01 Jun 2025, 01:37 [ UTC - 5; DST ]
|
Username Protected |
Message |
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Otto Celera 800 Posted: 23 Jan 2024, 20:50 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 11/22/12 Posts: 2835 Post Likes: +2780 Company: Retired Location: Lynnwood, WA (KPAE)
Aircraft: Lancair Evolution
|
|
On another site a poster reported that the highest speed they saw by the Celera prototype was 217 knots (ground speed) at 17,000', a long way short of the claims.
I agree, it looks like another Moller.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Otto Celera 800 Posted: 20 May 2025, 00:53 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 11/22/12 Posts: 2835 Post Likes: +2780 Company: Retired Location: Lynnwood, WA (KPAE)
Aircraft: Lancair Evolution
|
|
Username Protected wrote: https://www.avweb.com/https/www.avweb.com/multimedia/votw/best-of-the-web-laminar-flow-revolution/ They say the Celara 500 flight tests proved their concept, but so far as I know, they've never released the data to back that up. Until they do, it's a pig in a poke.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Otto Celera 800 Posted: 20 May 2025, 09:36 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 07/11/14 Posts: 1391 Post Likes: +372 Location: 46U
Aircraft: C182, Lancair IV-P
|
|
I give this team a lot of credit. Why divulge everything, particularly if working on own dime? Time will tell but I’m on the optimistic side.. Who will buy is another question? Best, Tom
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Otto Celera 800 Posted: 56 minutes ago |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 11/15/17 Posts: 1080 Post Likes: +559 Company: Cessna (retired)
|
|
Sort of reminescent of Jim Bede.
I once visited a Bede open house at the Newton, Ks airport and saw both the prop and jet Bd-5's fly.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Otto Celera 800 Posted: 54 minutes ago |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 11/15/17 Posts: 1080 Post Likes: +559 Company: Cessna (retired)
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Laminar flow isn’t the controlling issue while flying at high sonic/supersonic speeds.
It’s the drag bulge at the wing fuselage intersection (solvable by area ruling). The airplane shown in the video is going to run into the same wall every other design in the last 50 years has.
Even the Concorde couldn’t overcome the issue, so they used brute force (I.e., 4 turbojet engines) to fly supersonic. And with afterburners to get past the drag rise bump near Mach 1.
|
|
Top |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us
BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a
forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include
the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner,
Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.
BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates.
Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.
Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2025
|
|
|
|