banner
banner

22 Nov 2025, 13:40 [ UTC - 5; DST ]


Stevens Aerospace (Banner)



Reply to topic  [ 162 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11  Next
Username Protected Message
 Post subject: Re: Airplane Purchase Research: Pressurized Twin Options
PostPosted: 06 Feb 2018, 14:24 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 03/28/17
Posts: 8956
Post Likes: +11364
Location: N. California
Aircraft: C-182
January 1989 British Midland Airways 737, shut down wrong engine.

https://aviation-safety.net/database/re ... 19890108-0

I'll take an engine failure in a twin jet over anything that has propellers, for the reason stated above; just fly it on speed.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Airplane Purchase Research: Pressurized Twin Options
PostPosted: 06 Feb 2018, 14:37 
Offline



 WWW  Profile




Joined: 05/23/13
Posts: 8568
Post Likes: +11093
Company: Jet Acquisitions
Location: Franklin, TN 615-739-9091 chip@jetacq.com
How the heck did this become a Crash Talk thread?

:btt:

_________________
Recent acquisitions - 2019 King Air 350i - 2025 Citation M2Gen2 - 2015 Citation CJ3+


Top

 Post subject: Re: Airplane Purchase Research: Pressurized Twin Options
PostPosted: 06 Feb 2018, 14:44 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 03/28/17
Posts: 8956
Post Likes: +11364
Location: N. California
Aircraft: C-182
Username Protected wrote:
How the heck did this become a Crash Talk thread?

:btt:



Because most "Pressurized Twins" crash more easily than jets. :eek: :D


Top

 Post subject: Re: Airplane Purchase Research: Pressurized Twin Options
PostPosted: 06 Feb 2018, 14:53 
Offline


 WWW  Profile




Joined: 12/03/14
Posts: 20758
Post Likes: +26247
Company: Ciholas, Inc
Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
Username Protected wrote:
How the heck did this become a Crash Talk thread?

Because safety is a major consideration in the decision of which aircraft to buy if it carries 8 key employees of a company.

So when choosing between a King Air and Citation, the safety factor is relevant.

Mike C.

_________________
Email mikec (at) ciholas.com


Top

 Post subject: Re: Airplane Purchase Research: Pressurized Twin Options
PostPosted: 06 Feb 2018, 14:57 
Offline


 WWW  Profile




Joined: 12/03/14
Posts: 20758
Post Likes: +26247
Company: Ciholas, Inc
Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
Username Protected wrote:
January 1989 British Midland Airways 737, shut down wrong engine.

Good find.

I remember reading about this accident and had forgotten it involved a mistaken engine shutdown. What made the situation tricky was that they throttled back the wrong engine at the very same time the broken engine ceased making vibrations, so a false connection was made.

Once they shutdown the engine in the 737, can't they restart it if they so choose? Why is shutdown irrevocable?

The crew did attempt a restart of the engine they shutdown, so they must have thought it was possible.

Mike C.

_________________
Email mikec (at) ciholas.com


Top

 Post subject: Re: Airplane Purchase Research: Pressurized Twin Options
PostPosted: 06 Feb 2018, 15:17 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 11/09/13
Posts: 1910
Post Likes: +927
Location: KCMA
Aircraft: Aero Commander 980
Username Protected wrote:
AA191 _lost_ an engine; it departed the aircraft.


The crew followed the procedures perfectly and ended up crashing. It is the reason why most operators now recommend V2 +10 or just keep what you have airspeed wise in the event of a failure at TO.

In the AA 191 event the engine departed the airframe because of a faulty MX procedure. The slat on that side retracted due to a loss of hyd pressure.

The crew being well trained and professional followed the procedure which called for a pitched up to and maintain V2. That wing with the retracted flap stalled and caused the crash.

Had the crew just held the AS they had they would have had a chance to fly it around and land.

After that the procedures were changed. Every event has the chance to helps improve safety. It is why things are always changing.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Airplane Purchase Research: Pressurized Twin Options
PostPosted: 06 Feb 2018, 15:28 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 03/28/17
Posts: 8956
Post Likes: +11364
Location: N. California
Aircraft: C-182
There are two ways to shut down the jet engines, pull the fire handle, which shuts off fuel, ignition , pneumatics ,hydraulics, and arms the fire bottles; and the second way is to place the start levers to the cut off position which shuts off fuel and ignition. Can't speak to the feasibility of restoring the fire handle on the 737.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Airplane Purchase Research: Pressurized Twin Options
PostPosted: 06 Feb 2018, 15:42 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 01/31/09
Posts: 5193
Post Likes: +3038
Location: Northern NJ
Aircraft: SR22;CJ2+;C510
Username Protected wrote:
There are two ways to shut down the jet engines, pull the fire handle, which shuts off fuel, ignition , pneumatics ,hydraulics, and arms the fire bottles; and the second way is to place the start levers to the cut off position which shuts off fuel and ignition. Can't speak to the feasibility of restoring the fire handle on the 737.


