banner
banner

13 Jan 2026, 08:49 [ UTC - 5; DST ]


Garmin International (Banner)



Reply to topic  [ 127 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 5, 6, 7, 8, 9  Next
Username Protected Message
 Post subject: Re: Aerostar vs C-421C
PostPosted: 11 Jan 2026, 16:36 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 08/09/11
Posts: 2111
Post Likes: +2942
Company: Naples Jet Center
Location: KAPF KPIA
Aircraft: EMB500 AC95 AEST
A couple different ends of the spectrum with these 2 planes but one thing I believe; the Aerostar is the most balanced, direct, honest, and best flying piston twin ever invented.

I moved back to a 331 powered Commander, another brilliant and great flying Ted Smith design.

For me, with business and kids 1,000- 1,500 nm away, JetA is more practical.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Aerostar vs C-421C
PostPosted: 11 Jan 2026, 17:59 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 04/19/19
Posts: 895
Post Likes: +273
Location: Benton AR KSUZ
Aircraft: Baron B55 Pll
Are windshields available for both? If so, does anyone know the cost for each plane? I found a used one for the Cessna at $17.5k and on Aerostar site it says anti ice so I doubt that is the windshield. Looks like side windows are available and reasonable


Top

 Post subject: Re: Aerostar vs C-421C
PostPosted: 11 Jan 2026, 18:19 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 10/24/19
Posts: 197
Post Likes: +81
Location: Central NY, (N03)
Aircraft: 421C
Username Protected wrote:

For me, with business and kids 1,000- 1,500 nm away, JetA is more practical.


I agree! Buy and fly the aircraft that meets your mission.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Aerostar vs C-421C
PostPosted: 11 Jan 2026, 18:23 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 05/04/11
Posts: 531
Post Likes: +126
Location: Covington, GA
Aircraft: 421C, 58
New windshields for the 421c are in stock at textron, can’t remember exactly but it’s 25-30k.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Aerostar vs C-421C
PostPosted: 11 Jan 2026, 20:05 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 04/19/19
Posts: 895
Post Likes: +273
Location: Benton AR KSUZ
Aircraft: Baron B55 Pll
Username Protected wrote:
New windshields for the 421c are in stock at textron, can’t remember exactly but it’s 25-30k.



Thanks


Top

 Post subject: Re: Aerostar vs C-421C
PostPosted: 11 Jan 2026, 20:06 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 01/08/17
Posts: 495
Post Likes: +351
Aircraft: Aerostars, Debonair
The Aerostar windshield has a hot plate typically on higher end planes. The windshield is expensive, but available.

There were also alcy windshields, some of which were grandfathered known-ice.

I don't know first hand, but I have seen labor figures for the installation on the 340 windshield - better have a drink before reading that bid. I would suspect the 421 could be similar on install cost.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Aerostar vs C-421C
PostPosted: 11 Jan 2026, 20:23 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 01/08/17
Posts: 495
Post Likes: +351
Aircraft: Aerostars, Debonair
Username Protected wrote:
the Aerostar is the most balanced, direct, honest, and best flying piston twin ever invented.


And just so the viewers don't confuse you with Arne ,

how many different types do you have in your books?


Top

 Post subject: Re: Aerostar vs C-421C
PostPosted: 11 Jan 2026, 22:13 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 01/23/18
Posts: 825
Post Likes: +1243
Aircraft: Aerostar
In Arnie’s defense:

I think I’m the Aerostar owner he was referring to.

Big Ego.

Plus, I have repeatedly posted big (realistic) numbers for the cost of ownership of a pressurized Aerostar.

Worse, I tell potential owners that if they have the slightest economic concern at the prospect of a 50K surprise, they should pass on owning a pressurized twin, any pressurized piston twin.

Them’s fighting words for wantabe buyers (and sellers).

:btt:

Bottom line:

An Aerostar is pretty comfortable for four occupants, and is going to be faster and have a lower ownership cost per mile than a 400 series Cessna piston twin.

An Aerostar handles and flys really nice, there is nothing tricky about flying one, assuming you fly it like an Aerostar and not a Cessna 182.

