04 Jun 2025, 01:45 [ UTC - 5; DST ]
|
Username Protected |
Message |
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Best jet to replace MU2 Posted: 02 Feb 2015, 01:21 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 12/03/14 Posts: 20246 Post Likes: +25389 Company: Ciholas, Inc Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
|
|
Username Protected wrote: That's OK in theory, but if he has a performance related incident he is likely uninsured...no? If insurance companies didn't pay any claim in which some limitation or FAR was violated, they would pay no claims at all. I very seriously doubt an insurance company will reject a claim on this basis. Mike C.
_________________ Email mikec (at) ciholas.com
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Best jet to replace MU2 Posted: 02 Feb 2015, 01:41 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 12/03/14 Posts: 20246 Post Likes: +25389 Company: Ciholas, Inc Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Hmm, it was explained to me in training at some point (I don't recall which one anymore) that at the extreme edge of the takeoff performance charts, which include MGTOW, 5° flaps, ISA+30 (i.e. 29°C at 8000'), and up to 10 kts tail wind, the TAS would be over the tire speed limit. I think that was done to show you that Vtire can be a limit you can hit under extreme conditions that are still "on chart". It does take a very special set of circumstances. I do not believe the 8000 ft limitation came from that. With your stated conditions, MGTOW, ISA+30, 8000 MSL, 10 knots tailwind, you are going to use MAJOR amounts of runway. My chart says 8,300 ft (but that is based on -6 engines). Mike C.
_________________ Email mikec (at) ciholas.com
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Best jet to replace MU2 Posted: 02 Feb 2015, 02:11 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 11/08/12 Posts: 7363 Post Likes: +4833 Location: Live in San Carlos, CA - based Hayward, CA KHWD
Aircraft: Piaggio Avanti
|
|
Username Protected wrote: With your stated conditions, MGTOW, ISA+30, 8000 MSL, 10 knots tailwind, you are going to use MAJOR amounts of runway. My chart says 8,300 ft (but that is based on -6 engines). Agreed! It'd be stupid to use those conditions (why wouldn't you use flaps 20, or takeoff upwind instead of downwind?). But... the story was they set the limitation based on the worst case conditions charted. I dunno. Could be completely made up. But, the numbers come out pretty close.
_________________ -Jon C.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Best jet to replace MU2 Posted: 02 Feb 2015, 21:02 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 11/08/12 Posts: 7363 Post Likes: +4833 Location: Live in San Carlos, CA - based Hayward, CA KHWD
Aircraft: Piaggio Avanti
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Not that mfr limits make sense, but it would be pretty easy to put a v-tire line on the chart rather than extrapolating an extreme case to limit normal ops. Agreed.
_________________ -Jon C.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Best jet to replace MU2 Posted: 03 Feb 2015, 15:24 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 08/08/12 Posts: 1445 Post Likes: +938
|
|
Username Protected wrote: That is one FINE lookin' airplane right there! 
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Best jet to replace MU2 Posted: 03 Feb 2015, 21:32 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 01/19/10 Posts: 350 Post Likes: +157 Location: NY
Aircraft: C310R
|
|
Username Protected wrote: That is one FINE lookin' airplane right there!  Looks like he sold ,now he fly on Premier
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Best jet to replace MU2 Posted: 03 Feb 2015, 22:17 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 10/10/10 Posts: 676 Post Likes: +490
Aircraft: C441 Conquest II
|
|
Username Protected wrote: That is one FINE lookin' airplane right there!  Looks like he sold ,now he fly on Premier Greg Mink sold the plane to Thomas Allen...that's why Thomas was saying it was such a great plane...it's his! (and it is a great plane).
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Best jet to replace MU2 Posted: 03 Feb 2015, 22:55 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 08/08/12 Posts: 1445 Post Likes: +938
|
|
Thanks Dave! It is a great airplane!
|
|
Top |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us
BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a
forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include
the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner,
Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.
BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates.
Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.
Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2025
|
|
|
|