09 Dec 2025, 13:52 [ UTC - 5; DST ]
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Blueorigin new glen flight 2 Posted: 15 Nov 2025, 16:48 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 12/24/17 Posts: 1444 Post Likes: +1293
Aircraft: A36
|
|
|
Technical progress is rarely linear. We have no idea who is actually ahead in whatever metric matters. It's easy to cut corners and show apparent progress early on. That doesn't mean that you won't be overtaken later. The USSR was ahead in the beginning, too.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Blueorigin new glen flight 2 Posted: 15 Nov 2025, 16:55 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 03/23/11 Posts: 14709 Post Likes: +6849 Location: Frederick, MD
Aircraft: V35A TC
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Technical progress is rarely linear. We have no idea who is actually ahead in whatever metric matters. It's easy to cut corners and show apparent progress early on. That doesn't mean that you won't be overtaken later. The USSR was ahead in the beginning, too. This was all proved out years ago in the early 90's with the Delta Clipper....the only thing missing then was the funding to make it happen. 
_________________ Views represented here are my own.....and do not in anyway reflect my employer's position.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Blueorigin new glen flight 2 Posted: 16 Nov 2025, 14:51 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 01/06/08 Posts: 5362 Post Likes: +3084
Aircraft: B55 P2
|
|
True, but any competition is good for the industry. We'll have to see if SpaceX made a good or bad gamble with their enormous BFR, I don't think its clear yet. Username Protected wrote: Nice job, but this means they are now where SpaceX was about 5 years ago.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Blueorigin new glen flight 2 Posted: 16 Nov 2025, 15:20 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 09/02/11 Posts: 1980 Post Likes: +2481 Location: N Alabama
Aircraft: 1968 B55
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Nice job, but this means they are now where SpaceX was about 5 years ago. In 2023-2024, it took SpaceX 16 months from first flight of Starship to its first booster landing. In 2025, it took Blue 11 months from first flight of New Glenn to its first booster landing. In 2026, both companies have a really ambitious set of plans. Let's see who scores first. If Blue is able to get Blue Moon safely to the lunar surface, I think you could argue that they're actually ahead of SpaceX in some pretty significant ways.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us
BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a
forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include
the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner,
Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.
BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates.
Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.
Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2025
|
|
|
|