29 May 2025, 15:51 [ UTC - 5; DST ]
|
Username Protected |
Message |
Username Protected
|
Post subject: jetprop? pro's and con's Posted: 08 Mar 2024, 14:23 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 01/10/13 Posts: 1240 Post Likes: +514 Location: greenville,ms
Aircraft: baron 58
|
|
thinking of moving from my 58 to one
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: jetprop? pro's and con's Posted: 08 Mar 2024, 17:17 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 08/16/15 Posts: 3404 Post Likes: +4897 Location: Ogden UT
Aircraft: Piper M600
|
|
Joe is also a very good broker, and an upstanding human. Would consider him for any PA46 variant. Tall son of a biscuit eater as well, and instructs from the right seat in all PA46 variants, if anyone wants to talk techniques or wives tales about getting in these aircraft. Ran into him in Grand Cayman a month ago. Attachment: 1.jpg
Please login or Register for a free account via the link in the red bar above to download files.
_________________ Chuck Ivester Piper M600 Ogden UT
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: jetprop? pro's and con's Posted: 08 Mar 2024, 21:52 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 08/03/20 Posts: 93 Post Likes: +81
Aircraft: Citation Mustang
|
|
You did not ask for a comparison with the Meridian but any discussion of JetProp must include the comparison.
JetProp is a great airplane with plus and minus versus Meridian. The JetProp is based on the small case PT6. The physically smaller engine allows the front baggage compartment to remain which is a big advantage. The smaller engine burns less fuel for a given amount of torque. Both the Meridian and JetProp/35 are similar speeds. The lighter JetProp climbs very fast at lower altitudes. You can pull 4000 fpm if you wish.
The physically larger Meridian engine fills the space so there is no front baggage. The engine is capable of more power but is limited/de-rated to 500hp so it can make full rated torque at virtually any altitude and temp the aircraft is allowed. The JetProp is limited to FL250 both in certification and as a practical matter by how much power it can make at altitude.
The Meridian holds more fuel but the difference in burn means the JetProp can go farther. That said a JetProp with full extended range has a useful load of about 300 lbs depending on the specific aircraft. If you own a JetProp you basically resign yourself to flying a bit over gross even with two people and bags. If you leave out fuel to make the range equal to Meridian the two aircraft hold about the same cargo. The JetProp has a front cargo compartment but no weight capacity to use it.
The Meridian wing is simply stronger. It’s not just the stronger spar that came with the 1999 and newer Mirage (I think). The Meridian wing has more chord and depth for fuel capacity. It resulted in a stronger wing that rides better in turbulence. The difference is significant.
The JetProp has a typical PT6 air scoop for ram air. When you open the ice door Ram air goes away so you lose some torque when you need it. The airplane still climbs well into the teens. In the 20s with ice door open you lose some performance.
With the derated engine the Meridian can afford to have the ice bypass open all the time which is how and why Piper built it that way. There is nothing to control. The JetProp guys will say Piper left free power on the table by not having ram air but that is not true. The Meridian can already make max power without the ram so there is nothing to gain. Ram air on the JetProp helps because the engine is not making max certified power at altitude without it.
The original JetProp were all the /34 engine. Later they offered the /21 or /35. All three are physically similar. The difference is temp limits. If your mission is in the teens for altitude (think basic med) the cheaper /21 is compelling at those altitudes all three are the same. If you want to fly at FL250 regularly you want the /35.
I am a fan of both aircraft. If you want a 2 passenger rocket that is cheaper to feed get the JetProp. If you want to take four adults and bags with a better ride buy the Meridian.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: jetprop? pro's and con's Posted: 09 Mar 2024, 00:36 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 12/03/14 Posts: 20200 Post Likes: +25329 Company: Ciholas, Inc Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Why on earth would you buy one of these over a Citation? To save gas? Well, yeah, that's exactly why one gets an SETP, less fuel. Mike C.
_________________ Email mikec (at) ciholas.com
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: jetprop? pro's and con's Posted: 09 Mar 2024, 01:05 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 03/23/08 Posts: 7357 Post Likes: +4087 Company: AssuredPartners Aerospace Phx. Location: KDVT, 46U
Aircraft: IAR823, LrJet, 240Z
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Why on earth would you buy one of these over a Citation? To save gas? Well, yeah, that's exactly why one gets an SETP, less fuel. Mike C. And volume. Y’all that live in the land of endless hangars have it easy.
In a lot of places the hangar you have defines the airplane you have and the ramp up in hangar volume is a serious issue.
_________________ Tom Johnson-Az/Wy AssuredPartners Aerospace Insurance Tj.Johnson@AssuredPartners.com C: 602-628-2701
|
|
Top |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us
BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a
forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include
the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner,
Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.
BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates.
Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.
Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2025
|
|
|
|