17 Nov 2025, 14:53 [ UTC - 5; DST ]
|
| Username Protected |
Message |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: The closest to a new Commander 1000 you could get. Posted: 12 Oct 2015, 21:02 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 08/09/11 Posts: 2054 Post Likes: +2850 Company: Naples Jet Center Location: KAPF KPIA
Aircraft: EMB500 AC95 AEST
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Do all the turbine commanders have the lav between the pilots and the cabin without hard doors? Never seen one with hard doors or the lab anywhere else, but maybe Bruce has?
It's either a semi-rigid pocket door or a double curtain on a track depending on the plane. There was actually an aft lav config with a hard door available on the 690B but I have seen only one, and it was changed to the more commonly seen open layout.
The lav in a turboprop is for emergency use. One does not want to encourage their use Unless it's the relief tube, of course. We put those under the crew seats all the time. No need to get out of your seat
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: The closest to a new Commander 1000 you could get. Posted: 12 Oct 2015, 21:13 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 06/09/09 Posts: 4438 Post Likes: +3305
Aircraft: C182P, Merlin IIIC
|
|
|
My lav is used often on long trips. Women are appreciative of the fact that they have complete privacy in the rear behind a closed solid door. No smell in the cabin ever since the outflow valve is further back behind the lav yet.
Mine is for use whenever someone needs to use it, not just emergency use. The factory setup for the lav sucks, the way mine is setup makes servicing it a non event.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: The closest to a new Commander 1000 you could get. Posted: 12 Oct 2015, 21:50 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 08/09/11 Posts: 2054 Post Likes: +2850 Company: Naples Jet Center Location: KAPF KPIA
Aircraft: EMB500 AC95 AEST
|
|
Username Protected wrote: My lav is used often on long trips. Women are appreciative of the fact that they have complete privacy in the rear behind a closed solid door. No smell in the cabin ever since the outflow valve is further back behind the lav yet.
Mine is for use whenever someone needs to use it, not just emergency use. The factory setup for the lav sucks, the way mine is setup makes servicing it a non event. Mine is too. I take 5 bags of kitty litter and clean up is a non-event. I just don't like to encourage it.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: The closest to a new Commander 1000 you could get. Posted: 12 Oct 2015, 22:07 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 06/09/09 Posts: 4438 Post Likes: +3305
Aircraft: C182P, Merlin IIIC
|
|
The pilot who flew my aircraft before me also used kitty litter. I tried it for one trip and realized it was not the right way to go. The kitty litter, once loaded with liquid, moves around and tends to cause even the toughest garbage bags to leak. http://noodor.com/p/urine-travel-john-t ... bsorb.htmlI found this powder which gels when it becomes wet and basically eliminates foul odor. Upon landing pull tabs on garbage bag and throw away, no stink and no leaks. The kittly litter is like sand and is abrasive when wet causing leaky bags. The gel is not abrasive, no leaks.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: The closest to a new Commander 1000 you could get. Posted: 12 Oct 2015, 22:13 |
|
 |

|

|
 |
Joined: 07/21/08 Posts: 5834 Post Likes: +7285 Location: Decatur, TX (XA99)
Aircraft: 1979 Bonanza A36
|
|
Username Protected wrote: The pilot who flew my aircraft before me also used kitty litter. I tried it for one trip and realized it was not the right way to go. The kitty litter, once loaded with liquid, moves around and tends to cause even the toughest garbage bags to leak. http://www.amazon.com/Smelleze®-Urine-Solidifier-Deodorizer-Granules/dp/B004SBOUBM/ref=pd_sim_194_4?ie=UTF8&refRID=1J6AR1DH7Z94MC33RZRS I found this powder which gels when it becomes wet and basically eliminates foul odor. Upon landing pull tabs on garbage bag and throw away, no stink and no leaks. The kittly litter is like sand and is abrasive when wet causing leaky bags. The gel is not abrasive, no leaks. It is simply amazing to me that, in a plane that costs more than a upscale 5 bedroom house in a nice neighborhood, we are reduced to pooping in cat litter. This has to be absurd to non pilots. It is to me too.
_________________ I'm just here for the free snacks
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: The closest to a new Commander 1000 you could get. Posted: 12 Oct 2015, 22:24 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 12/03/14 Posts: 20748 Post Likes: +26219 Company: Ciholas, Inc Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
|
|
Username Protected wrote: ...we are reduced to pooping in cat litter. This has to be absurd to non pilots. I'd rather my passengers feel absurd than they couldn't hold it any more. Mike C.
_________________ Email mikec (at) ciholas.com
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: The closest to a new Commander 1000 you could get. Posted: 12 Oct 2015, 23:29 |
|
 |

|

|
 |
Joined: 09/05/12 Posts: 6986 Post Likes: +5179 Location: Portland, OR (KHIO)
Aircraft: 1962 Bonanza P35
|
|
Username Protected wrote: My lav is used often on long trips. Women are appreciative of the fact that they have complete privacy in the rear behind a closed solid door. No smell in the cabin ever since the outflow valve is further back behind the lav yet.
Mine is for use whenever someone needs to use it, not just emergency use. The factory setup for the lav sucks, the way mine is setup makes servicing it a non event. Mine is too. I take 5 bags of kitty litter and clean up is a non-event. I just don't like to encourage it.
Two words: Wag Bags
_________________ Paul I heart flying
ABS Lifetime Member EAA Lifetime Member
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: The closest to a new Commander 1000 you could get. Posted: 13 Oct 2015, 05:24 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 06/09/09 Posts: 4438 Post Likes: +3305
Aircraft: C182P, Merlin IIIC
|
|
Username Protected wrote: The pilot who flew my aircraft before me also used kitty litter. I tried it for one trip and realized it was not the right way to go. The kitty litter, once loaded with liquid, moves around and tends to cause even the toughest garbage bags to leak. http://www.amazon.com/Smelleze®-Urine-Solidifier-Deodorizer-Granules/dp/B004SBOUBM/ref=pd_sim_194_4?ie=UTF8&refRID=1J6AR1DH7Z94MC33RZRS I found this powder which gels when it becomes wet and basically eliminates foul odor. Upon landing pull tabs on garbage bag and throw away, no stink and no leaks. The kittly litter is like sand and is abrasive when wet causing leaky bags. The gel is not abrasive, no leaks. It is simply amazing to me that, in a plane that costs more than a upscale 5 bedroom house in a nice neighborhood, we are reduced to pooping in cat litter. This has to be absurd to non pilots. It is to me too.
Tecnically, I am not using cat litter but an absorbing powder.
My aircraft left the factory with a flushing type potty which has to be removed and carried out to empty. I have the unit but have to interest in using it as it could be messy when full of liquid and is not as easy to dispose of. One Merlin I know of has the lav setup so that it can be serviced externally by a lav cart. My problem with this is that many of my destinations have no lav cart service.
The absorbing powder solution is clean, odorless and a non issue to service.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us
BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a
forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include
the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner,
Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.
BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates.
Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.
Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2025
|
|
|
|