07 Jun 2025, 14:51 [ UTC - 5; DST ]
|
Username Protected |
Message |
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Cirrus convert Posted: 08 Jun 2014, 09:57 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 10/17/13 Posts: 90 Post Likes: +8 Location: KPWK
Aircraft: Pa-28-181/236; SR20
|
|
I recently was named on my friends policy as a pilot for his SR20. Im temporarily suspending my search for a plane. Flew the SR 20 yesterday and fell n love with it. Has the avionics I want and I can rent with no hassle of ownership. Love Bo, but this is too good an opportunity to pass up.
The private T hangar/man cave that the SR20 resides in is a plus. Chairs, stocked fridge, it's wonderful.
Last edited on 10 Jun 2014, 21:12, edited 2 times in total.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus convert Posted: 08 Jun 2014, 10:26 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 12/11/10 Posts: 1872 Post Likes: +297
Aircraft: pa 31
|
|
Nothing wrong with that. Enjoy. You probably never need yo fly with more than 4 people plus bags. Username Protected wrote: I recently was named on my friends policy as a pilot for his SR20. Im temporarily suspending my search for a plane. Flew the SR 20 yesterday and fell n love with it. Has the avionics I want and I can rent with no hassle of ownership. Love Bo, but this is too good an opportunity to pass up.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus convert Posted: 08 Jun 2014, 10:32 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 09/02/09 Posts: 8674 Post Likes: +9188 Company: OAA Location: Oklahoma City - PWA/Calistoga KSTS
Aircraft: UMF3, UBF 2, P180 II
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Very different experience More of a car feel than a plane. Cirrus are great, but they make you lazy, and let you forget that you are a pilot. I can understand why there are so many accidents involving cirrus. I fly sr22 once in a while, and it is a very different feel. I don't really like the relax feel. Just because you have that red strap, than everything is not going to be ok. You still need to pilot. It is still a plane. Here we go again  . It's getting to be be like twin vs. single...
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus convert Posted: 08 Jun 2014, 10:55 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 10/17/13 Posts: 90 Post Likes: +8 Location: KPWK
Aircraft: Pa-28-181/236; SR20
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Arthur,
Go for it! It's a great plane to fly. If you get a chance, also try out the -22....even more fun! Thanks Arlen. My buddy is in a partnership with two other guys. They all wanted me involved as they may be looking at a 22 Turbo in future, and want to see how we all fit. It's a relatively inexpensive rate just $15 more ph than the Archer I'm getting my IR in. It has the exact avionics. We all get along, they have a T hanger with a fridge in it so it's fun also hanging out. Feel I can't lose. I'm got back into flying to visit my kids. Yesterday was doing 140 kias which translated to 165 gs due to winds. At 8.6 ff per hour. Blew me away.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus convert Posted: 08 Jun 2014, 10:57 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 10/17/13 Posts: 90 Post Likes: +8 Location: KPWK
Aircraft: Pa-28-181/236; SR20
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Conversion or seduction? Good question David.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus convert Posted: 08 Jun 2014, 12:52 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 11/06/10 Posts: 12151 Post Likes: +3041 Company: Looking Location: Outside Boston, or some hotel somewhere
Aircraft: None
|
|
Username Protected wrote: 140 kias at what altitude?
The 20 seems like a good trainer, but I never understood why someone would choose one for a traveling machine when the 22 is available. Kind of like the Cheetah and the Tiger in the Grumman line. Money. Tim
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus convert Posted: 08 Jun 2014, 12:57 |
|
 |

|

|
 |
Joined: 02/25/13 Posts: 7471 Post Likes: +3089 Location: Jacksonville, FL (KCRG)
Aircraft: 1991 Baron 58
|
|
Username Protected wrote: 140 kias at what altitude?
The 20 seems like a good trainer, but I never understood why someone would choose one for a traveling machine when the 22 is available. Kind of like the Cheetah and the Tiger in the Grumman line. Money and Mission. If you need a 2 person travel machine for 450 nm or less trips 90% of the time and do a lot of local flying, the 20 fits the bill better. The 20 would be only 25 minutes slower at the max distance and since most trips are <300 for a lot of people the time difference shrinks to 15 minutes or less for less gas and cost but the same size cabin.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus convert Posted: 08 Jun 2014, 12:57 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 11/06/10 Posts: 12151 Post Likes: +3041 Company: Looking Location: Outside Boston, or some hotel somewhere
Aircraft: None
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Very different experience More of a car feel than a plane. Cirrus are great, but they make you lazy, and let you forget that you are a pilot. I can understand why there are so many accidents involving cirrus. I fly sr22 once in a while, and it is a very different feel. I don't really like the relax feel. Just because you have that red strap, than everything is not going to be ok. You still need to pilot. It is still a plane. Franck, Sorry but this is funny. Speed management on a Cirrus is much more critical then in a Bonanza. In a Cirrus, you come in fast you will float forever and go off the runway. The laminar flow wing with stiff gear means when you set a Cirrus down, you feel everything. If you want to grease it you better be on your "A" game. The Bonanza you have more options to control speed, prop control and gear for example. Also the Bonanza has better shocks, a more forgiving airfoil... end result a Bonanza is much easier to fly and a much more forgiving airplane. This applies to almost every aspect of flight. Tim
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus convert Posted: 08 Jun 2014, 13:23 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 01/29/08 Posts: 26338 Post Likes: +13080 Location: Walterboro, SC. KRBW
Aircraft: PC12NG
|
|
Username Protected wrote: 140 kias at what altitude?
The 20 seems like a good trainer, but I never understood why someone would choose one for a traveling machine when the 22 is available. Kind of like the Cheetah and the Tiger in the Grumman line. Seriously, who buys a 20? You'd be happy with it for 3 hours and want faster.
|
|
Top |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us
BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a
forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include
the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner,
Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.
BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates.
Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.
Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2025
|
|
|
|