banner
banner

10 Nov 2025, 06:21 [ UTC - 5; DST ]


Greenwich AeroGroup (banner)



Reply to topic  [ 142 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 6, 7, 8, 9, 10  Next
Username Protected Message
 Post subject: Re: Eclipse vs. Meridian
PostPosted: 04 Sep 2017, 19:32 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 10/31/14
Posts: 560
Post Likes: +268
Aircraft: eclipse
Username Protected wrote:
Can't do this in any Tprop
Attachment:
IMG_1703.JPG


Louie agrees especially upside down


Piaggio avanti


At less than 60 GPM?

I don't think so

Top

 Post subject: Re: Eclipse vs. Meridian
PostPosted: 04 Sep 2017, 19:48 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 10/14/14
Posts: 1784
Post Likes: +2028
Company: Corporate Air Technology
Aircraft: Pa28-235
Username Protected wrote:
Don, I suggest you not base your choice on this but, there have been no Eclipse crashes. Saw it posted on Beechtalk a week or so ago.


There was an Eclipse fatal in South Africa. Being investigated with thoughts of hypoxia or pilot incapacitation. Guy was only 57, a little young for incapacitation, but possible.

http://www.ainonline.com/aviation-news/business-aviation/2015-12-10/first-fatal-accident-eclipse-bizjet-reported

Low numbers, too little to have statistical power, but similar number of Piper Matrix's built as EA50's, no US fatals, more than twice as many G1000 Mirage and Meridians built, no fatals. They are all safe aircraft though. I would worry less about the plane than the pilot.


I need to figure out the green font thing. I was being sarcastic, the post in crash talk was titled "No eclipse crashes" it was referring to folks traveling to watch the recent solar event.

Vern Raburn, founder of Eclipse was a customer of mine and an early investor in my company. A true aviation enthusiast, considered a Royal Duke build before Rocket Engineering, owned many war birds including a Locheed Constilation. Unfortunately his computer industry background did not scale well to his Eclipse dream. He did get very close in the end to inking a deal with Russian builder that may have given the project longer legs.

As for the Eclpse as a sound investment, I can not endorse this. As Vern found out production numbers do not support it. With no production, aftermarket support will become very expensive if at all available. I would put the Eclipse, a nicely engineered product in the same category as an old Paris Jet. Relegated to the few who can afford to fly and maintain one for the pure joy of it.

The positive financial model if there is such a thing with airplanes would certainly be weighted to something with lively production.

Top

 Post subject: Re: Eclipse vs. Meridian
PostPosted: 04 Sep 2017, 20:27 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 10/31/14
Posts: 560
Post Likes: +268
Aircraft: eclipse
Steve
They are currently in production and you can buy one with custom paint for less than a Piper M600, also is a great airplane.

I guess sometime in the next year they will start building the new 700 model.

They just started flying their first of 3 test airplanes for the new 700


Top

 Post subject: Re: Eclipse vs. Meridian
PostPosted: 04 Sep 2017, 20:49 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 10/14/14
Posts: 1784
Post Likes: +2028
Company: Corporate Air Technology
Aircraft: Pa28-235
Username Protected wrote:
Steve
They are currently in production and you can buy one with custom paint for less than a Piper M600, also is a great airplane.

I guess sometime in the next year they will start building the new 700 model.

They just started flying their first of 3 test airplanes for the new 700


Andy, I stated lively production, if they can not pump out and sell a hefty number of these I see little chance of their success. It would make a great Bonanza replacement, about the same size. If it were my money (no I don't have enough) I would be leaning toward a Cessna CJ, Mustang or M2, all substantially more airplane for the dollar and one that is likely to be supported better.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Eclipse vs. Meridian
PostPosted: 04 Sep 2017, 21:53 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 03/15/16
Posts: 691
Post Likes: +459
Location: Charlotte NC
Aircraft: Piper Mirage
I think when I looked at the Meridian last, it didn't need a gear overhaul at a certain interval like the other turboprops and jets. It's been a while since I looked at it but I believe the meridian was made more like a ga airplane than a corporate jet when it comes to routine Maintanence which makes it much cheaper to maintain than other t props.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Eclipse vs. Meridian
PostPosted: 04 Sep 2017, 21:57 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 09/05/12
Posts: 698
Post Likes: +524
Location: Vero Beach, FL
Aircraft: C310R, E55P, H130T2
Agree with Jason. If you want a used light jet the only ones to consider are a Mustang or Phenom 100.

Currently there are 34 Mustangs for sale and 31 Phenoms. Good portion of those on engine and maintenance programs...hard to believe you couldn't get a good deal with that much selection for sale. A big plus of Cessna is the maintenance network all though Embraer is laser focused on developing and expanding their support network. Embraer has made significant improvements.

With that said if I was in your shoes I'd buy a Meridian and reasses how it works in a few years. The market seems to be stable for ones with the gross weight increase...2003-2004+ model year if I recall correctly. I don't think you'd lose that much money on a used one if you had to get out in a year or two. Get one with a G500 retrofit or later G1000 birds. I'd avoid the Avidyne equipped ones...that plane is a unicorn to me until a 3rd party like JPI or EI releases STC solution to free you from digital engine displays wrapped up in the Avidyne suite. I'm also fairly certain that Avidyne doesn't even support that system anymore...could be wrong.

