22 Nov 2025, 13:40 [ UTC - 5; DST ]
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Airplane Purchase Research: Pressurized Twin Options Posted: 06 Feb 2018, 14:53 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 12/03/14 Posts: 20758 Post Likes: +26247 Company: Ciholas, Inc Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
|
|
Username Protected wrote: How the heck did this become a Crash Talk thread? Because safety is a major consideration in the decision of which aircraft to buy if it carries 8 key employees of a company. So when choosing between a King Air and Citation, the safety factor is relevant. Mike C.
_________________ Email mikec (at) ciholas.com
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Airplane Purchase Research: Pressurized Twin Options Posted: 06 Feb 2018, 14:57 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 12/03/14 Posts: 20758 Post Likes: +26247 Company: Ciholas, Inc Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
|
|
Username Protected wrote: January 1989 British Midland Airways 737, shut down wrong engine. Good find. I remember reading about this accident and had forgotten it involved a mistaken engine shutdown. What made the situation tricky was that they throttled back the wrong engine at the very same time the broken engine ceased making vibrations, so a false connection was made. Once they shutdown the engine in the 737, can't they restart it if they so choose? Why is shutdown irrevocable? The crew did attempt a restart of the engine they shutdown, so they must have thought it was possible. Mike C.
_________________ Email mikec (at) ciholas.com
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Airplane Purchase Research: Pressurized Twin Options Posted: 06 Feb 2018, 15:17 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 11/09/13 Posts: 1910 Post Likes: +927 Location: KCMA
Aircraft: Aero Commander 980
|
|
Username Protected wrote: AA191 _lost_ an engine; it departed the aircraft. The crew followed the procedures perfectly and ended up crashing. It is the reason why most operators now recommend V2 +10 or just keep what you have airspeed wise in the event of a failure at TO. In the AA 191 event the engine departed the airframe because of a faulty MX procedure. The slat on that side retracted due to a loss of hyd pressure. The crew being well trained and professional followed the procedure which called for a pitched up to and maintain V2. That wing with the retracted flap stalled and caused the crash. Had the crew just held the AS they had they would have had a chance to fly it around and land. After that the procedures were changed. Every event has the chance to helps improve safety. It is why things are always changing.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Airplane Purchase Research: Pressurized Twin Options Posted: 06 Feb 2018, 15:42 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 01/31/09 Posts: 5193 Post Likes: +3038 Location: Northern NJ
Aircraft: SR22;CJ2+;C510
|
|
Username Protected wrote: There are two ways to shut down the jet engines, pull the fire handle, which shuts off fuel, ignition , pneumatics ,hydraulics, and arms the fire bottles; and the second way is to place the start levers to the cut off position which shuts off fuel and ignition. Can't speak to the feasibility of restoring the fire handle on the 737. In the Citations you have a fire button. Press it and it closes valves to shutoff fuel, hydraulics, etc. Press it again and the valves open and an engine restart can be attempted.
_________________ Allen
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Airplane Purchase Research: Pressurized Twin Options Posted: 06 Feb 2018, 17:09 |
|
 |

|

|
Joined: 05/23/13 Posts: 8568 Post Likes: +11093 Company: Jet Acquisitions Location: Franklin, TN 615-739-9091 chip@jetacq.com
|
|
Username Protected wrote: How the heck did this become a Crash Talk thread? Because safety is a major consideration in the decision of which aircraft to buy if it carries 8 key employees of a company. So when choosing between a King Air and Citation, the safety factor is relevant. Mike C.
While safety is always a concern, I certainly wouldn't think it has any bearing on a decision like this. Sure, if we were comparing an airplane with a questionable safety record to one with an excellent safety record you would have a point. King Airs and Citations? It would be wrong to suggest that either have any significant safety concerns. You can certainly find a way to kill yourself in either, but I would never suggest buying one over the other for safety reasons.
In fact of the many reasons why a jet is superior to a turboprop, I wouldn't even list safety other than noting that the jet is better if an engine loss occurs during take off.
Faster, quieter, higher... all good reasons.
_________________ Recent acquisitions - 2019 King Air 350i - 2025 Citation M2Gen2 - 2015 Citation CJ3+
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Airplane Purchase Research: Pressurized Twin Options Posted: 06 Feb 2018, 17:43 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 01/01/10 Posts: 3503 Post Likes: +2476 Location: Roseburg, Oregon
Aircraft: Citation Mustang
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Bogus comment Mike C - once the ECO handle has been pulled it can't be reset. There have been many cases where the wrong one was pulled, isolating and ending hydraulics, fuel, bleed air and electrics with valves, doors and contacts.
Props CAN be unfeathered easily, and a re-start is likely. For the jet - not possible after yanking that handle. Look it up. All it takes is a faulty sensor to start the ball rolling.
Bob Engine restart is always an option in all of the jets I'm familiar with unless you have one of the following three Fs: Fire FOD Frozen fan
_________________ Previous A36TN owner
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Airplane Purchase Research: Pressurized Twin Options Posted: 06 Feb 2018, 17:51 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 12/03/14 Posts: 20758 Post Likes: +26247 Company: Ciholas, Inc Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Sure, if we were comparing an airplane with a questionable safety record to one with an excellent safety record you would have a point. King Airs and Citations? It would be wrong to suggest that either have any significant safety concerns. That's because they are judged relative to their peers, King Airs against turboprops, Citations against jets. Head to head, there is no contest, the Citation is much safer historically than a King Air. Mike C.
_________________ Email mikec (at) ciholas.com
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Airplane Purchase Research: Pressurized Twin Options Posted: 06 Feb 2018, 19:08 |
|
 |

