banner
banner

11 Jan 2026, 04:02 [ UTC - 5; DST ]


Greenwich AeroGroup (banner)



Reply to topic  [ 57 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4
Username Protected Message
 Post subject: Re: Piper T tail lance thoughts?
PostPosted: 05 Jan 2026, 14:07 
Offline




User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 12/10/07
Posts: 36352
Post Likes: +14672
Location: Minneapolis, MN (KFCM)
Aircraft: 1970 Baron B55
Username Protected wrote:
Resurrecting an old thread. Currently a Mooney M20J driver for the past 5 years. I’ve got it dialed in, Garmin 500 autopilot with garmin avionics suite. It’ll do 155 ktas on 10 gph at 8000’. But it’s starting to get small with two tall adults and a growing kiddo. I live at 3000’ and am usually flying at 9000’ to 10,000’ to get over the turbulence of western Texas. The cabin of the PA32 looks very inviting.

Theres a thread on here a few years ago of some guy tuning the turbo Saratoga with the intercooler mod to get 185ktas at 8500’. I saved the thread a few years ago. Granted it was the better/updated wing. Has anyone tried to tune their turbo lance to get better cooling / optimal airspeed like that? Jesse was his first name. Can’t remember the last name.

I'd be surprised if a turbo Saratoga could cruise at 185 kt down around 8000 MSL. At much higher altitudes it might be possible.

_________________
-lance

It's easier to fool people than to convince them that they have been fooled.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Piper T tail lance thoughts?
PostPosted: 05 Jan 2026, 14:31 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 07/01/16
Posts: 43
Post Likes: +3
Look it up, he was pretty detailed in his approach and well documented.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Piper T tail lance thoughts?
PostPosted: 05 Jan 2026, 15:10 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 03/28/17
Posts: 9119
Post Likes: +11598
Location: N. California
Aircraft: C-182
JAL used Pipers as trainers for awhile, and when they switched from the Arrow 3 conventional tail to the the Arrow 4 T-tail it was a disappointment. Couldn't get a smooth takeoff rotation. They even adjusted the angle of incidence, but little help. Piper seems to have these problems in the T-tail single engine piston line, apparently including the Lance.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Piper T tail lance thoughts?
PostPosted: 05 Jan 2026, 15:15 
Online


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 03/23/11
Posts: 14799
Post Likes: +6909
Location: Frederick, MD
Aircraft: V35A TC
I had a PA-32 for a few years and you won’t find a more comfortable plane to ride in….as a pilot it’s not the best or the fastest but it will get the job done…..and the Mrs will like the cabin space.

I sold it and bought a V35A….. :peace:

_________________
Views represented here are my own.....and do not in anyway reflect my employer's position.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Piper T tail lance thoughts?
PostPosted: 05 Jan 2026, 21:37 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 06/18/15
Posts: 1299
Post Likes: +532
Location: Alaska/Idaho
Aircraft: Helio Courier, MU2
Username Protected wrote:
Look it up, he was pretty detailed in his approach and well documented.


My experience was about 170ktas at 17,000. At ISA that’s about 130IAS. 185ktas at 8500, ISA day over 160kias. Since in intercooled PA32 can maintain any realistic cruise power to 17000’, his results imply his PA32 could cruise 209ktas at 17,000. Skeptical…


Top

 Post subject: Re: Piper T tail lance thoughts?
PostPosted: 05 Jan 2026, 22:44 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 07/01/16
Posts: 43
Post Likes: +3
viewtopic.php?f=49&t=159870

You read it and then tell me what you think.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Piper T tail lance thoughts?
PostPosted: 06 Jan 2026, 01:27 
Offline




User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 12/10/07
Posts: 36352
Post Likes: +14672
Location: Minneapolis, MN (KFCM)
Aircraft: 1970 Baron B55
Username Protected wrote:
https://beechtalk.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=49&t=159870

You read it and then tell me what you think.

I read the whole thread. I saw that he got about 178 KTAS at 12,200 (confirmed with a GPS triangle) and 185 KTAS at 15,500 (unconfirmed). While this is impressive for a turbo Saratoga it's still a long way from 185 Kt at 8500 ft.

_________________
-lance

It's easier to fool people than to convince them that they have been fooled.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Piper T tail lance thoughts?
PostPosted: 06 Jan 2026, 10:01 
Offline


 WWW  Profile




Joined: 02/27/19
Posts: 588
Post Likes: +309
Company: OwnShip Technology AG
Location: Zurich, Switzerland
Aircraft: C33/P32R
ForeFlight says book value in HP Cruise for our 2004 II TC lightly loaded is ~175-178 kt. So not exactly 185 kt but not too far off either. I can confirm it makes 180 up high on around 20 USG/h.


Please login or Register for a free account via the link in the red bar above to download files.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Piper T tail lance thoughts?
PostPosted: 06 Jan 2026, 11:52 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 01/31/10
Posts: 13662
Post Likes: +7820
Company: 320 Fam
Aircraft: 58TC
Username Protected wrote:
https://beechtalk.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=49&t=159870

You read it and then tell me what you think.

I read the whole thread. I saw that he got about 178 KTAS at 12,200 (confirmed with a GPS triangle) and 185 KTAS at 15,500 (unconfirmed). While this is impressive for a turbo Saratoga it's still a long way from 185 Kt at 8500 ft.