I love Piper. Great company, great people. I had my eyes set on a used Seneca when I was shopping for a twin. I really wanted to represent the home team, unfortunately I couldn't find a good example of a used Seneca within my budget so that's how I ended up with a 310R.


Last edited on 05 Sep 2017, 00:26, edited 1 time in total.

Top

 Post subject: Re: Eclipse vs. Meridian
PostPosted: 04 Sep 2017, 22:25 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 01/14/09
Posts: 825
Post Likes: +313
Location: Boise, ID
Aircraft: 06 Meridian, C180
You are wrong about Avidyne supporting the Meridian. I just renewed my maintenance on the Avidyne for 3 years at just over $1AMU per year. I don't get why you feel you need the digital engine displays with a separate manufacturer. Garmin has them in theirs. What's your issue there?


Top

 Post subject: Re: Eclipse vs. Meridian
PostPosted: 04 Sep 2017, 22:28 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 09/05/12
Posts: 698
Post Likes: +524
Location: Vero Beach, FL
Aircraft: C310R, E55P, H130T2
Username Protected wrote:
You are wrong about Avidyne supporting the Meridian. I just renewed my maintenance on the Avidyne for 3 years at just over $1AMU per year. I don't get why you feel you need the digital engine displays with a separate manufacturer. Garmin has them in theirs. What's your issue there?


Lack of innovation for a discontinued product...stuck in the past. The engine displays keep you locked in that era.

Garmin just breathed new life into the G1000 product line with the NXI upgrade.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Eclipse vs. Meridian
PostPosted: 04 Sep 2017, 22:49 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 01/14/09
Posts: 825
Post Likes: +313
Location: Boise, ID
Aircraft: 06 Meridian, C180
Username Protected wrote:
You are wrong about Avidyne supporting the Meridian. I just renewed my maintenance on the Avidyne for 3 years at just over $1AMU per year. I don't get why you feel you need the digital engine displays with a separate manufacturer. Garmin has them in theirs. What's your issue there?


Lack of innovation for a discontinued product...stuck in the past. The engine displays keep you locked in that era.

Garmin just breathed new life into the G1000 product line with the NXI upgrade.

Innovation in a turbine engine monitor? OK, I'll bite. What does Garmin's engine monitor tell you that Avidyne's does not?

Top

 Post subject: Re: Eclipse vs. Meridian
PostPosted: 05 Sep 2017, 00:06 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 09/05/12
Posts: 698
Post Likes: +524
Location: Vero Beach, FL
Aircraft: C310R, E55P, H130T2
Username Protected wrote:
OK, I'll bite. What does Garmin's engine monitor tell you that Avidyne's does not?


Nothing...you're missing the point. At present date if an Meridian owner wanted to bail on the Avidyne suite there is only one option...the G950 from Cutter at $200k (that's what google search article said it cost). Avidyne offers you nothing to update their 10 year old glass panel. Meggit owners could at least jump to the G500 with nearly identical cability as the G950 for a lot less money.

Buying a G500 equipped plane offers you flexibility if/when Garmin improves that product or other competitors step into this space. Buying a G1000 equipped plane will likely have a pathway to the G1000 NXI. The G1000 NXI looks badass.

I certainly mean no disrespect. I'm just pointing out considerations that would weigh on me if I was shopping for a Meridian.

From Cutter
"Up until now, owners of older model Piper Meridians had few options for upgrading their flight deck to more modern standards. Meggitt-equipped Piper Meridians could install the Garmin G600 PFD/MFD retrofit...Avidyne-equipped Piper Meridians had really no option for retrofit packages as the G600 could not be used as it did not integrate the engine and systems as part of its interface. The only option was to wait for an upgrade directly from Avidyne… which has not gone beyond the concept stage for nearly two years. As a result, owners of pre-2009 Piper Meridian models seemed to be stuck… UNTIL NOW."


Top

 Post subject: Re: Eclipse vs. Meridian
PostPosted: 05 Sep 2017, 00:51 
Offline



User avatar
 WWW  Profile




Joined: 06/28/09
Posts: 14423
Post Likes: +9555
Location: Walnut Creek, CA (KCCR)
Aircraft: 1962 Twin Bonanza
Even if you update to the dual G500 setup you're stuck with the Meggit stuff for the turbine instruments, which is more of a limitation than the Avidyne stuff probably. I wouldn't worry about that too much, any fully integrated system you're going to be stuck with somewhat, including G1000.

_________________
http://calipilot.com
atp/cfii


Top

 Post subject: Re: Eclipse vs. Meridian
PostPosted: 05 Sep 2017, 11:14 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 01/14/09
Posts: 825
Post Likes: +313
Location: Boise, ID
Aircraft: 06 Meridian, C180
Username Protected wrote:
Nothing...you're missing the point. At present date if an Meridian owner wanted to bail on the Avidyne suite there is only one option...the G950 from Cutter at $200k (that's what google search article said it cost). Avidyne offers you nothing to update their 10 year old glass panel. Meggit owners could at least jump to the G500 with nearly identical cability as the G950 for a lot less money.

