banner
banner

03 May 2025, 20:27 [ UTC - 5; DST ]


Garmin International (Banner)



Reply to topic  [ 15 posts ] 
Username Protected Message
 Post subject: Intro To BT - Russ Law
PostPosted: 28 Oct 2024, 14:17 
Offline

 Profile




Joined: 09/29/24
Posts: 2
Post Likes: +7
Location: KPNS Pensacola, FL
Aircraft: Cirrus SE22 G2
Thanks for allowing me to be a part of BT. I have been a "guest" for a while.

Currently own / fly a 2007 Cirrus SR22 based in Pensacola, FL. Great Airplane.....But not a Beech! I have 2,000 hours and CFI-I and Multi.

Joined BT to better understand the F33A vs. V35B aircraft. I will purchase one of these models when I better understand the nuances of each.


Please login or Register for a free account via the link in the red bar above to download files.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Intro To BT - Russ Law
PostPosted: 28 Oct 2024, 14:53 
Offline




User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 12/10/07
Posts: 34626
Post Likes: +13252
Location: Minneapolis, MN (KFCM)
Aircraft: 1970 Baron B55
Username Protected wrote:
Thanks for allowing me to be a part of BT. I have been a "guest" for a while.

Currently own / fly a 2007 Cirrus SR22 based in Pensacola, FL. Great Airplane.....But not a Beech! I have 2,000 hours and CFI-I and Multi.

Joined BT to better understand the F33A vs. V35B aircraft. I will purchase one of these models when I better understand the nuances of each.

Welcome aboard. There's really not much difference between them from any practical perspective. Some will tell you that all the V tails exhibit more roll/yaw coupling (tail waging in turbulence) than the straight tail on the same fuselage but IMO that's pretty much BS. Other nuances are the 2nd row windows on a 33 don't open while the same windows on a 35 can open a couple inches for ventilation and all the way for emergency egress. Beyond that it's mostly esthetics with one camp insisting the 35s are better looking and another with the opposite opinion on that.

At one point in the past, a V35B with the same equipment was worth more than a similar F33A but that trend reversed several years ago, possibly due to the "doctor killer" moniker for the 35s and the (proven false) belief that V-tails were less safe.

The V-tail is supposed to have less drag but if there's a measurable difference in speed on the same power it's no more than a knot. Some folks will claim that the V-tail has less rudder authority than the straight tail but if anything the opposite is true and I think you'd find that after flying each on the same day in the same conditions, that you couldn't honestly tell which you were flying without actually looking at the tail.

_________________
-lance

It's easier to fool people than to convince them that they have been fooled.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Intro To BT - Russ Law
PostPosted: 28 Oct 2024, 16:09 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 04/16/11
Posts: 6066
Post Likes: +8400
Company: Self Employed
Location: Burlington, NC
Aircraft: V35B
Lance has a lot of great points, but he glossed over one important fact.

The V Tail just looks so good...

Attachment:
20161015_143919.jpg


Please login or Register for a free account via the link in the red bar above to download files.

_________________
Matt
336-266-3105


Top

 Post subject: Re: Intro To BT - Russ Law
PostPosted: 28 Oct 2024, 17:03 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 01/19/16
Posts: 4012
Post Likes: +7385
Location: 13FA Earle Airpark FL/0A7 Hville NC
Aircraft: E33/152A
And all the later 33s have opening middle windows. 1968 had one operative one. 69 and newer had both.

The biggest difference is no tail flutter propensity on the straight tails and almost no inflight breakups.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Intro To BT - Russ Law
PostPosted: 28 Oct 2024, 18:13 
Offline




User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 12/10/07
Posts: 34626
Post Likes: +13252
Location: Minneapolis, MN (KFCM)
Aircraft: 1970 Baron B55
Username Protected wrote:
Lance has a lot of great points, but he glossed over one important fact.

The V Tail just looks so good...

Attachment:
20161015_143919.jpg

You must have missed:

"Beyond that it's mostly esthetics with one camp insisting the 35s are better looking and another with the opposite opinion on that." :D

_________________
-lance

It's easier to fool people than to convince them that they have been fooled.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Intro To BT - Russ Law
PostPosted: 28 Oct 2024, 18:23 
Offline




User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 12/10/07
Posts: 34626
Post Likes: +13252
Location: Minneapolis, MN (KFCM)
Aircraft: 1970 Baron B55
Username Protected wrote:
And all the later 33s have opening middle windows. 1968 had one operative one. 69 and newer had both.

I thought I'd seen openable windows on a F33A before, thanks for correcting that.

Quote:
The biggest difference is no tail flutter propensity on the straight tails and almost no inflight breakups.


I disagree on both counts. I'm pretty sure there have been inflight breakups on BE33s, my recollection is that mishandled V-tails tend to fail the wings downward (after the tail fails) and the straight tail versions tend to fail the wings upward when penetrating a thunderstorm. Also AFaIK there are very few examples of inflight breakups that didn't involve losing control in a thunderstorm or due to SD in IMC in either type.

