01 Nov 2025, 13:43 [ UTC - 5; DST ]
|
|
Page 1 of 1
|
[ 15 posts ] |
|
| Username Protected |
Message |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: HondaJet Echelon Posted: 16 Oct 2023, 15:36 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 04/28/21 Posts: 106 Post Likes: +66 Company: Charwood Partners
|
|
|
Up to 11 folks on board, including pilot. 2650NM Range 1+4. FL 470.
1) I'll believe it when I see it 2) Hopefully they have a solution to keep the things on the runway.....
TL:DR - Yawn.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: HondaJet Echelon Posted: 16 Oct 2023, 17:42 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 04/24/18 Posts: 736 Post Likes: +359 Location: NYC
Aircraft: ISP Eagle II SR22 g2
|
|
Username Protected wrote: yeah, but do the brakes work reliably? Hopefully, they figure out a solution to the weathervaning caused by the OTWEM design.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: HondaJet Echelon Posted: 16 Oct 2023, 17:44 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 08/05/16 Posts: 3151 Post Likes: +2294 Company: Tack Mobile Location: KBJC
Aircraft: C441
|
|
|
Same type? Yikes, how did they pull that off - different engines, different cabin, different performance. About the only thing that is the same are the avionics.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: HondaJet Echelon Posted: 16 Oct 2023, 19:28 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 05/09/18 Posts: 1175 Post Likes: +859 Location: Tucson, AZ
Aircraft: 1980 TR182
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Same type? Yikes, how did they pull that off - different engines, different cabin, different performance. About the only thing that is the same are the avionics. 737 MAX. 
_________________ Stan Kartchner Tucson, AZ (KRYN]
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: HondaJet Echelon Posted: 16 Oct 2023, 19:31 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 06/17/14 Posts: 6006 Post Likes: +2743 Location: KJYO
Aircraft: C-182, GA-7
|
|
Username Protected wrote: 737 MAX.  I was just typing that when I refreshed the page! Well said! Hopefully the Echelon gets some larger tires!
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: HondaJet Echelon Posted: 17 Oct 2023, 07:41 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 04/28/21 Posts: 106 Post Likes: +66 Company: Charwood Partners
|
|
|
When 100% of the owner-pilots I know have left the HDJT type due to cost-of-insurance issues (N=3), there ain't no way in hell that an insurer is going to insure this for an owner-pilot at any semblance of a "reasonable" number...
for ~10mm, there are a bunch of crewed jets I'd rather have.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: HondaJet Echelon Posted: 17 Oct 2023, 12:45 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 05/30/17 Posts: 198 Post Likes: +160
|
|
|
I hope they have addressed the ground handling/braking issues on these HondaJets. I have several hours in the HDJT and it quickly became apparent to me why these airplanes wind up off the runway, in ditches and down embankments … very challenging combination of aerodynamic and design factors, especially single pilot. My instructor pilot said that “you’ll get used to it” but I think the incident statistics tend to belie that. In the air and in the cabin, it’s a superb airplane. On the ground, there be dragons … maybe that was just my inadequacies but if I had the $$ for one, I would buy something else, maybe an M2. I do like the range and cabin size of the new one however and kudos for Honda to keep pushing the performance envelope!
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: HondaJet Echelon Posted: 17 Oct 2023, 13:04 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 08/05/16 Posts: 3151 Post Likes: +2294 Company: Tack Mobile Location: KBJC
Aircraft: C441
|
|
Username Protected wrote: When 100% of the owner-pilots I know have left the HDJT type due to cost-of-insurance issues (N=3), there ain't no way in hell that an insurer is going to insure this for an owner-pilot at any semblance of a "reasonable" number...
for ~10mm, there are a bunch of crewed jets I'd rather have. I don't think you'll be able to get one of these in the hangar for less than $16M. It has more range than a PC-24 and those are topping $14M. New jets (or airplanes, or vehicles in general) rarely pencil out. You could probably get a Falcon 900 with a dining area and two couches for a similar cost of ownership if you include capital cost. People just don't want to sit in a seat someone else farted in, or they are going to run them hard like NetJets or a busy corporate flight department where the per hour capital cost is small. I do think a part 91 owner coming from another jet (especially the smaller hondajet) will be able to insure it single pilot for less than the cost of another crew member, at least after the first year. That said, why do everything yourself when you can have another guy put the pitot covers on and start the air conditioning for an additional single digit % increase in annual spend.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: HondaJet Echelon Posted: 17 Oct 2023, 13:47 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 11/08/12 Posts: 7634 Post Likes: +5027 Location: Live in San Carlos, CA - based Hayward, CA KHWD
Aircraft: Piaggio Avanti
|
|
Username Protected wrote: … why do everything yourself when you can have another guy put the pitot covers on and start the air conditioning for an additional single digit % increase in annual spend. Because managing other humans is a PITA.
_________________ -Jon C.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: HondaJet Echelon Posted: 18 Oct 2023, 00:31 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 12/03/14 Posts: 20723 Post Likes: +26150 Company: Ciholas, Inc Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Because managing other humans is a PITA. I call it "chartering the human". It ruins the ability to use your airplane when and where you want. Mike C.
_________________ Email mikec (at) ciholas.com
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: HondaJet Echelon Posted: 18 Oct 2023, 11:56 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 08/05/16 Posts: 3151 Post Likes: +2294 Company: Tack Mobile Location: KBJC
Aircraft: C441
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Agree could be an awesome plane and finally a SOP jet that can actually go from NYC to LA.
Just a little sad that they've gone with Williams. We are fast approaching a total oligopoly when it comes to SP jet engines and that's not good for anyone. See PT6 market for reference. Be really nice to see a new player in this area and I had hoped HondaJet would have continued to develop their own engines. That is the biggest question I have - why did they invest all of that time and money into their own engine and then bail? Maybe GE bailed? That was the most exciting part of their entry into the market.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Page 1 of 1
|
[ 15 posts ] |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us
BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a
forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include
the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner,
Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.
BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates.
Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.
Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2025
|
|
|
|