13 Jan 2026, 08:49 [ UTC - 5; DST ]
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Aerostar vs C-421C Posted: 11 Jan 2026, 17:59 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 04/19/19 Posts: 895 Post Likes: +273 Location: Benton AR KSUZ
Aircraft: Baron B55 Pll
|
|
|
Are windshields available for both? If so, does anyone know the cost for each plane? I found a used one for the Cessna at $17.5k and on Aerostar site it says anti ice so I doubt that is the windshield. Looks like side windows are available and reasonable
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Aerostar vs C-421C Posted: 11 Jan 2026, 18:19 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 10/24/19 Posts: 197 Post Likes: +81 Location: Central NY, (N03)
Aircraft: 421C
|
|
Username Protected wrote: For me, with business and kids 1,000- 1,500 nm away, JetA is more practical.
I agree! Buy and fly the aircraft that meets your mission.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Aerostar vs C-421C Posted: 11 Jan 2026, 18:23 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 05/04/11 Posts: 531 Post Likes: +126 Location: Covington, GA
Aircraft: 421C, 58
|
|
|
New windshields for the 421c are in stock at textron, can’t remember exactly but it’s 25-30k.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Aerostar vs C-421C Posted: 11 Jan 2026, 20:05 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 04/19/19 Posts: 895 Post Likes: +273 Location: Benton AR KSUZ
Aircraft: Baron B55 Pll
|
|
Username Protected wrote: New windshields for the 421c are in stock at textron, can’t remember exactly but it’s 25-30k. Thanks
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Aerostar vs C-421C Posted: 11 Jan 2026, 20:06 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 01/08/17 Posts: 495 Post Likes: +351
Aircraft: Aerostars, Debonair
|
|
|
The Aerostar windshield has a hot plate typically on higher end planes. The windshield is expensive, but available.
There were also alcy windshields, some of which were grandfathered known-ice.
I don't know first hand, but I have seen labor figures for the installation on the 340 windshield - better have a drink before reading that bid. I would suspect the 421 could be similar on install cost.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Aerostar vs C-421C Posted: 11 Jan 2026, 20:23 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 01/08/17 Posts: 495 Post Likes: +351
Aircraft: Aerostars, Debonair
|
|
Username Protected wrote: the Aerostar is the most balanced, direct, honest, and best flying piston twin ever invented. And just so the viewers don't confuse you with Arne , how many different types do you have in your books?
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Aerostar vs C-421C Posted: 11 Jan 2026, 22:13 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 01/23/18 Posts: 825 Post Likes: +1243
Aircraft: Aerostar
|
|
In Arnie’s defense: I think I’m the Aerostar owner he was referring to. Big Ego. Plus, I have repeatedly posted big (realistic) numbers for the cost of ownership of a pressurized Aerostar. Worse, I tell potential owners that if they have the slightest economic concern at the prospect of a 50K surprise, they should pass on owning a pressurized twin, any pressurized piston twin. Them’s fighting words for wantabe buyers (and sellers). Bottom line: An Aerostar is pretty comfortable for four occupants, and is going to be faster and have a lower ownership cost per mile than a 400 series Cessna piston twin. An Aerostar handles and flys really nice, there is nothing tricky about flying one, assuming you fly it like an Aerostar and not a Cessna 182. There is nothing wrong with a 421, much more cabin space and comfortable seating for more than four occupants, and the 421 should be quieter due to the slower propeller speeds of its geared engines. Somewhere I read that one should buy an airplane that can do 80% of the owner’s missions and if necessary charter for the 20%. Sounds reasonable. I’m an egotistical Aerostar owner, I don’t care about reasonable or even practical. I don’t think everyone should be an Aerostar owner, I don’t say “come on in the water’s fine”. I believe a fair number of folks who imagine it would be cool to own an Aerostar shouldn’t. Basically, owning (AND properly maintaining and operating) an Aerostar makes you a member of a special club, folks who were members of that club aren’t ex-Aerostar owners, they are former Aerostar owners. There is a difference, and if you know, you know. Last: When Bill Lear was asked about the absence of a toilet in his airplane, he said I don’t have a toilet in my Cadillac I don’t need one in my airplane. No toilet in my Aerostar.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Aerostar vs C-421C Posted: 11 Jan 2026, 22:35 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 11/22/08 Posts: 3125 Post Likes: +1077 Company: USAF Propulsion Laboratory Location: Dayton, OH
Aircraft: PA24, AEST 680, 421
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I have owned a 600 for ten years and currently own a 700CR. I hate them both. Zero useful load. I can’t even run full fuel tanks and when I do the plane flys backwards. I would stay away from Aerostars at all cost. They’re maintenance nightmares also. Last time I went flying the right wing fell off. That was a really bad day and one hell of a money pit experience. On top of it they’re really ugly too. I hope this helps in your decision going forward. So slow you need a rear view mirror!