In the Citations you have a fire button. Press it and it closes valves to shutoff fuel, hydraulics, etc. Press it again and the valves open and an engine restart can be attempted.

_________________
Allen


Top

 Post subject: Re: Airplane Purchase Research: Pressurized Twin Options
PostPosted: 06 Feb 2018, 17:09 
Offline



 WWW  Profile




Joined: 05/23/13
Posts: 8568
Post Likes: +11093
Company: Jet Acquisitions
Location: Franklin, TN 615-739-9091 chip@jetacq.com
Username Protected wrote:
How the heck did this become a Crash Talk thread?

Because safety is a major consideration in the decision of which aircraft to buy if it carries 8 key employees of a company.

So when choosing between a King Air and Citation, the safety factor is relevant.

Mike C.


While safety is always a concern, I certainly wouldn't think it has any bearing on a decision like this. Sure, if we were comparing an airplane with a questionable safety record to one with an excellent safety record you would have a point. King Airs and Citations? It would be wrong to suggest that either have any significant safety concerns. You can certainly find a way to kill yourself in either, but I would never suggest buying one over the other for safety reasons.

In fact of the many reasons why a jet is superior to a turboprop, I wouldn't even list safety other than noting that the jet is better if an engine loss occurs during take off.

Faster, quieter, higher... all good reasons.
_________________
Recent acquisitions - 2019 King Air 350i - 2025 Citation M2Gen2 - 2015 Citation CJ3+


Top

 Post subject: Re: Airplane Purchase Research: Pressurized Twin Options
PostPosted: 06 Feb 2018, 17:43 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 01/01/10
Posts: 3503
Post Likes: +2476
Location: Roseburg, Oregon
Aircraft: Citation Mustang
Username Protected wrote:
Bogus comment Mike C - once the ECO handle has been pulled it can't be reset. There have been many cases where the wrong one was pulled, isolating and ending hydraulics, fuel, bleed air and electrics with valves, doors and contacts.

Props CAN be unfeathered easily, and a re-start is likely. For the jet - not possible after yanking that handle. Look it up. All it takes is a faulty sensor to start the ball rolling.

Bob

Engine restart is always an option in all of the jets I'm familiar with unless you have one of the following three Fs:
Fire
FOD
Frozen fan

_________________
Previous A36TN owner


Top

 Post subject: Re: Airplane Purchase Research: Pressurized Twin Options
PostPosted: 06 Feb 2018, 17:51 
Offline


 WWW  Profile




Joined: 12/03/14
Posts: 20758
Post Likes: +26247
Company: Ciholas, Inc
Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
Username Protected wrote:
Sure, if we were comparing an airplane with a questionable safety record to one with an excellent safety record you would have a point. King Airs and Citations? It would be wrong to suggest that either have any significant safety concerns.

That's because they are judged relative to their peers, King Airs against turboprops, Citations against jets.

Head to head, there is no contest, the Citation is much safer historically than a King Air.

Mike C.

_________________
Email mikec (at) ciholas.com


Top

 Post subject: Re: Airplane Purchase Research: Pressurized Twin Options
PostPosted: 06 Feb 2018, 19:08 
Offline



 WWW  Profile




Joined: 05/23/13
Posts: 8568
Post Likes: +11093
Company: Jet Acquisitions
Location: Franklin, TN 615-739-9091 chip@jetacq.com
Username Protected wrote:
Sure, if we were comparing an airplane with a questionable safety record to one with an excellent safety record you would have a point. King Airs and Citations? It would be wrong to suggest that either have any significant safety concerns.

That's because they are judged relative to their peers, King Airs against turboprops, Citations against jets.

Head to head, there is no contest, the Citation is much safer historically than a King Air.

Mike C.


Makes sense to me... when are you going to buy a jet!!! :D
_________________
Recent acquisitions - 2019 King Air 350i - 2025 Citation M2Gen2 - 2015 Citation CJ3+


Top

 Post subject: Re: Airplane Purchase Research: Pressurized Twin Options
PostPosted: 06 Feb 2018, 19:24 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 11/09/13
Posts: 1910
Post Likes: +927
Location: KCMA
Aircraft: Aero Commander 980
Username Protected wrote:
Bogus comment Mike C - once the ECO handle has been pulled it can't be reset. There have been many cases where the wrong one was pulled, isolating and ending hydraulics, fuel, bleed air and electrics with valves, doors and contacts.

Props CAN be unfeathered easily, and a re-start is likely. For the jet - not possible after yanking that handle. Look it up. All it takes is a faulty sensor to start the ball rolling.

Bob

Engine restart is always an option in all of the jets I'm familiar with unless you have one of the following three Fs:
Fire
FOD
Frozen fan


Clint, like Paul said in some airplanes it’s a one time deal when you pull the fire handle. Same with disconnecting a generator you can only reset on the ground.