I'd also be very surprised if a straight tail wouldn't experience elevator flutter at high speeds with loose cables and/or trim tabs. I do agree that the newer examples of both versions are more robust in this regard along with higher Vne limits and since the model 33 came along much later than the 35, most if not all of the 33s are less susceptible to flutter.

_________________
-lance

It's easier to fool people than to convince them that they have been fooled.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Intro To BT - Russ Law
PostPosted: 28 Oct 2024, 20:32 
Online


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 12/18/07
Posts: 20816
Post Likes: +10019
Location: W Michigan
Aircraft: Ex PA22, P28R, V35B
For definitive model differences, Larry Ball wrote 2 books.
Those incomparable Bonanzas (through about 1972)
They called me Mr. Bonanza (later, to 1990).

Good reads.

_________________
Stop Continental Drift.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Intro To BT - Russ Law
PostPosted: 28 Oct 2024, 20:38 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 09/16/10
Posts: 9004
Post Likes: +2064
Hi Russ, great looking plane, welcome to BT! :thumbup:

_________________
Education cuts, don't heal.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Intro To BT - Russ Law
PostPosted: 28 Oct 2024, 20:41 
Online



User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 02/14/11
Posts: 3563
Post Likes: +2900
Company: Air Mass Aviation
Location: Seneca, SC (CEU)
Aircraft: 1979 Bonanza A36
Just get an A36 and have the best bonanza :pilot:

_________________
Remember, no matter where you go....there you are.

Scott Massios CFI/CFII


Top

 Post subject: Re: Intro To BT - Russ Law
PostPosted: 28 Oct 2024, 20:47 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 01/19/16
Posts: 4012
Post Likes: +7385
Location: 13FA Earle Airpark FL/0A7 Hville NC
Aircraft: E33/152A
Username Protected wrote:
And all the later 33s have opening middle windows. 1968 had one operative one. 69 and newer had both.

I thought I'd seen openable windows on a F33A before, thanks for correcting that.

Quote:
The biggest difference is no tail flutter propensity on the straight tails and almost no inflight breakups.


I disagree on both counts. I'm pretty sure there have been inflight breakups on BE33s, my recollection is that mishandled V-tails tend to fail the wings downward (after the tail fails) and the straight tail versions tend to fail the wings upward when penetrating a thunderstorm. Also AFaIK there are very few examples of inflight breakups that didn't involve losing control in a thunderstorm or due to SD in IMC in either type.

I'd also be very surprised if a straight tail wouldn't experience elevator flutter at high speeds with loose cables and/or trim tabs. I do agree that the newer examples of both versions are more robust in this regard along with higher Vne limits and since the model 33 came along much later than the 35, most if not all of the 33s are less susceptible to flutter.


In 1962-2007:
• there were 148 reports of in-flight structural failure in Beech models 33, 35 and 36 airplanes.
• of those, 136 were in Model 35 ("V-tail") aircraft and 12 were in Model 36 Bonanzas.  There were no reports of in-flight break-ups in Model 33 Debonairs or Bonanzas.



http://www.thomaspturner.net/inflight%20breakups.htm

http://www.thomaspturner.net/inflight%2 ... 20NTSB.htm


There has been just one in a straight-tail Bonanza. The Aviation Consumer's 1979 study of in-flight breakups during the years 1964-77 showed the V-tail to have a rate of 0.65 breakups per 100,000 flight hours, compared to just 0.03 for the straight-tail 33 and 36 models combined.

https://cdn.imagearchive.com/piperforum ... eakups.pdf

I have personally seen 3 V tails that suffered tail flutter and resulting major structural damage. I have heard about many more. I have never heard of it happening in a straight tail. If it has happened it was very rare.

Another benefit to the straight tail models is that aluminum elevator skins are available that do not corrode like the magnesium ruddervators that are more expensive and sometimes not available with questionably future availability.

Top

 Post subject: Re: Intro To BT - Russ Law
PostPosted: 29 Oct 2024, 00:35 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 04/16/11
Posts: 6066
Post Likes: +8400
Company: Self Employed
Location: Burlington, NC
Aircraft: V35B
Username Protected wrote:

Attachment:
20161015_143919.jpg

You must have missed:

"Beyond that it's mostly esthetics with one camp insisting the 35s are better looking and another with the opposite opinion on that." :D[/quote]
Yeah, I missed that... :doh:

_________________
Matt
336-266-3105


Top

 Post subject: Re: Intro To BT - Russ Law
PostPosted: 29 Oct 2024, 07:25 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 05/11/10
Posts: 13004
Post Likes: +12601
Location: Indiana
Aircraft: Cessna 185, RV-7
At this late date, you’re likely to see bigger differences between two V35Bs than you’ll see between a random V35B and an F33A. Weight and balance is the most important thing.

Most of the differences are myths. I don’t know if V-tails really come apart or not. But I do know that V35Bs don’t have a history of that unless flown above Vne out the bottom of a thunderstorm. If that happens, you might wish you were in a Navion instead of any Bo.

There are people who’ve owned both who swear the V-tail wag is real. I think it has more to do with the short coupling, as I’ve felt it in a 55 Baron.

There are those who say a V-tail can’t handle a crosswind. No one who’s ever owned one says that; only people who look at pictures but don’t fly.

