banner
banner

23 Dec 2025, 12:42 [ UTC - 5; DST ]


Greenwich AeroGroup (banner)



Reply to topic  [ 4188 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80 ... 280  Next
Username Protected Message
 Post subject: Re: Flying the Citation II
PostPosted: 28 Oct 2016, 20:17 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 03/09/13
Posts: 933
Post Likes: +474
Location: Byron Bay,NSW Australia
Aircraft: C525,C25A,C25C,CL604
Username Protected wrote:
ILS1 at KIMT. 400 OVC @ 4. Nothing particularly remarkable. Just low IFR approach SP in a jet.

[youtube]https://youtu.be/0XlzquYKp1w[/youtube]


Did you forget the ignition Mark, no weird sound watching that one.

Andrew


Top

 Post subject: Re: Flying the Citation II
PostPosted: 28 Oct 2016, 20:35 
Offline


 WWW  Profile




Joined: 05/29/13
Posts: 14647
Post Likes: +12421
Company: Easy Ice, LLC
Location: Marquette, Michigan; Scottsdale, AZ, Telluride
Aircraft: C510,C185,C310,R66
Username Protected wrote:
ILS1 at KIMT. 400 OVC @ 4. Nothing particularly remarkable. Just low IFR approach SP in a jet.

[youtube]https://youtu.be/0XlzquYKp1w[/youtube]


Did you forget the ignition Mark, no weird sound watching that one.

Andrew


Moi? The hell you say? :lol: Guilty.
_________________
Mark Hangen
Deputy Minister of Ice (aka FlyingIceperson)
Power of the Turbine
"Jet Elite"


Top

 Post subject: Re: Flying the Citation II
PostPosted: 28 Oct 2016, 22:59 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 03/09/13
Posts: 933
Post Likes: +474
Location: Byron Bay,NSW Australia
Aircraft: C525,C25A,C25C,CL604
Username Protected wrote:
Moi? The hell you say? :lol: Guilty.


Haha. Couldn't see those green lights, I've never ever done that :D

Andrew


Top

 Post subject: Re: Flying the Citation II
PostPosted: 28 Oct 2016, 23:48 
Offline


 WWW  Profile




Joined: 05/29/13
Posts: 14647
Post Likes: +12421
Company: Easy Ice, LLC
Location: Marquette, Michigan; Scottsdale, AZ, Telluride
Aircraft: C510,C185,C310,R66
Username Protected wrote:
Moi? The hell you say? :lol: Guilty.


Haha. Couldn't see those green lights, I've never ever done that :D

Andrew


Can't get away with anything on BT!!
_________________
Mark Hangen
Deputy Minister of Ice (aka FlyingIceperson)
Power of the Turbine
"Jet Elite"


Top

 Post subject: Re: Flying the Citation II
PostPosted: 29 Oct 2016, 06:51 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 06/08/12
Posts: 12581
Post Likes: +5190
Company: Mayo Clinic
Location: Rochester, MN
Aircraft: Planeless in RST
Nicely done Mark!
Why iron mountain? Marquette below minimums?

_________________
BFR 8/18; IPC 8/18


Top

 Post subject: Re: Flying the Citation II
PostPosted: 29 Oct 2016, 09:50 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 12/09/10
Posts: 3634
Post Likes: +865
Location: KPAN
Aircraft: PA12
Username Protected wrote:
I have always felt safe in the 310. Let me just say I feel a lot safer in the jet.


Amen Brother!

300+ hours of multi turbine time in the last 6 months between the 550 and 425. Has sure made me feel the same.

_________________
520 M35, 7ECA, CL65, CE550, E170/190, B737
5/19 737
5/18 E170/190
8/17 CL65
3/17 CE500


Top

 Post subject: Re: Flying the Citation II
PostPosted: 29 Oct 2016, 09:55 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 12/09/10
Posts: 3634
Post Likes: +865
Location: KPAN
Aircraft: PA12
Longest flight to date in the CII non stop. 1440 nm in 4.1 on the tach. Burned 3500lbs landed with 1500 a good hour and a half of reserve.


