30 Apr 2024, 09:37 [ UTC - 5; DST ]
|
Username Protected |
Message |
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: FS: Low Time Citation 501 Single Pilot Posted: 16 Apr 2024, 22:04 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: 05/07/22 Posts: 10 Post Likes: +1
Aircraft: Cessna 180
|
|
In this discussion, it's a matter of perspective, based on your age and qualifications: For a fifty-something with X experience vs a sixty-to-seventy something with identical quals the insurance price difference for the same aircraft type will probably be substantial. Therefore the price paid by Mr Braunfels for the Citation may very well be cheaper than, say, I don't know, a C-421 or similar. The insurance industry is adapting badly to an extremely fluid and dynamic aircraft ownership evolution, where young rich guys are buying and wrecking expensive machinery and old rich guys are doing the same. Throw in yet another hurricane or tornado and here we are with a lot of expensive twisted aluminum. I'm not sticking up for the underwriters here, but I'm afraid that this is the current market, and like all of us I like it not.
As far as what mission-length is rational to say; "We'll take the jet!", I'll say this: I regularly drive 250sm (160nm flight) to check on a rental property, and between fuel and bathroom stops it's a five hour slog. If I owned the beautiful jet for sale in this thread, and it's parked within one hour of my house, I'm taking that, each and every time.
It's becoming more and more logical by the day.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: FS: Low Time Citation 501 Single Pilot Posted: 17 Apr 2024, 07:30 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: 01/17/21 Posts: 89 Post Likes: +42
Aircraft: C550
|
|
Turning 72 this year . Insurance premiums on my 550 haven’t changed in the last 4 years .
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: FS: Low Time Citation 501 Single Pilot Posted: 17 Apr 2024, 10:36 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: 11/06/20 Posts: 1320 Post Likes: +1304 Location: Tulsa, OK - KRVS
Aircraft: C501SP
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I thought Mike C told us insurance on these was cheaper? Compared to a newer SETP (which I believe is the thread to which you are referring) it would be, due to the difference in hull value.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: FS: Low Time Citation 501 Single Pilot Posted: 17 Apr 2024, 15:23 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: 04/27/10 Posts: 1880 Post Likes: +829 Location: KFFZ & KGRR
Aircraft: BE36, CE501
|
|
Username Protected wrote: 501: 17,500 VFR (so no delay getting a clearance, able to fly direct like the SEP, etc) 26 mins flight time and 636lbs (95g) fuel.
SR22: 11,500 VFR 49 mins flight time and 15.1g fuel.
Don't forget to normalize for the lower price of Jet-A vs 100LL!
_________________ Last 60 mos: CL65 type rating, flew 121, CE680, CE525S, and CE500 type ratings.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: FS: Low Time Citation 501 Single Pilot Posted: 17 Apr 2024, 16:15 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: 01/01/10 Posts: 3460 Post Likes: +2406 Location: Roseburg, Oregon
Aircraft: Citation Mustang
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I’m sort of glad my hangar won’t accommodate this, because I might do something bold.
In practical terms, what would be a minimal leg length to justify one of these jets? It ruins you over time. I'm to the point where if I have a trip beyond 50nm, I take the Mustang. However, I also have the benefit of a 50% lower fuel consumption compared to a 501.
_________________ Previous A36TN owner
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: FS: Low Time Citation 501 Single Pilot Posted: 17 Apr 2024, 17:15 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: 11/06/20 Posts: 1320 Post Likes: +1304 Location: Tulsa, OK - KRVS
Aircraft: C501SP
|
|
Username Protected wrote: It ruins you over time. I'm to the point where if I have a trip beyond 50nm, I take the Mustang. However, I also have the benefit of a 50% lower fuel consumption compared to a 501. No question the newer engines are more efficient. But they are also a LOT more expensive to purchase (you're looking at $2M for a Mustang), plus at the risk of incurring Chip's wrath, there are engine program costs that have to be paid on the newer planes. JT15D's definitely drink a lot of fuel, but everything else is very reasonable. Engines can be repaired cheaply by independent shops, Textron offers a factory low utilization maintenance program (LUMP) that moves your Phase 1-4 (equivalent to a piston annual) from every 2 years to every 3 years and your Phase 5 (heavy inspection - interior comes out, etc) from every 3 years to every 6 years. I just went through a Phase 1-4 this past summer and it was $17k. We found a few things - paint touch ups on a few spots of corrosion (on the flaps - likely a rock kicked up and chipped the paint and then moisture got in there), some pressurization system ductwork needed to be replaced, some fasteners that were worn out, topped off the hydraulic system, inspected a whole bunch of stuff..... I am thrilled with my decision to buy a Tarver bird back in 2021. Come on in, the water's warm.....
