banner
banner

26 Nov 2025, 10:06 [ UTC - 5; DST ]


Garmin International (Banner)



Reply to topic  [ 180 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12  Next
Username Protected Message
 Post subject: Re: Travel Air—>Baron—>MU2—>Citation
PostPosted: 14 Jun 2019, 19:53 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 08/23/10
Posts: 909
Post Likes: +726
Username Protected wrote:
Grass field 440nm to 2800ft mountain strip to grass field without getting gas is current mission and a 501 cannot do that. Decision had zero to do with money. I don’t think your TBM could do that mission either Marc.


What part of that mission will the TBM not do? The grass field? How high is the mountain strip?


Top

 Post subject: Re: Travel Air—>Baron—>MU2—>Citation
PostPosted: 14 Jun 2019, 19:58 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 05/05/09
Posts: 5309
Post Likes: +5298
Aircraft: C501, R66, A36
4400 ft elevation. It could do that I think. I’ve never seen a tbm on a grass strip


Top

 Post subject: Re: Travel Air—>Baron—>MU2—>Citation
PostPosted: 14 Jun 2019, 21:11 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 08/23/10
Posts: 909
Post Likes: +726
Username Protected wrote:
4400 ft elevation. It could do that I think. I’ve never seen a tbm on a grass strip


Well, nobody asked, but I love looking up scenarios such as this.

On a 30*, no wind, standard pressure day with (4) 170# people on board and NBAA reserves to depart from the 4400' mountain strip the following runway length is required (50' clearance):


Meridian - 3,600'

M600 - 3,400'

TBM 850 - 3,100'

SF50 - 5,500'

Mustang - 5,250'

PC12 - 2,350'


These are the airplanes I'm intereted in and have POH's for. I'd love to know how the MU-2 does, or any other airplanes should anyone wish to provide.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Travel Air—>Baron—>MU2—>Citation
PostPosted: 14 Jun 2019, 21:29 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 05/05/09
Posts: 5309
Post Likes: +5298
Aircraft: C501, R66, A36
Mu-2 used 1500ft with 4 adults, 1 baby and 220 gallons.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Travel Air—>Baron—>MU2—>Citation
PostPosted: 14 Jun 2019, 21:43 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 04/20/09
Posts: 707
Post Likes: +201
Location: KMMU / Morristown, NJ
Aircraft: Cheyenne (58P prior)
Michael what were your insurance requirements to fly solo? It seems like you just completed the sims and now you’re flying trips with the family - Is it really that straight forward? Pretty impressive.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Travel Air—>Baron—>MU2—>Citation
PostPosted: 14 Jun 2019, 23:38 
Offline


User avatar
 WWW  Profile




Joined: 08/03/10
Posts: 1561
Post Likes: +1810
Company: D&M Leasing Houston
Location: Katy, TX (KTME)
Aircraft: CitationV/C180
I picked up the Citation today and flew back to Texas from Florida. I met my Dad in Jacksonville so he could fly back with me. It was a neat experience to take him with me and one I won’t ever forget. The plane performed well although there are several minor things to get ironed out. Fuel burn is obnoxious at FL280 but I’ll have to live with it until July 9th when it goes in for avionics. The ADSB upgrade will allow me to go to RVSM altitudes and drop the fuel burn to 800lbs or so. I saw 340-350 knots burning 1150lbs per hour. :eek: at FL280. Very quiet and comfortable and easy to fly. Looking forward to tweaking this bird and getting all I can from her.


Please login or Register for a free account via the link in the red bar above to download files.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Travel Air—>Baron—>MU2—>Citation
PostPosted: 14 Jun 2019, 23:46 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 08/23/10
Posts: 909
Post Likes: +726
Username Protected wrote:
Mu-2 used 1500ft with 4 adults, 1 baby and 220 gallons.


That’s really good!


Top

 Post subject: Re: Travel Air—>Baron—>MU2—>Citation
PostPosted: 14 Jun 2019, 23:57 
Offline


 WWW  Profile




Joined: 12/03/14
Posts: 20781
Post Likes: +26293
Company: Ciholas, Inc
Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
Username Protected wrote:
About 20 hrs in it now. I feel comfortable in it.

That's unusually fast, perhaps a bit of overconfidence.

There's a lot you don't know yet. Try not to get too much of an education at any given moment.

The MU2 is not hard to fly, but it is very unforgiving of inattention and sloppiness. Everything happens fast, so make sure you fly the plane and not that the plane flies you.

Mike C.

