banner
banner

01 Jun 2025, 06:54 [ UTC - 5; DST ]


Greenwich AeroGroup (banner)



Reply to topic  [ 44 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Username Protected Message
 Post subject: Re: Cessna 310 resale value?
PostPosted: 15 May 2025, 22:46 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 03/17/14
Posts: 125
Post Likes: +24
Location: Seattle (KBFI)
Aircraft: fmr BE33, SR22, B200
Re: insurance.

I had 1700 total and 40 multi (39 of that in a Duchess 20 years ago) and went to a King Air B200. Insurance is doable, and was 2.4% of hull value for the first year.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cessna 310 resale value?
PostPosted: 17 May 2025, 15:58 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 09/20/14
Posts: 2040
Post Likes: +1621
Location: KBJC, KMCW, KVGT
Aircraft: G36TN, Great Lakes
Username Protected wrote:
I'm in the same boat. I want a 340 but looking for a "starter twin" to build some time. I tried getting insurance for a 340 last year with 45 hours of twin time and 2500 overall. I'd be happy to pay more for year one as it would be cheaper than buying/selling a 310/Baron/Seneca, but the broker said all the underwriters came back with a no-quote.


Speaking of which...

If you're looking for multi time builder, this is what you want https://www.trade-a-plane.com/search?ca ... e=aircraft

Cheaper to buy, flys slower on less gas, so you get your hours faster at less expense. And since it's a trainer, you should get better insurance and be able to sell it down the line.

_________________
Matt Beckner


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cessna 310 resale value?
PostPosted: 18 May 2025, 21:37 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 06/17/14
Posts: 5876
Post Likes: +2641
Location: KJYO
Aircraft: C-182, GA-7
A friend of mine dry leased an A55 then purchased it so that he could build his 250-500 hours of fixed wing multi time after about 3500 in rotary wing aircraft.

An AH-64 driver (retired Army CAPT) with about 2000 hours picked up his Commercial Multi and flew a 100 hour block in my TravelAir. He got offered a job flying the Sewer Pipe and Caravan, so had to get his Commercial single.

What I would normally recommend, just for time building, is finding a TravelAir or Twinkie or P2006T or Seminole, or even a Cougar or Duchess. However, you are in Alaska, so it may be better to come to one of these programs down here where you build 100 hours over 3 weeks. Some of these programs now require you to fly with a CFI and the $300-$325 wet goes to $400 right real quick and in a hurry. Others are $300/hr for a 50 or 100 hour block and you also carry renters insurance for multi aircraft.

Outside of that, with those mountains around Alaska, I would be downright nervous in an NA aircraft, even a President Baron or President 310.

You will never get the $$ out of what you put in, which was already noted. While that is good advice, look at the threads about overhauls - Engine parts are still hard to come by, Divco is busy, and some of the boutique overhaul firms are backed up for months. So, you end up with 2 IO-470 or IO-520 factory remans if you can get them far enough out. You can follow this process and talk to AirPower about current prices. https://www.overhaulbids.com/homes/piston/solo

If you buy a run out aircraft or run it out yourself, you will probably only see 50% of the value that you put in and the law of diminishing returns hits as you put more into the aircraft.

If I were paying for my boys to build time (unfortunately grounded - ADHD), I would probably buy a new or gently used Tecnam P2006T and let them fly while also leasing it back to a local flight school and probably having them work at the school on the weekends and do MX work towards their A&P once they turned 18. I went through this exercise about (now) 10 years ago. It's hard to get a new or newer Seminole or Diamond DA-42 but those have a pretty high resale value because of the scarcity. Also, the DA-42's price is eye watering.

Lastly, talk to Tom or one of the insurance folks to get a feel for the market. Sometimes the magic number is 100 or 150 multi hours and sometimes it's those hours over one year and sometimes the insurance still makes you pay the piper if you have the new certificate smell and 250 hours.

Then you have the politics of you going outside Alaska to build time but AvGas prices down here aren't eye-watering.