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Aerostar vs C-421C Posted: 11 Jan 2026, 23:54 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 08/09/11 Posts: 2111 Post Likes: +2942 Company: Naples Jet Center Location: KAPF KPIA
Aircraft: EMB500 AC95 AEST
|
|
Username Protected wrote: the Aerostar is the most balanced, direct, honest, and best flying piston twin ever invented. And just so the viewers don't confuse you with Arne , how many different types do you have in your books?
lol - not sure I want to admit the “experience” but it’s definitely been most of them over the formative years. I was thinking the other day that I hadn’t seen a twin Cessna on the ramp in awhile and that I was lucky enough to fly most of the Cessnas except maybe a 320 and T50. While I never flew a T50, I have a prop from one hanging on my office wall.
Arnie lost me on Bonanza corrosion promotion which was even before the wave thing as I recall.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Aerostar vs C-421C Posted: Yesterday, 00:02 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 06/18/15 Posts: 1303 Post Likes: +534 Location: Alaska/Idaho
Aircraft: Helio Courier, MU2
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I have owned a 600 for ten years and currently own a 700CR. I hate them both. Zero useful load. I can’t even run full fuel tanks and when I do the plane flys backwards. I would stay away from Aerostars at all cost. They’re maintenance nightmares also. Last time I went flying the right wing fell off. That was a really bad day and one hell of a money pit experience. On top of it they’re really ugly too. I hope this helps in your decision going forward. So slow you need a rear view mirror!
Radar needs to be installed in the tail so you don’t get run over by a thunderstorm
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Aerostar vs C-421C Posted: Yesterday, 00:04 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 12/17/13 Posts: 6680 Post Likes: +5988 Location: Hollywood, Los Angeles, CA
Aircraft: Aerostar Superstar 2
|
|
Username Protected wrote: The Aerostar windshield has a hot plate typically on higher end planes. The windshield is expensive, but available.
There were also alcy windshields, some of which were grandfathered known-ice.
I don't know first hand, but I have seen labor figures for the installation on the 340 windshield - better have a drink before reading that bid. I would suspect the 421 could be similar on install cost. Yes, mine has the alcohol window, my 601P had the hot plate. I had alcohol window on my pre-Roman Empire Turbo Commander - simple system that works reasonably well.
_________________ "Either we heal now as a team, or we will die as individuals."
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Aerostar vs C-421C Posted: Yesterday, 00:55 |
|
|
|
|
I've only flown PIC in 19 distinct types. Spread across SES,SEL,MEL,Glider, "flown" (not PIC) 5 or 6 more. Never flown anything that burns Jet-A The Aerostar is the nicest handling plane I've ever flown.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Aerostar vs C-421C Posted: Yesterday, 01:20 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 02/25/17 Posts: 292 Post Likes: +100 Location: Winnipeg, Canada
Aircraft: P210 SE, C182
|
|
|
When at Max gross in the climb on a hot day, say ISA +10 to +15, what will the Aerostar 700 and the Cessna 421C approximate climb rates be from FL 200 to 250? Is FL 250 realistic to get to on a warm day at max gross?
Garth
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Aerostar vs C-421C Posted: Yesterday, 04:45 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 01/05/11 Posts: 327 Post Likes: +250
Aircraft: 1978 Aerostar 700CR
|
|
|
If you’re debating whether, or, not you want to own an Aerostar, you probably should not own one. On the other hand, if you want an Aerostar, there really is no debate and depending on how you look at it, no logic. You just want it. If you’re a newbie and want an Aerostar, once you fly it, it’s all over. All common sense goes out the door. There’s just nothing like it and probably never will be. Today, the mind set is just not there for design. When you fully understand what Ted Smith designed, it’s staggering.
Thankfully some of us live in a period where we get to own fly and enjoy this magnificent design of an airplane. That day will not be with us forever. It will be a memory. Thankfully for some of us, it’s reality.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us
BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a
forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include
the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner,
Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.
BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates.
Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.
Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2026
|
|
|
|