 Location: Walterboro, SC. KRBW
Aircraft: PC12NG
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Why not one of the 67A powered King Air 350s? You get that 300+ knots you have been looking for and maintain that cabin class feel that you like. Sure, fuel burn and maintenance are probably up a bit but it can’t be anything like a P300. Additional training should be reasonable.
Good luck in your search. Range and Useful load is the problem there. PC12 hauls more and goes a lot farther on full fuel.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: FS: 2008 Pilatus PC12NG Posted: 28 Nov 2018, 08:50 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 01/29/08 Posts: 26338 Post Likes: +13087 Location: Walterboro, SC. KRBW
Aircraft: PC12NG
|
|
Username Protected wrote: A neighbor parted with his 180hp C172 and moved to a 310. He wanted to go further and faster. But after the honeymoon phase, he got frustrated that he couldn't get into many of the airports he wanted to visit, and he found himself not wanting to pull the airplane out for short trips because it cost so much to operate. Now barely a year later the 310 is gone and he's trying to find a cessna single as nice as the one he used to have.
Jason, you are certainly in a different pay grade than my friend and I, but to me it sounds familiar. His uprated skyhawk fit his lifestyle perfectly and it seems like you have much the same situation. Yup.... same problem. I think SETP will continue to take over the small to mid size jet market for the same reason. Pilatus has sold every plane they built this year and the few demonstrators they have left they don't want to sell because then they won't have anything to demo.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us
BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a
forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include
the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner,
Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.
BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates.
Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.
Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2026
|
|
|
|