The plane could crack 190 in “marketing” conditions. 185 was easily repeatable and what I would call high performance cruise. I could run it with wide open manifold pressure, lean of peak. It made far more power when lean of peak due to cooling limitations when rich of peak.
_________________
Views are my own and don’t represent employers or clients
My 58TC https://tinyurl.com/mry9f8f6


Top

 Post subject: Re: Piper T tail lance thoughts?
PostPosted: 06 Jan 2026, 12:08 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 01/31/10
Posts: 13662
Post Likes: +7820
Company: 320 Fam
Aircraft: 58TC
Username Protected wrote:
Look it up, he was pretty detailed in his approach and well documented.


My experience was about 170ktas at 17,000. At ISA that’s about 130IAS. 185ktas at 8500, ISA day over 160kias. Since in intercooled PA32 can maintain any realistic cruise power to 17000’, his results imply his PA32 could cruise 209ktas at 17,000. Skeptical…


I’d be skeptical too.

The S1AD, like the J2BDs on my Panther, reached a much lower realistic critical altitude. Optimized for cooling and HP, the 15k range was about the top altitude for performance. The Bendix RSA is a great fuel system, but coupled with LYC turbocharging it peters out lower than a comparable Continental. LOP, to maintain max MP you needed even thicker air.

Fun project and a GREAT family hauler.
_________________
Views are my own and don’t represent employers or clients
My 58TC https://tinyurl.com/mry9f8f6


Top

 Post subject: Re: Piper T tail lance thoughts?
PostPosted: 07 Jan 2026, 17:18 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 01/06/08
Posts: 5416
Post Likes: +3114
Aircraft: B55 P2
Just my $.02 Having flown a PA32 my feeling is that "tuning" is sort of missing the point. For me its a simple rugged, reliable, easy-to-fly plane that can carry a lot of passengers and cargo and operate out of short fields.

Great for what it does, but not a speedster or a joy to fly. If it really can do 185 at 8500' the fuel burn must be very high.


Username Protected wrote:
Resurrecting an old thread. Currently a Mooney M20J driver for the past 5 years. I’ve got it dialed in, Garmin 500 autopilot with garmin avionics suite. It’ll do 155 ktas on 10 gph at 8000’. But it’s starting to get small with two tall adults and a growing kiddo. I live at 3000’ and am usually flying at 9000’ to 10,000’ to get over the turbulence of western Texas. The cabin of the PA32 looks very inviting.

Theres a thread on here a few years ago of some guy tuning the turbo Saratoga with the intercooler mod to get 185ktas at 8500’. I saved the thread a few years ago. Granted it was the better/updated wing. Has anyone tried to tune their turbo lance to get better cooling / optimal airspeed like that? Jesse was his first name. Can’t remember the last name.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Piper T tail lance thoughts?
PostPosted: Yesterday, 19:01 
Offline


 WWW  Profile




Joined: 01/12/10
Posts: 594
Post Likes: +1084
Location: Dallas, Texas
Aircraft: Piaggio P180, T-6
Flew a brand new one in the late 70s for charter. Personally I thought it was the worst hand flying piece of crap ever put in the sky. Hot start issues, elevator was terrible in its feel and rode like crap in turbulence. Thats all I remember.


Top

Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic  [ 57 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4



PlaneAC

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  

Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us

BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner, Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.

BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates. Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.

Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2026

.shortnnumbers-85x100.png.
.SCA.jpg.
.LogAirLower85x50.png.
.AeroMach85x100.png.
.geebee-85x50.jpg.
.jetacq-85x50.jpg.
.puremedical-85x200.jpg.
.daytona.jpg.
.mcfarlane-85x50.png.
.ElectroairTile.png.
.aviationdesigndouble.jpg.
.v2x.85x100.png.
.wat-85x50.jpg.
.AAI.jpg.
.8flight logo.jpeg.
.KalAir_Black.jpg.
.kingairnation-85x50.png.
.bullardaviation-85x50-2.jpg.
.dbm.jpg.
.aerox_85x100.png.
.suttoncreativ85x50.jpg.
.b-kool-85x50.png.
.Aircraft Associates.85x50.png.
.KingAirMaint85_50.png.
.kadex-85x50.jpg.
.garmin-85x200-2021-11-22.jpg.
.Latitude.jpg.
.sierratrax-85x50.png.
.temple-85x100-2015-02-23.jpg.
.headsetsetc_Small_85x50.jpg.
.holymicro-85x50.jpg.
.bpt-85x50-2019-07-27.jpg.
.airmart-85x150.png.
.Wentworth_85x100.JPG.
.planelogix-85x100-2015-04-15.jpg.
.tempest.jpg.
.gallagher_85x50.jpg.
.sarasota.png.
.Wingman 85x50.png.
.Plane Salon Beechtalk.jpg.
.tat-85x100.png.
.traceaviation-85x150.png.
.boomerang-85x50-2023-12-17.png.
.ocraviation-85x50.png.
.blackwell-85x50.png.
.midwest2.jpg.
.MountainAirframe.jpg.
.rnp.85x50.png.
.performanceaero-85x50.jpg.
.avnav.jpg.
.CiESVer2.jpg.
.camguard.jpg.
.concorde.jpg.
.blackhawk-85x100-2019-09-25.jpg.
.stanmusikame-85x50.jpg.
.ABS-85x100.jpg.
.jandsaviation-85x50.jpg.
.Elite-85x50.png.
.Plane AC Tile.png.
.saint-85x50.jpg.
.pdi-85x50.jpg.
.BT Ad.png.