11 Nov 2025, 02:30 [ UTC - 5; DST ]
|
|
Page 1 of 1
|
[ 13 posts ] |
|
| Username Protected |
Message |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: CJ1 - CASP vs Pro Parts vs neither Posted: 28 Mar 2018, 10:10 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 05/20/16 Posts: 10 Company: LIFT Aviation Company
Aircraft: King Air 300
|
|
Oh I have thumbed through previous posts and figured I'd bring up my own topic. Be kind if there is an exact thread I missed on this topic. So as the topic line suggests: - we are a management company primarily in Cirrus, Meridian, TBM, Pilatus, Cessna 441, KingAir - just took delivery of a 2001 CJ1 - Collins ProLine 3 tube - GTN 650/750 upgrade - engines on TAP elite - just had the precoolers replaced - the question is (round numbers below) - best option for us? - $75/hr for CASP covering Collins components including labor and rental equipment vs - $270/hr for pro parts covering pretty much all parts? vs - self insuring and rolling the dice? Aircraft will likely fly 300 hours/yr. I have talked to many on the 525s and seems about 50% self insure (engine programs) - 25% CASP - 25% Pro Parts Anyhow, open to any friendly feedback. Thank you kindly in advance. 
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: CJ1 - CASP vs Pro Parts vs neither Posted: 28 Mar 2018, 11:09 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 08/30/13 Posts: 419 Post Likes: +71 Company: Cruce Aircraft Services Location: KPGD
Aircraft: Learjet 55, C-310
|
|
|
If you’re just managaing the airplane, less headaches will occur if you’re on the programs. If the owner has deep pockets and writing a check for $50k is a sneeze for him, then self insure for the parts.
Our accountants would rather see consistent cost, so they like smartparts. Though the owner just sneezed a check for $14 million for a new jet.
I hope that helps!
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: CJ1 - CASP vs Pro Parts vs neither Posted: 28 Mar 2018, 12:24 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 05/20/16 Posts: 10 Company: LIFT Aviation Company
Aircraft: King Air 300
|
|
|
All great advice - and along my thought process - thank you kindly
Maintenance will be with our local 500/525 guru.
ADS-B was just done pretty reasonably - it has the GTN650/750with the GTX transponders so the upgrade was pretty minimal - after the $100k for the 650/750
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: CJ1 - CASP vs Pro Parts vs neither Posted: 28 Mar 2018, 13:06 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 01/31/09 Posts: 5193 Post Likes: +3038 Location: Northern NJ
Aircraft: SR22;CJ2+;C510
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Maintenance will be with our local 500/525 guru.
Does your local maintenance shop have a good parts guy who knows how to source parts? What maintenance turnaround are you expecting? Can you wait while a part is sent out for OH/repair at 20% of the cost of an exchange part? Do you understand the different scenarios with Proparts and under which scenarios you come out ahead and which ones Cessna wins? With Proparts you are being charged retail prices for new or exchange parts. Your local parts guy can source parts at the same price or less. What markup over wholesale does your parts guy charge you? Collins repairs are pricey if you want quick turnaround with exchange components. Your most likely failure is a PFD/MFD panel. It is usually a power supply problem in the panel. An exchange panel can cost $15K while Duncan can repair it for a few AMU. If you can manage your parts supply chain you can save over the long term significantly over the programs. The programs give predictable costs to the owner. But if you go on Proparts understand what happens if you sell the plane and have a negative PP balance.
_________________ Allen
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: CJ1 - CASP vs Pro Parts vs neither Posted: 28 Mar 2018, 14:04 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 12/03/14 Posts: 20739 Post Likes: +26204 Company: Ciholas, Inc Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
|
|
|
Join Citation Jet Pilots. The forum and library will be worth it.
There's no viable option other than being on the Williams engine program. It will cost more in the long run to be off program. The Williams mafia has all the power and they have priced off program engine maintenance to make sure the programs are cheaper.
I've never understood ProParts given you have to pay for everything, for the most part, in the end, and all of it comes at high list prices. ProParts is a drug that encourages a lot of part swapping in maintenance and drives up your costs.
The Collins question is harder to measure and may be worth it. All depends on the failure rate and the repair costs.
For a plane that flies 300 hours/year, you are likely to need FEWER parts/repairs per hour than most owner/operators, so you are more likely to lose on programs than others. However, for a plane that flies that much, extended downtime could be a major revenue/cost factor.
Remember that no program is designed to lose money for the program vendor.
So, in short, Williams TAP and I'd go bare on everything else.
All of the advice above is from study and reading the views of others, not from actual experience.
Mike C.
_________________ Email mikec (at) ciholas.com
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: CJ1 - CASP vs Pro Parts vs neither Posted: 31 Mar 2018, 21:55 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 03/04/13 Posts: 2790 Post Likes: +1408 Location: Little Rock, Ar
Aircraft: A36 C560 C551 C560XL
|
|
|
Mike is, based on my experience, correct. If you are not on Williams’ engine program, you will be. They will see to it. As for ProParts, I have it on the Ultra to manage the risk on the Primus 1000 screens. Other than that, you can pay list price + anywhere:). I very actively monitor parts purchases. There are times that I don’t Use ProParts but buy elsewhere because it’s so much cheaper. Very few repair techs understand ProParts. They think it is Carte Blanche to just order parts.
Robert
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: CJ1 - CASP vs Pro Parts vs neither Posted: 02 Apr 2018, 02:12 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 03/09/13 Posts: 929 Post Likes: +472 Location: Byron Bay,NSW Australia
Aircraft: C525,C25A,C25C,CL604
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Does your local maintenance shop have a good parts guy who knows how to source parts? From what I’ve been able to figure out this is the key. I’m on pro-parts and I feel at the moment it is not worth it. I sway between not renewing next year and keeping it. My recent Doc 10 had about 50k worth of parts added to my balance. I’m not convinced they were all required but it’s easy for the maintenance shops just swap parts out. As Allen says you need someone with a bunch of good contacts and sources. This is a key issue for me in Australia. I wish CJP would create a database but maybe with Textron being a great support of the organisation that won’t happen. Andrew
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: CJ1 - CASP vs Pro Parts vs neither Posted: 02 Apr 2018, 09:05 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 12/03/14 Posts: 20739 Post Likes: +26204 Company: Ciholas, Inc Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I wish CJP would create a database but maybe with Textron being a great support of the organisation that won’t happen. I'm not aware of any support, financial or otherwise, that Textron gives to CJP. Mike C.
_________________ Email mikec (at) ciholas.com
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: CJ1 - CASP vs Pro Parts vs neither Posted: 02 Apr 2018, 14:11 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 01/31/09 Posts: 5193 Post Likes: +3038 Location: Northern NJ
Aircraft: SR22;CJ2+;C510
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I wish CJP would create a database but maybe with Textron being a great support of the organisation that won’t happen. I'm not aware of any support, financial or otherwise, that Textron gives to CJP. Mike C.
Look under the Partners tab on the CJP website and the different levels of sponsorship.
_________________ Allen
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: CJ1 - CASP vs Pro Parts vs neither Posted: 02 Apr 2018, 15:18 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 03/09/13 Posts: 929 Post Likes: +472 Location: Byron Bay,NSW Australia
Aircraft: C525,C25A,C25C,CL604
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I'm not aware of any support, financial or otherwise, that Textron gives to CJP. Mike come to a CJP conference, this year October at San Antionio. You will see! I’m not in any way bashing Textron or CJP BTW. Andrew
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Page 1 of 1
|
[ 13 posts ] |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us
BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a
forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include
the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner,
Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.
BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates.
Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.
Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2025
|
|
|
|