I loved the Navajo (in the back with the boss most of the time) over the mountains of WV, MD, and PA, but those are really just small hills to you. Seeing the red glow of the turbos is unnerving the first time as a PAX vs in the right seat. It may be the best bet to just buy a low-time example for the best value if you can find it and bite the insurance bullet the first year. Also, I have no clue what AvGas costs up there but it's a lot less down here if you are building hours.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cessna 310 resale value?
PostPosted: 19 May 2025, 09:24 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 11/08/13
Posts: 2102
Post Likes: +1404
Location: KCRQ
Aircraft: Breeezy, 172,601P
I wanted an Aerostar, by my own evaluation (30hrs MEL) I was not yet ready.
I bought a Travel Air, put modern avionics in it and leased it back to the local flying club.
This allowed me to write off a bunch of the improvements.
Over 4 years I used the Travel Air and got about 300hrs of MEL time.
Going places doing things, IFR, VFR all over the west coast.
I maintained it with a blank check approach, anything not perfect was fixed.
I replaced one engine and worked hard to make it squawk free.
Then I purchased an Aerostar and sold the Travel Air to some club members at a price that was probably under its market value.

If you can't afford to make a 310 perfect, you can't afford to own a cabin class twin.
Cabin class twins are cheap for a reason, if you don't have a plan for a 100K unplanned event your not ready for a cabin class twin. (my unplanned event cost me ~$125K)*


I think this was a good path for me.
Keeping up with a more complex aircraft in the real world was really good training for the Aerostar. I've now had the Aerostar 8 years.

Learning Pressurization, Radar, turbo engine management and flying around in real weather without a really solid basic MEL background would be a big big step.

Id say the step from complex single to twin was about the same learning curve as transitioning from a simple MEL to a complex pressurized MEL.

One might be able to find a mentor pilot and work diligently over 6 months and get to the same place, I believe the cost will be similar in both cases.


*Lifter split in half and came loose in the left engine.
Engine continued to run and make oil pressure with one dead cylinder,.
Destroyed the case, crank all connecting rods and filled the
prop, governor, 2 turbos, turbo controller with steel metal chips.
I had to buy a new engine I got 10% core value for the engine. Had to replace the turbos and turbo controller. Overhauled the prop governor and the prop.
Total bill all in was north of $120K. Note that I have my A+P and did some of the work myself.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cessna 310 resale value?
PostPosted: 19 May 2025, 09:49 
Offline


User avatar
 WWW  Profile




Joined: 11/30/12
Posts: 4849
Post Likes: +5472
Location: Santa Fe, NM (KSAF)
Aircraft: B200, 500B
Username Protected wrote:
Outside of that, with those mountains around Alaska, I would be downright nervous in an NA aircraft, even a President Baron or President 310.

99% of the piston aircraft in Alaska are NA.

You don’t fly over the mountains in pistons, you fly through the passes.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cessna 310 resale value?
PostPosted: 19 May 2025, 10:18 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 09/05/12
Posts: 693
Post Likes: +505
Location: Vero Beach, FL
Aircraft: C310R, E55P, H130T2
I have a 1975 Cessna 310R I bought for $105K with 800hrs since factory remans back in 2015.

Here is some of the big things I've done since ownership:
-New props $40k
-Paint $40k
-New aux fuel bladders $14k installed
-Side brace kit - $20k
-Major panel upgrades- $200k
-Annuals and maintenance along the way - $250k - alternators, starter upgrades, starter drive adapters, top overhauls, fuel selector valves, an AD that they found this year from 1990 every shop had missed until now (AD 90-02-13).

It sure is nice now, it hauls 950lbs with full fuel payload, has a 5.5 hr endurance. If I had to do it all over again, I'd just get a Cirrus SR22 G5 or newer. It's one of the nicest 310Rs in the fleet, that said I'd be hard pressed to get over $275-300k for it if I had to fire sell it, maybe more if I was patient and found a buyer that appreciated what they are looking at.

In terms of an investment, it was a poor one.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cessna 310 resale value?
PostPosted: 19 May 2025, 16:05 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 09/20/14
Posts: 2040
Post Likes: +1621
Location: KBJC, KMCW, KVGT
Aircraft: G36TN, Great Lakes
Username Protected wrote:
Outside of that, with those mountains around Alaska, I would be downright nervous in an NA aircraft, even a President Baron or President 310.

99% of the piston aircraft in Alaska are NA.

You don’t fly over the mountains in pistons, you fly through the passes.