It’s is a nice feature on your plane that a restart is always an option.

Top

 Post subject: Re: Airplane Purchase Research: Pressurized Twin Options
PostPosted: 06 Feb 2018, 19:36 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 08/16/15
Posts: 3702
Post Likes: +5471
Location: Ogden UT
Aircraft: Piper M600
Username Protected wrote:
Bogus comment Mike C - once the ECO handle has been pulled it can't be reset. There have been many cases where the wrong one was pulled, isolating and ending hydraulics, fuel, bleed air and electrics with valves, doors and contacts.

Props CAN be unfeathered easily, and a re-start is likely. For the jet - not possible after yanking that handle. Look it up. All it takes is a faulty sensor to start the ball rolling.

Bob

Engine restart is always an option in all of the jets I'm familiar with unless you have one of the following three Fs:
Fire
FOD
Frozen fan


Forgot one: Frickin too low
_________________
Chuck Ivester
Piper M600
Ogden UT


Top

 Post subject: Re: Airplane Purchase Research: Pressurized Twin Options
PostPosted: 06 Feb 2018, 20:00 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 03/28/17
Posts: 8956
Post Likes: +11364
Location: N. California
Aircraft: C-182
Username Protected wrote:
Bogus comment Mike C - once the ECO handle has been pulled it can't be reset. There have been many cases where the wrong one was pulled, isolating and ending hydraulics, fuel, bleed air and electrics with valves, doors and contacts.

Props CAN be unfeathered easily, and a re-start is likely. For the jet - not possible after yanking that handle. Look it up. All it takes is a faulty sensor to start the ball rolling.

Bob

Engine restart is always an option in all of the jets I'm familiar with unless you have one of the following three Fs:
Fire
FOD
Frozen fan[/quote]

Clint, like Paul said in some airplanes it’s a one time deal when you pull the fire handle. Same with disconnecting a generator you can only reset on the ground.

It’s is a nice feature on your plane that a restart is always an option.[/quote]

_____________________________________________________________________


We had a new captain that got a tail pipe fire on an attempted engine start. He panicked and pulled the fire handle. The problem with that is the procedure for tail pipe fire is to bring the start lever to cut off, cutting off the fuel, and motor the engine with the start switch to blow out the fire, but pulling the fire handle cut off the air to the starter, so he had to call for the fire trucks. :D Oh, he also had to call the chief pilot. :eek:


Top

Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic  [ 162 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11  Next



PWI, Inc. (Banner)

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  

Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us

BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner, Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.

BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates. Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.

Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2025

.mcfarlane-85x50.png.
.holymicro-85x50.jpg.
.suttoncreativ85x50.jpg.
.planelogix-85x100-2015-04-15.jpg.
.ABS-85x100.jpg.
.AeroMach85x100.png.
.pdi-85x50.jpg.
.shortnnumbers-85x100.png.
.airmart-85x150.png.
.saint-85x50.jpg.
.dbm.jpg.
.rnp.85x50.png.
.KalAir_Black.jpg.
.concorde.jpg.
.Wingman 85x50.png.
.puremedical-85x200.jpg.
.Plane AC Tile.png.
.CiESVer2.jpg.
.kadex-85x50.jpg.
.b-kool-85x50.png.
.Wentworth_85x100.JPG.
.boomerang-85x50-2023-12-17.png.
.gallagher_85x50.jpg.
.aviationdesigndouble.jpg.
.ssv-85x50-2023-12-17.jpg.
.blackhawk-85x100-2019-09-25.jpg.
.jetacq-85x50.jpg.
.MountainAirframe.jpg.
.aerox_85x100.png.
.traceaviation-85x150.png.
.headsetsetc_Small_85x50.jpg.
.sarasota.png.
.camguard.jpg.
.AAI.jpg.
.bpt-85x50-2019-07-27.jpg.
.ocraviation-85x50.png.
.Elite-85x50.png.
.jandsaviation-85x50.jpg.
.tat-85x100.png.
.SCA.jpg.
.Aircraft Associates.85x50.png.
.8flight logo.jpeg.
.performanceaero-85x50.jpg.
.blackwell-85x50.png.
.temple-85x100-2015-02-23.jpg.
.BT Ad.png.
.Latitude.jpg.
.daytona.jpg.
.v2x.85x100.png.
.geebee-85x50.jpg.
.wat-85x50.jpg.
.tempest.jpg.
.LogAirLower85x50.png.
.bullardaviation-85x50-2.jpg.
.midwest2.jpg.
.KingAirMaint85_50.png.
.garmin-85x200-2021-11-22.jpg.
.kingairnation-85x50.png.
.sierratrax-85x50.png.
.avnav.jpg.
.stanmusikame-85x50.jpg.