07 Dec 2023, 00:22 [ UTC - 5; DST ]
|
Username Protected |
Message |
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: FS: 1976 Mitsubishi MU-2 M-model Posted: 19 Sep 2023, 15:28 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 08/13/20 Posts: 186 Post Likes: +108 Location: KLOU/KJVY
|
|
Username Protected wrote: The 3 blade that doesn't require the inspections the others do. Ah, yes the 4 blade props on the nwere models have an AD that requires inspections every 5 years, with an AMOC that extends that to 7 years. The 3 blades have no AD that I am aware of. You can go 10+ years between overhauls if you like (and I did, no issues). My prop overhauls were like $7500 for the pair. The cost of the 4 blade overhauls can be eye watering because the blades are often undersized from all the gratuitous overhauling the AD causes. There's a lot to like about the M model. It has most of the benefits of the later models (6 PSI cabin, FL280 ceiling, higher gross weight) with none of the negatives (expensive glass windshield, expensive 4 blade props, stupid oil cooler boots that break, heavier empty weight). Mike C.
Very good info Mike, I'm actually gonna plagiarize some of this to my original post
_________________ -MU-2 -C501
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: FS: 1976 Mitsubishi MU-2 M-model Posted: 19 Sep 2023, 15:36 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 12/30/18 Posts: 6 Post Likes: +3 Company: UAL
|
|
What’s the useful load? How much baggage (volume) can you put in it? I have 5 small kids (8 and under), is that even a realistic airplane for a family like mine for the next 10 years?
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: FS: 1976 Mitsubishi MU-2 M-model Posted: 19 Sep 2023, 15:46 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 08/13/20 Posts: 186 Post Likes: +108 Location: KLOU/KJVY
|
|
Username Protected wrote: What’s the useful load? How much baggage (volume) can you put in it? I have 5 small kids (8 and under), is that even a realistic airplane for a family like mine for the next 10 years? Its really one of those planes where, "If it fits, it flies". Attached is a picture of myself and 2 partners flying to a convention with our entire booth-worth of signs/decor/products in the plane. Useful load = 3,570. With full fuel you have 1,118 lbs free. It has 7 seatbelts so yes, 5 small kids and mom+dad can fit. I can't promise they won't kick each other though  You can definitely fit soft baggage for all 7 people as well. At least 4 in the cabin behind the rear seats (the whole head rest area flips down for easier access), 4 soft bags in the pressurized external baggage, and at least 4 hard or soft bags in the un-pressurized external baggage (or up to three sets of golf bags). Attachment: IMG_9651.jpeg Attachment: IMG_9653.jpeg
Please login or Register for a free account via the link in the red bar above to download files.
_________________ -MU-2 -C501
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: FS: 1976 Mitsubishi MU-2 M-model Posted: 21 Sep 2023, 19:12 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 03/16/11 Posts: 25 Post Likes: +19
|
|
Will a normal length pair of skis fit in the external baggage area? Or will they need to go in the cabin?
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: FS: 1976 Mitsubishi MU-2 M-model Posted: 21 Sep 2023, 20:03 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 12/03/14 Posts: 18544 Post Likes: +22919 Company: Ciholas, Inc Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Will a normal length pair of skis fit in the external baggage area? Or will they need to go in the cabin? Anything but short kids skis won't fit in the baggage compartments. They sit in the aisle. I've done it a few times. My Citation is really no better since I lack the "ski tube" mod, so they go in the cabin on the floor. Mike C.
_________________ Email mikec (at) ciholas.com
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: FS: 1976 Mitsubishi MU-2 M-model Posted: 21 Sep 2023, 20:07 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 03/16/11 Posts: 25 Post Likes: +19
|
|
Copy thanks Mike. Is that the same for the long body MU2? I assume the baggage areas are the same so only the seating area is longer?
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: FS: 1976 Mitsubishi MU-2 M-model Posted: 21 Sep 2023, 23:58 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 12/03/14 Posts: 18544 Post Likes: +22919 Company: Ciholas, Inc Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Copy thanks Mike. Is that the same for the long body MU2? I assume the baggage areas are the same so only the seating area is longer? The long body is different. When you enter the "foyer" at the rear of the plane, there is a baggage "section" at the rear, often with cargo netting. It can take larger things since it spans the diameter of the fuselage. That's still not enough usually for skis (maybe 140 cm would fit, not sure). Attachment: mu2-long-baggage-area.png So even in the long body, most skis are in the passenger cabin and on the floor. Mike C.
Please login or Register for a free account via the link in the red bar above to download files.
_________________ Email mikec (at) ciholas.com
|
|
Top |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us
BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a
forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include
the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner,
Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.
BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates.
Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.
Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2023
|
|
|
|