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: FS: Low Time Citation 501 Single Pilot Posted: 17 Apr 2024, 17:53 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: 01/10/13 Posts: 1132 Post Likes: +441 Location: greenville,ms
Aircraft: baron 58
|
|
how much turbine time required for insurance, i have 4500tt 1100 multi but no turbine time. is there an faa time required number of hours for single pilot operation
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: FS: Low Time Citation 501 Single Pilot Posted: 17 Apr 2024, 18:11 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: 11/06/20 Posts: 1320 Post Likes: +1304 Location: Tulsa, OK - KRVS
Aircraft: C501SP
|
|
Username Protected wrote: how much turbine time required for insurance, i have 4500tt 1100 multi but no turbine time. is there an faa time required number of hours for single pilot operation This airplane is Single Pilot per it's type certificate. So if you can pass the type rating single pilot you can fly the plane single pilot. I moved from an SR22 directly to a 501. I knew I was going to fly with a mentor pilot for a full year so I did my initial type rating as a crew (I had the "SIC REQUIRED" limitation on my type rating). Then at my next recurrent (1 year later) I took the check ride as a single pilot and passed, which removed the limitation from my rating. Insurance is a whole other deal. You can pretty much count on some amount of mentor time (I believe 25-50 hours is common). Now in my experience, contract jet pilots are paid on a day rate so if you just want to get through the time you can plan a lot of long flights to get it over with. For me I wanted to have someone with me through all 4 seasons, different weather, different missions, etc. so I viewed it as an investment in my safety. I was also fortunate that my mentor had recently packaged out of SWA so he had a lot of time on his hands and was very available. That will obviously vary from town to town.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: FS: Low Time Citation 501 Single Pilot Posted: 17 Apr 2024, 19:02 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: 05/05/09 Posts: 4970 Post Likes: +4801
Aircraft: G44, C501, C55, R66
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I’m sort of glad my hangar won’t accommodate this, because I might do something bold.
In practical terms, what would be a minimal leg length to justify one of these jets? It ruins you over time. I'm to the point where if I have a trip beyond 50nm, I take the Mustang. However, I also have the benefit of a 50% lower fuel consumption compared to a 501.
Your program fees for the Mustang cost about the entire fuel bill on the 501. Add in the capital difference placed in T bills and the 501 is practically free to operate.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: FS: Low Time Citation 501 Single Pilot Posted: 17 Apr 2024, 19:18 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: 01/07/21 Posts: 304 Post Likes: +302
Aircraft: M20J/R, Sr22, SR20
|
|
BTW, where has Mike C been?
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: FS: Low Time Citation 501 Single Pilot Posted: 18 Apr 2024, 01:23 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: 12/17/13 Posts: 6367 Post Likes: +5547 Location: Hollywood, Los Angeles, CA
Aircraft: Turbo Commander 680V
|
|
Username Protected wrote: BTW, where has Mike C been? He's always either here non-stop in, or he takes 6 months off. He'll be back, prob when the next Citation V thread is ready to pop up.
_________________ Problem is the intelligent people are full of doubt, while the stupid ones are full of confidence.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: FS: Low Time Citation 501 Single Pilot Posted: 18 Apr 2024, 06:52 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: 01/26/09 Posts: 2912 Post Likes: +975 Company: SkewTLogPro Location: Tampa, FL (KVDF)
Aircraft: 1984 Bonanza A36TN
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Your program fees for the Mustang cost about the entire fuel bill on the 501. Add in the capital difference placed in T bills and the 501 is practically free to operate. What is a good proxy for the fuel costs using the various cards? Would you say it averages $4/gallon, $5/gallon or more right now? Is the cost of retail diesel a good proxy? Without signing up for the fuel cards it is difficult to estimate.
_________________ Friends don't let friends fly commercial.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: FS: Low Time Citation 501 Single Pilot Posted: 18 Apr 2024, 08:57 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: 12/02/14 Posts: 15 Post Likes: +12
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Your program fees for the Mustang cost about the entire fuel bill on the 501. Add in the capital difference placed in T bills and the 501 is practically free to operate. What is a good proxy for the fuel costs using the various cards? Would you say it averages $4/gallon, $5/gallon or more right now? Is the cost of retail diesel a good proxy? Without signing up for the fuel cards it is difficult to estimate.
I have three cards, CAA, Everest and Avfuel. Scanning across the US today shows everything from $3.75 by Amarillo to $8.75 at Gunnison. Most major metros have options in the $4.XX to low $5.XX.
|
|
Top |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us
BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a
forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include
the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner,
Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.
BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates.
Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.
Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2024
|
|
|
|