banner
banner

28 Mar 2024, 17:30 [ UTC - 5; DST ]


Concorde Battery (banner)



Reply to topic  [ 64 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5
Username Protected Message
 Post subject: Re: 182RG to a Twin
PostPosted: 31 Aug 2014, 18:00 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 01/18/11
Posts: 7681
Post Likes: +3685
Location: Lakeland , Ga
Aircraft: H35, T-41B, Aircoupe
He is good, I don't think saratogas hit the ground as hard as a crappy v tail.


Top

 Post subject: Re: 182RG to a Twin
PostPosted: 31 Aug 2014, 18:02 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 08/28/11
Posts: 1711
Post Likes: +1701
Company: N/A - Retired
Location: Southern AZ / South Carolina
Certainly not as fast :D


Top

 Post subject: Re: 182RG to a Twin
PostPosted: 31 Aug 2014, 20:34 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 04/26/14
Posts: 1353
Post Likes: +405
Location: Phoenix, Arizona
Aircraft: Baron B58P
Username Protected wrote:
Actually your "filling plant" appears to be misinformed and has bought into the OWT that medical oxygen has moisture in it. First of all, moisture would cause the exact same problem for medical use as for aviation use in that it could freeze in the regulator due to adiabatic cooling. Where this nonsense comes from is that for medical use, O2 from the tank is often run through a container of water to add moisture before delivering it to patients.

Second, these days pretty much all oxygen "filling plants" get their gas from the same source and store it in the same tanks regardless of the intended use whether it be medical, aviation, or welding.

IOW the only difference between medical O2 and welding O2 is that the former requires a prescription. And the only difference between ABO and welding O2 is a sticker that says Aviation Breathing Oxygen that sometimes gets applied to the receiving tank.


That certainly makes sense considering the specs for welding oxygen are higher than breathing oxygen. Thanks again for the correction!


Top

 Post subject: Re: 182RG to a Twin
PostPosted: 18 May 2017, 22:15 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 04/26/14
Posts: 48
Post Likes: +7
Company: Which one?
Location: North Dakota
Aircraft: 04 Meridian 05Mirage
Username Protected wrote:
TT: 100+ -check
30 hr "hood" -check
New IR, New MEL -check
Attitude- check
North Dakota winter coming. I don't see a problem, what could go wrong?



I Just thought I would throw out an update for all you folks that thought a Saratoga was to much airplane. Today I am over 500 hour pilot. (In 3.5 years) Back in December I bought a 2005 Malibu Mirage and have almost 80 hours in it. I feel very comfortable in the Mirage already and also the Saratoga (which I have for sale, if anyone interested 701-400-7067)

I do understand where some of you were coming from in prior posts telling me about IFR flying and getting to much airplane. However. I still stand by my very high go/no go limitations and I believe if you can put your heart into learning and spend a good amount of time flying, very periodically, a guy can fly anything he wants to!!! I have learned so much in the last three years and will continue to learn. Aviation has opened up so many doors in my business, without it I would not be able to do what I do. I am blessed to be able to do this. I just LOVE TO FLY!!!

On a side note I have never owned a Beech product but I can tell you I am EXTREMELY happy with my choice of the Saratoga 2TC and now the Mirage. I am already planning a little upgrade to bolt on the front of the Mirage soon!!!

_________________
Cody
2004 Meridian
2005 Malibu Mirage


Top

Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic  [ 64 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5




You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  

Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us

BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner, Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.

BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates. Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.

Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2024

.Wentworth_85x100.JPG.
.avionwealth-85x50.png.
.shortnnumbers-85x100.png.
.midwest2.jpg.
.dbm.jpg.
.traceaviation-85x150.png.
.temple-85x100-2015-02-23.jpg.
.aviationdesigndouble.jpg.
.aircraftferry-85x50.jpg.
.kingairnation-85x50.png.
.CiESVer2.jpg.
.AAI.jpg.
.bullardaviation-85x50-2.jpg.
.boomerang-85x50-2023-12-17.png.
.gallagher_85x50.jpg.
.aeroled-85x50-2022-12-06.jpg.
.aircraftassociates-85x50.png.
.centex-85x50.jpg.
.ssv-85x50-2023-12-17.jpg.
.MountainAirframe.jpg.
.airmart-85x150.png.
.kingairacademy-85x100.png.
.ei-85x150.jpg.
.planelogix-85x100-2015-04-15.jpg.
.bpt-85x50-2019-07-27.jpg.
.daytona.jpg.
.wat-85x50.jpg.
.saint-85x50.jpg.
.SCA.jpg.
.Rocky-Mountain-Turbine-85x100.jpg.
.jetacq-85x50.jpg.
.ABS-85x100.jpg.
.tat-85x100.png.
.Wingman 85x50.png.
.geebee-85x50.jpg.
.cav-85x50.jpg.
.Foreflight_85x50_color.png.
.chairmanaviation-85x50.jpg.
.pdi-85x50.jpg.
.camguard.jpg.
.wilco-85x100.png.
.sierratrax-85x50.png.
.blackhawk-85x100-2019-09-25.jpg.
.pure-medical-85x150.png.
.Latitude.jpg.
.one-mile-up-85x100.png.
.kadex-85x50.jpg.
.stanmusikame-85x50.jpg.
.lucysaviation-85x50.png.
.concorde.jpg.
.jandsaviation-85x50.jpg.
.Marsh.jpg.
.avfab-85x50-2018-12-04.png.
.blackwell-85x50.png.
.Genesys_85x50.jpg.
.headsetsetc_Small_85x50.jpg.
.tempest.jpg.