There is nothing wrong with a 421, much more cabin space and comfortable seating for more than four occupants, and the 421 should be quieter due to the slower propeller speeds of its geared engines.

Somewhere I read that one should buy an airplane that can do 80% of the owner’s missions and if necessary charter for the 20%.

Sounds reasonable.

I’m an egotistical Aerostar owner, I don’t care about reasonable or even practical.

I don’t think everyone should be an Aerostar owner, I don’t say “come on in the water’s fine”.
I believe a fair number of folks who imagine it would be cool to own an Aerostar shouldn’t.

Basically, owning (AND properly maintaining and operating) an Aerostar makes you a member of a special club, folks who were members of that club aren’t ex-Aerostar owners, they are former Aerostar owners. There is a difference, and if you know, you know.

Last: When Bill Lear was asked about the absence of a toilet in his airplane, he said I don’t have a toilet in my Cadillac I don’t need one in my airplane.

No toilet in my Aerostar.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Aerostar vs C-421C
PostPosted: 11 Jan 2026, 22:35 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 11/22/08
Posts: 3125
Post Likes: +1077
Company: USAF Propulsion Laboratory
Location: Dayton, OH
Aircraft: PA24, AEST 680, 421
Username Protected wrote:
I have owned a 600 for ten years and currently own a 700CR. I hate them both. Zero useful load. I can’t even run full fuel tanks and when I do the plane flys backwards. I would stay away from Aerostars at all cost. They’re maintenance nightmares also. Last time I went flying the right wing fell off. That was a really bad day and one hell of a money pit experience. On top of it they’re really ugly too. I hope this helps in your decision going forward.


So slow you need a rear view mirror!


Top

 Post subject: Re: Aerostar vs C-421C
PostPosted: 11 Jan 2026, 23:54 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 08/09/11
Posts: 2111
Post Likes: +2942
Company: Naples Jet Center
Location: KAPF KPIA
Aircraft: EMB500 AC95 AEST
Username Protected wrote:
the Aerostar is the most balanced, direct, honest, and best flying piston twin ever invented.


And just so the viewers don't confuse you with Arne ,

how many different types do you have in your books?


lol - not sure I want to admit the “experience” but it’s definitely been most of them over the formative years. I was thinking the other day that I hadn’t seen a twin Cessna on the ramp in awhile and that I was lucky enough to fly most of the Cessnas except maybe a 320 and T50. While I never flew a T50, I have a prop from one hanging on my office wall.

Arnie lost me on Bonanza corrosion promotion which was even before the wave thing as I recall. :lol:

Top

 Post subject: Re: Aerostar vs C-421C
PostPosted: Yesterday, 00:02 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 06/18/15
Posts: 1303
Post Likes: +534
Location: Alaska/Idaho
Aircraft: Helio Courier, MU2
Username Protected wrote:
I have owned a 600 for ten years and currently own a 700CR. I hate them both. Zero useful load. I can’t even run full fuel tanks and when I do the plane flys backwards. I would stay away from Aerostars at all cost. They’re maintenance nightmares also. Last time I went flying the right wing fell off. That was a really bad day and one hell of a money pit experience. On top of it they’re really ugly too. I hope this helps in your decision going forward.


So slow you need a rear view mirror!


Radar needs to be installed in the tail so you don’t get run over by a thunderstorm

Top

 Post subject: Re: Aerostar vs C-421C
PostPosted: Yesterday, 00:04 
Offline


User avatar
 WWW  Profile




Joined: 12/17/13
Posts: 6680
Post Likes: +5988
Location: Hollywood, Los Angeles, CA
Aircraft: Aerostar Superstar 2
Username Protected wrote:
The Aerostar windshield has a hot plate typically on higher end planes. The windshield is expensive, but available.

There were also alcy windshields, some of which were grandfathered known-ice.

I don't know first hand, but I have seen labor figures for the installation on the 340 windshield - better have a drink before reading that bid. I would suspect the 421 could be similar on install cost.


Yes, mine has the alcohol window, my 601P had the hot plate. I had alcohol window on my pre-Roman Empire Turbo Commander - simple system that works reasonably well.

