09 Jun 2025, 15:05 [ UTC - 5; DST ]
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Vans RV8 28,000 ft. Posted: 16 Dec 2015, 12:22 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 11/03/08 Posts: 16237 Post Likes: +27283 Location: Peachtree City GA / Stoke-On-Trent UK
Aircraft: A33
|
|
other than being dead I suppose it would be ok
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Vans RV8 28,000 ft. Posted: 16 Dec 2015, 12:38 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 07/10/10 Posts: 1070 Post Likes: +776 Location: New Braunfels, TX
Aircraft: PC-12
|
|
Username Protected wrote: other than being dead I suppose it would be ok 
_________________ ----Still emotionally attached to my Baron----
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Vans RV8 28,000 ft. Posted: 16 Dec 2015, 12:48 |
|
 |

|

|
 |
Joined: 06/08/11 Posts: 8472 Post Likes: +8284 Location: Cedar Rapids, IA (KCID)
Aircraft: 1978 Bonanza A36
|
|
Username Protected wrote: To get from 28k' to 10k' will require a descent of 7,200 FPM. Does it really? As long as a descent is initiated immediately, even descending at "only" 3,000 FPM will start the trend towards more oxygen and thus more time of useful consciousness. In other words, things get better gradually from the moment the descent is started. So I assume the key is to initiate the descent without delay, and that that is more important than to descend at a ridiculous rate. No? - Martin
_________________ Martin Pauly ABS Recognized Flight Instructor YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/martinpauly
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Vans RV8 28,000 ft. Posted: 16 Dec 2015, 12:53 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 04/29/13 Posts: 754 Post Likes: +542
Aircraft: C177RG, ATOS-VR
|
|
Username Protected wrote: To get from 28k' to 10k' will require a descent of 7,200 FPM. I wonder if he bothered to practice this life-critical maneuver? Every 1,000 feet you descend gives you another minute or so more useful consciousness. Glider pilots in the Sierra wave regularly fly above that and I can't remember the last time someone died in a glider due to an oxygen system failure. Someone flying along in a pressurized plane may be a little lax in monitoring their pressure/oxygen system, but I guarantee you that most people flying at those altitudes depending on an oxygen system are keeping a very close eye on things. I flown at 25,000' in my plane and I had a second O2 bottle/system next to me ready to use if I needed it. Vince
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Vans RV8 28,000 ft. Posted: 16 Dec 2015, 13:11 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 11/08/12 Posts: 12805 Post Likes: +5255 Location: Jackson, MS (KHKS)
Aircraft: 1961 Cessna 172
|
|
Username Protected wrote: A pilot on the Vans RV forum told how he got his RV8 to 28,000 ft. Though impressive, it seems like a risky flight. What consequences, if any, with a failure of his 02 system? 25,000 is the current limit for pressurized aircraft without redundant systems. 28 isn't far off that. It's more dangerous than chess club, but isn't reckless. https://www.vansaircraft.com/pdf/hp_limts.pdfWould worry me more.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Vans RV8 28,000 ft. Posted: 16 Dec 2015, 13:16 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 11/03/08 Posts: 16237 Post Likes: +27283 Location: Peachtree City GA / Stoke-On-Trent UK
Aircraft: A33
|
|
Username Protected wrote: So I assume the key is to initiate the descent without delay, and that that is more important than to descend at a ridiculous rate. No?
- Martin It's easy to sit at a desk and say that. A run through the altitude chamber should convince anyone that the key isn't getting down, it's processing the information to decide that there is a problem and deciding to start down
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Vans RV8 28,000 ft. Posted: 16 Dec 2015, 13:36 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 06/26/12 Posts: 2377 Post Likes: +1963 Location: Fredericksburg, VA
Aircraft: F/A-18C, T-45C, V35B
|
|
Username Protected wrote: So I assume the key is to initiate the descent without delay, and that that is more important than to descend at a ridiculous rate. No?
- Martin It's easy to sit at a desk and say that. A run through the altitude chamber should convince anyone that the key isn't getting down, it's processing the information to decide that there is a problem and deciding to start down
This is the key. Time of useful consciousness is just that. The actual ability to process information and make decisions degrades well before that. The question becomes: can I recognize the onset of hypoxia in enough time to take action before I lose the ability to make that decision?
The ability to regain oxygen saturation in the blood is another obstacle that has to be overcome. Overcoming the oxygen paradox becomes a major issue.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Vans RV8 28,000 ft. Posted: 16 Dec 2015, 14:09 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 11/08/12 Posts: 12805 Post Likes: +5255 Location: Jackson, MS (KHKS)
Aircraft: 1961 Cessna 172
|
|
Username Protected wrote: NA engine? maybe. Max mp about 10" at that altitude or about 30% power. A 210hp engine would make 60-65hp. Probably adequate for level flight, especially if the plane was light for the attempt.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Vans RV8 28,000 ft. Posted: 16 Dec 2015, 14:36 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 12/03/14 Posts: 20305 Post Likes: +25442 Company: Ciholas, Inc Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
|
|
Username Protected wrote: NA engine? I had my NA Comanche 260B to FL210 before, on a very long cross country (SJC to ICT, ride those winds). Pretty meager power, about 14" MAP. But it flew, and not that light, either. A much lighter RV8 with the same engine seems like it could do it, though not loaded for range. Mike C.
_________________ Email mikec (at) ciholas.com
|
|
Top |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us
BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a
forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include
the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner,
Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.
BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates.
Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.
Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2025
|
|
|
|