26 Nov 2025, 10:06 [ UTC - 5; DST ]
|
| Username Protected |
Message |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Travel Air—>Baron—>MU2—>Citation Posted: 14 Jun 2019, 19:53 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 08/23/10 Posts: 909 Post Likes: +726
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Grass field 440nm to 2800ft mountain strip to grass field without getting gas is current mission and a 501 cannot do that. Decision had zero to do with money. I don’t think your TBM could do that mission either Marc. What part of that mission will the TBM not do? The grass field? How high is the mountain strip?
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Travel Air—>Baron—>MU2—>Citation Posted: 14 Jun 2019, 19:58 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 05/05/09 Posts: 5309 Post Likes: +5298
Aircraft: C501, R66, A36
|
|
|
4400 ft elevation. It could do that I think. I’ve never seen a tbm on a grass strip
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Travel Air—>Baron—>MU2—>Citation Posted: 14 Jun 2019, 21:11 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 08/23/10 Posts: 909 Post Likes: +726
|
|
Username Protected wrote: 4400 ft elevation. It could do that I think. I’ve never seen a tbm on a grass strip Well, nobody asked, but I love looking up scenarios such as this. On a 30*, no wind, standard pressure day with (4) 170# people on board and NBAA reserves to depart from the 4400' mountain strip the following runway length is required (50' clearance): Meridian - 3,600' M600 - 3,400' TBM 850 - 3,100' SF50 - 5,500' Mustang - 5,250' PC12 - 2,350' These are the airplanes I'm intereted in and have POH's for. I'd love to know how the MU-2 does, or any other airplanes should anyone wish to provide.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Travel Air—>Baron—>MU2—>Citation Posted: 14 Jun 2019, 21:29 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 05/05/09 Posts: 5309 Post Likes: +5298
Aircraft: C501, R66, A36
|
|
|
Mu-2 used 1500ft with 4 adults, 1 baby and 220 gallons.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Travel Air—>Baron—>MU2—>Citation Posted: 14 Jun 2019, 23:46 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 08/23/10 Posts: 909 Post Likes: +726
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Mu-2 used 1500ft with 4 adults, 1 baby and 220 gallons. That’s really good!
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Travel Air—>Baron—>MU2—>Citation Posted: 14 Jun 2019, 23:57 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 12/03/14 Posts: 20781 Post Likes: +26293 Company: Ciholas, Inc Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
|
|
Username Protected wrote: About 20 hrs in it now. I feel comfortable in it. That's unusually fast, perhaps a bit of overconfidence. There's a lot you don't know yet. Try not to get too much of an education at any given moment. The MU2 is not hard to fly, but it is very unforgiving of inattention and sloppiness. Everything happens fast, so make sure you fly the plane and not that the plane flies you. Mike C.
_________________ Email mikec (at) ciholas.com
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Travel Air—>Baron—>MU2—>Citation Posted: 15 Jun 2019, 08:21 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 03/03/11 Posts: 2070 Post Likes: +2172
Aircraft: Piaggio Avanti
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I picked up the Citation today and flew back to Texas from Florida. I met my Dad in Jacksonville so he could fly back with me. It was a neat experience to take him with me and one I won’t ever forget. The plane performed well although there are several minor things to get ironed out. Fuel burn is obnoxious at FL280 but I’ll have to live with it until July 9th when it goes in for avionics. The ADSB upgrade will allow me to go to RVSM altitudes and drop the fuel burn to 800lbs or so. I saw 340-350 knots burning 1150lbs per hour.  at FL280. Very quiet and comfortable and easy to fly. Looking forward to tweaking this bird and getting all I can from her. That pic with your dad is awesome. Being able to share that experience with him is probably about as good as airplane ownership gets. That fuel burn though! You sure there wasn’t a hole in the tank?
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Travel Air—>Baron—>MU2—>Citation Posted: 15 Jun 2019, 08:50 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 12/31/17 Posts: 1067 Post Likes: +635 Location: KADS
Aircraft: C560
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I picked up the Citation today and flew back to Texas from Florida. I met my Dad in Jacksonville so he could fly back with me. It was a neat experience to take him with me and one I won’t ever forget. The plane performed well although there are several minor things to get ironed out. Fuel burn is obnoxious at FL280 but I’ll have to live with it until July 9th when it goes in for avionics. The ADSB upgrade will allow me to go to RVSM altitudes and drop the fuel burn to 800lbs or so. I saw 340-350 knots burning 1150lbs per hour.  at FL280. Very quiet and comfortable and easy to fly. Looking forward to tweaking this bird and getting all I can from her. That pic with your dad is awesome. Being able to share that experience with him is probably about as good as airplane ownership gets. That fuel burn though! You sure there wasn’t a hole in the tank?
The Citation is a great airplane. Treasure the time with your dad, I lost mine about 3 months ago. Mine flew all over the world and got me into aviation. Several years ago he went with me on a trip to KTUS and I found this picture on the internet of him. While we were waiting on the passengers to do their business we toured Pima.Attachment: TUS100511.jpg
Thank you Bill Ward who ever you are.
Please login or Register for a free account via the link in the red bar above to download files.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Travel Air—>Baron—>MU2—>Citation Posted: 15 Jun 2019, 10:03 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 12/03/14 Posts: 20781 Post Likes: +26293 Company: Ciholas, Inc Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
|
|
Username Protected wrote: There is no grass strip I would fly a TBM into unless it was an emergency. Wheels too small and high pressure. Tire pressure is your best indication of turf runway compatibility. In rough terms, the tire pressure will be your max contact pressure on the ground. For the MU2, that's ~55 PSI for the nose tires and ~65 PSI for the mains. The low pressure comes from large wheels. You can't land on a truly soft field, but it does well generally. A TBM is about double those numbers (130 PSI for the mans?) which means it really isn't suitable for turf. Attachment: mu2-on-grass.jpg Mike C.
Please login or Register for a free account via the link in the red bar above to download files.
_________________ Email mikec (at) ciholas.com
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Travel Air—>Baron—>MU2—>Citation Posted: 15 Jun 2019, 10:45 |
|
 |

|

|
 |
Joined: 03/18/09 Posts: 1162 Post Likes: +248 Company: Elemental - Pipistrel Location: KHCR
Aircraft: Citation CJ2+
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Well, nobody asked, but I love looking up scenarios such as this.
On a 30*, no wind, standard pressure day with (4) 170# people on board and NBAA reserves to depart from the 4400' mountain strip the following runway length is required (50' clearance):
Meridian - 3,600'
M600 - 3,400'
TBM 850 - 3,100'
SF50 - 5,500'
Mustang - 5,250'
PC12 - 2,350'
These are the airplanes I'm intereted in and have POH's for. I'd love to know how the MU-2 does, or any other airplanes should anyone wish to provide.
Something to keep in mind when looking at the Mustang and SF50 is that the numbers you are referencing may be the equivalent of a 'balanced field (since they aren't Part 25, they don't call them that), which might be either stopping on the runway at v1, or climbing to 35 feet with a loss of an engine at v1 while still being over the runway. I think the turboprop aircraft simply deal with clearance over a 50 foot obstacle - although I have not reviewed their POHs, so I am not sure.
_________________ -- Jason Talley Pipistrel Distributor http://www.elemental.aero
CJ2+ 7GCBC Pipsitrel Panthera
|
|
| Top |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us
BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a
forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include
the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner,
Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.
BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates.
Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.
Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2025
|
|
|
|