_________________
"Either we heal now as a team, or we will die as individuals."


Top

 Post subject: Re: Aerostar vs C-421C
PostPosted: Yesterday, 00:55 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 11/08/13
Posts: 2232
Post Likes: +1531
Company: www.netburner.com
Location: KCRQ
Aircraft: Breeezy, 601P www.netburner.com -->
I've only flown PIC in 19 distinct types. Spread across SES,SEL,MEL,Glider,
"flown" (not PIC) 5 or 6 more.
Never flown anything that burns Jet-A
The Aerostar is the nicest handling plane I've ever flown.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Aerostar vs C-421C
PostPosted: Yesterday, 01:20 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 02/25/17
Posts: 292
Post Likes: +100
Location: Winnipeg, Canada
Aircraft: P210 SE, C182
When at Max gross in the climb on a hot day, say ISA +10 to +15, what will the Aerostar 700 and the Cessna 421C approximate climb rates be from FL 200 to 250? Is FL 250 realistic to get to on a warm day at max gross?

Garth


Top

 Post subject: Re: Aerostar vs C-421C
PostPosted: Yesterday, 04:45 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 01/05/11
Posts: 327
Post Likes: +250
Aircraft: 1978 Aerostar 700CR
If you’re debating whether, or, not you want to own an Aerostar, you probably should not own one. On the other hand, if you want an Aerostar, there really is no debate and depending on how you look at it, no logic. You just want it. If you’re a newbie and want an Aerostar, once you fly it, it’s all over. All common sense goes out the door. There’s just nothing like it and probably never will be. Today, the mind set is just not there for design. When you fully understand what Ted Smith designed, it’s staggering.

Thankfully some of us live in a period where we get to own fly and enjoy this magnificent design of an airplane. That day will not be with us forever. It will be a memory. Thankfully for some of us, it’s reality.


Top

Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic  [ 127 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 5, 6, 7, 8, 9  Next



PlaneAC

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  

Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us

BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner, Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.

BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates. Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.

Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2026

.KalAir_Black.jpg.
.sierratrax-85x50.png.
.blackhawk-85x100-2019-09-25.jpg.
.tat-85x100.png.
.geebee-85x50.jpg.
.camguard.jpg.
.gallagher_85x50.jpg.
.LogAirLower85x50.png.
.daytona.jpg.
.kingairnation-85x50.png.
.midwest2.jpg.
.AAI.jpg.
.rnp.85x50.png.
.shortnnumbers-85x100.png.
.tempest.jpg.
.SCA.jpg.
.aviationdesigndouble.jpg.
.suttoncreativ85x50.jpg.
.bullardaviation-85x50-2.jpg.
.jandsaviation-85x50.jpg.
.headsetsetc_Small_85x50.jpg.
.performanceaero-85x50.jpg.
.BT Ad.png.
.Plane AC Tile.png.
.saint-85x50.jpg.
.ocraviation-85x50.png.
.KingAirMaint85_50.png.
.aerox_85x100.png.
.temple-85x100-2015-02-23.jpg.
.stanmusikame-85x50.jpg.
.bpt-85x50-2019-07-27.jpg.
.holymicro-85x50.jpg.
.Aircraft Associates.85x50.png.
.mcfarlane-85x50.png.
.ElectroairTile.png.
.concorde.jpg.
.MountainAirframe.jpg.
.Elite-85x50.png.
.traceaviation-85x150.png.
.Latitude.jpg.
.dbm.jpg.
.garmin-85x200-2021-11-22.jpg.
.AeroMach85x100.png.
.b-kool-85x50.png.
.jetacq-85x50.jpg.
.blackwell-85x50.png.
.CiESVer2.jpg.
.Wingman 85x50.png.
.planelogix-85x100-2015-04-15.jpg.
.ABS-85x100.jpg.
.v2x.85x100.png.
.kadex-85x50.jpg.
.boomerang-85x50-2023-12-17.png.
.puremedical-85x200.jpg.
.pdi-85x50.jpg.
.wat-85x50.jpg.
.avnav.jpg.
.airmart-85x150.png.
.Plane Salon Beechtalk.jpg.
.Wentworth_85x100.JPG.