Please login or Register for a free account via the link in the red bar above to download files.

_________________
520 M35, 7ECA, CL65, CE550, E170/190, B737
5/19 737
5/18 E170/190
8/17 CL65
3/17 CE500


Top

 Post subject: Re: Flying the Citation II
PostPosted: 29 Oct 2016, 10:34 
Offline


 WWW  Profile




Joined: 05/29/13
Posts: 14647
Post Likes: +12421
Company: Easy Ice, LLC
Location: Marquette, Michigan; Scottsdale, AZ, Telluride
Aircraft: C510,C185,C310,R66
Username Protected wrote:
I have always felt safe in the 310. Let me just say I feel a lot safer in the jet.


Amen Brother!

300+ hours of multi turbine time in the last 6 months between the 550 and 425. Has sure made me feel the same.


And to think I was your first :rofl:
_________________
Mark Hangen
Deputy Minister of Ice (aka FlyingIceperson)
Power of the Turbine
"Jet Elite"


Top

 Post subject: Re: Flying the Citation II
PostPosted: 29 Oct 2016, 10:34 
Offline


 WWW  Profile




Joined: 05/29/13
Posts: 14647
Post Likes: +12421
Company: Easy Ice, LLC
Location: Marquette, Michigan; Scottsdale, AZ, Telluride
Aircraft: C510,C185,C310,R66
Username Protected wrote:
Nicely done Mark!
Why iron mountain? Marquette below minimums?


No. I came out of KSAW. 310 was at Kimt

_________________
Mark Hangen
Deputy Minister of Ice (aka FlyingIceperson)
Power of the Turbine
"Jet Elite"


Top

 Post subject: Re: Flying the Citation II
PostPosted: 29 Oct 2016, 14:41 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 06/08/12
Posts: 12581
Post Likes: +5190
Company: Mayo Clinic
Location: Rochester, MN
Aircraft: Planeless in RST
Username Protected wrote:
Nicely done Mark!
Why iron mountain? Marquette below minimums?


No. I came out of KSAW. 310 was at Kimt


:thumbup:
_________________
BFR 8/18; IPC 8/18


Top

 Post subject: Re: Flying the Citation II
PostPosted: 29 Oct 2016, 19:06 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 08/18/12
Posts: 770
Post Likes: +164
Company: D.J. Williams, Inc.
Location: Lake Mary, FL
Aircraft: T-210
Really enjoy your videos Mark. Keep them coming.

Dave


Top

 Post subject: Re: Flying the Citation II
PostPosted: 30 Oct 2016, 20:15 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 12/11/10
Posts: 1874
Post Likes: +302
Aircraft: pa 31
I started reading this thread 3 days ago. Very informative, from Dave's original post to Mark's videos.....So I have reached the end of all 77 pages in this thread. Very interesting. One question that I don't understand is this.....
RVSM costs a pretty penny. Almost all aircraft now have GPS and RAIM to check for errors. With WAAS you get within 4 feet accuracy vertically, so why don't aircraft and ATC use the aircraft's GPS derived altitude? Even with RVSM equipped aircraft, the altimeters must have some error in them so what am I missing?

Remy


Top

 Post subject: Re: Flying the Citation II
PostPosted: 30 Oct 2016, 20:52 
Offline


 WWW  Profile




Joined: 05/29/13
Posts: 14647
Post Likes: +12421
Company: Easy Ice, LLC
Location: Marquette, Michigan; Scottsdale, AZ, Telluride
Aircraft: C510,C185,C310,R66
Username Protected wrote:
I started reading this thread 3 days ago. Very informative, from Dave's original post to Mark's videos.....So I have reached the end of all 77 pages in this thread. Very interesting. One question that I don't understand is this.....
RVSM costs a pretty penny. Almost all aircraft now have GPS and RAIM to check for errors. With WAAS you get within 4 feet accuracy vertically, so why don't aircraft and ATC use the aircraft's GPS derived altitude? Even with RVSM equipped aircraft, the altimeters must have some error in them so what am I missing?