Is that an Alaska thing? I'm going to have to respectfully disagree. My SOP is to fly as high as I can justify over mountains. Staying low and in the passes means minimal glide range if something goes wrong and a very likely rough ride the rest of the time. Flying high (and even 5,000'+ over the tops of major mountains and mountain ranges) gives me more time and distance to deal with any problems which pop up. Easily reach many more airports on either side of a major mountain range if I had to. It also gives me better radio coverage with ATC, which otherwise will be pretty sparse or non-existent if you're down low. Being high means better situational awareness since ATC will often share radar information, and gives me better communication options if something goes wrong.

Flying through the passes means minimal options in an emergency, no ability to talk to ATC for IFR flight plans, flight following, or for help of any sort. I've gotten caught in some pretty "interesting" mountain wave, too, where flying low would have been a bad idea.

:bud:
_________________
Matt Beckner


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cessna 310 resale value?
PostPosted: 19 May 2025, 17:18 
Offline


User avatar
 WWW  Profile




Joined: 11/30/12
Posts: 4849
Post Likes: +5472
Location: Santa Fe, NM (KSAF)
Aircraft: B200, 500B
Username Protected wrote:
99% of the piston aircraft in Alaska are NA.

You don’t fly over the mountains in pistons, you fly through the passes.


Is that an Alaska thing?

Yes, that’s an Alaska thing. My statement could be read as a generality, but it was only meant to apply to Alaskan GA flying. I rarely fly *through* passes in the lower 48 outside of Idaho.

https://fly8ma.com/ac-91-15-terrain-fly ... in-alaska/

Quote:
Terrain flying in Alaska means, for the most part, “drainage flying.” Very few routes cross mountain ranges. They go through the mountains by way of passes. Most routes follow river or creek drainage patterns. Therefore, chart studies of the route to be followed should include recognition of the direction of flow of streams or rivers so that flight comparisons may be made and cross checked. Many rivers twist and turn through flatlands with so little gradient that it is difficult to tell which way the water is running. Most of the floating trees which snag on bars will have the roots pointed upstream. River routes, except during periods of high water, also offer the best forced landing possibilities on gravel bars which are frequently available. It so happens, by virtue of physical geography, choice, development of settlements, and occasional wisdom that most airports are located on, or within sight of, rivers, or large streams.

In the interior, all creeks, streams, or drainages by any other name, flow into rivers which go near an airport within a reasonable distance. It follows that the best way to find an airport if you are lost is to head downstream and down river. The airport you find may not be anywhere near your destination, but you will be on an airport and not on the muskeg out of gas and perhaps upside down. Check your WAC charts (or Sectional Charts once they are published) and notice, for example, that Northway, Tanacross, Big Delta, Fairbanks, Nenana, and Tanana are all on the Tanana River or very close to it. Even if you should be 20 or 30 miles off course flying from Northway to Fairbanks, flying “ down- drainage “ will bring you back to the river and on to an airport.

If you should happen to wind up 50 miles north of this route somehow or other, and follow the drainage, you wouldn’t get anywhere near Fairbanks, because you would then be on the north slope, with drainage into the Yukon River instead of the Tanana. However, you would find airports at Chicken, Eagle, Circle, Fort Yukon, Beaver, Stevens Village, Rampart and again, Tanana, where the Tanana River joins the Yukon.

It is hardly possible to follow a drainage cut, down to visible water flow, without running into an airport within a hundred miles on the drainage route, following downhill cuts, then dreams, then the river. In most cases there will be an airport in less distance than that.


Lake Hood is one of the busiest GA airports in the world and I would literally say 95% of the piston planes there are NA singles.

Top

 Post subject: Re: Cessna 310 resale value?
PostPosted: 19 May 2025, 20:36 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 06/24/17
Posts: 141
Post Likes: +29
Location: Alaska
Aircraft: S35
Username Protected wrote:
A light Q with no boots and IO-470 VOs 2 blades flies the best between a R and Q

R model has a lot of hidden differences from the Q in the structure beyond the long nose. The R works better with the engine upgrades because the different mount legs handle the 3 blade propellers better.

Q with 3 blades has trouble with the small front shock mounts needing replacement every couple years. The curtains in the nose of the Q cause corrosion issues but if removed then water from the nose gear gets up into nose mounted avionics boxes. The nose fender helps if you can find one not all beat up.

I'd prefer the light Q after flying both unless in weather where I need boots. The alcohol windshield is not the best but I'm not a big fan of looking through hot plates most of the time flying in good weather.