_________________
Email mikec (at) ciholas.com


Top

 Post subject: Re: Travel Air—>Baron—>MU2—>Citation
PostPosted: 15 Jun 2019, 07:25 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 01/28/13
Posts: 6310
Post Likes: +4393
Location: Indiana
Aircraft: C195, D17S, M20TN
There is no grass strip I would fly a TBM into unless it was an emergency. Wheels too small and high pressure. There are some TBM owners who do but best I can tell the strip while grass is dry and extremely firm, like granite.

Strictly from a POH standpoint there should be no problem. I’ve had a main off the taxiway once and helped another owner with the same and prefer not to go there again. Sinks like a rock with fuel on board.

_________________
Chuck
KEVV


Top

 Post subject: Re: Travel Air—>Baron—>MU2—>Citation
PostPosted: 15 Jun 2019, 08:21 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 03/03/11
Posts: 2070
Post Likes: +2172
Aircraft: Piaggio Avanti
Username Protected wrote:
I picked up the Citation today and flew back to Texas from Florida. I met my Dad in Jacksonville so he could fly back with me. It was a neat experience to take him with me and one I won’t ever forget. The plane performed well although there are several minor things to get ironed out. Fuel burn is obnoxious at FL280 but I’ll have to live with it until July 9th when it goes in for avionics. The ADSB upgrade will allow me to go to RVSM altitudes and drop the fuel burn to 800lbs or so. I saw 340-350 knots burning 1150lbs per hour. :eek: at FL280. Very quiet and comfortable and easy to fly. Looking forward to tweaking this bird and getting all I can from her.


That pic with your dad is awesome. Being able to share that experience with him is probably about as good as airplane ownership gets.

That fuel burn though! You sure there wasn’t a hole in the tank?


Top

 Post subject: Re: Travel Air—>Baron—>MU2—>Citation
PostPosted: 15 Jun 2019, 08:50 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 12/31/17
Posts: 1067
Post Likes: +635
Location: KADS
Aircraft: C560
Username Protected wrote:
I picked up the Citation today and flew back to Texas from Florida. I met my Dad in Jacksonville so he could fly back with me. It was a neat experience to take him with me and one I won’t ever forget. The plane performed well although there are several minor things to get ironed out. Fuel burn is obnoxious at FL280 but I’ll have to live with it until July 9th when it goes in for avionics. The ADSB upgrade will allow me to go to RVSM altitudes and drop the fuel burn to 800lbs or so. I saw 340-350 knots burning 1150lbs per hour. :eek: at FL280. Very quiet and comfortable and easy to fly. Looking forward to tweaking this bird and getting all I can from her.


That pic with your dad is awesome. Being able to share that experience with him is probably about as good as airplane ownership gets.

That fuel burn though! You sure there wasn’t a hole in the tank?


The Citation is a great airplane. Treasure the time with your dad, I lost mine about 3 months ago. Mine flew all over the world and got me into aviation. Several years ago he went with me on a trip to KTUS and I found this picture on the internet of him. While we were waiting on the passengers to do their business we toured Pima.
Attachment:
TUS100511.jpg


Thank you Bill Ward who ever you are.

Please login or Register for a free account via the link in the red bar above to download files.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Travel Air—>Baron—>MU2—>Citation
PostPosted: 15 Jun 2019, 10:03 
Offline


 WWW  Profile




Joined: 12/03/14
Posts: 20781
Post Likes: +26293
Company: Ciholas, Inc
Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
Username Protected wrote:
There is no grass strip I would fly a TBM into unless it was an emergency. Wheels too small and high pressure.

Tire pressure is your best indication of turf runway compatibility. In rough terms, the tire pressure will be your max contact pressure on the ground.

For the MU2, that's ~55 PSI for the nose tires and ~65 PSI for the mains. The low pressure comes from large wheels. You can't land on a truly soft field, but it does well generally. A TBM is about double those numbers (130 PSI for the mans?) which means it really isn't suitable for turf.
Attachment:
mu2-on-grass.jpg

Mike C.


Please login or Register for a free account via the link in the red bar above to download files.

_________________
Email mikec (at) ciholas.com


Top

 Post subject: Re: Travel Air—>Baron—>MU2—>Citation
PostPosted: 15 Jun 2019, 10:20 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 01/28/13
Posts: 6310
Post Likes: +4393
Location: Indiana
Aircraft: C195, D17S, M20TN
Mike has it;
Mains 135
Nose 95

Nada grass

_________________
Chuck
KEVV


Top

 Post subject: Re: Travel Air—>Baron—>MU2—>Citation
PostPosted: 15 Jun 2019, 10:38 
Offline


 WWW  Profile




Joined: 12/03/14
Posts: 20781
Post Likes: +26293
Company: Ciholas, Inc
Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
The other aspect about grass is prop clearance. The MU2 has ample prop ground clearance. To hit a prop, you'd have to land gear up, and even that won't do it on the long body MU2s.