|

|
Joined: 05/23/13 Posts: 8568 Post Likes: +11093 Company: Jet Acquisitions Location: Franklin, TN 615-739-9091 chip@jetacq.com
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Sure, if we were comparing an airplane with a questionable safety record to one with an excellent safety record you would have a point. King Airs and Citations? It would be wrong to suggest that either have any significant safety concerns. That's because they are judged relative to their peers, King Airs against turboprops, Citations against jets. Head to head, there is no contest, the Citation is much safer historically than a King Air. Mike C.
Makes sense to me... when are you going to buy a jet!!!
_________________ Recent acquisitions - 2019 King Air 350i - 2025 Citation M2Gen2 - 2015 Citation CJ3+
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Airplane Purchase Research: Pressurized Twin Options Posted: 06 Feb 2018, 19:24 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 11/09/13 Posts: 1910 Post Likes: +927 Location: KCMA
Aircraft: Aero Commander 980
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Bogus comment Mike C - once the ECO handle has been pulled it can't be reset. There have been many cases where the wrong one was pulled, isolating and ending hydraulics, fuel, bleed air and electrics with valves, doors and contacts.
Props CAN be unfeathered easily, and a re-start is likely. For the jet - not possible after yanking that handle. Look it up. All it takes is a faulty sensor to start the ball rolling.
Bob Engine restart is always an option in all of the jets I'm familiar with unless you have one of the following three Fs: Fire FOD Frozen fan
Clint, like Paul said in some airplanes it’s a one time deal when you pull the fire handle. Same with disconnecting a generator you can only reset on the ground.
It’s is a nice feature on your plane that a restart is always an option.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Airplane Purchase Research: Pressurized Twin Options Posted: 06 Feb 2018, 19:36 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 08/16/15 Posts: 3702 Post Likes: +5471 Location: Ogden UT
Aircraft: Piper M600
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Bogus comment Mike C - once the ECO handle has been pulled it can't be reset. There have been many cases where the wrong one was pulled, isolating and ending hydraulics, fuel, bleed air and electrics with valves, doors and contacts.
Props CAN be unfeathered easily, and a re-start is likely. For the jet - not possible after yanking that handle. Look it up. All it takes is a faulty sensor to start the ball rolling.
Bob Engine restart is always an option in all of the jets I'm familiar with unless you have one of the following three Fs: Fire FOD Frozen fan
Forgot one: Frickin too low
_________________ Chuck Ivester Piper M600 Ogden UT
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Airplane Purchase Research: Pressurized Twin Options Posted: 06 Feb 2018, 20:00 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 03/28/17 Posts: 8956 Post Likes: +11364 Location: N. California
Aircraft: C-182
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Bogus comment Mike C - once the ECO handle has been pulled it can't be reset. There have been many cases where the wrong one was pulled, isolating and ending hydraulics, fuel, bleed air and electrics with valves, doors and contacts.
Props CAN be unfeathered easily, and a re-start is likely. For the jet - not possible after yanking that handle. Look it up. All it takes is a faulty sensor to start the ball rolling.
Bob Engine restart is always an option in all of the jets I'm familiar with unless you have one of the following three Fs: Fire FOD Frozen fan[/quote] Clint, like Paul said in some airplanes it’s a one time deal when you pull the fire handle. Same with disconnecting a generator you can only reset on the ground. It’s is a nice feature on your plane that a restart is always an option.[/quote] _____________________________________________________________________ We had a new captain that got a tail pipe fire on an attempted engine start. He panicked and pulled the fire handle. The problem with that is the procedure for tail pipe fire is to bring the start lever to cut off, cutting off the fuel, and motor the engine with the start switch to blow out the fire, but pulling the fire handle cut off the air to the starter, so he had to call for the fire trucks.  Oh, he also had to call the chief pilot. 
|
|
| Top |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us
BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a
forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include
the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner,
Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.
BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates.
Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.
Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2025
|
|
|
|