After that then I like the 421B best. The cost to maintain is not a huge difference from the 414 and or a turbo 310R. It is actually easier to work on than the tip tank 414s

421 is easier to fly than the 310 once your comfortable with engine management and systems but it's not for training. The wrong one of any of these can also just bury you in MX sadly.

I just helped an owner through the same thing you're dealing with. He bought a 310Q and got his multi in it. Flew it for a year about 100hrs and then bought a 421B. I checked him out in the 421 and he was able to get insured in both . They had huge hour number and said no at first for the 310 but a year later going back with rating and 100 plus in type PIC they were willing. But he is keeping the 310 for short trips, recurrent training with actual shutdowns. and 421 for long trips and weather. Different missions for both. It's hard to find something ideal for all missions but you may find a 310 does enough for what you need.

The old rule of airplane with 80% of what you need vs rare trips where you need the 20% more.

The 402 low time may be hard to find. 401 might be another possibility or short body Navajo instead of a Chieftain.

Biggest issue with Cessna twins is corrosion in the rear spar cap extrusions behind the exhaust system. They all try to destroy themselves unless you keep a regular program of ACF-50, cleaning and inspection.

I have started to look at the 401/402 series, it seems easier to find examples in good shape compared to the Navajos out there. Insurance isn’t a requirement for me, I’m not financing but the instructors I’ve talked to want it for liability reasons.

I am curious on the wing spar AD on the 400 series, it starts at 15k time in service correct, or is it every 50 hours regardless. I re-read the AD, 2018-03-03 a few times and it was a little confusing as to compliance times.


Last edited on 19 May 2025, 23:33, edited 1 time in total.

Top

 Post subject: Re: Cessna 310 resale value?
PostPosted: 19 May 2025, 21:27 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 08/23/15
Posts: 336
Post Likes: +283
Location: South Jersey KVAY
Aircraft: F33A IO550B CE-472
This 310 is very local too me. Been on market about 60 days. Has all the add ons and options I want for a 310. Literally my perfect 310. I cant help think the price is way too high even for how nice it is? What do you guys think? I called my insurance broker for a quote and they said the first two denied saying the hull value is just too much. I have 2500TT 675 multi. 0 time in type. Current owner says he paid 420k for it before he put in the new interior. Im ok paying a little over market value for the right plane but I do have a problem with paying signficantly over market value. Is the seller in outer space or is this a fair price? If he is in outer space how does one negotiate with that? Everyone says the piston twin market is deflated. I would disagree.

https://www.trade-a-plane.com/search?ca ... e=aircraft


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cessna 310 resale value?
PostPosted: 19 May 2025, 21:34 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 01/02/08
Posts: 7781
Post Likes: +5805
Company: Rusnak Auto Group
Location: Newport Coast, CA
Aircraft: Baron B55 N7123N
That is a top 1% 310R. The fellow who owns it should be more clear that it is an IO-550 Colemill Bearcat conversion, making it even more desirable. Curious why someone puts so much time and money into an airplane, then turns around and puts it up for sale. Hopefully not for medical reasons…

_________________
STAND UP FOR YOUR COUNTRY

Sven


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cessna 310 resale value?
PostPosted: 19 May 2025, 21:37 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 03/13/18
Posts: 327
Post Likes: +322
Location: KPDK; KSGJ
Aircraft: Piper Mirage
Username Protected wrote:
This 310 is very local too me. Been on market about 60 days. Has all the add ons and options I want for a 310. Literally my perfect 310. I cant help think the price is way too high even for how nice it is? What do you guys think? I called my insurance broker for a quote and they said the first two denied saying the hull value is just too much. I have 2500TT 675 multi. 0 time in type. Current owner says he paid 420k for it before he put in the new interior. Im ok paying a little over market value for the right plane but I do have a problem with paying signficantly over market value. Is the seller in outer space or is this a fair price? If he is in outer space how does one negotiate with that? Everyone says the piston twin market is deflated. I would disagree.

https://www.trade-a-plane.com/search?ca ... e=aircraft



I don’t know the 310 market at all but IF there is NDH and no corrosion and it’s all correct I would think it’s got to be worth somewhere in the low to mid 300s at least.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cessna 310 resale value?
PostPosted: 19 May 2025, 21:40 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 08/23/15
Posts: 336
Post Likes: +283
Location: South Jersey KVAY
Aircraft: F33A IO550B CE-472
Username Protected wrote:
That is a top 1% 310R. The fellow who owns it should be more clear that it is an IO-550 Colemill Bearcat conversion, making it even more desirable. Curious why someone puts so much time and money into an airplane, then turns around and puts it up for sale. Hopefully not for medical reasons…


