01 May 2025, 08:09 [ UTC - 5; DST ]
|
Username Protected |
Message |
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Upgrade from Baron Posted: 01 Mar 2025, 11:02 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 06/05/22 Posts: 37 Post Likes: +6 Company: N/A
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Jeff, I agree with you and direct operating (variable) costs, especially fuel/oil. I've run the numbers many times, which is why we (partners) are considering selling the C421C and trying to upgrade to a turbine; leaning towards the C425. There are costs however which I refer to the "Turboprop Tax". Landing fees are always higher, insurance is higher (even on similar hull value), training costs are higher, hanger rent is higher, and generally the initial purchase price is definitely higher. To me it will probably be worth it just for peace of mind of engine reliability. But I can't knock the C421C, as for me it has been a great plane, may favorite of the 6 planes I've owned.
I threw the idea out there as a possibility to consider depending on how much money Matt had to spend on the upgrade. Now the truth is I live about 65 nm from perhaps on of the finest twin cessna maintenance organizations in the US located at Waco TX, and that makes my ownership/maintenance a no stress event. But yes, I would like to upgrade.
Chris C Does the facility in Waco work on all Cessna's or just twins? I'm at GTU and that would be great if I end up buying a Mustang/M2
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Upgrade from Baron Posted: 01 Mar 2025, 15:44 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 03/17/20 Posts: 92 Post Likes: +62 Location: Houston (KDWH)
Aircraft: A36TN
|
|
I believe air impressions only works on twin Cessnas of the piston flavor. There was a 210 in their hangar when I was there a couple of months ago, but I believe it was a friend of theirs. I asked Jeff if they work on conquests and it was a definite no.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Upgrade from Baron Posted: 01 Mar 2025, 16:00 |
|
 |

|

|
 |
Joined: 02/09/09 Posts: 6220 Post Likes: +3002 Location: Owosso, MI (KRNP)
Aircraft: 1969 Bonanza V35A
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I threw the idea out there as a possibility to consider depending on how much money Matt had to spend on the upgrade. Now the truth is I live about 65 nm from perhaps on of the finest twin cessna maintenance organizations in the US located at Waco TX, and that makes my ownership/maintenance a no stress event. But yes, I would like to upgrade.
Chris C Juan at DFW Aeroworx works on the Conquest. He did the prebuy and I believe still works on the 441 I managed when we sold it a year ago and he seemed very knowledgeable about them. I'm in the same boat as you, I have a 414 and would love a lower end turbine. The acquisition cost isn't the issue, the normal expenses are not the problem, it's when something goes wrong that becomes a problem. We put $25k into an ACM (next option was $77k!). We had a lightning strike early on and each engine had to comply with $25k in new SB's during the inspection. Then Honeywell came out with a mandatory SB that was about $300k each engine to comply with, which affected the sale value of the airplane. I found a company that could do it for about only $300k total. When we bought the airplane, it showed up for prebuy. The shop found that WestStar GJT had missed $35k in inspections. We found it a couple days prior to the prebuy (I had pictures of the logs) and the seller ended up getting a ferry permit to get it to prebuy. It doesn't take many of those events to bury you.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Upgrade from Baron Posted: 01 Mar 2025, 19:27 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 12/03/14 Posts: 19922 Post Likes: +25000 Company: Ciholas, Inc Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
|
|
Username Protected wrote: We put $25k into an ACM (next option was $77k!). Overhauled and rebuilt my ACM for $14K. Key was knowing which shop to send the parts (Qualified Technologies, Upland, CA). Quote: We had a lightning strike early on and each engine had to comply with $25k in new SB's during the inspection. Then Honeywell came out with a mandatory SB that was about $300k each engine to comply with If not an AD, mandatory SBs are not required for part 91 operators. Neither are overhauls. Quote: The shop found that WestStar GJT had missed $35k in inspections. Westar is trying to be another Duncan or Stevens, those high end shops just under the factory service centers, so their prices are not cheap. Quality has gotten spotty with them, too, from what I hear. Some get great service, others have had some problems. Quote: It doesn't take many of those events to bury you. They don't occur very often and there are usually ways to mitigate the impact, especially if part 91 and if you are at least somewhat involved in the upkeep of the airplane. Not so much wrench turning as in deciding on the strategy. For example, I had a failing hydraulic pump. Textron service center would cost $35-40K since it involved a new pump that was different and a conversion kit. I found a used pump and fix it for $1800, labor included. That's the source of thing that can save tons of money if done right. Turbines just don't break as often as pistons do, and that includes things that aren't engines, too. The constant shaking of a piston aircraft breaks stuff. Mike C.
_________________ Email mikec (at) ciholas.com
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Upgrade from Baron Posted: 01 Mar 2025, 20:48 |
|
 |

|

|
 |
Joined: 02/09/09 Posts: 6220 Post Likes: +3002 Location: Owosso, MI (KRNP)
Aircraft: 1969 Bonanza V35A
|
|
When we looked, there were two ACM's available. That's with two shops looking for it, me and the one that did our heavy maintenance on the airplane. There were no other options...
I'm well aware that SB's are not mandatory for part 91 airplane. However, if you have the engine apart, and have any aspiration of selling the airplane to a potential 135 operator, the $25k SB per engine would save a much larger bill in the future to tear it down to install the part. I can't remember which part it was at the moment. IIRC, the $300k one was a T-wheel replacement that was immediately mandatory for 135 operators, unlike at the next teardown, etc. for some SB's.
|
|
Top |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us
BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a
forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include
the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner,
Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.
BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates.
Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.
Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2025
|
|
|
|