banner
banner

12 Jun 2025, 23:59 [ UTC - 5; DST ]


Garmin International (Banner)



Reply to topic  [ 52 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4
Username Protected Message
 Post subject: Re: Cessna 441 copilot time
PostPosted: 23 May 2016, 12:10 
Online



User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 07/21/08
Posts: 5755
Post Likes: +7146
Location: Decatur, TX (XA99)
Aircraft: 1979 Bonanza A36
Username Protected wrote:

Agree on most, the usable load is limited by the 12.5k rule. Which is in place for type ratings and other arbitrary weight limitations.

You can fly it heavier if you buy paperwork.

I would bet many KA250 are flown overweight without buying the paperwork.

The KA250 is a easy 300kt airplane.

So they are marketing it as a single pilot, knowing that most people will buy the STC if needed? I kinda see the point. It just seems rather disingenuous to me. Seems like a huge risk to take if you get caught flying one of these in a corporate role while overweight. An accident would open the floodgates to litigation. That would be a field day for a personal injury attorney.

_________________
I'm just here for the free snacks


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cessna 441 copilot time
PostPosted: 23 May 2016, 12:10 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 06/09/09
Posts: 4438
Post Likes: +3304
Aircraft: C182P, Merlin IIIC
Douglas, I am sure the reason it is not listed as having a higher useful is because of the 12,500# cert regulation. You can get the STC to operate at 14,000# but will need to get the type rating. The structure is there to operate at the higher weight.

In comparison, the C441 is a Cessna Titan 404 with turboprop engines and associated systems. Likely why several crashed early on until Cessna figured out that they had not reinforced the tail enough. The 250 also has a 6" taller cabin than the C441.

The C441's piston heritage certainly has a key role in its low weight and its low weight is a big part of its amazing efficiency.

Anyone really interested in the history of the twin Cessna line should buy the book "Wings for the World III". Every 400 series Cessna twin is in the book with details about how they were developed.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cessna 441 copilot time
PostPosted: 23 May 2016, 12:15 
Online



User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 07/21/08
Posts: 5755
Post Likes: +7146
Location: Decatur, TX (XA99)
Aircraft: 1979 Bonanza A36
Username Protected wrote:
Douglas, I am sure the reason it is not listed as having a higher useful is because of the 12,500# cert regulation. You can get the STC to operate at 14,000# but will need to get the type rating. The structure is there to operate at the higher weight.

In comparison, the C441 is a Cessna Titan 404 with turboprop engines and associated systems. Likely why several crashed early on until Cessna figured out that they had not reinforced the tail enough. The 250 also has a 6" taller cabin than the C441.

The C441's piston heritage certainly has a key role in its low weight and its low weight is a big part of its amazing efficiency.

Anyone really interested in the history of the twin Cessna line should buy the book "Wings for the World III". Every 400 series Cessna twin is in the book with details about how they were developed.

Thanks Erwin, I will find that. I am fascinated by the heritage behind all of these birds. I agree that the 250 is a totally different bird, designed from the start for the turbine. And I misspoke earlier when I said single pilot on the STC. I meant type rating. This whole useful load thing is just a real sore subject. Pilatus got it right, so I cant understand why so many others are so behind the curve.

_________________
I'm just here for the free snacks


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cessna 441 copilot time
PostPosted: 23 May 2016, 14:04 
Offline


 WWW  Profile




Joined: 12/03/14
Posts: 20325
Post Likes: +25465
Company: Ciholas, Inc
Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
Username Protected wrote:
The C441's piston heritage certainly has a key role in its low weight and its low weight is a big part of its amazing efficiency.

All King Airs are piston heritage.

Apparently, for the 250, it was from the chubby side of the family, though.

The 12,500 lbs limit is not what reduces useful load, it is the ~8,830 lbs empty weight. By comparison, the 441 is 6400 lbs empty typically. An extra 2,400 lbs to haul around. Where did they put it all?

Mike C.

_________________
Email mikec (at) ciholas.com


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cessna 441 copilot time
PostPosted: 23 May 2016, 14:21 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 11/09/13
Posts: 1910
Post Likes: +927
Location: KCMA
Aircraft: Aero Commander 980
Or where did they take it from?


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cessna 441 copilot time
PostPosted: 23 May 2016, 14:38 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 12/18/12
Posts: 810
Post Likes: +409
Location: Europe
Aircraft: Aerostar 600A
Username Protected wrote:
Or where did they take it from?


" Il semble que la perfection soit atteinte non quand il n'y a plus rien à ajouter, mais quand il n'y a plus rien à retrancher."

"Perfection is Achieved Not When There Is Nothing More to Add, But When There Is Nothing Left to Take Away"

Antoine de Saint-Exupery

_________________
A&P/IA
P35
Aerostar 600A


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cessna 441 copilot time
PostPosted: 23 May 2016, 16:06 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 11/08/12
Posts: 7374
Post Likes: +4834
Location: Live in San Carlos, CA - based Hayward, CA KHWD
Aircraft: Piaggio Avanti
Username Protected wrote:
I agree that the 250 is a totally different bird, designed from the start for the turbine.

Uh, no. It evolved from the Queen Air.

_________________
-Jon C.


Top

Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic  [ 52 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4



B-Kool (Top/Bottom Banner)

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  

Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us

BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner, Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.

BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates. Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.

Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2025

.b-kool-85x50.png.
.temple-85x100-2015-02-23.jpg.
.tempest.jpg.
.jandsaviation-85x50.jpg.
.sierratrax-85x50.png.
.tat-85x100.png.
.centex-85x50.jpg.
.boomerang-85x50-2023-12-17.png.
.bpt-85x50-2019-07-27.jpg.
.Wingman 85x50.png.
.saint-85x50.jpg.
.ABS-85x100.jpg.
.kingairnation-85x50.png.
.KingAirMaint85_50.png.
.ssv-85x50-2023-12-17.jpg.
.shortnnumbers-85x100.png.
.puremedical-85x200.jpg.
.traceaviation-85x150.png.
.MountainAirframe.jpg.
.wilco-85x100.png.
.holymicro-85x50.jpg.
.jetacq-85x50.jpg.
.daytona.jpg.
.garmin-85x200-2021-11-22.jpg.
.pdi-85x50.jpg.
.concorde.jpg.
.headsetsetc_Small_85x50.jpg.
.planelogix-85x100-2015-04-15.jpg.
.ocraviation-85x50.png.
.KalAir_Black.jpg.
.SCA.jpg.
.camguard.jpg.
.blackhawk-85x100-2019-09-25.jpg.
.bullardaviation-85x50-2.jpg.
.stanmusikame-85x50.jpg.
.gallagher_85x50.jpg.
.blackwell-85x50.png.
.wat-85x50.jpg.
.aviationdesigndouble.jpg.
.midwest2.jpg.
.mcfarlane-85x50.png.
.rnp.85x50.png.
.Wentworth_85x100.JPG.
.aerox_85x100.png.
.geebee-85x50.jpg.
.Elite-85x50.png.
.kadex-85x50.jpg.
.dbm.jpg.
.performanceaero-85x50.jpg.
.airmart-85x150.png.
.Latitude.jpg.
.CiESVer2.jpg.