Yes i thought the same. Top 1% easily. Yes unfortunately he told me he lost his medical and not sure he is getting it back.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cessna 310 resale value?
PostPosted: 19 May 2025, 21:40 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 09/20/14
Posts: 2040
Post Likes: +1621
Location: KBJC, KMCW, KVGT
Aircraft: G36TN, Great Lakes
Username Protected wrote:
That is a top 1% 310R. The fellow who owns it should be more clear that it is an IO-550 Colemill Bearcat conversion, making it even more desirable. Curious why someone puts so much time and money into an airplane, then turns around and puts it up for sale. Hopefully not for medical reasons…


Nice looking plane. He says he's motivated, and that the price is negotiable. Spells either "my wife is fed up with me pouring all my time and money into this airplane" or "can't get a medical". Both are sad.

_________________
Matt Beckner


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cessna 310 resale value?
PostPosted: 20 May 2025, 07:56 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 11/08/12
Posts: 268
Post Likes: +131
Aircraft: Cessna 340A; C172
Username Protected wrote:
This 310 is very local too me. Been on market about 60 days. Has all the add ons and options I want for a 310. Literally my perfect 310. I cant help think the price is way too high even for how nice it is? What do you guys think? I called my insurance broker for a quote and they said the first two denied saying the hull value is just too much. I have 2500TT 675 multi. 0 time in type. Current owner says he paid 420k for it before he put in the new interior. Im ok paying a little over market value for the right plane but I do have a problem with paying signficantly over market value. Is the seller in outer space or is this a fair price? If he is in outer space how does one negotiate with that? Everyone says the piston twin market is deflated. I would disagree.

https://www.trade-a-plane.com/search?ca ... e=aircraft


If that were a $400K+ 310R it would have to have something better than G5s and had better maintenance. The landing gear looks pretty bad, the boots are questionable, and the struts aren’t serviced properly. That reflects on both the maintenance history and the owners focus on cosmetics. It has a lot of nice attributes and might be worth a premium after inspection.

Is this the plane that was for sale in southern Florida a few years ago?


Top

Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic  [ 44 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next



B-Kool (Top/Bottom Banner)

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  

Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us

BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner, Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.

BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates. Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.

Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2025

.midwest2.jpg.
.CiESVer2.jpg.
.ssv-85x50-2023-12-17.jpg.
.Latitude.jpg.
.sierratrax-85x50.png.
.blackhawk-85x100-2019-09-25.jpg.
.tat-85x100.png.
.wilco-85x100.png.
.wat-85x50.jpg.
.Wentworth_85x100.JPG.
.Wingman 85x50.png.
.pdi-85x50.jpg.
.headsetsetc_Small_85x50.jpg.
.jetacq-85x50.jpg.
.blackwell-85x50.png.
.jandsaviation-85x50.jpg.
.ocraviation-85x50.png.
.camguard.jpg.
.bullardaviation-85x50-2.jpg.
.kingairnation-85x50.png.
.stanmusikame-85x50.jpg.
.MountainAirframe.jpg.
.temple-85x100-2015-02-23.jpg.
.aviationdesigndouble.jpg.
.dbm.jpg.
.mcfarlane-85x50.png.
.b-kool-85x50.png.
.kadex-85x50.jpg.
.geebee-85x50.jpg.
.garmin-85x200-2021-11-22.jpg.
.performanceaero-85x50.jpg.
.concorde.jpg.
.KalAir_Black.jpg.
.traceaviation-85x150.png.
.saint-85x50.jpg.
.shortnnumbers-85x100.png.
.puremedical-85x200.jpg.
.planelogix-85x100-2015-04-15.jpg.
.daytona.jpg.
.tempest.jpg.
.rnp.85x50.png.
.ABS-85x100.jpg.
.airmart-85x150.png.
.KingAirMaint85_50.png.
.SCA.jpg.
.boomerang-85x50-2023-12-17.png.
.bpt-85x50-2019-07-27.jpg.
.centex-85x50.jpg.
.aerox_85x100.png.
.gallagher_85x50.jpg.
.Elite-85x50.png.
.holymicro-85x50.jpg.