The wag and crosswind allegations rest on a faulty premise: the V-tail has less vertical surface than the 33. According to Norm Colvin, if you total the vertical components of the two ruddervators, you’ll see more surface on a V-tail. And particularly regarding crosswinds [according to me, not Colvin], the ruddervators are less blanked by the fuselage in the flare, meaning there’s more yaw control.

As long as I’m here, a little aesthetic note: Imagine you’ve just arrived somewhere in your Bo, and a student pilot approaches. If you taxi up in a V-tail, he might say, “Beautiful airplane. What is it?” If you’re in a straight tail, he’ll say, “Hey, nice Arrow!” :lol:


Top

 Post subject: Re: Intro To BT - Russ Law
PostPosted: 29 Oct 2024, 21:10 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 04/16/11
Posts: 6066
Post Likes: +8400
Company: Self Employed
Location: Burlington, NC
Aircraft: V35B
Username Protected wrote:
As long as I’m here, a little aesthetic note: Imagine you’ve just arrived somewhere in your Bo, and a student pilot approaches. If you taxi up in a V-tail, he might say, “Beautiful airplane. What is it?” If you’re in a straight tail, he’ll say, “Hey, nice Arrow!” :lol:


Reminds me of a time my dad and I flew to St. Simons Island, GA with a friend in his brand new G36.

As we taxied onto the ramp, a thirty something gentleman was eyeing the Bonanza. As we tied down, the gentleman approached us. "Nice Saratoga. When I finish my certificate that's what I'm looking to buy."

The owner, stood up from the tie down, under the wing. "You don't want to buy a Saratoga. They're good planes, but slow as crap. You really need to look into a Bonanza. A Turbo Normalized 36."

They spoke for 10 minutes, until the gentleman realized he called a Bonanza a Piper, but after looking at my friend's TN G36, he changed his mind and now wanted a Bonanza.

-Friends don't let friends buy Brand X :peace:

_________________
Matt
336-266-3105


Top

 Post subject: Re: Intro To BT - Russ Law
PostPosted: 31 Oct 2024, 00:36 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 06/17/14
Posts: 5848
Post Likes: +2626
Location: KJYO
Aircraft: C-182, GA-7
Russ -

Welcome to BT. Also, if you really want a V-tail, I think this one may be one for you to consider! It's not a Beech, but it's awful pretty!
Attachment:
N311CV VisionJet.png


Please login or Register for a free account via the link in the red bar above to download files.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Intro To BT - Russ Law
PostPosted: 08 Nov 2024, 12:00 
Offline

 Profile




Joined: 09/29/24
Posts: 2
Post Likes: +7
Location: KPNS Pensacola, FL
Aircraft: Cirrus SE22 G2
Thanks to all for the info!! I agree that there is NO “bad” Bo model. I have flown and love them all. Thanks to this Forum, I’ll (no doubt) get the info / insight to find the right Bo for me.

Thanks again,

Russ Law
KPNS
CFI-I


Top

Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic  [ 15 posts ] 



Aviation Fabricators (Bottom Banner)

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  

Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us

BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner, Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.

BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates. Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.

Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2025

.concorde.jpg.
.headsetsetc_Small_85x50.jpg.
.MountainAirframe.jpg.
.bkool-85x50-2014-08-04.jpg.
.Wentworth_85x100.JPG.
.holymicro-85x50.jpg.
.tat-85x100.png.
.traceaviation-85x150.png.
.camguard.jpg.
.wat-85x50.jpg.
.saint-85x50.jpg.
.boomerang-85x50-2023-12-17.png.
.aerox_85x100.png.
.aviationdesigndouble.jpg.
.Wingman 85x50.png.
.shortnnumbers-85x100.png.
.airmart-85x150.png.
.temple-85x100-2015-02-23.jpg.
.puremedical-85x200.jpg.
.stanmusikame-85x50.jpg.
.KalAir_Black.jpg.
.Rocky-Mountain-Turbine-85x100.jpg.
.performanceaero-85x50.jpg.
.kadex-85x50.jpg.
.ssv-85x50-2023-12-17.jpg.
.garmin-85x200-2021-11-22.jpg.
.pdi-85x50.jpg.
.avfab-85x50-2018-12-04.png.
.bpt-85x50-2019-07-27.jpg.
.wilco-85x100.png.
.jetacq-85x50.jpg.
.bullardaviation-85x50-2.jpg.
.jandsaviation-85x50.jpg.
.ABS-85x100.jpg.
.KingAirMaint85_50.png.
.CiESVer2.jpg.
.planelogix-85x100-2015-04-15.jpg.
.lucysaviation-85x50.png.
.blackhawk-85x100-2019-09-25.jpg.
.midwest2.jpg.
.tempest.jpg.
.ocraviation-85x50.png.
.geebee-85x50.jpg.
.mcfarlane-85x50.png.
.SCA.jpg.
.daytona.jpg.
.centex-85x50.jpg.
.kingairnation-85x50.png.
.Latitude.jpg.
.Elite-85x50.png.
.sierratrax-85x50.png.
.blackwell-85x50.png.
.dbm.jpg.
.gallagher_85x50.jpg.