banner
banner

04 Jun 2025, 01:45 [ UTC - 5; DST ]


Stevens Aerospace (Banner)



Reply to topic  [ 130 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 5, 6, 7, 8, 9
Username Protected Message
 Post subject: Re: Best jet to replace MU2
PostPosted: 02 Feb 2015, 01:21 
Offline


 WWW  Profile




Joined: 12/03/14
Posts: 20246
Post Likes: +25389
Company: Ciholas, Inc
Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
Username Protected wrote:
That's OK in theory, but if he has a performance related incident he is likely uninsured...no?

If insurance companies didn't pay any claim in which some limitation or FAR was violated, they would pay no claims at all.

I very seriously doubt an insurance company will reject a claim on this basis.

Mike C.

_________________
Email mikec (at) ciholas.com


Top

 Post subject: Re: Best jet to replace MU2
PostPosted: 02 Feb 2015, 01:41 
Offline


 WWW  Profile




Joined: 12/03/14
Posts: 20246
Post Likes: +25389
Company: Ciholas, Inc
Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
Username Protected wrote:
Hmm, it was explained to me in training at some point (I don't recall which one anymore) that at the extreme edge of the takeoff performance charts, which include MGTOW, 5° flaps, ISA+30 (i.e. 29°C at 8000'), and up to 10 kts tail wind, the TAS would be over the tire speed limit.

I think that was done to show you that Vtire can be a limit you can hit under extreme conditions that are still "on chart". It does take a very special set of circumstances.

I do not believe the 8000 ft limitation came from that.

With your stated conditions, MGTOW, ISA+30, 8000 MSL, 10 knots tailwind, you are going to use MAJOR amounts of runway. My chart says 8,300 ft (but that is based on -6 engines).

Mike C.

_________________
Email mikec (at) ciholas.com


Top

 Post subject: Re: Best jet to replace MU2
PostPosted: 02 Feb 2015, 02:11 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 11/08/12
Posts: 7363
Post Likes: +4833
Location: Live in San Carlos, CA - based Hayward, CA KHWD
Aircraft: Piaggio Avanti
Username Protected wrote:
With your stated conditions, MGTOW, ISA+30, 8000 MSL, 10 knots tailwind, you are going to use MAJOR amounts of runway. My chart says 8,300 ft (but that is based on -6 engines).

Agreed! It'd be stupid to use those conditions (why wouldn't you use flaps 20, or takeoff upwind instead of downwind?). But... the story was they set the limitation based on the worst case conditions charted. I dunno. Could be completely made up. But, the numbers come out pretty close.

_________________
-Jon C.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Best jet to replace MU2
PostPosted: 02 Feb 2015, 09:10 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 11/08/12
Posts: 12804
Post Likes: +5254
Location: Jackson, MS (KHKS)
Aircraft: 1961 Cessna 172
Not that mfr limits make sense, but it would be pretty easy to put a v-tire line on the chart rather than extrapolating an extreme case to limit normal ops.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Best jet to replace MU2
PostPosted: 02 Feb 2015, 21:02 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 11/08/12
Posts: 7363
Post Likes: +4833
Location: Live in San Carlos, CA - based Hayward, CA KHWD
Aircraft: Piaggio Avanti
Username Protected wrote:
Not that mfr limits make sense, but it would be pretty easy to put a v-tire line on the chart rather than extrapolating an extreme case to limit normal ops.

Agreed.

_________________
-Jon C.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Best jet to replace MU2
PostPosted: 03 Feb 2015, 15:24 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 08/08/12
Posts: 1445
Post Likes: +938
Username Protected wrote:


That is one FINE lookin' airplane right there! :dancing:


Top

 Post subject: Re: Best jet to replace MU2
PostPosted: 03 Feb 2015, 16:02 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 10/10/10
Posts: 676
Post Likes: +490
Aircraft: C441 Conquest II
:bow:


Top

 Post subject: Re: Best jet to replace MU2
PostPosted: 03 Feb 2015, 21:32 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 01/19/10
Posts: 350
Post Likes: +157
Location: NY
Aircraft: C310R
Username Protected wrote:


That is one FINE lookin' airplane right there! :dancing:

Looks like he sold ,now he fly on Premier

Top

 Post subject: Re: Best jet to replace MU2
PostPosted: 03 Feb 2015, 22:17 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 10/10/10
Posts: 676
Post Likes: +490
Aircraft: C441 Conquest II
Username Protected wrote:
That is one FINE lookin' airplane right there! :dancing:

Looks like he sold ,now he fly on Premier
Greg Mink sold the plane to Thomas Allen...that's why Thomas was saying it was such a great plane...it's his! (and it is a great plane).

Top

 Post subject: Re: Best jet to replace MU2
PostPosted: 03 Feb 2015, 22:55 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 08/08/12
Posts: 1445
Post Likes: +938
Thanks Dave! It is a great airplane!


Top

Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic  [ 130 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 5, 6, 7, 8, 9



B-Kool (Top/Bottom Banner)

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  

Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us

BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner, Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.

BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates. Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.

Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2025

.KalAir_Black.jpg.
.kadex-85x50.jpg.
.KingAirMaint85_50.png.
.daytona.jpg.
.planelogix-85x100-2015-04-15.jpg.
.performanceaero-85x50.jpg.
.temple-85x100-2015-02-23.jpg.
.camguard.jpg.
.ssv-85x50-2023-12-17.jpg.
.midwest2.jpg.
.tat-85x100.png.
.stanmusikame-85x50.jpg.
.Elite-85x50.png.
.blackhawk-85x100-2019-09-25.jpg.
.pdi-85x50.jpg.
.bpt-85x50-2019-07-27.jpg.
.traceaviation-85x150.png.
.jandsaviation-85x50.jpg.
.tempest.jpg.
.rnp.85x50.png.
.dbm.jpg.
.kingairnation-85x50.png.
.blackwell-85x50.png.
.Latitude.jpg.
.wilco-85x100.png.
.CiESVer2.jpg.
.MountainAirframe.jpg.
.headsetsetc_Small_85x50.jpg.
.aviationdesigndouble.jpg.
.centex-85x50.jpg.
.ocraviation-85x50.png.
.jetacq-85x50.jpg.
.puremedical-85x200.jpg.
.saint-85x50.jpg.
.shortnnumbers-85x100.png.
.concorde.jpg.
.aerox_85x100.png.
.ABS-85x100.jpg.
.sierratrax-85x50.png.
.airmart-85x150.png.
.wat-85x50.jpg.
.holymicro-85x50.jpg.
.garmin-85x200-2021-11-22.jpg.
.Wentworth_85x100.JPG.
.boomerang-85x50-2023-12-17.png.
.mcfarlane-85x50.png.
.gallagher_85x50.jpg.
.Wingman 85x50.png.
.SCA.jpg.
.b-kool-85x50.png.
.bullardaviation-85x50-2.jpg.
.geebee-85x50.jpg.