Buying a G500 equipped plane offers you flexibility if/when Garmin improves that product or other competitors step into this space. Buying a G1000 equipped plane will likely have a pathway to the G1000 NXI. The G1000 NXI looks badass.

I certainly mean no disrespect. I'm just pointing out considerations that would weigh on me if I was shopping for a Meridian.

From Cutter
"Up until now, owners of older model Piper Meridians had few options for upgrading their flight deck to more modern standards. Meggitt-equipped Piper Meridians could install the Garmin G600 PFD/MFD retrofit...Avidyne-equipped Piper Meridians had really no option for retrofit packages as the G600 could not be used as it did not integrate the engine and systems as part of its interface. The only option was to wait for an upgrade directly from Avidyne… which has not gone beyond the concept stage for nearly two years. As a result, owners of pre-2009 Piper Meridian models seemed to be stuck… UNTIL NOW."

I don't think I am missing the point. I was responding to your comment that you would avoid Avidyne due to the integrated engine monitoring system and would want it replace with a JPI or something:

"I'd avoid the Avidyne equipped ones...that plane is a unicorn to me until a 3rd party like JPI or EI releases STC solution to free you from digital engine displays wrapped up in the Avidyne suite. I'm also fairly certain that Avidyne doesn't even support that system anymore...could be wrong. "

Talking about the entire avionics suite is a different conversation and one where there are many, many frustrated G1000 Meridian owners on MMOPA that can't upgrade their G1000 because Piper has no upgrade path.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Eclipse vs. Meridian
PostPosted: 05 Sep 2017, 13:46 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 02/03/11
Posts: 197
Post Likes: +200
Location: San Diego, CA
Aircraft: B55, P46T
Enjoying this pre-Avidyne 2005 Meridian with dual WAAS GTN-750's and ADS-B.
So far a terrific experience and meets 90% of my needs perfectly.


Please login or Register for a free account via the link in the red bar above to download files.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Eclipse vs. Meridian
PostPosted: 05 Sep 2017, 13:47 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 01/14/09
Posts: 825
Post Likes: +313
Location: Boise, ID
Aircraft: 06 Meridian, C180
Beautiful panel! Does this still use the Meggitt DAU or a different one?


Top

 Post subject: Re: Eclipse vs. Meridian
PostPosted: 05 Sep 2017, 14:08 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 02/03/11
Posts: 197
Post Likes: +200
Location: San Diego, CA
Aircraft: B55, P46T
Still using the Meggitt DAU in this set up Greg. :cross:
So far....no exceedence events!, and no squawks in 120 hrs of ownership.


Top

Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic  [ 142 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 6, 7, 8, 9, 10  Next



Postflight (Bottom Banner)

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  

Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us

BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner, Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.

BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates. Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.

Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2025

.gallagher_85x50.jpg.
.v2x.85x100.png.
.BT Ad.png.
.jandsaviation-85x50.jpg.
.Plane AC Tile.png.
.CiESVer2.jpg.
.bullardaviation-85x50-2.jpg.
.sierratrax-85x50.png.
.Aircraft Associates.85x50.png.
.KingAirMaint85_50.png.
.boomerang-85x50-2023-12-17.png.
.jetacq-85x50.jpg.
.blackwell-85x50.png.
.headsetsetc_Small_85x50.jpg.
.dbm.jpg.
.KalAir_Black.jpg.
.daytona.jpg.
.aviationdesigndouble.jpg.
.Wentworth_85x100.JPG.
.SCA.jpg.
.bpt-85x50-2019-07-27.jpg.
.ocraviation-85x50.png.
.concorde.jpg.
.temple-85x100-2015-02-23.jpg.
.b-kool-85x50.png.
.shortnnumbers-85x100.png.
.holymicro-85x50.jpg.
.ABS-85x100.jpg.
.midwest2.jpg.
.Wingman 85x50.png.
.planelogix-85x100-2015-04-15.jpg.
.suttoncreativ85x50.jpg.
.saint-85x50.jpg.
.airmart-85x150.png.
.tat-85x100.png.
.mcfarlane-85x50.png.
.LogAirLower85x50.png.
.performanceaero-85x50.jpg.
.kingairnation-85x50.png.
.Elite-85x50.png.
.sarasota.png.
.AeroMach85x100.png.
.AAI.jpg.
.geebee-85x50.jpg.
.ssv-85x50-2023-12-17.jpg.
.MountainAirframe.jpg.
.camguard.jpg.
.8flight logo.jpeg.
.traceaviation-85x150.png.
.puremedical-85x200.jpg.
.rnp.85x50.png.
.blackhawk-85x100-2019-09-25.jpg.
.tempest.jpg.
.wat-85x50.jpg.
.aerox_85x100.png.
.stanmusikame-85x50.jpg.
.Latitude.jpg.
.kadex-85x50.jpg.
.garmin-85x200-2021-11-22.jpg.
.pdi-85x50.jpg.