10 Jun 2025, 13:58 [ UTC - 5; DST ]
|
Username Protected |
Message |
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Real World Range vs Book Range aka Chip's pet peeve Posted: 13 May 2016, 23:32 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 11/09/13 Posts: 1910 Post Likes: +927 Location: KCMA
Aircraft: Aero Commander 980
|
|
Username Protected wrote: 980 Commander is one of the best airplanes ever built!!! No argument from me! What I have found surprising is how fast it can get to altitude. There is a 15gph difference between FL200 and FL280 and I can get to FL280 in less than 15 minutes. That's a Big help extending range. Its great being able to climb directly to FL280 or FL270 all the time.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Real World Range vs Book Range aka Chip's pet peeve Posted: 16 May 2016, 11:17 |
|
 |

|

|
Joined: 05/23/13 Posts: 8020 Post Likes: +10334 Company: Jet Acquisitions Location: Franklin, TN 615-739-9091 chip@jetacq.com
|
|
Username Protected wrote: You know Wikipedia is editable/correctable, right?
Supposedly, though I have submitted changes that never seem to happen...
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Real World Range vs Book Range Posted: 17 May 2016, 21:56 |
|
 |

|

|
Joined: 05/23/13 Posts: 8020 Post Likes: +10334 Company: Jet Acquisitions Location: Franklin, TN 615-739-9091 chip@jetacq.com
|
|
Username Protected wrote: My longest flight in the CJ3 was 1500nm westbound in January with average 75kt headwind. 4.8 hours and I still landed with almost 1000lbs. I believe this plane could actually come very close to the 1800nm number from cessna assuming a standard day with no wind. You have a CJ3 and a King Air 350... I'm assuming all is right in your world!
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Real World Range vs Book Range Posted: 28 May 2016, 07:30 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 06/09/09 Posts: 4438 Post Likes: +3304
Aircraft: C182P, Merlin IIIC
|
|
Nice for a 350. Mid range for a Merlin.  I thought 350's were 300 knot aircraft? That block speed seems low for the winds this morning. Still impressive range for any King Air and you just know the passengers were comfortable, a strong suite of the line. Edit: I see you said they pulled power to make the range and hence the lower speed.
|
|
Top |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us
BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a
forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include
the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner,
Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.
BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates.
Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.
Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2025
|
|
|
|