24 Nov 2025, 13:39 [ UTC - 5; DST ]
|
| Username Protected |
Message |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus PIREP, the good and the bad..... Posted: 14 Oct 2016, 06:49 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 09/02/09 Posts: 8726 Post Likes: +9456 Company: OAA Location: Oklahoma City - PWA/Calistoga KSTS
Aircraft: UMF3, UBF 2, P180 II
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Im only six years late to this thread but what the hell. I fly a cessna t210 and a 421 more than 500 hours a year and i just recently flew in a 2016 sr 22 during a windy day. The airplane felt like it was going to loose its roof ! Would never buy a composite. I agree with Jason ! That was Never my experience. I live and fly in Oklahoma so,de facto, I flying a lot of windy conditions. What is it with all of these zombie threads reappearing all of a sudden anyway?
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus PIREP, the good and the bad..... Posted: 14 Oct 2016, 09:20 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 06/05/11 Posts: 386 Post Likes: +172 Location: Atlanta, GA
Aircraft: SR22
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Im only six years late to this thread but what the hell. I fly a cessna t210 and a 421 more than 500 hours a year and i just recently flew in a 2016 sr 22 during a windy day. The airplane felt like it was going to loose its roof ! Would never buy a composite. I agree with Jason ! That was Never my experience. I live and fly in Oklahoma so,de facto, I flying a lot of windy conditions. What is it with all of these zombie threads reappearing all of a sudden anyway?
Wasn't my experience either. I found the SR22 dealt with crosswinds like they weren't even there. I regularly found myself questioning the wind reports as 10+ knot crosswinds in the SR22 seemed like calm wind for many other planes I've flown. Look over and see the windsock indicating what the ATIS/AWOS was reporting.
I find the Baron I'm flying now more work on crosswind landings than the SR22.
_________________ Wayne
LinkedIn instagram: waynecease
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus PIREP, the good and the bad..... Posted: 14 Oct 2016, 09:58 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 07/17/13 Posts: 2150 Post Likes: +3107 Location: Houston Texas (KDWH)
Aircraft: 1966 C55 Baron
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Im only six years late to this thread but what the hell. I fly a cessna t210 and a 421 more than 500 hours a year and i just recently flew in a 2016 sr 22 during a windy day. The airplane felt like it was going to loose its roof ! Would never buy a composite. I agree with Jason ! I found the Cirrus SR22 that I had to be a good flying airplane in turbulence. Wind wasn't noticeable. Please note that I have two Beechcraft and I love them. However, I liked the Cirrus just as much. Good plane, and I hope to own another one day.
_________________ Flying - Because baseball, football, basketball, soccer, bowling & golf only take one ball.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus PIREP, the good and the bad..... Posted: 14 Oct 2016, 10:15 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 12/04/09 Posts: 356 Post Likes: +149
Aircraft: Dakota
|
|
|
Does anyone know what the sweetspot in the SR22 lineup is??? Maybe a year or model that has the important advantages but can be had for less $$$??
Seems like someone here once said the 2005-2006 boodles were just that but I can't really remember..
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus PIREP, the good and the bad..... Posted: 14 Oct 2016, 19:17 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 06/27/11 Posts: 948 Post Likes: +877 Location: Miami, Florida KTMB
Aircraft: SR22
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Does anyone know what the sweetspot in the SR22 lineup is??? Maybe a year or model that has the important advantages but can be had for less $$$??
Seems like someone here once said the 2005-2006 boodles were just that but I can't really remember.. The sweet spot depends upon your budget. There is a big jump between G2s and G3s, and again from G3s to G5s. The least expensive models are G1s (but they were not called that by Cirrus) that ended with serial number 819. A budget that fits with G1s will likely not think a G2, G3 or G5 makes any sense. Likewise for each of the others. Within each level, there are ones to look for that you could consider "sweet spots." For G2s, in my opinion that would be serial numbers between 2043 (a 2006 model that incorporated important static system improvements) and 2437 (a 2007 model that is the last G2 made). They don't cost any more than 2006s made before 2043, and there's not that much savings to be had by choosing a 2005 model. 2005 G2s starting with serial number 1663 have the significantly upgraded electrical system, so the "sweet spot" for 2005-2006 models might start there for some. But I'd favor serials after 2043 to get the better static system. The next step up, and possibly affordable for a G2 guy, would be to get a 2007 G3 - they are the least expensive G3s because they are Avidyne equipped, but they still have the G3 design improvements over the G2 - 92 gallons, better handling, 430Ws, electronic AC controls. As for where the sweet spot is for Garmin 1000 G3s (starting in 2008) and G5s -- don't know, but what you'd research is what changes Cirrus made along the way, and decide what you want and look for serial numbers after that. Cirrus is always making improvements it seems, one 2006 is not identical to another, for example, unless they are close together in serial numbers. One thing to watch for - most Cirrii were sold at "GTS" models with every option except AC included. If the ad doesn't say GTS it means the original buyer was picky and didn't want some of the GTS stuff. You want to find out what is missing - it might be an option you thought all Cirrii came with. A final thing to watch for is whether the chute has been repacked. Most 2016 and earlier should be, but a 2017 will need it done soon at around $15K.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus PIREP, the good and the bad..... Posted: 15 Oct 2016, 00:25 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 12/04/09 Posts: 356 Post Likes: +149
Aircraft: Dakota
|
|
|
Thank you for taking the time to respond Wally. Very helpful! Buddy wants to find the best ship in the low 200's he can.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us
BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a
forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include
the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner,
Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.
BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates.
Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.
Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2025
|
|
|
|