Remy


Couple thoughts. Airlines don't have WAAS and neither do most legacy jets. More importantly, what would happen if the GPS system went down? You would have a massive problem on your hands. All it takes is watching a commercial jet pass over or under you at 1,000 feet at a closure rate of 1000kts and you will get religion about having the most accurate reliable system possible. Hence RVSM.

_________________
Mark Hangen
Deputy Minister of Ice (aka FlyingIceperson)
Power of the Turbine
"Jet Elite"


Top

 Post subject: Re: Flying the Citation II
PostPosted: 30 Oct 2016, 21:59 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 12/16/07
Posts: 19177
Post Likes: +31010
Company: Real Estate development
Location: Addison -North Dallas(ADS), Texas
Aircraft: In between
Just a thought, GPS altitude can be quite a bit different than standard pressure altitude. How would you standardize? Would everyone have to go to WASS GPS?

_________________
Dave Siciliano, ATP


Top

 Post subject: Re: Flying the Citation II
PostPosted: 30 Oct 2016, 22:56 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 12/11/10
Posts: 1874
Post Likes: +302
Aircraft: pa 31
Dave,
If ALL the aircraft are on the same GPS signal stream, then they would ALL be safe relative to one another. I get that the signal could go down in rare instances but then you have the standard altimeter as back up. I see all these videos of million dollar jets,and I chuckle when I see iPads and garmin gdl39 portable units still being used. I use them in my Navajo, and I think the FAA needs to embrace the latest technology. There should be an easier solution to spending 80K$ a plane to certify them. Just seems that if I can use WAAS signals to do an approach to a couple hundred feet then it should be incorporated into the RVSM systems where we are talking about 1,000 feet separations.

R


Username Protected wrote:
Just a thought, GPS altitude can be quite a bit different than standard pressure altitude. How would you standardize? Would everyone have to go to WASS GPS?


Top

Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic  [ 4188 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80 ... 280  Next



PlaneAC

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  

Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us

BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner, Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.

BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates. Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.

Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2025

.ocraviation-85x50.png.
.8flight logo.jpeg.
.SCA.jpg.
.headsetsetc_Small_85x50.jpg.
.bullardaviation-85x50-2.jpg.
.MountainAirframe.jpg.
.jandsaviation-85x50.jpg.
.rnp.85x50.png.
.KingAirMaint85_50.png.
.pdi-85x50.jpg.
.ABS-85x100.jpg.
.BT Ad.png.
.bpt-85x50-2019-07-27.jpg.
.gallagher_85x50.jpg.
.concorde.jpg.
.Wingman 85x50.png.
.temple-85x100-2015-02-23.jpg.
.tempest.jpg.
.blackwell-85x50.png.
.jetacq-85x50.jpg.
.planelogix-85x100-2015-04-15.jpg.
.mcfarlane-85x50.png.
.aerox_85x100.png.
.shortnnumbers-85x100.png.
.kingairnation-85x50.png.
.aviationdesigndouble.jpg.
.airmart-85x150.png.
.Wentworth_85x100.JPG.
.Latitude.jpg.
.AAI.jpg.
.holymicro-85x50.jpg.
.AeroMach85x100.png.
.Plane AC Tile.png.
.Elite-85x50.png.
.sierratrax-85x50.png.
.camguard.jpg.
.midwest2.jpg.
.traceaviation-85x150.png.
.dbm.jpg.
.performanceaero-85x50.jpg.
.avnav.jpg.
.kadex-85x50.jpg.
.garmin-85x200-2021-11-22.jpg.
.stanmusikame-85x50.jpg.
.tat-85x100.png.
.v2x.85x100.png.
.suttoncreativ85x50.jpg.
.wat-85x50.jpg.
.b-kool-85x50.png.
.CiESVer2.jpg.
.boomerang-85x50-2023-12-17.png.
.blackhawk-85x100-2019-09-25.jpg.
.saint-85x50.jpg.
.LogAirLower85x50.png.
.daytona.jpg.
.Aircraft Associates.85x50.png.
.geebee-85x50.jpg.
.sarasota.png.
.puremedical-85x200.jpg.
.KalAir_Black.jpg.