The SETP have much less ground clearance, made worse by the fact the prop is quite far ahead of the nose gear which makes the effective prop clearance less when considering uneven ground. A dip of the nose and a ridge on the mains can put the prop into the ground in some cases. This afflicts the PC-12 despite it having similar tire pressures as the MU2.

Also, since brakes are less effective, you will be using beta to slow down on grass. The low prop clearance of the singles will tend to kick up dirt and debris that gets sucked into the engine. On the MU2, the high engine position pretty much eliminates that.

Mike C.

_________________
Email mikec (at) ciholas.com


Top

 Post subject: Re: Travel Air—>Baron—>MU2—>Citation
PostPosted: 15 Jun 2019, 10:45 
Offline



User avatar
 WWW  Profile




Joined: 03/18/09
Posts: 1162
Post Likes: +248
Company: Elemental - Pipistrel
Location: KHCR
Aircraft: Citation CJ2+
Username Protected wrote:

Well, nobody asked, but I love looking up scenarios such as this.

On a 30*, no wind, standard pressure day with (4) 170# people on board and NBAA reserves to depart from the 4400' mountain strip the following runway length is required (50' clearance):


Meridian - 3,600'

M600 - 3,400'

TBM 850 - 3,100'

SF50 - 5,500'

Mustang - 5,250'

PC12 - 2,350'


These are the airplanes I'm intereted in and have POH's for. I'd love to know how the MU-2 does, or any other airplanes should anyone wish to provide.


Something to keep in mind when looking at the Mustang and SF50 is that the numbers you are referencing may be the equivalent of a 'balanced field (since they aren't Part 25, they don't call them that), which might be either stopping on the runway at v1, or climbing to 35 feet with a loss of an engine at v1 while still being over the runway. I think the turboprop aircraft simply deal with clearance over a 50 foot obstacle - although I have not reviewed their POHs, so I am not sure.

_________________
--
Jason Talley
Pipistrel Distributor
http://www.elemental.aero

CJ2+
7GCBC
Pipsitrel Panthera


Top

Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic  [ 180 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12  Next



Postflight (Bottom Banner)

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  

Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us

BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner, Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.

BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates. Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.

Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2025

.sarasota.png.
.Aircraft Associates.85x50.png.
.Wentworth_85x100.JPG.
.bpt-85x50-2019-07-27.jpg.
.Wingman 85x50.png.
.stanmusikame-85x50.jpg.
.garmin-85x200-2021-11-22.jpg.
.rnp.85x50.png.
.gallagher_85x50.jpg.
.jandsaviation-85x50.jpg.
.pdi-85x50.jpg.
.concorde.jpg.
.daytona.jpg.
.holymicro-85x50.jpg.
.camguard.jpg.
.traceaviation-85x150.png.
.tat-85x100.png.
.8flight logo.jpeg.
.AeroMach85x100.png.
.Plane AC Tile.png.
.mcfarlane-85x50.png.
.planelogix-85x100-2015-04-15.jpg.
.midwest2.jpg.
.dbm.jpg.
.bullardaviation-85x50-2.jpg.
.kingairnation-85x50.png.
.jetacq-85x50.jpg.
.tempest.jpg.
.LogAirLower85x50.png.
.airmart-85x150.png.
.CiESVer2.jpg.
.performanceaero-85x50.jpg.
.aerox_85x100.png.
.Latitude.jpg.
.SCA.jpg.
.wat-85x50.jpg.
.shortnnumbers-85x100.png.
.v2x.85x100.png.
.KingAirMaint85_50.png.
.KalAir_Black.jpg.
.BT Ad.png.
.b-kool-85x50.png.
.MountainAirframe.jpg.
.AAI.jpg.
.aviationdesigndouble.jpg.
.puremedical-85x200.jpg.
.Elite-85x50.png.
.saint-85x50.jpg.
.ssv-85x50-2023-12-17.jpg.
.boomerang-85x50-2023-12-17.png.
.ABS-85x100.jpg.
.kadex-85x50.jpg.
.temple-85x100-2015-02-23.jpg.
.sierratrax-85x50.png.
.geebee-85x50.jpg.
.ocraviation-85x50.png.
.blackhawk-85x100-2019-09-25.jpg.
.avnav.jpg.
.suttoncreativ85x50.jpg.
.blackwell-85x50.png.
.headsetsetc_Small_85x50.jpg.