11 May 2025, 12:58 [ UTC - 5; DST ]
|
Username Protected |
Message |
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Honda Posted: 27 May 2023, 21:15 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 11/23/15 Posts: 201 Post Likes: +92 Location: Greensboro, NC
Aircraft: Twin Bonanza, MU2
|
|
Been flying the HondaJet for 3 years. Great plane, easy to fly, easy to land and the one that I fly has been super reliable. The G3000 is so intuitive and makes you look good.
However, for the untrained/ inexperienced pilot it can be an handful on a wet runway. Not having TRs or a speed brake that kills lift, landing on non grooved we runway requires a little more pavement. When I started flying it, the AFM did not include wet runway data, but the G3000 did but even the FlightSafety instructors were not sure. I finally determined that if you applied the corrections required by 135.385 for wet runways, at typical weight you legally required 5800 feet of runway prior to takeoff. Again this was on a wet runway. I never had any issues getting it stopped as long as you are on speed and touched down in the touchdown zone. The wheels are small, and the anti skid does work hard, what is does not always feels good. The newer aircraft have a lift dump system what will address operations on wet runways allowing the use of less than 6000 feet.
People have complained about the hard 20 Knot crosswind limitation. Owners can upgrade to the Elite S, and thru a software upgrade, nose wheel steering has been improved resulting at a 25 knot demonstrated cross wind limitation.
Earlier this year, HondaJet introduced a phased maintenance program, replacing the 600/ 1200 hours inspections with four (4) 150 hour inspections. This inspections suppose to reduce maintenance downtime.
My only gripe with HondaJet is their P3 program. The aircraft that I fly is based on Greensboro, next to the factory and until recently, every time/cycle/ hour limit component or inspection was not scheduled until it’s due date, resulting in downtime that could been avoided. Secondly, a 5 day tire change is totally unacceptable.
The demise of JetIt was predictable. Charging an owner 1600 for live hours only, only covers your maintenance reserves and fuel. You have not paid for ferries, pilots and administrative cost. They, like so many before were a transactional company and you rely of explosive growth; you raise capital thru aircraft sales to fund your operation. That is a “challenging” way of running a business, as many before, and many after are finding out.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Honda Posted: 27 May 2023, 21:21 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 03/04/13 Posts: 4716 Post Likes: +3709 Location: Hampton, VA
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Been flying the HondaJet for 3 years. Great plane, easy to fly, easy to land and the one that I fly has been super reliable. The G3000 is so intuitive and makes you look good.
However, for the untrained/ inexperienced pilot it can be an handful on a wet runway. Not having TRs or a speed brake that kills lift, landing on non grooved we runway requires a little more pavement. When I started flying it, the AFM did not include wet runway data, but the G3000 did but even the FlightSafety instructors were not sure. I finally determined that if you applied the corrections required by 135.385 for wet runways, at typical weight you legally required 5800 feet of runway prior to takeoff. Again this was on a wet runway. I never had any issues getting it stopped as long as you are on speed and touched down in the touchdown zone. The wheels are small, and the anti skid does work hard, what is does not always feels good. The newer aircraft have a lift dump system what will address operations on wet runways allowing the use of less than 6000 feet.
People have complained about the hard 20 Knot crosswind limitation. Owners can upgrade to the Elite S, and thru a software upgrade, nose wheel steering has been improved resulting at a 25 knot demonstrated cross wind limitation.
Earlier this year, HondaJet introduced a phased maintenance program, replacing the 600/ 1200 hours inspections with four (4) 150 hour inspections. This inspections suppose to reduce maintenance downtime.
My only gripe with HondaJet is their P3 program. The aircraft that I fly is based on Greensboro, next to the factory and until recently, every time/cycle/ hour limit component or inspection was not scheduled until it’s due date, resulting in downtime that could been avoided. Secondly, a 5 day tire change is totally unacceptable.
The demise of JetIt was predictable. Charging an owner 1600 for live hours only, only covers your maintenance reserves and fuel. You have not paid for ferries, pilots and administrative cost. They, like so many before were a transactional company and you rely of explosive growth; you raise capital thru aircraft sales to fund your operation. That is a “challenging” way of running a business, as many before, and many after are finding out. No speed brakes seems odd for a modern aircraft, same with the small wheels, especially if you don’t want to rock TRs, which I get with FJs or the odd Honda engine For the price I don’t get it, odd ball engine, airframe with very very old tech, advantage is it’s “new” and has a nice Garmin cockpit and a big shitter for those who can’t hold it? I mean just get a phenom or mustang, or for a low cost of entry get a nextant and hire a second low time guy to sit in the right seat Outside of flying people who crave “new” and have crohn's disease, I don’t get it Guess you can enjoy your bowel movement as it skids off the runway 
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Honda Posted: 28 May 2023, 01:33 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 06/17/14 Posts: 5856 Post Likes: +2630 Location: KJYO
Aircraft: C-182, GA-7
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Guess you can enjoy your bowel movement as it skids off the runway  I see what you did there….
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Honda Posted: 28 May 2023, 01:48 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 03/04/13 Posts: 4716 Post Likes: +3709 Location: Hampton, VA
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Guess you can enjoy your bowel movement as it skids off the runway  I see what you did there….
Chit happens
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Honda Posted: 28 May 2023, 03:04 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 08/16/15 Posts: 3362 Post Likes: +4827 Location: Ogden UT
Aircraft: Piper M600
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I think it’s a nice jet, but does have some ground handling issues. And it’s pricey I wouldn’t mind having one, really nice inside. But for the same money, an M2 although less sexy is a more robust chariot. None of the light jets other than the SF50 are selling well. Where people are putting their money in the turbine 6-7 seat market, at least first quarter:
Cirrus SF50, 18 Piper M500/600, 8 TBM 910/960, 5 Citation M2, 5 Eclipse!!!!!! 2 Embraer P100, 2 Epic E1000, 2 Honda Jet, 1 Chuck, where does it say Eclipse sold 2 new jets? Are they really making new ones or are they counting refurb of the used ones?
They are considered new aircraft. With new numbers and FAA certification of the new models. I think some of the challenges are Pratt, no longer making that engine, and the avionics not being made new. Have to see what they do about that.
_________________ Chuck Ivester Piper M600 Ogden UT
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Honda Posted: 29 May 2023, 13:50 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 12/30/15 Posts: 767 Post Likes: +776 Location: NH; KLEB
Aircraft: M2, erstwhile G58
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Sounds like it’s time to go to the CEOs house and start making oneself whole
“Nice ski boat, what’s that worth? I’ll take it and you still have a balance of XYZ”
I have the same view of not paying workers as slave labor
Pretty sure that however outrageous it is/was for JetIt to fall short on their obligations, the CEO is not personally responsible for corporate liabilities. A very good way to add a criminal trespass woe to whatever JetIt may owe. Well established body of law in this country that separates individual from corporate liability.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Honda Posted: 29 May 2023, 15:17 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 03/04/13 Posts: 4716 Post Likes: +3709 Location: Hampton, VA
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Sounds like it’s time to go to the CEOs house and start making oneself whole
“Nice ski boat, what’s that worth? I’ll take it and you still have a balance of XYZ”
I have the same view of not paying workers as slave labor
Pretty sure that however outrageous it is/was for JetIt to fall short on their obligations, the CEO is not personally responsible for corporate liabilities. A very good way to add a criminal trespass woe to whatever JetIt may owe. Well established body of law in this country that separates individual from corporate liability.
And hasn’t that worked out well lol
|
|
Top |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us
BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a
forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include
the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner,
Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.
BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates.
Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.
Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2025
|
|
|
|